1 of 34

Playing Red: How Our Adversaries Wargame

Matthew B. Caffrey, Jr

Wargaming Branch

Air Force Research Laboratory

2 of 34

What is a Wargame

13

0-3a-6

CGN

12 - * - 5

B7 - 0 - Z

6-4-8

3 of 34

What is a Wargame

Reality

Simulation

Model

Sim Game

Wargame

Proportional Representation

Over Time

Multi Sided

Armed Conflict

4 of 34

Rommel, you magnificent

b______, I read your book!

George C. Scott

In the movie Patton

5 of 34

Imitation is the most sincere form of compliment.

Milton Berle

6 of 34

Why listen to me?

  • Author – On Wargaming
  • Co-author – Gulf War Fact Book
  • Originator of the Connections conference
  • Designer of several wargames
  • Originator, Commercial Wargames db

7 of 34

Why listen to me?

Previously

  • Civilian
    • Professor of Wargaming & Campaign Planning, Air Command & Staff College
    • Research Associate, School of Advanced Airpower Studies
  • Military, Colonel USAFR (ret)
    • Senior Reservist, Information Directorate, Air Force Research Lab
    • Chief Wargame Strategy, HQ USAF/XOOC (CHECKMATE)

8 of 34

Overview

  • Former Adversaries
    • Germany
    • Japan
    • Soviet Union
      • North Vietnam
      • Iraq
  • Potential Adversaries
    • Hammas
    • North Korea
    • China
    • Iran
  • Future Adversaries

9 of 34

Former Adversaries�Germany

  • Prussian origin of Modern (second generation) Wargaming
  • Originally used to develop strategists
  • Under Moltke evolved to develop specific strategies
  • Given much of the credit for success in the wars of German Unification

10 of 34

German Wargaming

Red

White

Blue

11 of 34

German Wargaming

Red

White

Blue

  • After 1871
    • Adjudication tailored to level
    • Break Points
  • After Moltke (the younger) logistics

12 of 34

German Wargaming

Red

White

Blue

Frequency of adjudication

roughly matches decision cycle.

13 of 34

The Diffusion of Wargaming

Austro-Hungarian

England

Italy

France

Russia

Secondary diffusion

1820 / 1875 / 1905

1874 / 1889

1873

1872 / 1883

1866

Japan, Turkey, Latin Am.

14 of 34

Former Adversaries�Germany

  • Prussian origin of Modern (second generation Wargaming)
  • Originally used to develop strategists
  • Under Moltke evolved to develop specific strategies
  • Given much of the credit for success in the wars of German Unification
  • WWI use ignored political dimension

15 of 34

Former Adversaries�Nazi Germany

  • Pol Mil wargaming stopped by Hitler
  • Pre war wargaming used for doctrinal development – Blitzkrieg, Wolf Packs

16 of 34

History

Theory

Doctrine

Strategy

War

The Strategy Cycle �a.k.a.The Caffrey Loop

17 of 34

History

Theory

Doctrine

Strategy

Wargame

The Strategy Cycle �a.k.a.The Caffrey Loop

18 of 34

Former Adversaries�Nazi Germany

  • Pol Mil wargaming stopped by Hitler
  • Pre war wargaming used for doctrinal development – Blitzkrieg, Wolf Packs
  • Use during war – develop evaluate plans
    • 1940 Western campaign
    • Operation Barbarossa
    • Normandy Invasion

19 of 34

Former Adversaries�Japan

  • Sophisticated Pol-Mil wargame
  • Disconnect between Pol-Mil and Mil
  • Pearl Harbor – pinnacle of effective wargaming?
  • Midway – less guilty than apparent
    • Still missed critical insight (Point Luck)
  • Why Japan fought

20 of 34

Former Adversaries�Soviet Union

  • Distinctly different from German/US/ Japanese methods

21 of 34

Soviet Wargaming

Red

White

Blue

Both Red and Blue submit plan

for entire battle/campaign.

22 of 34

Soviet Wargaming

Red

White

Blue

White fights plans against each other.

23 of 34

Soviet Wargaming

Red

White

Blue

Debriefs both sides on final outcome!

24 of 34

Former Adversaries�Soviet Union

  • Distinctly different from German/US/ Japanese methods
  • Pre war wargame predicted territorial loss
  • Extensive use during offensive phase of war
  • Huge post war effort to collect/compile “historical norms”
  • Basis for Cold War Wargames – instruction to satellites and clients.

25 of 34

Former Adversaries�North Vietnam

  • Employed Soviet method of wargaming
  • Used wargaming down to the lowest level
  • Allowed multi element attacks with little if any comms
  • Weaknesses not recognized until late in war

26 of 34

Former Adversaries�Iraq

  • Learned ground/joint wargaming at Soviet War College
  • Purchased air wargame from US contractor – perfectly legal
  • Evidence they used Soviet style wargame during final phases of Iran/Iraq war
  • Evidence of use during ODS & OIF

27 of 34

Potential Adversaries�Hammas

  • Purchased license to use US video game engine – perfectly legal
  • Used to create two “American Army” type first person shooters
  • Goal similar to “American Army”
    • Recruitment
    • Teach doctrine

28 of 34

Potential Adversaries�North Korea

  • Little known of North Korean’s wargaming methods
  • Circumstantial evidence they used Soviet methods during Korean war
  • If so, given their isolation, they are unlikely to have adopted new methods

29 of 34

Potential AdversariesChina

  • Circumstantial evidence they used Soviet methods during Korean war
  • Made significant effort to learn US methods during period of good relations during the 1980s.
  • Current efforts appear to be to acquire US hardware but internally develop more comprehensive adjudication software

30 of 34

Potential Adversaries�Iran

31 of 34

Potential Adversaries�A Current Friend?

32 of 34

Future Adversaries

  • US success & globalization will increase the use of US wargaming technology – or better – being used against us.
  • Wargaming capabilities once only available to states are now available to individuals.
  • Potentially our adversaries could purchase wargames that are more effective than our legacy models.

33 of 34

Conclusion

  • Knowing how your adversary wargames can provide insights into their capabilities and limitations.
  • The US military needs to incorporate the best of how others wargame.

34 of 34

To Learn More

  • On Wargaming, Matt Caffrey, Air University Press, pending
  • The Art of Wargaming, Peter P. Perla, Naval Institute Press, 1990
  • Soviet Style Wargames, Sloan, Jalali, Wardak, and Giessler, Science Applications Inc., June 1986
  • Chinese War Termination Calculus and its Impact on PLA Operational Plans and Decisions, Charles Hawkins, unpublished, 18 May 2003