1 of 117

AI - FSTC Curriculum

Andhra Pradesh

AP MT Training

Round 1 �August 2026

2 of 117

DAY 1

3 of 117

Check - In:

🔵 Stand in a circle!

✏️ Pick up a sketch pen & blank name tag

😊 Write your name + draw an emoji showing your current feeling

🏫 Share your school & district

🌟 Share one memorable moment from your 2-year Amazon Future Engineer Program journey!

4 of 117

Expectations setting:

Cooking Pot:

5 of 117

Norm Setting

“What behaviours and norms do we need to create a space where everyone learns from everyone?”

  • Respect everyone's opinion
  • Listen actively
  • Give everyone a chance to speak
  • Participate actively
  • No judgement
  • Be open to learning
  • Respect time
  • Ask questions freely
  • Support each other
  • Keep phones away when not required

6 of 117

7 of 117

Unfolding Quest Alliance

8 of 117

QUEST ALLIANCE

Quest Alliance is a not-for-profit organization based in Bangalore, India with a presence across the country. Established in 2008, Quest Alliance equips children and young people with future skills for thriving careers enabling equitable school to work transitions

Problem Statement: By 2030, India is expected to add 31 Crore School Graduates, yet a significant challenge remains: Only 47% are likely to possess the Future-ready Skills needed for employability. Low prospects of employment are likely to trap youth into vicious cycles of unemployment, low wages and inter-generational poverty.

Who?

What?

9 of 117

Vision

A world where all young people take charge of their future and drive equitable social and economic progress.

Mission

We innovate for learning ecosystems to be future ready by creating and embedding tech enabled learning experiences for young people to thrive in their careers.

How?

10 of 117

Quest Alliance

Journey in AP

11 of 117

MasterCoach Model: Scaling computational thinking through dedicated MasterCoaches

​

Educator Empowerment: 557 teachers trained on 21st-century pedagogy and STEM mindset via the I & H process

​

Student Reach: 72,107 students actively engaged through the program

MoU Signed: SSA, LFE - Funded by Amazon to build a state-level AI curriculum grounded in 21st-century teacher pedagogy��100 schools across Srikakulam, Vizianagaram, and Visakhapatnam

​

Teachers Capacity: 200 teachers trained to deliver the curriculum�

Impact: 23,000 students (Grades 7–9) empowered with AI, Computational Thinking (CT), and Future Careers skills

2024

Journey of Andhra Pradesh

District Saturation Model

​

State engagement: 640 schools in 3 districts and 102 schools across the state.

​

Teachers Capacity: 1537 teachers trained to deliver the curriculum

​

​

Impact: 1 lakh students on core concepts of AI, ethics, Equity , Justices and Problem solving lens.

2025

MoU Signed: Partnered with �Department of School Education, �Govt. of Andhra Pradesh.

​

Skill Building: Fostering a STEM mindset and 21st-century skills in students.

​

Impact: 44,000+ students across 91 schools in 2 districts (Srikakulam & Guntur)

​

Implementation Partners: AIF and NIIT Foundation

2019

12 of 117

Impact Of AI Education

13 of 117

KEY FINDINGS

The programme made AI normal in the classroom. Now use style is what matters.

76%

of students now use AI�

Three in four, mostly for learning. About seven in ten use it weekly.

+0.75

the top technology gain�

AI-tool use rose more than any other learning technology (2.18 to 2.93 on a 1 to 6 scale).

+3.7

points on reasoning�

Raven's score rose every round, 62.6% to 66.3% correct. RAVENs is an objective, curriculum-free test of non-verbal cognitive ability. .

How,

not whether

is what counts�

Active, verifying users gain; passive over-reliance* goes with about 1.2 fewer Raven's items.

!

The bottom line. AI-based teaching can work in these schools. The next step is teaching students to use AI actively, not passively, and equipping teachers to guide that.

*Passive over reliance: Students accept AI answers without checking, depend on AI for difficult homework, or find it hard to start work without AI

​

2

14 of 117

WHAT WE MEASURED

Six instruments, the same students, three rounds

1

Raven's Progressive Matrices

Fluid reasoning that does not depend on the curriculum. A 12-item block common to all three rounds.

2

21st-century skills (SICKS)

Five domains, collaboration, communication, creativity, self-direction, critical thinking. 15 items, self-rated 1 to 5.

3

Alternative-Uses Task

Behavioural creativity: how many different uses a student can list for everyday objects. An objective count.

4

AI-use & offloading module

New in 2026. Adoption, how often, and use style: active (check, question, rewrite) versus passive (copy, accept).

5

Technology-use battery

Eight everyday learning technologies, from finding information to AI tools. Frequency 1 to 6.

6

Three linked rounds

2024 baseline, 2025 midline, 2026 endline. The same children followed across two years.

3

15 of 117

THE SAMPLE

738 students across three north-coastal districts (76% AI users)

738

students followed across all three rounds

51

government secondary schools

562

had used AI by 2026 (76%)

Rural, first-generation learners in government schools.�

Adoption is remarkably even across districts, about 76% in each. This is not an elite or urban sample; it is exactly where low-cost AI could matter most.

4

16 of 117

OUTCOME · TECHNOLOGY USE

AI-tool use grew the most of any learning technology

AI is the standout gain.�

Of eight learning technologies, AI-tool use rose the most, up 0.75 point since 2024. Other everyday uses stayed broadly flat.

Why the 2025 spike, then dip?�

AI-tool use jumped in 2025 as the module arrived, then settled in 2026 as novelty gave way to habit. Adoption is now steady at three in four students.

5

17 of 117

OUTCOME · HOW AI IS USED

Students reach for AI to learn, but habits are mixed

Mostly for understanding.�

The top uses are learning uses: understand a topic, get step-by-step help, find information.

But over-reliance rivals good habits.�

About 4 in 10 copy answers exactly; only about 3 in 10 check, question or rewrite. That gap is the opening for the programme.

6

18 of 117

THE KEY IDEA

There are two ways to use AI, and only one builds skill

ACTIVE · self-regulated use

  • Checks the answer against textbook or notes
  • Asks a teacher or elder when unsure
  • Asks the AI a follow-up to correct it
  • Rewrites the answer in their own words
  • Thinks about whether the answer makes sense

builds skill ↑

PASSIVE · cognitive offloading

  • Copies the answer exactly as it is
  • Accepts the answer without checking
  • Depends on AI for difficult homework
  • Cannot explain the answer in own words
  • Finds it hard to start work without AI

substitutes for thinking ↓

Same tool, opposite effects.�

The two styles pull apart cleanly in the data. Everything that follows is about which style a student adopts, and how to shift them towards the active one.

9

19 of 117

SAME START, DIFFERENT PATHS

Where students end up tracks how they use AI

They began together in 2024.�

Non-users, light users and heavy users all started within a few points of one another on reasoning. Starting ability does not explain what happened next.

They diverged by 2026.�

Light and non-users climbed to about 70%. Heavy, passive-leaning users fell back to where they began. The fork lines up with use style, not starting point.

13

20 of 117

THE MESSAGE

AI-based teaching can work here, with the right safeguards

1

Adoption already succeeded

AI is now a normal, mostly-for-learning tool in these classrooms. Access is no longer the constraint.

2

Use style is the real lever

Active, verifying use goes with higher reasoning and creativity; passive copying goes with lower. It is how, not whether.

3

The opening is the middle

Top learners already use AI well. Over-reliance concentrates among capable-but-not-yet-expert students in the middle.

4

Equip teachers to guide it

Safeguards mean teaching verification, check, ask, rewrite, and giving teachers the capacity to show students how to use AI well.

14

21 of 117

SSA Report - AFE

22 of 117

SLIDE 1 OF 3

A joint review by Samagra Shiksha AP, Quest Alliance, and PwC evaluating AI & Computational Thinking in government secondary schools across Srikakulam & Vizianagaram.

Samagra Shiksha Andhra Pradesh • Quest Alliance Diagnostic Study

Guide for Teachers & School Leaders

• SAMAGRA SHIKSHA AP

Amazon Future Engineer (AFE) Program Insights

3 / 3

Teacher Training

Universal attendance across training rounds

2.8 / 3

Ethical AI Score

Students strongly identify & reject AI bias

67%

Fixed Period Coverage

vs 58% in ad-hoc/free period schools

600+

Schools Reached

Across ZPHS, APMS & KGBVs in AP

Program Purpose

Embed Artificial Intelligence, ethics, and career awareness in 600+ ZPHS, APMS, and KGBV schools, empowering rural and marginalized students with future skills.

Key Success Anchor

Teachers showed 100% attendance (3.0/3.0) across training rounds. The current priority is translating training into regular classroom practice.

Primary Bottleneck

Timetable allocation is the single biggest factor governing student outcomes. Fixed periods boost coverage from 58% to 67%+.

23 of 117

SLIDE 2 OF 3

EVALUATION RESULTS • SCORE BREAKDOWN (SCALE 1.0 - 3.0)

Student Learning & Classroom Delivery Scorecard

Key Takeaway: High student enthusiasm and strong ethical comprehension must be backed by predictable scheduling and career guidance to build genuine career agency.

AI Concepts & Definition

Students clearly articulate basic AI concepts, daily-life examples (chatbots, recommendations), and distinguish human vs. machine intelligence.

Ethics, Fairness & Bias

Highest performing area! Students consistently reject gender and data bias in AI outputs, recognizing fairness as a core technical requirement.

Pedagogy & Collaboration

Teachers use interactive tools (QuickDraw, Turing Test) and group activities effectively to check student understanding during class.

Safe & Responsible Use

Students understand baseline safety but struggle when asked to apply safety principles to complex real-world digital scenarios.

Timetable Regularity

Major systemic challenge. Ad-hoc scheduling in free periods leads to fragmented learning and lower topic coverage across schools.

Career Aspirations

Lowest student score. While students can name tech job titles, they lack deeper clarity on what these careers involve and how AI links to them.

24 of 117

Tea Break

11:00 AM - 11:10 AM

25 of 117

Curriculum Framework + Exploration

26 of 117

Mentimeter: Palasa

27 of 117

6264 0139

28 of 117

5701 2043

29 of 117

Let’s Discuss:

What did Grade 7 help us understand?

1.

AI is not the same as all digital technology.

2.

AI is human-created and human-led.

​

3.

A correct or “smart” response does not automatically mean human-like intelligence.

​

30 of 117

Theme (Construct)

Grade 7 Outcome (Recognition)

Grade 8 Outcome (Analysis)

Grade 9 Outcome (Judgment & Agency)

AI Spark & Futures Stories

Identify examples of AI in daily life and describe how technology has changed work in their community.

Analyze how AI is reshaping at least one industry and compare optimistic and cautious AI futures.

Evaluate multiple AI futures and articulate local and global consequences.

AI Systems Discovery Labs

Distinguish between rule-based and AI systems; explain AI as “data + decision.”

Map an AI system (data - model - output - impact) and explain how changing data affects outcomes.

Critique limitations of AI systems and assess how data quality influences reliability.

Bias, Ethics & Responsibility Studios

Recognize unfair AI outcomes and identify at least one responsible human role.

Analyze bias in a real AI tool and explain accountability across roles.

Apply ethical reasoning to real AI dilemmas and propose modifications to reduce harm.

AI Design Quests

Identify simple situations where AI may not be appropriate and ask basic verification questions.

Justify whether AI should or should not be used in a given scenario, citing risks and benefits.

Decide whether AI should be built, modified, or rejected using ethical, technical, and contextual criteria.

Responsible AI Hackathons

Modify a simple AI-generated output and participate in a guided mini design challenge.

Design a basic AI-supported solution to a local problem and explain reasoning behind design decisions.

Develop and present a structured AI solution prototype integrating ethical considerations and iterate after feedback.

AI Portfolio & Reflection Loop

Maintain a basic AI portfolio and reflect on new insights about AI.

Curate portfolio artefacts showing progression and reflect on preferred roles in collaborative work.

Demonstrate longitudinal growth through portfolio synthesis and articulate personal stance on responsible AI use.

31 of 117

“How is AI changing the world around us?”

What might that mean for the future?

32 of 117

THEN → NOW

Farming

HealthCare

Transport

Communication

Education

33 of 117

THEN → NOW

What changed for people?

Question

04

What role does AI/technology play?

Question

03

What is happening now?

​

Question

02

What was this like earlier?

Question

01

If today’s change continues, what might 2035 look like?�

Include: � 1 opportunity + 1 concern

34 of 117

Live from 2035:

  • Who benefits most?
  • Who might be left out?
  • What could go wrong?
  • What should humans still remain responsible for?

35 of 117

Ethical way of usage

36 of 117

Let’s Reflect:

Grade 7 - Recognize AI:� �Where AI is used ?

Grade 8- �Analyse AI: � � What changed?

How are people affected?

​

Grade 9 - �Judge & Shape AI: ��What future might follow? �Who benefits? �What could go wrong? �What should humans decide?

​

37 of 117

Understanding �FSTC

38 of 117

Activity:

Scenario 1:

Revathy – Choosing My Next Career Step

​

Revathy has worked for five years in a company changing rapidly due to Generative AI and automation. Some routine technical tasks are becoming less relevant. Her family wants her to stay because the job is secure, while her friends suggest an expensive technology course.

​

How can Revathy understand her current strengths, explore changing opportunities, and make a confident decision rather than reacting to pressure?

​

​

39 of 117

Activity:

Scenario 2:

Krishna – The Digital Jump

​

Krishna is part of a third-generation family retail business. Store footfall is declining, and the family wants to explore digital marketplaces, payments, social media, customer databases, low-code/no-code and AI tools. They are also concerned about privacy, fraud and cybersecurity.

​

How can Krishna and the family decide what technology they actually need, understand the risks, and transition to digital without losing their existing strengths?

​

​

40 of 117

Activity:

Scenario 3:

Hemalatha – The School Transport Puzzle

​

Hema latha's school team is trying to understand why students arrive late. Data about arrival times, routes, traffic, weather, breakdowns, stops and departure times is scattered across registers, WhatsApp messages and spreadsheets.

​

How should Hemalatha break the problem into smaller parts, identify patterns, determine what information matters, and test possible explanations before choosing a solution?

​

​

41 of 117

Let’s Discuss:

  1. What is changing or creating difficulty here?
  2. What does this person need to understand before acting?
  3. What skills would help them respond?
  4. What could be a sensible first step?

​

Debrief:

“Identify about three to five important skills, but be prepared to explain why those skills are needed.”

​

42 of 117

What is FSTC?

🔤 F = Future

📚 S = Skills for

🌟 T = Thriving

💼 C = Careers

43 of 117

Let’s Reflect:

  • Grade 7 — Recognise & Explore

“At this stage, learners are developing awareness: � of themselves, of technology, of changing opportunities and of the skills involved.”�

  • Grade 8 — Analyse & Apply

“Learners now move beyond recognising the skill. They begin using skills to understand problems, evaluate situations and respond to changing contexts.”�

  • Grade 9 — Decide, Adapt & Shape

“Here, the learner is expected to exercise greater agency: making reasoned choices, responding to uncertainty, adapting and thinking about how they can shape outcomes.”

​

44 of 117

Lunch

12:30 PM - 01:30 PM

45 of 117

Energizer

46 of 117

MT Identity –

Community Formation

​

​

47 of 117

Activity: Instructions

  • There are posters placed around the room.
  • You will move from one poster to another in pairs or groups of three.
  • “At every poster, you will read the prompt, discuss your experience with your partner or group, write your response on a sticky note, and stick it on that poster.”
  • “Once you finish one poster, move to the next poster. Don't stay with the same people throughout. Try to meet people you haven't interacted with yet.”

​

​

48 of 117

Posters:

49 of 117

Let’s Reflect:

“If your entire two-year journey as a nominated teacher were an OBJECT or a MOVIE, what would it be? and why?”

Activity: Story-telling

Instructions:

  • Don’t tell your own story this time.
  • Instead, think about one person you left/right to you.
  • You heard their proud moment, challenge, growth or object.

50 of 117

Individual Reflection : 10 mins

​

Think and write.

  • Which section of the training do I feel most confident facilitating?

​

  • Which section of the curriculum do I feel most confident facilitating?

​

  • Which section of the training feels most challenging?

​

  • What support would help me become more confident?

51 of 117

Day Closure:

What is one learning or one takeaway you are carrying with you from today?

​

52 of 117

53 of 117

DAY 2

54 of 117

‹#›

MT Training round 1

August

​

MT Training + Cascade training round 2

Hack to the Future , Recognition and reward to students and teachers and Top announcement

​

State level showcase event & Teacher recognition

HM Orientation�Cascade Training +�Curriculum delivery in classroom

September

QA Field team support to MT teachers , by school visits, 1 on 1 phone call mentoring, biweekly virtual calls

MT Journey - 2026 - 27

Join the journey�July�

AI Curriculum Vetted by SCERT

Intermediate Ideathon Process with selected schools

84 740 500 1569 100000

MT| Schools | Head Teachers | Teacher Trained | Students

​

55 of 117

MASTER TRAINER JOURNEY ROADMAP

July–October 2026

From selected teacher to facilitator, implementer and mentor

Selected MT →Prepared Learner→Cascade Facilitator→Classroom Implementer→Teacher Mentor

​

Purpose

The MT journey builds a teacher-led support system in which Master Trainers remain rooted in their own classrooms while helping cascade teachers implement the Critical AI and Data Literacy curriculum. Across these four months, MTs move from onboarding and preparation to facilitation, classroom implementation and sustained teacher support.

​

Journey at a glance

July - Join the journey

August - Train to facilitate

September - Train teachers & begin implementation

October - Mentor & monitor

​

​

56 of 117

Vizianagaram

Visakhapatnam

Srikakulam

Palasa

27

10

34

13

👥 Confirmed Cohort Size 84 Master Trainers

📑 Official Communication Final MT list � communicated to the � State Education � Department

💬 Community Building WhatsApp onboarding & � continuous engagement � launched

JULY 2026 |

57 of 117

​

​

AUGUST 2026 |

01

PHASE 1: PRE-TRAINING READINESS

📋 Confirm Attendance

📝 Complete Pre-Form

📖 WhatsApp Pre-Reads

02

PHASE 2: MT PHYSICAL TRAINING ROUND 1

🎯 Curriculum Progression (G7–G9)�👩‍🏫 Learner Experience & Hands-on Practice

💡 Active Facilitation & Peer Feedback Loops

👥 MT Group Alignment for Cascade Trainings

03

PHASE 3: INITIAL CASCADE-TRAINING ACTION PLAN

📍 Blocks Selection & Training Dates

👥 Co-Facilitator & Teacher Groups Allocation

📑 Outline Thematics & Session Flow�🔄 Divide Facilitation vs. Coordination Roles

58 of 117

SEPTEMBER 2026 |

👨‍🏫 Cascade ��Teacher Training

Guide teachers on curriculum & implementation

🏫 Classroom ��Implementation

Roll out curriculum with your own students during September

📱 Ongoing ��WhatsApp Support

Encourage peer learning & �share key resources

59 of 117

OCTOBER 2026 | I Implement, Mentor and Support Teachers

Role shift: Cascade facilitator → classroom implementer and teacher mentor

With my own students

· Complete the first curriculum construct- First 2 chapters.

· Begin the next construct.

· Track lesson completion- Call Cascade Teachers, fill KOBO Form.

· ** Support student participation, project work and emerging Ideathon-Hackathon milestones.

· Use student work and classroom experience to strengthen my own facilitation.

With my pre-assigned cascade teachers

· Make at least one meaningful contact with every assigned teacher during the month.

· Use phone or WhatsApp; where possible, use both meaningfully.

· Confirm whether classroom implementation has started.

· Ask how many curriculum sessions have been completed.

· Understand challenges and support required.

· Escalate unresolved issues to the assigned PO immediately when urgent, or through the next scheduled support space when non-urgent.

WhatsApp support

· Share reminders.

· Respond to routine teacher questions.

· Encourage peer exchange.

​

Milestones

✓ Complete the first curriculum construct in my classroom and begin the next.

✓ Contact every assigned cascade teacher, confirm whether implementation has begun and escalate every unresolved issue.

60 of 117

Continuous Support Across July–October

WhatsApp engagement

WhatsApp engagement continues from July 2026 to June 2027.

· Onboarding and training preparation.

· Curriculum resources and reminders.

· Questions, troubleshooting and peer exchange.

· Celebration of progress and informal recognition.

Virtual support

Four fortnightly/bi-weekly calls across the two-month support period:

· Three curriculum or content-focused virtual support calls.

· One virtual support call for cascade-teacher progress review.

The final format and ownership of the review meeting will be communicated separately.

Recognition

· Informal recognition during July–October through WhatsApp appreciation, training spaces and programme interactions.

· Formal recognition after October, based on completion of MT training, facilitation of Cascade Teacher Training, and sustained support to cascade teachers and implementation progress.

61 of 117

Curriculum Exploration - 1

62 of 117

Https://www.menti.com/?code=86512380

PPPPPPPPPPPPA

MENTIMETER DAY 2 -PALASA

63 of 117

Turing Test:

WHAT DID YOU NOTICE?

  • How did you identify the Machine?
  • Where were its answers coming from?
  • Did it actually understand the question?
  • What happened when the answer was not already available?
  • Who made the Machine able to respond?

Transition

So far, the machine depended on what humans had already provided.

“What will change when we give a machine data-examples instead of every answer?”

64 of 117

Learning Patterns:

2 → A 4 → A 6 → A

3 → B 5 → B 7 → B

8 → ?

  • How many of you think it is A, raise your hand !
  • How many of you think it is B, raise your hand !

​

65 of 117

REVEAL

A = Even numbers

B = Odd numbers

EXAMPLES → NOTICE A PATTERN → PREDICT A NEW CASE

​

So the machine says that

New Case 8 = Gorup A

66 of 117

Group �1

Group �2

Activity:

67 of 117

“ Did anyone tell you the rule?”

· How did you decide?

· What did the examples help you notice?

· How is this different from the Turing machine?

​

68 of 117

· Did more examples help?

· Could poor or limited examples lead to a poor prediction?

· Can a machine make a confident prediction and still be wrong?

​

​

Group �3

69 of 117

MACHINE VERSION 1- �Turing Machine

HUMAN

↓

RULE / PREPARED ANSWER

↓

MACHINE

↓

RESPONSE

MACHINE VERSION 2 - �Machine learning from Examples

HUMAN

↓

EXAMPLES / DATA

↓

MACHINE FINDS A PATTERN

↓

PREDICTION

↓

UNFAMILIAR EXAMPLE

↓

MACHINE STRUGGLES/ MIS-CLASSIFIES

↓

MORE EXAMPLES GIVEN

↓

MACHINE PREDICTS CORRECTLY

70 of 117

WHAT STAYED THE SAME? WHAT CHANGED?

​

VERSION 1: Turing Machine learns Rules → Gives Response

​

VERSION 2: Takes in Examples/Data → Recognizes Pattern → Makes Prediction

What stayed the same in both?

Where were humans involved?

71 of 117

FINAL KEY MESSAGE

​

VERSION 1: Turing Test Machine

Human instructions → Machine response

RULE BASED MACHINE

​

VERSION 2: MACHINE LEARNING From DATA (AI Systems)

Examples/Data → Pattern → Prediction

DATA BASED MACHINE

​

In both, humans design, provide information and check the system.

72 of 117

Curriculum Exploration - 2

73 of 117

Activity:

Scenario:

YOUR SCHOOL IS OFFERED AN AI LEARNING ASSISTANT

​

Benefits: Personalised questions; language translation; identifies learning gaps.

​

Concerns: Unequal device access; may give wrong explanations; collects performance data; recommendations are not fully transparent.

​

​

​

74 of 117

Activity:

Scenario:

YOUR SCHOOL STUDENTS WANTS TO USE AN AI ART & WRITING GENERATOR FOR COMPETITION

​

Benefits: Helps students who struggle with drawing or writing create professional-looking artwork and polished stories quickly; saves production costs and time.

​

Concerns: AI models are trained on real artists’ and writers’ work without permission; student artists might feel demotivated; generated content might lack authentic voice and emotional depth.

​

​

​

75 of 117

Activity:

Scenario:

A LOCAL YOUTH CENTER PLANS AN AI RESUME & INTERVIEW COACH FOR JOB SEEKERS

​

Benefits: Gives tailored feedback on job applications; helps young adults practice interviews anytime; improves grammar and professional formatting

​

Concerns: Might suggest buzzwords that don't reflect the applicant's real skills; candidates without regular internet access lose out; employers' AI filters might reject AI-generated resumes.

​

​

​

76 of 117

Scenario: YOUR SCHOOL IS OFFERED AN AI LEARNING ASSISTANT (Time 5 mins)

​

Benefits: personalised questions; language translation; identifies learning gaps.

​

Concerns: unequal device access; may give wrong explanations; collects performance data; recommendations are not fully transparent.

​

Place 4 charts in the 4 corners of the room:

Corner 1 Chart: YES — USE IT

Corner 2 Chart: YES USE IT, BUT WITH CONDITIONS

Corner 3 Chart: NO — DO NOT USE IT AT ALL

Corner 4 Chart: WE CANNOT DECIDE, WE NEED MORE INFORMATION

​

​

Ask participants to move to the position that best reflects their judgement.

77 of 117

78 of 117

79 of 117

80 of 117

81 of 117

82 of 117

Let’s Reflect:

  • Which benefit of using new AI Technology (in this case the AI Assistant) was worth accepting?
  • What problem does using AI solve?
  • Who benefits from using AI ?
  • What could go wrong?
  • Is anyone overlooked, excluded or harmed unintentionally/intentionally?
  • What safeguards are needed?

83 of 117

Prepare your reasons:

Each corner has 3 minutes.

​

They have to prepare:

​

1 strong reason for choosing that specific corner +

1 concern they have for not choosing any other corner

​

Shareout from each corner - Only one person will consolidate and share. Everyone else will listen to each other

Listen to others.

Use your judgement.

Shift corners if anything changed your mind

​

**If you move, be ready to say what changed your mind.

​

84 of 117

Now ask all participants

​

Which benefit of using new AI Technology (in this case the AI Assistant) was worth accepting?

​

What problem does using AI solve?

Who benefits from using AI ?

What could go wrong?

Is anyone overlooked, excluded or harmed unintentionally/intentionally?

What safeguards are needed?

​

Then introduce trade-offs and human oversight:

gaining a benefit may involve a limitation, cost or risk that must be reduced, managed or sometimes rejected. Trade-off does not mean every risk is acceptable → Connect to Tamarind Truth Story

​

Big Picture Question:

So What responsibility do we have as humans in an AI-applied environment ?

​

access, language, infrastructure, learner needs and teacher capacity may change the decision.

85 of 117

Grade 7 Session 3

AI Systems Discovery Labs

Can Machines Think? Exploring the Turing Test

Grade 7 Session 4

AI Systems Discovery Labs

How AI Learns: Rule-Based and Data-Based Systems

Grade 8 Session 3

AI Systems Discovery Labs

How Machines Learn Patterns

Grade 8 Session 4

AI Systems Discovery Labs

Computer Vision: Teaching AI to See

Grade 8 Session 5

AI Systems Discovery Labs

Natural Language AI: Beyond Chatbots

Grade 9 Session 3

AI Systems Discovery Labs

Inside an AI System: Data, Model, Output & Impact

Grade 9 Session 4

AI Systems Discovery Labs

Can We Trust AI? Reliability, Accuracy & Limitations

Grade 9 Session 5

AI Systems Discovery Labs

AI Failure Lab: When Good AI Goes Wrong

Let’s Reflect:

86 of 117

Facilitation Sessions

87 of 117

Facilitation Habits:

“What facilitation habits build a classroom culture focused on deep conceptual understanding rather than rote memorization?”

  • Ask students for their answer before you explain
  • Test the reasoning given by students
  • Give a chance to speak
  • Ask the student for evidence
  • No judgement
  • Don't give direct answers, ask more helpful questions. Keep uncertainty alive
  • Disagreement is good, use it productively to guide Empathy and Equity
  • Don't just do an activity. Consolidate it and reflect to make learning deeper

88 of 117

FACILITATE OR TELL? - Quiz Mode

​

AGREE (Stand Up) if it is GOOD Facilitation

DISAGREE (SIT down) if it is NOT GOOD Facilitation.

​

1. If a student is confused , give the correct AI definition even before giving thinking prompt to students — DISAGREE

2. If students have different opinions during activity/discussion, resolve the disagreement immediately — DISAGREE

3. Ask students to for evidence before calling an AI output correct/verified — AGREE

4. In a discussion on ethics-related topic, every student in the class must reach one correct answer. — DISAGREE

89 of 117

Key insight

A facilitation strategy is not tied to one activity.

The same pedagogy can come across lessons, but its depth & details becomes deeper as learners progress from Grade 7 to Grade 8 to Grade 9.

90 of 117

Match the Following - This is an individual Activity

MATCH THE FACILITATION MOVE TO THE LESSON

A. G7 L1 — What is AI? AI Around Us

B. G7 L7 — Understanding Problems Around Us

C. G8 L2 — What Makes Good Data?

D. G8 L3 — How Machines Learn Patterns

E. G9 L2 — AI and Society: Opportunities, Risks & Trade-offs

F. G9 L6 — Who Is Responsible? Accountability in AI Systems

​

1. Examine the issue from developer, user, company, school and government perspectives

2. “Who benefits? What could go wrong? What conditions would change your decision?”

3. “Useful for what? What information is missing?”

4. Let learners predict, give more examples, then revise.

5. “What made you decide about AI?”

6..Keep asking “Why?” to move towards a root cause.

​

​

Suggested matching: A→5, B→6, C→3, D→4, E→2, F→1.

​

91 of 117

6 Helpful Facilitation Habits for 21st Century Pedagogy

1. Ask students for their answer before you explain — “What do you think?”

2. Test the reasoning given by students— “What made you say that?”

3. Ask the student for evidence when they make any claim— “What are you noticing?”

4. Dont give direct answers, ask more helpful questions. Keep uncertainty alive — “What more do we need to know?”

5. Disagreement is good, use it productively to guide Empathy and Equity — “Who sees it differently? Why?”

6. Dont just do an activity. Consolidate it and reflect to make learning deeper — “So what have we discovered?”

92 of 117

The facilitator’s job is not to remove thinking by giving answers too quickly.

It is to create the conditions in which learners can:

NOTICE → QUESTION → INVESTIGATE → REASON → JUDGE → ACT RESPONSIBLY.- 21st Century PEDAGOGY

93 of 117

MOCK SESSION

94 of 117

Min ClassRoom : 15 mins

​

  • Give/Ask participants a short curriculum-based activity - Grade 9 Lesson 5- AI Failure Lab
  • 1 group will facilitate
  • 2 groups will act as students
  • Everyone else will be observers, will watch silently. No discussion or suggestions

​

  • The facilitator should intentionally use different moves: questioning, probing, waiting, asking for evidence, inviting multiple responses, rather than explaining.

​

95 of 117

Checklist for observers during facilitation. They can share out after activity is done:

  1. What did the facilitator do that made you think?
  2. Where did the facilitator step in?
  3. Where did they step back?
  4. What would have happened if the facilitator had simply explained the answer?

​

Now Individual Reflection Wall for all:

Put up 3 charts with the above prompts give them 2 min. To write their responses on sticky notes and put it on the charts.

  • One facilitation behaviour I already use: ________
  • One behaviour I need to consciously practise as an MT: ________
  • One behaviour I need to stop doing: ________

​

​

96 of 117

Mini Training Scene preparation (15 min.):

Say “So far we thought of facilitating a classroom, but you are also a Master Trainer who will be guiding the teachers, so now think if you have to facilitate the same activity in a teacher training rather than a classroom, what would you do differently?”

Take responses on the shift they will bring in a teacher training and note it down on a chart/board.

97 of 117

Consolidate

​

  1. Facilitation is about enabling thinking, not giving answers. Create space for learners to explore, reason, question and arrive at conclusions.
  2. Facilitation moves should be intentional. Ask questions and intervene based on the learning objective and what learners need at that moment.
  3. Know when to step in and step back. Provide a nudge when needed, but allow learners to productively struggle, explore and learn from each other.
  4. MTs should model the facilitation they expect teachers to use. Experience and demonstration are more powerful than simply explaining facilitation strategies.
  5. Cascade for application, not replication. When training teachers, create opportunities for them to practise, reflect and adapt the facilitation strategies to their own classroom context.

98 of 117

99 of 117

DAY 3

100 of 117

Check - In:

🔵 MY WALL OF STRENGTH

​

✏️ After attending the MT training sessions:

​

What are my new learnings that makes me confident as a Master Trainer to support my Cascade Teachers?

​

101 of 117

102 of 117

103 of 117

104 of 117

Curriculum Theme/Construct 3 :

Bias, Ethics & Responsibility Studios

105 of 117

106 of 117

107 of 117

108 of 117

109 of 117

110 of 117

111 of 117

112 of 117

Teacher training Outline

Time

Day 1 – Curriculum Foundation + Experiencing the Curriculum

Day 2 – Facilitation + Preparing to Cascade

9:00–9:30

Registration, pre-training form + Cooking Pot Questions

Recap / Cooking Pot Questions

9:30–10:00

Introduction, Check-in, Norms & Agenda setting

Curriculum Exploration - Construct 3: Experience the curriculum as a learner

10:00–10:30

- About QA + state journey

- Impact of AI Education / SSA context

10:30–11:00

FSTC Connection to the curriculum – What skills are we building and why?

Curriculum Session Walkthroughs – Understand session flow, resources, key facilitator moves and likely learner challenges

11:00–11:10

☕ Tea Break

☕ Tea Break

11:15–12:15

Curriculum Exploration – Construct 1: Experience the curriculum as a learner + unpack the learning intent

Facilitation Practice – Mini Classroom: Practise selected curriculum activity as facilitator

12:15 to 12:30

Reporting forms: introduce the session completion forms and the support they will get from MTs

12:30–1:15

Curriculum Exploration – Construct 2: Experience + unpack key concepts, activities and learner experience

- Commitment Circle

- Post-training form

- Group Photo

1:15–2:00

🍱 Lunch

🍱 Lunch

2:00 to 2:15

Energiser - Unplugged

Group Photo

2:15–3:00

Facilitation Strategies – From Telling to Enabling Thinking

​

3:00 to 3:30

Day 1 Reflection + Cooking Pot – What do I understand? What do I still need to clarify?

​

113 of 117

Themes for Cascade Training:

​

  1. QA + State Journey
  2. Pre-Training Form (Day 1)
  3. Impact of AI Education
  4. Curriculum Theme:
    1. Theme 1 : AI Sparks & Future Stories
    2. Theme 2: AI System Labs Discovery
    3. Theme 3: Bias Ethics Responsibility Studio
  5. Facilitation & PedaGOGY - Mock Session Practice
  6. Lesson Completion Form
  7. Post-Training Form (Day 2)

114 of 117

Individual Reflection : 10 mins

​

Think and write.

  • Which section of the training do I feel most confident facilitating?

​

  • Which section of the curriculum do I feel most confident facilitating?

​

  • Which section of the training feels most challenging?

​

  • What support would help me become more confident?

115 of 117

Observation questions:

- what tools did the group use?

- was there space for participants to think?

- what is one thing you liked about the presentation.

​

116 of 117

Day Closure: MAKE A PLEDGE

What is one thing that I will do better as an MT from today?

​

117 of 117

GROUP PHOTO

​