B.Sc. (Applied Statistics & Analytics)�
Analysis of Initial Public Offerings
GROUP MEMBERS | ROLL NUMBERS |
Naman Gandhi | A006 |
Aryan Nisar | A011 |
Diya Unarker | A020 |
Mokshaa Agnihotri | A024 |
Paridhi Sinha | A040 |
Mentor:
Prof. Piyush Shaha
Subject: Sampling Distribution and Application
Index
Acknowledgement
We are grateful for the opportunity given to us by our prestige university NSOMASA, NMIMS, Mumbai to work on this project.
We would like to express our gratitude to our Mentor, Prof. Piyush Shaha , who was a continual source of inspiration. He pushed us to think imaginatively. His vast knowledge, extensive experience, and professional competence in SDA enabled us to successfully accomplish this project
Thanking You
Group 4
Introduction
WHAT IS AN IPO
Introduction
NEED FOR AN IPO
BACKGROUND
Definition of Variables
Literature Review
Research Objectives
Data
Data
Variables used to find required values:
Data
Methodology
Assumptions
Two sample Z test:
One sample t-test and two sample t-test:
Assumptions
Pearson’s correlation test:
Test-Statistics:
Data Analysis
Criteria | Test |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Data Analysis-1
Data Analysis-1
(B): post and during covid listing gains
H̥̥ : μ_1=μ_2
Hˌ: μ_1≠μ_2
Level of significance=α=5%
(x_2 ) ̅=61.050
x ̅_3=3.384
t=3.0152
p-value=0.009485
Since p-value is significantly less that α =0.05 we reject our null hypothesis in favour of alternative hypothesis.
Data Analysis-1
Data Analysis-2
We will now compare large cap, mid cap and small cap IPOs on the following basis:
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
(A)Listing gains
Case 1: We compare the means of listing gains of large and mid cap IPOs. Our null hypothesis H̥̥ is that the means are equal is being tested against alternative hypothesis that they are unequal.
H̥̥ : μ 1=μ 2
Hˌ: μ 1≠μ 2
Level of significance=α=5%
(x 1 ) =-0.2744182
x 2=0.2550422
t=-0.074644
p-value=0.941
Since p-value is greater that α=0.05 we have insufficient proof to reject our null hypothesis in favour of alternative hypothesis.
Data Analysis-2
(A)Listing gains
Case 2: We compare the means of listing gains of large and small cap IPOs. Our null hypothesis H̥̥ is that the means are equal is being tested against alternative hypothesis that they are unequal.
H̥̥ : μ_1=μ_2
Hˌ: μ_1≠μ_2
Level of significance=α=5%
(x_1 ) ̅=0.2313383
x ̅_3=0.3036931
t=-0.40052
p-value=0.6918
Since p-value is greater that α=0.05 we have insufficient proof to reject our null hypothesis in favour of alternative hypothesis.
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-2
Data Analysis-3
We will now compare and find the correlation between following parameters:
Data Analysis-4
Conclusion
Limitations
Future Scope
References