The data behind the deals - investigating how public money is spent through procurement
@herahussain @opencontracting
engage@open-contracting.org
bit.ly/ocpjourno-covid
US$
9,500,000,000,000
#1
GOVERNMENT
CORRUPTION RISK
57%
FOREIGN BRIBERY CASES
FOR PUBLIC CONTRACTS
40%
SPENDING, SIGN OFF & APPROVAL UNDEFINED (OECD 2012)
2
What Open Contracting is doing to open up the data behind government contracts
Open Contracting connects
to open up & monitor public contracting
Government
Business
Civil society
What we do
AFGHANISTAN ALBANIA ARGENTINA AUSTRALIA, CANADA CHILE COLOMBIA COSTA RICA DOMINICAN REPUBLIC FRANCE GEORGIA GHANA GUATEMALA IRELAND ITALY KENYA MACEDONIA MEXICO MOLDOVA MONGOLIA NIGERIA PARAGUAY ROMANIA, SIERRA LEONE UGANDA UK UKRAINE UNITED STATES URUGUAY VIETNAM ZAMBIA BUENOS AIRES (ARGENTINA) BOJONEGORO (INDONESIA) ELGEYO MARAKWET (KENYA) JALISCO (MEXICO) MEXICO CITY (MEXICO) MONTREAL (CANADA) SCOTLAND (UK)
Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS)
Planning
Tender
Award
Implementation
Contract
Unified, structured data & records
(with unique IDs etc)
Open contracting reforms save Ukraine more than $1 billion
Busting price-fixing scandal in Colombia
But what...
about the commercial confidentiality of contracts?
mythbusting.open-contracting.org
REPORT
We've talked to over 70 experts from more than
20 countries and found surprisingly little evidence that supports keeping contracting information secret.
3
Common red flags & how to find them
bit.ly/ocpjourno
RESOURCE
Red flags for integrity: Giving the green light to open data solutions
Corruption can happen at different stages of the procurement cycle
Planning
Tender
Award
Implementation
Contract
Key planning documents not provided | Non-public bid opening | High number of contract awards to one bidder | Large difference between contract award and final contract amount � | Change orders issued after contract award on line item requirements |
| Short notice to bidders | Supplier address
| Supplier receives multiple single source contracts | Change orders to increase prize substantially (or multiple by a smaller amount) |
| Vague description of supply terms | Bidder that has never bid previously wins tender | Final prize is higher than industry average | Payment without delivery of service |
Title Text
Winning supplier provides a substantially lower bid price than competitors.
INFORMATION ABOUT SUPPLIER BIDS
Winning bid is too close to price estimate.
COMPARE BUDGET WITH FINAL CONTRACT
Company has no history in providing service or product:
PRIOR CONTRACTS & DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY PURPOSE E.G. ON WEBSITE
FRAUD
COLLUSION / CARTELS
The difference between bid prices is an exact percentage (a whole number).
INFORMATION ABOUT SUPPLIER BIDS
Companies registered vs companies actually providing vs control of market
ANALYSIS OF CONTRACT AWARDS
& DATA ON COMPANIES IN SECTOR
BID
RIGGING
Single bidder only
(limited, competitive, direct)
Use of direct awards/exceptions
Multiple contract winner
WHO ARE THE TOP SUPPLIERS?
LOOK BY SECTORS, e.g. HEALTH
FIXING THE PLANS
FIXING TENDERS
FIXING
AWARDS
FIXING
IMPLEMENTATION
A RED FLAG DOES NOT MEAN
THAT THERE IS CORRUPTION
A red flag is something anomalous that deserves further investigation.
It is not proof that anything is wrong or that a transaction is corrupt, collusive, fraudulent, or otherwise illicit. A flag cannot, and is not intended to, prove corruption in the procurement process.
Flags can, however, offer insight into the risk of corrupt or illicit behavior in individual contracts and signal troubling patterns across the procurement system worthy of further investigation. The use of analytics for red flagging may also showcase more general opportunities to increase integrity and value for money across the procurement process.
EMERGENCIES CAN INCREASE CORRUPTION RISK
Ideas for stories
COVID19 CONTRACT MONITORING
Covid
monitoring
for OCDS countries
The COVID-19 pandemic has companies all over #Ukraine suddenly trading in medical supplies, especially masks, even if they used to specialize in footwear or car parts before, while prices are sometimes fifty (!) times as high as in December 2019.
According to our calculations, public entities bought almost 2.5 million surgical masks for the total amount of UAH 25 million between January 1 and March 28, 2020 (± USD 1 million with an average exchange rate of 1 USD = 25 UAH). The month with the largest volume of purchases was March at 1.8 million masks. In February, they bought 547,000 masks, and in January 108,000.
“Los contratos del desastre” (Contracts from the disaster) project by Poder in México and El Intercambio in Guatemala analyzed public procurement in the wake of natural disasters.
Here they explain how they mapped unstructured procurement data to the OCDS.
No open data?
5
Data sources
& tools
The reality of doing this work systematically...
GOOD OLD FASHIONED FOIA
(via OpenCorporates.com)
(via OpenOwnership.org)
(via OpenOpps.com)�
(via opentenders.eu) �
WHERE TO FIND DATA
OCDS
datasets
What next
1.
Make contracts your new favourite data set to monitor
2. Build a list of where & what information you have access to
3. Set up a database to import data
�4. Make better FOIA requests for the specific info that is missing
5. Got a story? Talk to us. Let us know if you've written a cool story! Our helpdesk can also help with technical questions if you’re working on a public interest investigation. Email info@open-contracting.org.
Stay in touch
Our newsletter for investigative journalists:
opencontracting.substack.com
@opencontracting
www.open-contracting.org