1 of 72

Short-cut demand elasticities

byKen Clements*

Economics, UWA

August 2025

Abstract

Suppose you don’t know the price elasticity of demand but need some value. The rule of ½ states that the elasticity is equal to -½. This presentation

(i) highlights the precise conditions under which the rule holds,

(ii) indicates its practical importance, and

(iii) points to related results on simplifications of demand elasticities.

When nothing much is known about the elasticity, -½ is likely to be a good starting point for certain types of goods.

1

*This is mostly based on the book by K. W. Clements, H. Liu, J. M. Mariano, E. A. Selvanathan, S. Selvanathan and G. Verikios (2025), Short-cut demand elasticities and other convenient approaches to consumer demand (Springer). In addition to my co-authors of the book, for helpful comments and support, I also thank Simon Chang, Shawn Xiaoguang Chen, Tom Hertel, Haiyan Liu, Anda Nugroho and seminar participants at UWA.

2 of 72

Booze consumption

Price elasticities of demand, imported booze, USA:

2

Source: A. Muhammad (2025). “Trump Tariffs 2.0: Assessing the Impacts on US Distilled Spirits Imports.” Agribusiness, 1-7

3 of 72

Own-price elasticities around - ½

3

4 of 72

Small cross-price elasticities

4

5 of 72

Trouble-makers

5

6 of 72

Simplifications in 3 steps

6

7 of 72

Step II

7

8 of 72

Step III

8

9 of 72

Trouble-makers undisturbed

9

10 of 72

Payoff from simplification

  •  

10

11 of 72

Rule of ½�Price elasticities = -½

  •  

11

12 of 72

Utility and demands

  •  

12

13 of 72

More familiar elasticity form

  •  

13

14 of 72

Preference independence

  •  

14

 

15 of 72

Three (very) different economists�What’s the link?

15

Arthur Pigou

1877-1959

Milton Friedman

1912-2006

Henry Schultz

1893-1938

16 of 72

Early contributors to �preference independence

  • Pigou (1910). “A method of determining the numerical value of the elasticities of demand.” Economic Journal

16

17 of 72

Early contributors to �preference independence

  • Pigou (1910). “A method of determining the numerical value of the elasticities of demand.” Economic Journal
  • Friedman (1935). “Professor Pigou’s method for measuring elasticities of demand from budgetary data.” Quarterly Journal of Economics

17

18 of 72

Early contributors to �preference independence

  • Pigou (1910). “A method of determining the numerical value of the elasticities of demand.” Economic Journal
  • Friedman (1935). “Professor Pigou’s method for measuring elasticities of demand from budgetary data.” Quarterly Journal of Economics
  • Schultz (1938). The theory and measurement of demand. University of Chicago Press.

18

19 of 72

Pigou’s law, �price and income elasticities linked

  • Price elasticities are proportional to income elasticities
  • Luxuries are more price elastic than necessities
  • Puzzling? Income and price elasticities deal with different dimensions of the good
  • Common usage of language:

Salt – essential (few substitutes) and viewed as a necessity (low income elasticity)

Foreign vacation -- not essential and not a necessity

19

 

20 of 72

Elasticity = ½�in two more steps

  •  

20

21 of 72

Summary of rule of ½

  •  

21

22 of 72

 

  1. Time-series, multiple countries
  2. Cross-commodity regressions
  3. Prior studies/surveys

22

23 of 72

 

  •  

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24 of 72

Preference independent Rotterdam

  •  

24

25 of 72

Preference independent Rotterdam

  •  

25

26 of 72

 

  •  

26

27 of 72

 

27

Mean = - 0.59

Median = - 0.46

 

28 of 72

 

  •  

28

29 of 72

 

 

29

Centre of gravity not too far from -½, but note dispersion

30 of 72

 

  • Prior studies/surveys
  • Mostly centred around -½
  • But still not completely settled
  • Details in Appendix

30

31 of 72

 

  •  

31

32 of 72

Possible objections

  •  

32

33 of 72

Objection 1: �No necessities, no luxuries

  •  

33

34 of 72

Response 1:�Allowing for necessities & luxuries

  •  

34

35 of 72

Objection 2: �Micro goods not preference independent

  •  

35

36 of 72

Response 2:�Aggregate micro goods into groups

  •  

36

37 of 72

Direct evidence

  •  

37

38 of 72

Price elasticities, �broad aggregates

38

39 of 72

Sources of elasticities

Beer, wine and spirits

Clements, Mariano, Verikios and Wong (2022). “How Elastic is Alcohol Consumption?” Economic Analysis and Policy

Elder, Lawrence, Ferguson, Naimi, Brewer, Chattopadhyay, Toomey and Fielding (2010). “The Effectiveness of Tax Policy Interventions for Reducing Excessive Alcohol Consumption and Related Harms.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Fogarty (2010). “The Demand for Beer, Wine and Spirits: A Survey of the Literature.” Journal of Economic Surveys

Gallet (2007). “The Demand for Alcohol: A Meta-Analysis of Elasticities.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Nelson (2013a). “Robust Demand Elasticities for Wine and Distilled Spirits: Meta-Analysis with Corrections for Outliers and Publication Bias.” Journal of Wine Economics

Nelson (2013b). “Meta-Analysis of Alcohol Price and Income Elasticities – with Corrections for Publication Bias.” Health Economics Review

Nelson (2014). “Estimating the Price Elasticity of Beer: Meta-Analysis of Data with Heterogeneity, Dependence, and Publication Bias.” Journal of Health Economics

Selvanathan and Selvanathan (2005). The Demand for Alcohol, Tobacco and Marijuana: International Evidence

Sornpaisarn, Shield, Cohen, Schwartz and Rehm (2013). “Elasticity of Alcohol Consumption, Alcohol-Related Harms, and Drinking Initiation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research

Wagenaar, Salois and Komro (2009). “Effects of Beverage Alcohol Price and Tax Levels on Drinking: A Meta‐Analysis of 1003 Estimates from 112 Studies.” Addiction

Water

Dalhuisen, Florax, de Groot, and Nijkamp (2003). “Price and Income Elasticities of Residential Water Demand: A Meta-Analysis.” Land Economics

Espey, Espey and Shaw (1997). “Price Elasticity of Residential Demand for Water: A Meta-Analysis.” Water Resources Research

Cigarettes

Gallet and List (2003). “Cigarette Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Elasticities.” Health Economics

Petrol

Espey (1996). “Explaining the Variation in Elasticity Estimates of Gasoline Demand in the United States: A Meta-Analysis.” Energy Journal

Espey (1998). “Gasoline Demand Revisited: An International Meta-Analysis of Elasticities.” Energy Economics

Goodwin, Dargay and Hanly (2004). “Elasticities of Road Traffic and Fuel Consumption with Respect to Price and Income: A Review.” Transport Reviews

Graham and Glaister (2002). “Review of Income and Price Elasticities of Demand for Road Traffic.” Working Paper, Imperial College

Electricity

Espey and Espey (2004). “Turning on the Lights: A Meta-Analysis of Residential Electricity Demand Elasticities.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics

39

40 of 72

Micro products more elastic

40

Source: Tellis (1988). “The Price Elasticity of Selected Demand: A Meta-analysis of Econometric Models of Sales.” Journal of Marketing Research

41 of 72

Wrap up, rule of ½

  • Idiot’s law of elasticities (Dawkins, Srinivasan and Whalley, 2001)
  • “All elasticities are 1 until someone shows them to be otherwise, or ‘coffee-table elasticities’ where informal discussions and opinions around the coffee table determine whether a value of, say, ½ or 2 is chosen.”
  • ½ has more than a coffee-table, let alone an idiot’s, pedigree
  • Qualifications to rule ½:

(i) Applicable to broad aggregates only

(ii) ½ a guideline, not a law

(iii) Based on approximations

“Approximations are the soul of science” (von Neumann)

41

42 of 72

Linear expenditure system

42

 

43 of 72

Under-appreciated problem:�LES and food

  •  

43

44 of 72

Under-appreciated problem:�LES and food

  •  

44

Food luxury for rich!

45 of 72

WarningLES income elasticities

  •  

45

46 of 72

One solution:�Piecewise LES

  • Piecewise linear approximation to underlying nonlinear Engel curves
  • Estimate LES for each income quintile separately
  • Data: Australian Household Expenditure Survey 2015-16. Representative sample of 10,000 households

46

47 of 72

Food and income �quintile LES, Australia HES

47

48 of 72

Food and income �quintile LES, Australia HES

48

49 of 72

Food and income �quintile LES, Australia HES

49

50 of 72

Food and income �quintile LES, Australia HES

50

51 of 72

CGE applications

  •  

51

52 of 72

Thanks for your attention

52

53 of 72

References

Below is a list of references for the presentation, as well useful sources on applied demand analysis.

Barten, A. P. (1964). “Consumer Demand Functions under Conditions of Almost Additive Preferences.” Econometrica 32: 1-38.

Bewley, R. A. (1986). Allocation Models: Specification, Estimation and Applications. Ballinger.

Baumol, W. J. (1952). “The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 66: 545-56.

Brown, A., and A. Deaton (1972). “Surveys in Applied Economics: Models of Consumer Behaviour.” Economic Journal 82: 1145-236.

Clements, K. W. (2008). “Price Elasticities of Demand are Minus One-Half.” Economics Letters 99: 490-93.

Clements, K. W., H. Liu, J. M. Mariano, E. A. Selvanathan, S. Selvanathan and G. Verikios (2025). Short-cut Demand Elasticities and other Convenient Approaches to Consumer Demand. Springer.

Clements, K. W., and J. Si (2017). “Notes on the Pattern of OECD Consumption.” Unpublished working paper, UWA Business School.

Clements, K. W., and J. Si (2018). “Divisia and Frisch are Friends.” UWA Economics Discussion Paper 18-05.

Clements, K. W., J. Si, E. A. Selvanathan and S. Selvanathan (2020). “Demand Elasticities for 9 Goods in 37 Countries.” Applied Economics 52: 2636-55.

Dawkins, C., T. Srinivasan and J. Whalley (2001). “Calibration.” In J. J. Heckman and E. Leamer (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 5. Elsevier.

Deaton, A. S. (1974). “A Reconsideration of the Empirical Implications of Additive Preferences.” Economic Journal 84: 338-48.

53

54 of 72

References (cont’d)

Deaton, A. S., and J. Muellbauer (1980). Economics and Consumer Behaviour. Cambridge University Press.

Friedman, M. (1935). “Professor Pigou's Method for Measuring Elasticities of Demand from Budgetary Data.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 50: 151-63.

Frisch, R. (1959). “A Complete Scheme for Computing All Direct and Cross Demand Elasticities in a Model with Many Sectors.” Econometrica 27: 177-96.

Frisch, R. (1932). New Methods of Measuring Marginal Utility. J. C. B. Mohr.

Goldberger, A. S. (1987). Functional Form and Utility: A Review of Consumer Demand Theory. Westview Press.

Gorman, W. M. (1959). “Separability Utility and Aggregation.” Econometrica 27: 469-81.

Houthakker, H. S. (1957). “An International Comparison of Household Expenditure Patterns, Commemorating the Centenary of Engel’s Law.” Econometrica 25: 532-51.

Houthakker, H. S. (1960). “Additive Preferences.” Econometrica 28: 244-57.

Lluch, C., A. A. Powell and R. A. Williams (1977). Patterns in Household Demand and Savings. Oxford University Press.

Muhammad, A. (2025). “Trump Tariffs 2.0: Assessing the Impacts on US Distilled Spirits Imports.” Agribusiness: 1-7.

Pigou, A. C. (1910). “A Method of Determining the Numerical Value of Demand Elasticities.” Economic Journal 20: 636-40.

54

55 of 72

References (cont’d)

Pollak, R. A., and T. J. Wales (1992). Demand System Specification and Estimation. Oxford University Press.

Powell, A. A. (1974). Empirical Analytics of Demand Systems. DC Heath.

Selvanathan, S. (1993). A System-Wide Analysis of International Consumption Patterns. Kluwer.

Stone, R. (1954). “Linear Expenditure Systems and Demand Analysis: An Application to the Pattern of British Demand.” Economic Journal 64: 511-27.

Tellis, G. J. (1988). “The Price Elasticity of Selected Demand: A Meta-analysis of Econometric Models of Sales.” Journal of Marketing Research 25: 331–41.

Theil, H. (1965). “The Information Approach to Demand Analysis.” Econometrica 33: 67-87.

Theil, H. (1975/76). Theory and Measurement of Consumer Demand. Two Volumes. North-Holland.

Theil, H. (1980). The System-Wide Approach to Microeconomics. The University of Chicago Press.

Tobin, J. (1956). “The Interest Elasticity of the Transactions Demand for Cash.” Review of Economics and Statistics 38: 241-47.

55

56 of 72

This contains elaborations of the material in the main slides and some further results. Optional reading!

Appendix

56

57 of 72

57

Glossary and key results, demand analysis and ½

Symbol/Result

Meaning

Utility function

Income flexibility, the reciprocal of the income elasticity of the marginal utility of income

58 of 72

58

Table 1. SUMMARY OF MAJOR CONCEPTS

Glossary and key results, LES

Symbol/Equation

Meaning/Name

Constraints

  1. Notation

 

Price of good i

 

Total expenditure, “income” for short

 

Budget share of i

  1. Expenditure System

 

Cost of subsistence of i

Marginal share of i

Supernumerary income

(Continued next page)

59 of 72

59

Glossary and key results, LES (cont’d)

Symbol/Equation

Meaning/Name

Constraints

  1. Demand elasticities

Income elasticity of i

  1. Uncompensated price elasticities with positive gammas

Uncompensated own-price elasticity

Uncompensated cross-price elasticity

(Continued next page)

60 of 72

60

Glossary and key results, LES (cont’d)

Symbol/Equation

Meaning/Name

Constraints

  1. Compensated price elasticities with positive gammas 

Compensated own-price elasticity

Compensated cross-price elasticity

  1. Utility

Stone-Geary utility

Marginal utility of income

Frisch parameter -- income elasticity of marginal utility of income

61 of 72

Measurement of income flexibility 𝜙

  •  

61

 

 

62 of 72

 

  •  

62

63 of 72

Linear expenditure system

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

64 of 72

Lluch, Powell and Williams (1977),� influential book

  •  

64

65 of 72

LES and Frisch

  •  

65

Source: Lluch et al. (1977, p. 77).

Source: Lluch et al. (1977, p. 77).

66 of 72

Some weaknesses with LES

  •  

66

67 of 72

 

  •  

67

68 of 72

 

  •  

68

69 of 72

½ and monetary economics

  •  

69

70 of 72

Price stabilisation and ½

  •  

70

71 of 72

References for appendix

Acland, D., and D. H. Greenberg (2023). “The Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Income for Distributional Weighting and Social Discounting: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 14: 386-405.

Arrow, K. J., H. B. Chenery, B. S. Minhas and R. M. Solow (1961). “Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency.” Review of Economics and Statistics 43: 225-50.

Brown, A., and A. Deaton (1972). “Surveys in Applied Economics: Models of Consumer Behaviour.” Economic Journal 82: 1145-236.

Chen, D. L. (1999). World Consumption Economics. World Scientific.

Clements, K. W., H. Liu, J. M. Mariano, E. A. Selvanathan, S. Selvanathan and G. Verikios (2025). Short-cut Demand Elasticities and other Convenient Approaches to Consumer Demand. Springer.

Clements K. W., M. J. Mariano and G. Verikios (2022). “Expenditure Patterns, Heterogeneity, and Long-term Structural Change.” Economic Modelling. 113: 105888.

DeJanvry, A., J. Bieri and A. Nunez (1972). “Estimation of Demand Parameters Under Consumer Budgeting: An Application to Argentina.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54: 422-30.

Evans, D. J. (2005). “The Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Consumption: Estimates for 20 OECD Countries.” Fiscal Studies 26: 197-224.

Frisch, R. (1959). “A Complete Scheme for Computing All Direct and Cross Demand Elasticities in a Model with Many Sectors.” Econometrica 27: 177-96.

Gao, G. (2012). The Economic Behaviour of Seven Billion Consumers: Food, Functional Form and Quality. PhD thesis, The University of Western Australia.

71

72 of 72

References for appendix (cont’d)

Groom, B., and D. Maddison (2019). “New Estimates of the Elasticity of Marginal Utility for the UK.” Environmental and Resource Economics 72: 1155-82.

Hjertstrand, P. (2025). “The Marginal Utility of Income and Homogeneous Demand Systems.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 229: 106853.

Layard, R., G., Mayraz and S. Nickell (2008). “The Marginal Utility of Income.” Journal of Public Economics 92: 1846-57.

Lluch, C., A. A. Powell and R. A. Williams (1977). Patterns in Household Demand and Savings. Oxford University Press.

Newbery, D. M. G., and J. E. Stiglitz (1981). The Theory of Price Stabilisation: A Study in the Economics and Risk. Oxford University Press.

Selvanathan, S. (1993). A System-Wide Analysis of International Consumption Patterns. Kluwer.

Stern, N. (1977). “The Marginal Valuation of Income.” In M. Artis and R. Norbay (eds), Studies in Modern Economic Analysis. Blackwell.

Theil, H. (1987). “Evidence from International Consumption Comparisons” Chapter 2 in H. Theil and K. W. Clements Applied Demand Analysis: Results from System-Wide Approaches. Ballinger.

72