1 of 162

Vaccine essentials

Steve Kirsch�Executive Director

COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund�stk@treatearly.org

stevekirsch.substack.com Nov 18, 2021

1

2 of 162

Agenda

Safety

Efficacy

Masks

Mandates

Recovered immunity

Early treatments

Rule breakers

Corruption of science and medicine

Censorship

2

3 of 162

3

About me

Retired high-tech serial entrepreneur. Age 65.

�Started CETF which funded fluvoxamine, HCQ, camostat, ...studies. Featured on 60 Minutes.

Doubly vaxxed before learning my friends were dead/disabled after vaccination. Driven by data, not “popular opinion.”

Quit my company to focus 100% on saving lives.

Not a doctor so not subject to intimidation tactics.

No conflicts of interest. No history of misinformation spreading or conspiracy theories < May 25, 2021.

4 of 162

4

How to use this slide deck

Most all of the images are clickable and lead to the source study or data.

5 of 162

5

How science works

Create hypothesis.

See if the hypothesis can explain the data.

6 of 162

Which side is telling the truth?

The side that wants a debate.

6

7 of 162

7

Our claim

Our team’s hypothesis, that the vaccines are unsafe and largely ineffective, fits the data.

Their “safe and effective” hypothesis doesn’t. They don’t want to debate us. Even for $1M just to show up at the debate table (offered to members of the CDC and FDA external committee members). Nobody at the FDA, CDC, NIH, or any of the drug companies will debate us, even though it would reduce vaccine hesitancy (a key goal) if they won.

8 of 162

Safety

8

9 of 162

In the US, the vaccines kill more people than they are estimated to save

Killed: >150K1

Saved: ~10K2

9

1Estimating the number of vaccine deaths computes over 150K excess deaths due to the COVID vaccines 8 different ways.

2Pfizer’s 6 month phase 3 trials result clearly shows 1 life saved for every 22,000 full vaccinations. Since we’ve partially vaccinated almost 220M Americans, that’s at most 10,000 lives saved as of Oct 10, 2021. But that’s assuming the vaccines are as effective against Delta as they are against wild type virus. So it’s probably much less than 10,000 lives saved.

10 of 162

Vax is nonsensical �Killed > Saved for all ages

The table shows the numbers for Killed vs. Saved from COVID death over 6 months. Units for both columns are per million doses. The saved column assumes vaccines are 100% effective against projected COVID deaths over the 6 month efficacy period (the most optimistic scenario).

This article details how the numbers were calculated. Both columns are from US government data (VAERS and CDC) and subtract out background deaths.

Bottom line: It is nonsensical to vaccinate any age group.

10

Age

Killed

Saved

K:S

20-30

67

11

6.1:1

30-40

121

31

3.9:1

40-50

210

76

2.8:1

50-60

436

185

2.4:1

60-70

1031

450

2.3:1

70-80

2140

1133

1.9:1

80+

6276

3458

1.8:1

11 of 162

Killed > Saved validated in multiple papers published in the peer-reviewed medical literature

11

12 of 162

Estimated over 200,000 deaths based on VAERS reports.

Published in peer-reviewed medical journal.

12

13 of 162

High vaccination rate→high excess mortality validated in new study from Germany

(November 19, 2021)

13

14 of 162

Pfizer Phase 3: �6 month study result

Killed > Saved (10 > 1)

1 person’s life was saved from COVID by the vaccine (see Table S4 showing 2 COVID deaths in placebo vs. 1 COVID death in vaccine group), but at an estimated cost of 10 all-cause mortality excess deaths. Cardiac arrest was 4X higher in vaccine group (see Table S4).

14

Group

Vaccine

Placebo

Pre-unblind

21

17

Post-unblind

5

0

Total

26

17

See this article for the latest updated numbers in pre-unblinding phase (21 vs. 17, a 24% increase in deaths).

15 of 162

Killed > Saved validated in latest FDA report

(23.5% more deaths if got the vax vs. placebo)

15

16 of 162

Wait a second... weren’t the death rates in the UK supposed to go down after vaccination?!?

16

17 of 162

Wait a second... weren’t child deaths rates in the US supposed to go down after vaccination?!?

17

18 of 162

18

Vaccine as deadly as the virus

Admission that “the cure may be worse than the disease” by Taiwan health authorities.

Note: Not all deaths after vaccination are caused by the vaccine. Based on the VAERS data, we found that “only” 98% are caused by the vaccine. So deaths from both are comparable.

19 of 162

19

Odd how few infections in Asia before the vaccines rolled out

20 of 162

>800X deadlier than the smallpox vaccine1

The smallpox vaccine is considered much too deadly to use.

20

1Mathew Crawford’s analysis (which used government data from 35% of the world’s population) found 822 deaths per million fully vaccinated. Smallpox is 1 death per million vaccinated.

21 of 162

One of these vaccines is unsafe.

Can you spot which one?

(nobody at the FDA or CDC can, including the advisory committees!)

21

Note: These results cannot be explained by “over-reporting” because physician surveys say they are seeing >100X increase in adverse events with these vaccines. Nor can they be explained by “more people” were vaccinated this year vs. typical years.

22 of 162

One of these vaccines is unsafe.

Can you spot which one?

(This is the EU system. The same notes appy.)

22

23 of 162

High vaccine adverse events are not due to “over-reporting.” There are more events reported because there are more events occurring.

Small practice

750 patients�Reports in 29 years: 0�Reports this year: 25

Large practice

20,000 patients�Reports in 11 years: 0�Reports this year: 2,00011A more than 20,000X increase over the average year!

23

24 of 162

THE FDA SAYS THESE ARE ALL “BACKGROUND DEATHS”

But if they were background deaths, all the bars would be the same height!

24

The x-axis is days to onset. Note how the reports peak on the second day, and not the first day. This is consistent with the mechanism of action of the vaccine. It takes 24 hours for the spike protein production to reach peak production and begin to decline. The mRNA is mostly disintegrated after 48 hours, leaving just the spike protein on the cell surface.

25 of 162

The greater the number vaccinated, the higher the reported injuries.

25

26 of 162

Causality is crystal clear in the VAERS data for 5-11 year olds

26

27 of 162

These numbers are unprecedented.

More AEs than for all vaccines in the last 30 years combined!

NB: Multiply all numbers by 41 to get the actual count

27

28 of 162

For ages 5-11: Kill 117 → Save 1

28

Dr. Rogers is a specialist in risk-benefit analysis. Because he couldn’t find an accurate risk benefit analysis on the Internet, he did his own using CDC numbers and VAERS data extrapolated downward to the 5 to 11 age group.

29 of 162

29

The vaccines don’t just stay in your arm like a traditional vaccine.

The PEG coating enables them to go all over your body including your brain, heart, lungs, and blood vessels which can cause blot clots and inflammation everywhere. 50% have elevated D-dimer after vaccination.

Note that the liver, spleen, and adrenals distribution are not shown as these were all “expected.” This graph shows accumulation of the LNPs in the ovaries. This explains the huge number of adverse events in VAERS for women.

30 of 162

30

Menstrual issues are highly elevated by up to 8,800X vs. baseline.

CDC does not want you to know this

31 of 162

A list of some of the cardiac events in VAERS…

Tachycardia is 7,973X above baseline. �Cardiac failure is 475X above baseline rates.

31

32 of 162

Cardiac risk more than doubled after vaccination

32

33 of 162

Cardiac risk more than doubled after vaccination

33

34 of 162

Ask yourself if cardiac arrest is typical in 3 year olds just 1 day after vaccination?

34

35 of 162

While some claimed the Gundry results were just a talk abstract, more troubling is that the results are validated in the VAERS database AND were confirmed by other researchers. Sadly, they won’t publish because they would lose funding from drug companies.

35

36 of 162

36

There are more cardiac events in 2021 than 2019.

Note how the shape of the bars is not the same.

If this was just “over-reporting” the overall shape would be the same. It isn’t.

Chart prepared by Jessica Rose

37 of 162

37

60X higher rate of cardiac events on sports fields after vaccines rolled out. Why sports? Because the events are in plain sight of everyone! 100% reported.

The only viable explanation: caused by the vaccines. Nobody has any other explanation that fits the data.

38 of 162

38

“In October cardiac and circulatory events on the sportsfield went through the roof”

Unfortunately, nobody in public health appears to be interested in finding out why this is happening.

39 of 162

39

BROTHER AND SISTER BOTH DIE

within 2 months of each other, but only after being vaccinated.

This is very unlikely to have been caused by chance. Both died from cardiac arrest.

Cardiac arrest is elevated by 93X baseline in VAERS.

If it wasn’t the vaccine, what is the most likely cause?

40 of 162

40

Two cricket players down within 10 minutes of each other

Uncontrolled shaking in both.

Both were vaccinated on June 30, 2021. They both collapsed on Friday, July 2, just 48 hours after being vaccinated.

41 of 162

41

NBA star Brandon Goodwin

He’s done. Maybe forever.

42 of 162

42

Celine Dion

She’s done.

Likely forever.

Her symptoms are very familiar to the vaccine injured. The VAERS data shows women are twice as likely to get neurological symptoms than men.

43 of 162

Nursing home

Before vax: 240 people

After vax: 40 people

200 people died after the vax rollout. Killed 84% of the nursing home.

Watch the video starting at 23:25 for just 30 seconds.

If the vaccines are so safe, then how do you explain this??

43

44 of 162

The CDC is lying about “no deaths caused by the mRNA vaccines.”

Peter Schirmacher, one of the world’s top pathologists, did autopsies of 40 people who died after vaccination. He found that at least 30% to 40% of the deaths were caused by the vaccine. His work was later validated by other German pathologists who found even higher minimum percentages. The true percentage could be 100%. Schirmacher just set the floor.

Why can’t the CDC find a single death in over 18,000 cases worldwide?!?

44

45 of 162

Guess what the #1 most used vaccine is in Germany?

Yup. Pfizer.

Why can’t the CDC find a single death in over 18,000 cases worldwide?!?

45

46 of 162

Why didn’t the highly unusual causes of deaths in these 14 kids raise any red flags in the CDC 12-17 safety study?

12 of 14 deaths were “excess” (relative the normal number of deaths from other vaccines for that age range reported in VAERS). What caused all those excess deaths?

The vaccine of course, but the CDC wasn’t allowed to say that. They said NOTHING. They didn’t even acknowledge that 12 of the 14 deaths were excess. Right after that paragraph, they changed the topic.

46

47 of 162

Note: �Two dose calc: 1000000/((5.2+71.5)*41)=317 (note 41 is the under-reporting factor (URF). Note that the FDA and CDC refuse to calculate or disclose the URF and assume it is 1. There is no evidence to support that. We can prove it isn’t true. You can see the URF calculation here which uses the CDC’s approved methodology.

Reference: John Su, Safety update for COVID-19 vaccines: VAERS

1 in 317 boys (16-17) will get myocarditis from the vaccine.

41X higher than they claimed

(in order to save ~1 in a million kids from dying from COVID)

47

48 of 162

48

Is this what they mean by a “slightly elevated” risk of myocarditis?

49 of 162

49

Is this what they mean by a “slightly elevated” risk of myocarditis?

50 of 162

50

If it wasn’t the vaccine, how do you explain this?

14 years in ER and ICU. ��7 days after the vax available to 5-11 on Nov 10!

Deadly even at ⅓ the dose!

51 of 162

51

I wonder why newborn babies are suddenly dying in Scotland?

52 of 162

52

If it wasn’t the vaccine, how do you explain all these deaths from pulmonary haemorrhage for new born babies? This is a vaccine symptom!

53 of 162

Note: This is a comment from one of my followers on substack. He can be contacted here.

53

Way more myocarditis after the vax

(exactly the opposite of what the committees believe)

54 of 162

54

UK numbers clearly show more myocarditis cases after vaccine rollout.

Doctors believe the opposite. They don’t like looking at data like this.

55 of 162

55

So why do physicians think that the vaccines reduce the rates of myocarditis?

Because of articles like this one which completely fail to take into account that VAERS is under-reported by >41X

56 of 162

56

The reality

Myocarditis is >7X higher from the vaccine (=3157/450)

Rate per 1M �(infections or vaccinations)

Notes

COVID rate

450

Papers quote this for COVID.

# VAERS reports

77

Papers erroneously use the unadjusted counts (raw counts).

Estimated actual rate

3157

Actual event rate for vaccine (URF=41)

This table explains why: 1) cardiologists observe higher cases this year; 2) hospitals are increasing staffing in cardio and 3) the people who claim the reverse are always citing papers instead of cardiologists with patients

57 of 162

57

Damages DNA repair → increases risk of cancer

“Our findings… underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines.”

58 of 162

58

Should we ignore this data that the vaccines may be damaging us for life?

59 of 162

59

Hospitals are seeing more strokes and heart attacks

“Meanwhile, there has been an increase in people coming to the ER with more serious conditions, like strokes and heart attacks.”

60 of 162

Why are kids dropping like flies right after getting vaccinated? ��If they didn’t die from the vaccine, then what killed all these kids?

60

61 of 162

Very few kids got vaccinated before the EUA rolled out. Two of them died within days of the shot, both from cardiac issues.

62 of 162

Adults are dying “unexpectedly” of “unknown causes”

63 of 162

Hospitals are preparing for a rapid rise in cardiac cases. Why?

64 of 162

The only child of Ernest Ramirez was killed by the Pfizer vaccine on April 24, just 5 days after his first dose according to one of the world’s top cardiologists.

Ernest tried to notify the CDC of the death, but the CDC hasn’t called him back yet (7 months later). How do you explain that?

64

65 of 162

65

Another child paralysis…

You just never hear of these stories since they are never covered by the press.

It doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.

66 of 162

66

Deaths of teenage boys up 63%

How do you explain these headlines?!?

67 of 162

67

All cause mortality is up for the vaccinated groups and down for the unvaccinated.

It is supposed to be the reverse.

68 of 162

68

If these vaccines are so safe...

then why do they need the liability protection?!?!

69 of 162

How can excess deaths in the US be through the roof?!?!

Surely, the CDC is on the case. What is the cause????

Answer: Silence.

69

70 of 162

Whoops! Data from Scotland shows you’re 5X more likely to die if you get COVID and are vaccinated.

So why are they telling people the reverse?

70

71 of 162

Computing the VAERS URF

We used the method defined by the CDC, the anaphylaxis rates reported in the Blumenthal study in JAMA both shown here. Then we compare with the incidence rate of anaphylaxis in VAERS before the Blumenthal paper was published. We’ve vaccinated 97.5M people from the start thru March 2021 and there were 583 reports in VAERS who had an anaphylaxis reaction on their first dose. Using the MGH numbers with our own VAERS queries, we have 247 cases per million doses from the MGH study divided by 5.97 cases per million doses from VAERS. 247/5.97 = 41

Source: Estimating the number of COVID vaccine deaths in America (63 pages)

Rate of anaphylaxis was 2.47 per 10,000 doses

71

72 of 162

Validated it 12 other ways

All of these methods yielded excess death estimates of 150,000 or more

Source: Estimating the number of COVID vaccine deaths in America for the details on all 12 methods

  1. Excess CFR analysis
  2. Excess death analysis
  3. Small island study
  4. Norway data
  5. Poll #1
  6. Poll #2
  7. Doctor survey
  8. Pilot data (British Airways)
  9. Scotland data
  10. Columbia university excess death analysis using public datasets from US and Europe
  11. Indiana insurance company excess death rate 40% increase in 18 - 64 year-olds
  12. Pfizer 6 month trial all-cause mortality data (21 vs. 17)

72

73 of 162

Efficacy

73

74 of 162

74

Efficacy is a red herring.

Discussing efficacy for a deadly vaccine!?!

They want to shift the conversation to efficacy because the data is more confusing because they can point to studies that make it appear that the vaccine works like the one pictured here.

NOTE: There is a big difference in showing the vaccines prevent death from COVID vs. causing death from all-cause mortality (ACM). Many people don’t understand the distinction. The article pictured is the former. The previous section was the latter. See the difference?

75 of 162

75

The vaccines haven’t performed very well.

All-cause mortality is increased in every age group.

Click the image to read the entire thread

76 of 162

76

Latest research suggests zero efficacy

From Mathew Crawford’s These Vaccines are Ineffective

77 of 162

77

Ireland latest numbers

Vaccination makes you more likely to die if you get COVID.

Ireland numbers:

58% ICU vaxxed

100% dead vaxxed

78 of 162

78

Vaccination is useless. When are we going to figure this out?!?

The team is 100% vaccinated and it made no difference.

Half the team was likely naturally immune already.

79 of 162

79

The line is supposed to slope the other way!

Data is from 68 countries and 2,947 American counties

The vaccines do not work.

They are making things worse, not better.

80 of 162

80

Wait a second…

Weren’t vaccines supposed to make it less likely you’ll be infected?!?

81 of 162

81

Wait a second…

Weren’t vaccines supposed to make it less likely you’ll be infected?!?

82 of 162

Negative VE (UK government data on vaccine efficacy (VE)). It makes things worse.

82

83 of 162

Vaccine makes absolutely no difference on viral load

UCSF/UC Davis PCR study

An earlier study from Singapore showed that the virus began to clear faster (but only after 5 days), but the UCSF study (which sampled at random times) did not confirm that result.

83

84 of 162

This study from Singapore shows vaccinated patients clear the virus faster, but only after they’re most likely to have spread it!

84

85 of 162

Wait a second. I thought you said that vaccines are supposed to help you not get infected? This shows if you got vaccinated in the past you’re more likely to get the virus than an unvaccinated person.

85

86 of 162

How can they cancel Christmas in Gibraltar?!?

The vaccination rate there is >118% (they vaccinate people from Spain who come to Gibraltar to work).

86

87 of 162

Masks

87

88 of 162

Face mask historical timeline

Prior to COVIDFor decades, studies have shown that face masks don’t work against respiratory virus epidemics.

2020March 8: Fauci says masks don’t work (interview on 60 Minutes). “People should not be walking around with masks.”

April 3: The CDC issued guidance recommending that non-medical face coverings be worn in public.

May: CDC publishes paper showing masks don’t work in either direction.

May 27: Interview with CNN, Fauci urged Americans to wear face masks in public

Sept 16: Dr. Redfield, CDC head, says “if we wear masks for 12 weeks, we’d bring this pandemic under control.” He said that face masks are more effective than a vaccine.

2021

Jan 20: Biden signs order requiring face masks to be used.

88

89 of 162

The medical journals distort the science

Science says masks don’t work. They’ve never worked for respiratory viruses.

The CDC says masks don’t work for smoke. The virus is 25X smaller than smoke.

When they did the first major study of masks against COVID in Denmark, the scientists found that masks made things worse. But the journals refused to publish the finding unless it was changed to fit the popular narrative. They changed the conclusion so it didn’t match the data and their study was published. This is documented in this Editor’s Choice article in the BMJ.

89

90 of 162

CDC journal: Masks don’t work in EITHER direction

"We did not find evidence that surgical-type face masks are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility."

90

This was a meta-analysis of research all the way back to 1946. It didn’t include the 1919 paper by W.H. Kellogg of the Calif State Board of Health that masks were useless in stopping the Spanish flu.

A 2015 RCT which showed that cloth masks promoted more flu-like infections was excluded.

91 of 162

Two recent arbitration cases decided masks do not work at all. The laws of physics are still the same today as they were in 2018.

September 10, 2015

James Hayes, a neutral arbitrator, issued a 136-page ruling saying that hospitals could not make nurses wear masks. The “scientific evidence said to support the [mask mandate] on patient safety grounds is insufficient,” he wrote.

September 6, 2018�Arbitrator William Kaplan agreed with Hayes, calling the evidence for mask mandates “insufficient, inadequate, and completely unpersuasive.” As he wrote in his ruling, “The preponderance of the masking evidence is compelling—surgical and procedural masks are extremely limited in terms of source control: they do not prevent the transmission of the influenza virus.”

Note: Flu and COVID are roughly the same size and are transmitted the same way. Masks didn’t work in either direction.

Source:

Berenson, Alex. Pandemia: How Coronavirus Hysteria Took Over Our Government, Rights, and Lives (pp. 185-186). Regnery Publishing.

91

92 of 162

NEJM says masking does nothing. It is a reflex reaction to anxiety.

As late as April 1, physicians writing in the New England Journal of Medicine—the most prestigious health care publication in the United States—explained, “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection…. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”14

Source:

Berenson, Alex. Pandemia: How Coronavirus Hysteria Took Over Our Government, Rights, and Lives (pp. 185-186). Regnery Publishing.

92

93 of 162

93

94 of 162

The Bangladesh study was the nail in the coffin for mask efficacy

94

Mask proponents proclaimed that the Bangladesh mask study PROVED masks worked.

But none of these experts looked closely at the study! As soon as they saw the result they wanted to see, they hailed the study as definitive!

Except for one tiny little problem: if you actually look at the underlying data, it proved masks did not work at all.

Read this analysis by UC Berkeley Professor Ben Recht Revisiting the Bangladesh Mask RCT and The cult of statistical significance and the Bangladesh Mask RCT (Nov 29, 2021)

95 of 162

Mandates

95

96 of 162

96

Then vaccine mandates are pointless

Are COVID vaccines effective and safe?

YES

NO

97 of 162

97

“Once again publicly available data demonstrate that vaccines are not reducing infectivity or transmission, 2 of the main criteria for an injection to be considered a vaccine. Public health officials are brazenly proclaiming these embarrassing facts, while at the same time continuing to parrot the mantra to get vaccinated and stop the spread.

At this point, anyone with a working brain can see that whatever the vaccine mandate push is for, that it is not about public health and stopping the transmission of COVID.”

-- Dr. Chris Martenson

98 of 162

98

"Imagine a vaccine so safe you have to be threatened to take it -- for a disease so deadly you have to be tested to know you have it!!"

99 of 162

99

COVID vaccine mandates are necessary because the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn't protect the protected.

100 of 162

100

Considering a mandate? Take 10 minutes to read this remarkable speech first.

“I have no doubt that COVID-19 is the greatest threat to humanity we have ever faced; not because of a virus; … but because of our response to it.”

101 of 162

Why are we mandating a vaccine that is deadly and largely ineffective?!?

101

102 of 162

Recovered immunity

102

103 of 162

CDC admits�Recovered can’t spread the virus

103

104 of 162

New Harvard study confirms the CDC admission: recovered can’t spread the virus.

104

105 of 162

Early treatments

105

106 of 162

If you treat early with a combinations of drugs such as the Fareed-Tyson protocol you can

reduce hospitalization by 99.76% and death by nearly 100%��for all variants with no risk of death or disability. NIH totally ignores this.

106

Dr. George Fareed

107 of 162

Look what happened to COVID hospitalization rates when Japan adopted Ivermectin.

Hmmm… wonder what caused that?

107

108 of 162

Just taking aspirin after getting sick reduces your chance of being hospitalized by over 40%

108

109 of 162

Fluvoxamine alone

has far greater death benefit than any of the vaccines

Reduces risk of death by 92%... Turns COVID into the flu.

By contrast, Pfizer’s own study showed only a 50% death benefit. Fluvoxamine is 6X better.

109

110 of 162

But they don’t want you to know any of that

110

111 of 162

Every early treatment that works is ignored

(unless it comes from big pharma)

111

112 of 162

Because they need �you to believe that �mass vaccination is the ONLY way out

112

113 of 162

This is why doctors look the other way at the data.

They truly believe the vaccine is the only way out because they trust the CDC.

113

114 of 162

...even when the data shows the vaccines make the problem worse.

Their solution: boosters!

114

115 of 162

Early treatment benefits

No masking

No social distancing

No more lockdowns

No more mandates

Broader immunity

Herd immunity

115

116 of 162

Early treatment benefits

  1. Higher relative risk reduction for all variants (over 99%)
  2. Simple prophylaxis protocols be used to prevent infection with up to 100% success without the use of any drugs whatsoever
  3. Greater safety (minor temporary side effects, known safety profile)
  4. They lower both all-cause mortality and all-cause morbidity
  5. They work equally well on all variants
  6. They do not promote escape variants
  7. They do not cause vaccine enhanced infectivity/replication
  8. They do not risk original antigenic sin (linked-epitope suppression)
  9. They do not cause prion diseases
  10. They prevent long-haul COVID syndrome nearly 100% of the time
  11. They enable people to acquire recovered immunity which is up to 27X stronger and more durable than vaccine-induced immunity

116

117 of 162

117

118 of 162

118

ASK YOURSELF

Have you ever heard of anyone who got treated early with a proven early treatment protocol ever die from COVID?

Dr. George Fareed has treated over 7,000 COVID patients. 0 deaths for anyone who got treated early.

The one thing all the people in the hospital for COVID today have in common is none of them were treated early with a proven early treatment protocol such as the Fareed-Tyson protocol with a 99.76% risk reduction for hospitalization and no deaths or disabilities from the treatment or COVID. It works equally well for all variants.

Rochelle Walensky will never say that. They won’t call Fareed. Ever.

119 of 162

119

WHY IS THE NIH IGNORING ALL THE DATA?

There is no question, benefits >> risks for dozens of interventions.

If there is an effective treatment with repurposed drugs, can’t get an EUA for the vaccines.

This is why George Fareed never got a return phone call.

The objective of NIH is NOT saving lives. The objective of the NIH is to make money for big Pharma.

120 of 162

The rule breakers

120

121 of 162

Uttar Pradesh is now COVID-free

They used early treatments.

Vaccination rates there are miniscule (now 11%).

121

122 of 162

Kerala by contrast...

The Indian state of Kerala has 3% of India's population, and 67% of its inhabitants have at least one vaccination. One would expect Kerala's COVID cases to be so low as to be invisible in a chart of India's very low overall cases. Yet this state of just 33 million people accounted for 65% of all of India's cases on Thursday, and even more in recent weeks. It has essentially been the only state experiencing a surge in recent months. It also happens to be the Indian state that has rejected ivermectin.

Source: Horowitz: Heavily vaccinated state accounts for 65% of India’s COVID cases after rejecting ivermectin

122

123 of 162

123

Mandates encourage bad behavior

Mandates require you to vaccinate. But that’s the worst possible strategy because then you can spread the virus for life.

The virus is endemic. You are going to get it sooner or later. So there is no benefit to delaying since we have treatments that are 100% effective in keeping you out of the hospital.

If you get naturally infected, when you recover, you can’t spread the virus which the CDC was privately forced to admit.

If we ever want to end the pandemic and get to herd immunity, recovered immunity is exactly what we want and vaccination is exactly the wrong way to get there.

Aaron Rodgers did exactly the right thing for himself, his team, and for society. He’s the model. He contributes to herd immunity. His teammates do not.

124 of 162

124

November 7, 2021

125 of 162

How do we know masking, vaccination, testing are useless?

Because people who ignore the rules don’t do worse health wise. Congregation increased 3X in size.

125

126 of 162

The Gym Maui tripled membership after ignoring mandates. Nobody left.

126

127 of 162

Corruption

127

128 of 162

128

Health experts are ignoring the elephant in the room

129 of 162

129

Forced vaccination using a known deadly vaccine is a corrupt. We are next.

November 19, 2021

130 of 162

130

California Governor

Gavin Newsom

Got booster. Dropped from sight for 12 days after due to GBS. Claimed no injury.

He’s lying. I offered him $5M to disclose his vaccine-related medical records or produce a blank paper if he’s being honest. No response!

He’s mandating that you and your kids get injured too. He won’t allow his kids to get vaccinated, but he mandates it for your kids.

131 of 162

131

Doctor commits suicide over vax genocide

When was the last time you saw this happening for a safe vaccine?

132 of 162

132

We don’t seem to learn from our mistakes

From 1936, nearly 100 years ago.

133 of 162

133

Ivermectin for COVID has multiple peer-reviewed published meta-analysis + systematic reviews.

This is the highest level of evidence in evidence-based medicine.

134 of 162

134

This paper by Jessica Rose was unethically withdrawn by the publisher because they didn’t like what it said that myocarditis is far more widespread than the CDC said.

“Withdrawn” is used when the author withdraws the paper!?!

135 of 162

“The FDA’s risk-benefit analysis in connection with Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application to inject children ages 5 to 11 with their COVID-19 vaccine is one of the shoddiest documents I’ve ever seen.

—Dr. Toby Rogers

135

136 of 162

136

Why do scientists have to sue the FDA to see the Pfizer data?

137 of 162

137

“You want to see the data?! No problem! We’ll have it ready for you in 55 years!”

138 of 162

138

How can a kid who was in the Pfizer 12-15 year-old trial be paralyzed (likely for life) and not have that reported in the trial report to the FDA?

How can you approve a vaccine for < 12 when you haven’t yet investigated the 12-15 year old safety?

The FDA promised to investigate. They did nothing. Nobody investigated. Why?

139 of 162

139

Why didn’t anyone ask any questions about the gaming in the Pfizer Phase 3 trial?!? This didn’t happen by chance (p.< 0.00001). Number excluded >> effect size! Nobody said a word except my team members.

140 of 162

140

Serious adverse event data was gamed in the trials

Vaccine safer than placebo?!? Impossible!

141 of 162

141

Whoops!

Pfizer gets caught cheating on the safety data.

Nobody cares.

142 of 162

142

The definitive podcast on Pfizer trial cheating. Dr. David Wiseman pulls no punches in this interview. Highly recommended

143 of 162

143

Dr. Boaz Lev, Head of Israel MTE claimed that he had never heard of the VAERS numbers.

Truly stunning.

(80 seconds)

144 of 162

144

This is why nobody dies from the vaccine

145 of 162

145

Two-faced doctors

Publicly they must endorse the vaccine

Privately they say do not use

146 of 162

146

This is why doctors don’t warn their patients: �Fear of losing their license

147 of 162

147

Why the medical community reacts very slowly

Note that the author requested anonymity for fear of retribution

148 of 162

Censorship

148

149 of 162

Even for $1M, they won’t answer any questions. Not one.

149

150 of 162

150

151 of 162

151

Censorship

“Removed for violating community guidelines”

Please click the image and hear what the author had to say.

152 of 162

152

Deborah Conrad

18 year physician assistant. Fired just days after speaking out.

She couldn’t get any of her questions answered either. “Just do as your told.”

Watch the interview

153 of 162

153

Safety: Vax 100x more lethal than COVID

154 of 162

154

Hospitals

“Our way or the highway”

155 of 162

Summary

155

156 of 162

156

SUMMARY

  1. Vaccines are both unsafe and ineffective. Everyone should AVOID.
  2. The vaccinated are as contagious as the unvaccinated. Only people with recovered immunity stop the virus from spreading.
  3. Mask wearing is useless.
  4. Mandates are counter-productive and unethical.
  5. Vaccination with a non-sterilizing vaccine in the middle of a pandemic is dangerous; the worst possible solution.
  6. If you get COVID, treat with an early treatment protocol.
  7. Mitigation measures aren’t needed; we’ll all get it anyway. Focus should be on early treatment + natural immunity.
  8. Early treatment is the only way to get to zero COVID. It is better on every metric.

Nobody will debate us because they can’t defend their positions when faced with the facts.

The one thing every hospitalized COVID patient has in common: they didn’t use a proven early treatment protocol.

157 of 162

157

FOLLOW ME

Substack�stevekirsch.substack.com

Gab

stkirsch

158 of 162

158

FOR MORE INFO

See the Vaccine article on skirsch.io

It has links to everything, including this presentation

159 of 162

Appendix

159

160 of 162

160

Let’s be clear… it’s not about the science

161 of 162

Pfizer’s stunning admission

Myocarditis rates are at least 4.8X worse than the FDA is telling us due to this proof that VAERS is at least 4.8X underreported (since Optum reported 4.8X higher rates than VAERS)

161

162 of 162

My popular slide decks

The elephant in the room

Vaccine Essentials

All you need to know

Vaccine policies

Read until you are convinced

162