Wellness and Restorative Practices
Montgomery County Board of Education
February 7, 2023
Restorative Practices and the �Montgomery County Public Schools Wellness Infrastructure
2
3
Alignment to the Strategic Plan and Board Priorities
Board of Education Strategic Priorities
Outline for Today’s Discussion
4
Alignment with Antiracist Audit
5
MCPS Commitment | Audit Findings and Recommendations |
Re-establish trust, open lines of communication, and collaboration with students and the parent community | (Audit Domain 5) (Audit Recommendation 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5) |
Clear communication through district channels so that all school leaders, students, parents, and community members are clear on MCPS values and expectations regarding bullying and harassment | (Audit Recommendation 1.3 & 5.2) |
Consistent Community and school messaging so that all stakeholders are aware of what defines bullying and harassment and how to report incidents of thereof | (Audit Domain 1.1, 1.2, 1.3) (Audit Recommendation 1.3) (Audit Recommendation 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5) (Cross-Domain Recommendation III) |
Consistent and ongoing data analysis, reporting, and accountability | (Audit Recommendation 1.4) (Cross-Domain Recommendation II: Accountability for Racial Equity Work, Recommendation V: Continuous Data Collection) |
The Culture of Respect:
Setting Expectations and Defining Behaviors
6
7
The Culture of Respect:
Expectations
Overarching MCPS Board of Education Policies:
8
The Culture of Respect:
Definitions for Clarification
Addressing Instances of Bullying and Hate Bias
9
10
Addressing Instances of Bullying and Hate-Bias
INCIDENT / Allegation made by student, staff member, parent/guardian, or bystander
MCPS FORM 230-35, Bullying, Harassment, or Intimidation Reporting Form �submitted to Principal/Designee
Victim(s) receive Supportive Measures and a Safety Plan
Emergency Communications Center (MCPD) contacted for incidents deemed potentially criminal
School Administration conducts investigation (if/when MCPD isn’t taking the case)
Parent/Guardian Communication
Behavioral Threat Assessment Team (BTAT) assembled to assess risk (when applicable)
MCPS FORM 230-36, Bullying, Harassment, or Intimidation Investigation Form �completed
Disciplinary Action taken in alignment with the Student Code of Conduct
Parent/Guardian Communication
(Provided outcomes to the extent possible per confidentiality)
RECORD KEEPING:
Update the incident report in Synergy,
Notify Student Welfare and Compliance (serious incidents)
Supportive Measures provided for all involved students (Including how to report subsequent incidents)
11
Addressing Instances of Bullying and Hate-Bias
Communicating Resources and Processes
12
Addressing Instances of Bullying and Hate-Bias
Why The Restorative Approach?
Building relationships and building community together can prevent or reduce incidents of bullying and harassment.
Restorative approaches allow students to:
13
Addressing Instances of Bullying and Hate-Bias
What Does It Look Like?- A Highlight
La Cultura Cura—Circle Keepers
Focus Co-Created Classroom Environments
14
Creating A Restorative School Community
Restorative Justice (RJ) Services Provided | |
Schools that have received direct services from RJ Specialists this year: | 103 |
Number of direct service events: | 1,088 |
Top 7 Services Provided | |
Consultation/Planning/Modeling | 29% |
Facilitate Professional Development | 19% |
Mindfulness/Wellness | 14% |
Individual Student Support | 11% |
Individual Teacher Support | 7% |
Mediation or Response to Event | 7% |
Parent Engagement/Support | 3% |
Restorative Justice District and School Evaluation Tools
As of January 31,2023 with �87 schools reporting:
15
Evaluating A Restorative School Community
Wellness Infrastructure: Student Well-Being �Teams, Bridge to Wellness,
and Data Monitoring
16
17
Wellness Infrastructure Update
Full
Implementation
Multi-Tiered System of Support
Student Well-Being Teams (SWBTs)
High School Social Workers
Bridge to Wellness Programs
Districtwide
Collaboration
Montgomery County Health and Human Services in support of Bridge to Wellness
18
Student Well-Being Teams in Action: Case Study
19
Wellness Infrastructure: Social Workers
Gender
By Grade Level
Top 6 Reasons Students Are Receiving Services:
Students Referred for Service
2,044 Serviced by Social Worker
2,604 Referrals from Student Well-Being Teams
444 to Bridge to Wellness
116 Other
32%
31%
18%
19%
9th
10th
11th
12th
57% 42% 1%
X
Unspecified/
Non-Binary
20
Students Referred for Service
493 Total Referrals Including Self-Referrals
444 Referrals from SWBT
Below Top 2 Topics:
Emotional Dysregulation
Trauma
36%
28%
14%
22%
9th
10th
11th
12th
By Grade Level
Top 6 Reasons Students Are Being Serviced:
Gender
39%
60%
1%
Wellness Infrastructure: Bridge to Wellness
X
Unspecified/
Non-Binary
21
Wellness Infrastructure: Synergy MTSS
Participants
Session Outcomes
Feedback
School Counselors | 346 |
Psychologists | 70 |
PPWs | 49 |
Social Workers | 28 |
Schools Represented | 210 |
Total Participants | 1,427 |
Modifications and updates based on training feedback from end users
Focus on SWBT framework to decrease variability of implementation across schools
Asynchronous modules to provide refresher trainings
For observation and evaluation of specific best practices look-fors
To support full SWBT/MTSS platform implementation at the start of the 2023-2024 school year.
Next Steps: SWBT and MTSS Synergy Platform
Platform Updates
MTSS Canvas Courses
Observation Tool
Summer Training
January 2023
August 2023
Professional Learning
22
Discussion