1 of 29

Leadership

Theories & Traits

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

2 of 29

What Is Leadership?

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Leadership

The ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals.

Management

Use of authority inherent in designated formal rank to obtain compliance from organizational members.

3 of 29

Formal and Informal leaders

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

4 of 29

Importance of leadership

  • Motivating employees
  • Creating confidence
  • Building morale

5 of 29

Leadership Theories

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

6 of 29

Charismatic Leadership theory

Also called the “great man theory”

  • Basic assumptions of this theory:
    • Leaders in general, and great leaders in particular, have some special inborn qualities bestowed upon them by the divine power.
    • These qualities are sufficient for them to be successful .
    • Since these qualities are inborn they can not be enhanced by education.
    • These qualities make leaders effective and situational factors do not have any influence.

7 of 29

Trait Theories

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Leadership Traits:

  • Ambition and energy
  • The desire to lead
  • Honest and integrity
  • Self-confidence
  • Intelligence
  • High self-monitoring
  • Job-relevant knowledge

Traits Theories of Leadership

Theories that consider personality, social, physical, or intellectual traits to differentiate leaders from nonleaders.

8 of 29

Innate qualities of a successful leader

  • Physical feature.
  • Intelligence: which is expressed in terms of mental ability and to some extent an inborn quality.

9 of 29

Major qualities essential for leadership

  • Emotional stability
  • Human relations
  • Empathy
  • Objectivity
  • Motivational skills
  • Technical skills
  • Communicative skills
  • Social skills

10 of 29

Implications of theory

  • Firstly, the theory emphasizes that leaders require some traits and qualities to be effective.

  • Second, many of theses qualities and traits may be developed by individuals through training and development programs or purely through experience.

11 of 29

Trait Theories

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

Limitations:

  • No universal traits found that predict leadership in all situations.
  • Traits predict behavior better in “weak” than “strong” situations.
  • Unclear evidence of the cause and effect of relationship of leadership and traits.
  • Better predictor of the appearance of leadership than distinguishing effective and ineffective leaders.

12 of 29

Behavioral Theories

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

  • strong leadership is the result of effective role behavior.
  • Leadership is shown by person’s act rather than trait.

Behavioral Theories of Leadership

Theories proposing that specific behaviors differentiate leaders from non leaders.

13 of 29

Leadership Styles

Is the method of coping with organizational reality which evolves out of traits and errors and is not deliberately, adopted or eventually organized by leader.

Mc Gregor

14 of 29

Leadership Style

  • Authoritarian, Democratic, laissez fair leadership style.
  • Decision Continuum
  • Managerial grid
  • Likert’s :Four system of managerial leadrship
  • Reddin’s : Three dimensional leadership leadership style.

15 of 29

Authoritarian, Democratic, laissez fair

  • Developed by Lewin, Lippit & White.

  • These styles depend upon weather the leaders take complete resp of decision making or delegate it to their subordinates after cleraly defining limits.

16 of 29

Authoritarian style of leadership

  • Leader assumes full authority of deciding goals.
  • Policies , procedures & objectives are solely decided by leaders.
  • The leaders makes all the strategic plans and takes all important decisions.
  • Leaders does not take his subordinates in confidence.
  • The leaders uses his power and prestige to ensure that his subordinates carry out his orders to every last detail.

17 of 29

  • Leaders evaluates performance of his subordinates through appreciation or criticism.
  • Leader insists on loyalty from his subordinates.
  • He does not believe in sharing information and exercises strict and close detailed supervision.

Authoritarian style of leadership

18 of 29

Democratic style of leadership

  • Leader allows subordinates to participate in all decision making.
  • Joint discussions are held
  • Delegation of authority and resposibility takes place.
  • Total freedom to choose whom to work with and how to work is given to the subordinates.
  • Leaders show appreciation to subordinates and overlooks trivial shortcoming .

19 of 29

Democratic style of leadership

  • Leader is approachable, suggestive and treats all subordinates equal.
  • Leader is a mentor.

20 of 29

Authoritarian Style

  • Planning & Authority
  • Task accomplishment
  • Decision making
  • Delegation
  • Motivation
  • Communication
  • Learning
  • Training & development
  • Support & friendship

Democratic Style

21 of 29

Laissez fair style of leadership

  • Leader neither assumes responsibility to determine the objectives, goals, policies nor take decisions.
  • Complete freedom to do things in the manner that subordinates desire to do.
  • Leader is absolutely uninvolved in the affairs of his subordinates.
  • Appreciation / appraisal of performance is evaluated by co-workers.

22 of 29

Decision Continuum

A

Area of freedom to subordinates

Use of authority by manager

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Own style of decision

Manager makes decisions

Invitation style

Manager presents ideas

Suggestive style

Manager presents problems, elicits suggestions

Grp decision style

Managers defines limits

Delegate style

Limit defined delegation

23 of 29

Managerial grid

  • Developed by Robert Blake & JS Mouton.
  • Exact portrayal of leadership on a two dimensional graph.

24 of 29

1.1 Impoverished manager�9.1 task manager�9.9 Team manager�1.9 country club manager�5.5 Middle of the road

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

25 of 29

Likert’s Leadership model

  • System 1: Exploitative Authoritative
    • All decisions are taken by management.
    • Management does not have confidence in subordinates.
    • Subordinates are treated as instruments
    • Leader believe in surveillance, threat, coercion.
    • Positive rewards are used occasionally.

26 of 29

Likert’s Leadership model

  • System 2: Benevolent Autocrat
    • Leaders possesses certain degree of confidence and trust.
    • He is concerned about his subordinate
    • Although policies and strategies are designed by the management the subordinates are given an opportunity to comment.
    • Communication is formal
    • motivation is through a combination of rewards and punishments.

27 of 29

Likert’s Leadership model

  • System 3: Consultative
    • Leader expresses substantial confidence in subordinates.
    • Leaders make major decision, however subordinates take most decisions.
    • Motivation is through rewards but coercion is also significantly.
    • Controls are delegated to subordinates, with leader reserving the right to take final decision.

28 of 29

Likert’s Leadership model

  • System 4: Participative
    • Leader has absolute confidence in subordinates.
    • Communication is informal
    • Participation is widely invited
    • Controls are not emphasised, nevertheless , the leader encourages subordinates to assume responsibility.

29 of 29

Reddin,s three dimensional style

Effective leadership style

Ineffective leadership style

Executive style: concern for both production & people.

Compromiser style: weak decision maker. Always undecided about people or production.

Developer style: grt concern for people and less focus on production. Focus is on attitude and T&D

Missionary style: all for people even though task in hand is on high alert.

Benevolent Autocrat: more focus is on task, however he executes and plans carefully hence gets goals accomplished without resentment.

Autocrat Style: great emphasis is on task, even though people need focus. He does not have confidence in subordinates.

Bureaucrat style :most subordinates dislike him , but achieves task.

Deserter style: he is passive, pessimistic, escapist