1 of 64

Overview:�Study design and analysis� in epidemiology

Reshma Kassanjee (PhD)

University of Cape Town

SACEMA�

MMED 2024

000

2 of 64

2

Outline

  • Motivation: Why are we talking about “studies”?
  • A classical epidemiological study
  • Study classifications
  • Why study design matters
  • Randomised controlled trials
  • Measures of disease occurrence (incidence and prevalence) and effect (example)
  • Close

000

3 of 64

3

Outline

  • Motivation: Why are we talking about “studies”?
  • A classical epidemiological study
  • Study classifications
  • Why study design matters
  • Randomised controlled trials
  • Measures of disease occurrence (incidence and prevalence) and effect (example)
  • Close

000

4 of 64

M

M

E

D �

4

Why are we talking about “studies”?

modelling

5 of 64

M

M

E

D �

5

Meaningful

modelling of

epidemiological

data

Why are we talking about “studies”?

6 of 64

M

M

E

D �

6

Meaningful

modelling of

epidemiological

data

Come from studies!

  • There is some underlying real-world process�(signal with some noise)
  • Through observation or data collection (i.e. studies) we obtain data

Why are we talking about “studies”?

7 of 64

7

Questions

Insights

Modelling exercise

Why are we talking about “studies”?

8 of 64

8

Questions

Insights

Model

Data

Why are we talking about “studies”?

9 of 64

9

Why are we talking about “studies”?

10 of 64

10

Why are we talking about “studies”?

11 of 64

11

Why are we talking about “studies”?

Data on disease occurrence were obtained from studies

12 of 64

12

Why are we talking about “studies”?

13 of 64

13

Why are we talking about “studies”?

14 of 64

14

Why are we talking about “studies”?

  • Sometimes you want to know something about one group of people

  • Sometimes you want to know about an ‘effect’ - difference between two groups

(e.g. how much this mortality would change if we introduced treatment)

15 of 64

15

Outline

  • Motivation: Why are we talking about “studies”?
  • A classical epidemiological study
  • Study classifications
  • Why study design matters
  • Randomised controlled trials
  • Measures of disease occurrence (incidence and prevalence) and effect (example)
  • Close

000

16 of 64

16

  1. Define study question
  2. Select study type
  3. Collect data
  4. Analyse data
  5. Interpret results
  6. Report study and findings

Classical epidemiological study

17 of 64

17

  1. Define study question
  2. Select study type
  3. Collect data
  4. Analyse data
  5. Interpret results
  6. Report study and findings

All of this must be done ethically

Classical epidemiological study

18 of 64

18

  1. Define study question
  2. Select study type
  3. Collect data
  4. Analyse data
  5. Interpret results
  6. Report study and findings

All of this must be done ethically

Classical epidemiological study

Aim to measure disease occurrence and ‘effect’

19 of 64

19

  1. Define study question
  2. Select study type
  3. Collect data
  4. Analyse data
  5. Interpret results
  6. Report study and findings

All of this must be done ethically

Classical epidemiological study

Aim to measure disease occurrence and ‘effect’

20 of 64

20

Outline

  • Motivation: Why are we talking about “studies”?
  • A classical epidemiological study
  • Study classifications
  • Why study design matters
  • Randomised controlled trials
  • Measures of disease occurrence (incidence and prevalence) and effect (example)
  • Close

000

21 of 64

21

Some common distinctions between study designs:

  • Observational versus Experimental
  • Longitudinal versus Cross-sectional
  • Prospective versus Retrospective
  • Descriptive versus Analytic
  • Case-control versus Cohort
  • Qualitative versus Quantitative: we will discuss only quantitative studies

Study classifications

22 of 64

22

Some common distinctions between study designs:

  • Observational versus Experimental
  • Longitudinal versus Cross-sectional
  • Prospective versus Retrospective
  • Descriptive versus Analytic
  • Case-control versus Cohort
  • Qualitative versus Quantitative: we will discuss only quantitative studies

Study classifications

E.g. COVID-19 vaccination, and/or�its effect on�severe disease

23 of 64

23

Some common distinctions between study designs:

  • Observational versus Experimental
  • Longitudinal versus Cross-sectional
  • Prospective versus Retrospective
  • Descriptive versus Analytic
  • Case-control versus Cohort
  • Qualitative versus Quantitative: we will discuss only quantitative studies

Study classifications

E.g. COVID-19 vaccination, and/or�its effect on�severe disease

Exposure

Outcome

24 of 64

24

Observational versus Experimental

25 of 64

25

  • Observational
    • Observe the association between some exposure and outcome without interfering with what level/category of the exposure a person receives
  • Experimental
    • You set the level/category of the exposure the person receives, then you observe

Observational versus Experimental

26 of 64

26

Longitudinal versus cross-sectional

27 of 64

27

  • Longitudinal (cohort, follow-up)
    • Participants are observed over time
  • Cross-sectional (survey, prevalence study)
    • Participants are observed at a single point in time
    • Data on the exposure and outcome (and other variables) are collected

Longitudinal versus cross-sectional

28 of 64

28

Prospective versus Retrospective

29 of 64

29

  • Prospective
    • Follow participants forward in time
    • Data collection continues after your study starts
    • Retrospective
    • Looks backward in time
    • Typically using existing data

Prospective versus Retrospective

30 of 64

30

Descriptive versus Analytic

31 of 64

31

  • Descriptive
    • Describe characteristics/exposure/outcome
    • Analytical
    • Investigate relationships
    • Test hypotheses

Descriptive versus Analytic

32 of 64

32

Case-control versus Cohort

33 of 64

33

  • Case-control
    • Select participants based on outcome
    • Then study the association with the exposure
    • Carefully choose controls to compare to cases
    • Specific methods of analysis / measures that are valid
    • Cohort
    • Select participants based on exposure
    • Then study the association with the outcome

Case-control versus Cohort

34 of 64

34

Some common distinctions between study designs:

  • Observational versus Experimental
  • Longitudinal versus Cross-sectional
  • Prospective versus Retrospective
  • Descriptive versus Analytic
  • Case-control versus Cohort

Study classifications

35 of 64

35

Combining design elements

Observational

Longitudinal

Prospective

Retrospective

Cross- sectional

Experimental

Longitudinal

Prospective

36 of 64

36

Outline

  • Motivation: Why are we talking about “studies”?
  • A classical epidemiological study
  • Study classifications
  • Why study design matters
  • Randomised controlled trials
  • Measures of disease occurrence (incidence and prevalence) and effect (example)
  • Close

000

37 of 64

estimate =

37

truth

bias

random error

+

+

Why does study design even matter?

38 of 64

38

  • Suppose we want to know the impact of a new experimental ‘immunity boosting’ tablet on a person’s risk of having any severe illness
  • At a workplace, we offer free courses of the tablet, and then for six months we record any illness in ‘treated’ versus ‘untreated’

Example study 1

39 of 64

39

  • Suppose we want to know the impact of a new experimental ‘immunity boosting’ tablet on a person’s risk of having any severe illness
  • At a workplace, we offer free courses of the tablet, and then for six months we record any illness in ‘treated’ versus ‘untreated’

Observational versus Experimental

Longitudinal versus Cross-sectional

Prospective versus Retrospective

Descriptive versus Analytic

Case-control versus Cohort

Example study 1

40 of 64

40

  • Suppose we want to know the impact of a new experimental ‘immunity boosting’ tablet on a person’s risk of having any severe illness
  • At a workplace, we offer free courses of the tablet, and then for six months we record any illness in ‘treated’ versus ‘untreated’
  • We find a 30% reduction in illness when ‘treated’…
  • Would you use the tablet? Do you have concerns about the estimate?

Example study 1

41 of 64

Exposure:�Treatment

Outcome:

Illness

Attitude -�wellbeing

Exercise

Example study 1

42 of 64

Exposure:�Treatment

Outcome:

Illness

Attitude -�wellbeing

Exercise

Example study 1

43 of 64

Confounding

  • A concept relevant to causal inference
  • In a setting and analysis: the relationship or association between the exposure and outcome ≠ the causal effect
  • There is some non-causal backdoor path connecting the exposure and outcome

Example study 1

Exposure:�Treatment

Outcome:

Illness

Attitude -�wellbeing

Exercise

44 of 64

44

Outline

  • Motivation: Why are we talking about “studies”?
  • A classical epidemiological study
  • Study classifications
  • Why study design matters
  • Randomised controlled trials
  • Measures of disease occurrence (incidence and prevalence) and effect (example)
  • Close

000

45 of 64

45

  • Gold standard for experimental studies that aim to estimate causal effects
  • The exposure is randomly assigned to participants
  • Randomisation ensure there is no systematic difference between the people with different exposures/treatment��🡪 difference in outcomes can be attributed to the exposure

Randomised controlled trials

46 of 64

Exposure:�Treatment

Outcome:

Illness

Attitude -�wellbeing

Exercise

Example study 1

47 of 64

47

  • Controlled: appropriate comparison group/arm
  • Best practice is to include masking (blinding)
  • …by using a placebo: a ‘treatment’ that has no therapeutic effect, that resembles and is administered in the same way as the treatment being tested

Randomised controlled trials

48 of 64

48

Hierarchy of evidence

https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-021-00388-5

49 of 64

49

Outline

  • Motivation: Why are we talking about “studies”?
  • A classical epidemiological study
  • Study classifications
  • Why study design matters
  • Randomised controlled trials
  • Measures of disease occurrence (incidence and prevalence) and effect (example)
  • Close

000

50 of 64

50

  1. Define study question
  2. Select study type
  3. Collect data
  4. Analyse data
  5. Interpret results
  6. Report study and findings

All of this must be done ethically

Classical epidemiological study

Aim to measure disease occurrence and ‘effect’

51 of 64

51

  • Common measures of disease occurrence are:�prevalence and incidence

Measures of disease occurrence

52 of 64

52

  • Common measures of disease occurrence are:�prevalence and incidence
  • Prevalence: the proportion of the population with the condition at a point in time
  • Incidence: how quickly new cases of the condition are occurring (incidence rate, or cumulative incidence)

Measures of disease occurrence

53 of 64

53

  • Common measures of disease occurrence are:�prevalence and incidence
  • Prevalence: the proportion of the population with the condition at a point in time
  • Incidence: how quickly new cases of the condition are occurring (incidence rate, or cumulative incidence)

Measures of disease occurrence

Longitudinal versus Cross-sectional

54 of 64

54

  • Common measures of disease occurrence are:�prevalence and incidence
  • Prevalence: the proportion of the population with the condition at a point in time
  • Incidence: how quickly new cases of the condition are occurring (incidence rate, or cumulative incidence)
  • Sometimes prevalence is quite informative of incidence �(e.g., flu), sometimes not (e.g., HIV)

Measures of disease occurrence

55 of 64

55

 

Measures of disease effect

56 of 64

56

Measures of disease effect�Risk ratio example

  • Population: People living with HIV. Outcome: Becoming virally suppressed within 1 year of treatment start. Exposure: Drug A versus Drug B

57 of 64

57

Measures of disease effect�Risk ratio example

  • Population: People living with HIV. Outcome: Becoming virally suppressed within 1 year of treatment start. Exposure: Drug A versus Drug B

58 of 64

58

Measures of disease effect�Risk ratio example

  • Population: People living with HIV. Outcome: Becoming virally suppressed within 1 year of treatment start. Exposure: Drug A versus Drug B

59 of 64

59

Measures of disease effect�Risk ratio example

  • Population: People living with HIV. Outcome: Becoming virally suppressed within 1 year of treatment start. Exposure: Drug A versus Drug B

60 of 64

60

Measures of disease effect�Risk ratio example

  • Population: People living with HIV. Outcome: Becoming virally suppressed within 1 year of treatment start. Exposure: Drug A versus Drug B

  • Probability of becoming virally suppressed is 1.16�(95% CI: 1.00, 1.34) times greater when using Drug A�compared to B (i.e. 16% higher)

61 of 64

61

Outline

  • Motivation: Why are we talking about “studies”?
  • A classical epidemiological study
  • Study classifications
  • Why study design matters
  • Randomised controlled trials
  • Measures of disease occurrence (incidence and prevalence) and effect (example)
  • Close

000

62 of 64

62

  • There are different ways to design a study
  • There are different ways to measure something of interest
  • Study design matters for accuracy and precision

What I hope stays with you…

63 of 64

63

  • There are different ways to design a study
  • There are different ways to measure something of interest
  • Study design matters for accuracy and precision

  • When you use data/estimates in your model (or collect data) be sure to engage with (all) details of the study
  • Modelling studies go from processes at a small scale (relating to individuals) to a large scale (populations, across time and place); you need to understand your ‘small scale’ data well to interpret your ‘large scale’ results

What I hope stays with you…

64 of 64

This presentation is made available through a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial license. Details of the license and permitted uses are available at� http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Overview: Study Design and Analysis�Attribution: R. Kassanjee�Clinic on the Meaningful Modeling of Epidemiological Data

000

000

© 2014-2024 International Clinics on Infectious Disease Dynamics and Data

000

000