1 of 23

Wellness and Restorative Practices

Montgomery County Board of Education

February 7, 2023

2 of 23

Restorative Practices and the �Montgomery County Public Schools Wellness Infrastructure

2

3 of 23

3

Alignment to the Strategic Plan and Board Priorities

Board of Education Strategic Priorities

4 of 23

Outline for Today’s Discussion

4

  1. Defining Expectations and Behaviors
  2. Resources and Processes for Addressing Instances of Bullying; Restorative Justice Approaches
  3. Wellness Infrastructure
  4. Overview
  5. Intended Outcomes
  6. Defining Metrics
  7. Next Steps
  8. Discussion

5 of 23

Alignment with Antiracist Audit

5

MCPS Commitment

Audit Findings and Recommendations

Re-establish trust, open lines of communication, and collaboration with students and the parent community

(Audit Domain 5)

(Audit Recommendation 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5)

Clear communication through district channels so that all school leaders, students, parents, and community members are clear on MCPS values and expectations regarding bullying and harassment

(Audit Recommendation 1.3 & 5.2)

Consistent Community and school messaging so that all stakeholders are aware of what defines bullying and harassment and how to report incidents of thereof

(Audit Domain 1.1, 1.2, 1.3)

(Audit Recommendation 1.3)

(Audit Recommendation 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5)

(Cross-Domain Recommendation III)

Consistent and ongoing data analysis, reporting, and accountability

(Audit Recommendation 1.4)

(Cross-Domain Recommendation II: Accountability for Racial Equity Work,

Recommendation V: Continuous Data Collection)

6 of 23

The Culture of Respect:

Setting Expectations and Defining Behaviors

6

7 of 23

7

The Culture of Respect:

Expectations

Overarching MCPS Board of Education Policies:

  • Policy ACA: Nondiscrimination, Equity, and Cultural Proficiency

  • Policy JHF: Bullying, Harassment, or Intimidation

8 of 23

8

The Culture of Respect:

Definitions for Clarification

  • Bullying (Verbal, Physical, Social, and Cyber)
  • Harassment (Including Sexual Harassment / Sexual Misconduct)
  • Intimidation
  • Hate-Bias
  • Interpersonal Conflict

9 of 23

Addressing Instances of Bullying and Hate Bias

9

10 of 23

10

Addressing Instances of Bullying and Hate-Bias

INCIDENT / Allegation made by student, staff member, parent/guardian, or bystander

MCPS FORM 230-35, Bullying, Harassment, or Intimidation Reporting Form �submitted to Principal/Designee

Victim(s) receive Supportive Measures and a Safety Plan

Emergency Communications Center (MCPD) contacted for incidents deemed potentially criminal

School Administration conducts investigation (if/when MCPD isn’t taking the case)

Parent/Guardian Communication

Behavioral Threat Assessment Team (BTAT) assembled to assess risk (when applicable)

MCPS FORM 230-36, Bullying, Harassment, or Intimidation Investigation Form �completed

Disciplinary Action taken in alignment with the Student Code of Conduct

Parent/Guardian Communication

(Provided outcomes to the extent possible per confidentiality)

RECORD KEEPING:

Update the incident report in Synergy,

Notify Student Welfare and Compliance (serious incidents)

Supportive Measures provided for all involved students (Including how to report subsequent incidents)

11 of 23

11

Addressing Instances of Bullying and Hate-Bias

Communicating Resources and Processes

  • Counseling/Classroom Lessons
  • Culture of Respect - Student Training Module
  • “Ways to Report” Document [English / Spanish]

  • External Collaboration - (Town Halls, Presentations)
    • Choose Respect Montgomery
    • State’s Attorney’s Office
    • UMD Criminology and Criminal Justice - Universities at Shady Grove
  • Student Developed Mobile App – MCPS Stronger Student
    • Online Reporting 230-35, Maryland Safe Schools �Tip Line

12 of 23

12

Addressing Instances of Bullying and Hate-Bias

Why The Restorative Approach?

Building relationships and building community together can prevent or reduce incidents of bullying and harassment.

Restorative approaches allow students to:

  • Actively engage and problem-solve physical, psychological, social, and disciplinary issues that affect themselves and the community.
  • Take responsibility for their actions.
  • Work with those affected to restore and/or repair the members and community who were harmed as a result of those actions.

13 of 23

13

Addressing Instances of Bullying and Hate-Bias

What Does It Look Like?- A Highlight

La Cultura Cura—Circle Keepers

Focus Co-Created Classroom Environments

14 of 23

14

Creating A Restorative School Community

Restorative Justice (RJ) Services Provided

Schools that have received direct services from RJ Specialists this year:

103

Number of direct service events:

1,088

Top 7 Services Provided

Consultation/Planning/Modeling

29%

Facilitate Professional Development

19%

Mindfulness/Wellness

14%

Individual Student Support

11%

Individual Teacher Support

7%

Mediation or Response to Event

7%

Parent Engagement/Support

3%

15 of 23

Restorative Justice District and School Evaluation Tools

  • In October 2022, the Maryland State Department of Education created a tool in order to evaluate the implementation of restorative approaches across school districts.

  • MCPS modified this tool to align with the strategic priorities and findings in the antiracist audit.

  • Each school, led by the restorative justice coach will conduct an evaluation using the rubric in first quarter 2023.

As of January 31,2023 with �87 schools reporting:

  • 9.2% Reactive: Minimal preventative measures are �in place.
  • 64.4% Early: Limited preventative measures are �in place.
  • 23% Intermediate: Proactive measures are in place with moderate effectiveness.
  • 3.4% Mature: Proactive measures are in place with significant effectiveness.

15

Evaluating A Restorative School Community

16 of 23

Wellness Infrastructure: Student Well-Being �Teams, Bridge to Wellness,

and Data Monitoring

16

17 of 23

17

Wellness Infrastructure Update

Full

Implementation

Multi-Tiered System of Support

Student Well-Being Teams (SWBTs)

High School Social Workers

Bridge to Wellness Programs

Districtwide

Collaboration

Montgomery County Health and Human Services in support of Bridge to Wellness

18 of 23

18

Student Well-Being Teams in Action: Case Study

19 of 23

19

Wellness Infrastructure: Social Workers

Gender

By Grade Level

Top 6 Reasons Students Are Receiving Services:

  1. Signs of Depression
  2. Anxiety
  3. Family Conflict
  4. History of Trauma
  5. Emotional Dysregulation
  6. Classroom Disruption

Students Referred for Service

2,044 Serviced by Social Worker

2,604 Referrals from Student Well-Being Teams

444 to Bridge to Wellness

116 Other

32%

31%

18%

19%

9th

10th

11th

12th

57% 42% 1%

X

Unspecified/

Non-Binary

20 of 23

20

Students Referred for Service

493 Total Referrals Including Self-Referrals

444 Referrals from SWBT

Below Top 2 Topics:

Emotional Dysregulation

Trauma

36%

28%

14%

22%

9th

10th

11th

12th

By Grade Level

Top 6 Reasons Students Are Being Serviced:

  1. Emotional Dysregulation
  2. History of Trauma
  3. Family Conflict
  4. Social Connection
  5. Anxiety
  6. Depression

Gender

39%

60%

1%

Wellness Infrastructure: Bridge to Wellness

X

Unspecified/

Non-Binary

21 of 23

21

Wellness Infrastructure: Synergy MTSS

Participants

Session Outcomes

Feedback

School Counselors

346

Psychologists

70

PPWs

49

Social Workers

28

Schools Represented

210

Total Participants

1,427

22 of 23

Modifications and updates based on training feedback from end users

Focus on SWBT framework to decrease variability of implementation across schools

Asynchronous modules to provide refresher trainings

For observation and evaluation of specific best practices look-fors

To support full SWBT/MTSS platform implementation at the start of the 2023-2024 school year.

Next Steps: SWBT and MTSS Synergy Platform

Platform Updates

MTSS Canvas Courses

Observation Tool

Summer Training

January 2023

August 2023

Professional Learning

22

23 of 23

Discussion