Advanced AI Solutions for Asset-Intensive Industries
Keeping your Facilities in Shape with AI-Enabled Solutions.
METALS�& MINING
ENERGY
OIL�& GAS
PULP�& PAPER
ABOUT MODEC
ABOUT SHAPE
SHAPE’S SOLUTIONS
SUCCESS CASES
LIGHTHOUSE IN A BOX
VALUE ASSURANCE
GET IN TOUCH
About MODEC
1968
MODEC was
founded in Tokyo
1977
FPSO Castellon:
First FPSO ever built
10 YEARS
1986
FPSO Kakap Natuna:
First EPCI FPSO Project
20 YEARS
30 YEARS
1998
FPSO MODEC Venture 1:
First Charter and O&M FPSO Project
35 YEARS
2003
Brazil’s Office
40 YEARS
40 YEARS
BRAZIL’S HISTORY: 14 UNITS DELIVERED + 3 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
2003
FPSO Fluminense
2003
Rio de Janeiro Office (Corporate)
Macaé Office (O&M)
2007
FSO Cidade de Macaé MV15
2007
FPSO Cidade do Rio de Janeiro MV14
2009
FPSO Cidade de Niterói MV18
2010
FPSO Cidade de Santos MV20
2010
FPSO Cidade de Angra dos Reis MV22
Santos Office (O&M)
2013
FPSO OSX-3
2013
FPSO Cidade de São Paulo MV23
2014
FPSO Cidade�de Mangaratiba MV24
2015
FPSO Cidade de Itaguaí MV26
2016
FPSO Cidade de Caraguatatuba MV27
2017
FPSO Cid.de Campos dos Goytacazes MV29
2021
FPSO Carioca MV30
2022
FPSO Guanabara MV31
2023
FPSO Almirante Barroso MV32
2023
FPSO Anita Garibaldi MV33
2024
FPSO Bacallhau
MODEC’s History
2022
FPSO Miamte MV34
Global presence
Main Offices
FPSO in operation (16)
FPSO under construction (4)
FSO in operation (3)
USA
Houston
MEXICO
BRAZIL
Rio de Janeiro
JAPAN
Tokyo
Employes
+3,000
SENEGAL
COTÊ�D´IVOIRE
GHANA
SINGAPORE
VIETNAM
AUSTRALIA
NEW ZEALAND
Global
employees
+6,000
Total
portfolio
23 vessels
+ 280 years of operational & maintenance experience
36 FPSO
North Sea/Europe (1) | |
| FSO Maersk Culzean |
Southeast Asia (5) | |
| FSO Rang Dong MV17 |
| FSO Rong Doi MV12 |
| FSO Pathumabaha |
| FSO Vietsovpetro 01 |
| FSO Nanhai Sheng Kai |
11 FSO
Gulf of Mexico (1) | |
| FSO Ta’Kuntah |
Brazil (16) | |
| FPSO Bacalhau |
| FPSO Anita Garibaldi MV33 |
| FPSO Almirante Barroso MV32 |
| FPSO Guanabara MV31 |
| FPSO Carioca MV30 |
| FPSO Cidade de Campos dos Goytacazes MV29 |
| FPSO Cidade de Caraguatatuba MV27 |
| FPSO Cidade de Itaguai MV26 |
| FPSO Cidade de Mangaratiba MV24 |
| FPSO OSX-3 |
| FPSO Cidade de Sao Paulo MV23 |
| FPSO Cidade de Angra dos Reis MV22 |
| FPSO Cidade de Santos MV20 |
| FPSO Cidade de Niteroi MV18 |
| FPSO Cidade do Rio de Janeiro MV14 |
| FPSO Fluminense |
Buzios 5
Marlim 1
Bacalhau
West Africa (3) | |
| FSO Kome Kribi 1 |
| Escravos LPG FSO |
| FSO Madiela |
Brazil (1) | |
| FSO Cidade de Macae MV15 |
Southeast Asia (7) | |
| FPSO Song Doc Pride MV19 |
| FPSO Cuulong�MV9 |
| FPSO Jasmine Venture MV7 |
| FPSO Langsa Venture MV 8 |
| FPSO Nanhai Sheng Li |
| FPSO Anoa Natuna |
| FPSO Kakap Natuna |
Pacific (6) | |
| FPSO Pyrenees Venture |
| FPSO Stybarrow Venture MV16 |
| FPSO MODEC Venture 11 |
| FPSO Buffalo Venture |
| FPSO MODEC Venture 1 |
| FPSO Whakaaropai |
West Africa (5) | |
| FPSO�Sangomar Phase 1 |
| FPSO Prof. John Evans Atta Mills |
| FPSO PSVM |
| FPSO Kwame Nkrumah MV21 |
| FPSO Baobab Ivoirien MV10 |
Sangomar
Gulf of Mexico (1) | |
| FPSO Miamte MV34 |
Gulf of Mexico (4) | |
| Stampede TLP |
| Shenzi TLP |
| Marco Polo TLP |
| Prince TLP |
6 TLP
West Africa (2) | |
| Oveng TLP |
| Okume/Ebano TLP |
1 MOPU
West Africa (1) | |
| Tchatamba A MOPU |
TOTAL
12
SOUTHEAST�ASIA
11
WEST�AFRICA
6
PACIFIC
6
GULF OF�MEXICO
1
NORTH SEA
EUROPE
17
BRAZIL
EPCI EXPERIENCE = 53 PROJECTS (~30% TO BRAZIL)
About Shape
Who is Shape?
History of MODEC’s Digital Transformation:
The Global Lighthouse Network
MODEC become a global lighthouse of the world economic forum
1st
Oil upstream
company
1st
Site in
Latam
1st
Japanese
company
2015-2017
BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION
2017-2018
PILOT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
2019+
EXPANDING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
Shape's mission is to create sustainable business value through the combination of data, technology, and real-world industry experience.
* major industries where Shape already provide solutions and support.
Shape is a spin-off of MODEC
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH:
MARKET*
CUSTOMER PAINS
Minas Gerais
Pará
Rio Grande do Sul
Mato Grosso do Sul
Rondônia
Paraná
Singapore
Sergipe
Rio de Janeiro
BRASIL
Rio de Janeiro
São Paulo
Alagoas
Australia
Senegal
Japan
Mexico
Guyana
BRASIL
OIL & GAS
POWER GEN.
METALS & MINING
PULP & PAPER
SHAPE’S OFFICES
SHAPE’S PROJECTS
Global employees
~100
Global�presence
Shape
Revenue
Growth
2023
2024
85%
18%
Value proposition
Shape’s value proposition drives business impact by serving clients in three key pillars.
Integrate available data into a single source of truth
INTEGRATED�DATA PLATFORM
Transform data into insights that address business needs
APPLICATIONS�SUITE
Close the gap between digital solutions and front liners
VALUE �ASSURANCE
Lighthouse: Reliability Suite
DBMS:
Safety & Integrity
VET:
AI-Based Engineering
Sylph:
Sustainability Suite
Shape’s integrated solutions:
Fully dialogues with the Client's assets, by using Advanced Analytics.
Who is Shape?
AI-BASED ENGINEERING
VET
RELIABILITY
LIGHTHOUSE
Shape’s solutions
SAFETY & INTEGRITY
DBMS
SUSTAINABILITY
SYLPH
RELIABILITY�Lighthouse
Lighthouse:
value proposition
Maximize the performance of your facilities, ensuring current and future competitiveness.
IMPROVE RELIABILITY
INCREASE ASSET AVAILABILITY AND OVERALL PRODUCTION
IMPROVE RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT
REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS
MITIGATE HUMAN
RISK EXPOSURE
REDUCE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR COST
Lighthouse: potential impacts
Lighthouse track record:
* Based on average production in Brazil and Brent @$90
$160M
Additional Production
estimated/year
up to
$1,3M
Repair Cost Saving per plant/year
15%
Overall Downtime Reduction
estimated
Network effect:
The tool is continuously expanding. New models' creation and new failure modes!
8.500+
sensors tags connected�to AI models
370 million hours
of structured data analyzed
11 Plants
fully connected
800+
equipment models�deployed
Lighthouse:�problem statement
The solution support on asset-intensive industries surveillance to ensure asset health and safety.
SWISS CHEESE MODEL FOR RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT
Failure Causes
Failure prevention
Failure not
prevented
All downtimes in an asset (e.g., equipment failures and pre-failures) happen through a combination of multiple operational and processes variables at the same time;
The Lighthouse solution reduces the gaps in reliability management, improving equipment and process health.
Digital Solution�Platform for
Reliability
Lighthouse is a growing platform to provide digital solutions for the industry, primarily focused on reliability.
From detecting a possible failure to monitoring sensors, the platform allows the user to monitor the conditions of their assets in intuitive panels.
FAILURE PREDICTION
Alert failures in advance based on levels of control, engineering equations, or AI.
MAIN APPLICATIONS AVAILABLE:
DIAGNOSIS AND ACTIONS
Identify failure mode or key fault-related variables issuing recommendations.
ALARMS CONFIGURATION
Allows the user to manage and create alarms.
FEEDBACK CYCLE
Allows the user to classify alarm status and sort according to diagnosis.
ASSET HEALTH MONITORING
Monitor main assets KPIs from plant to equipment level.
Lighthouse
ASSET HEALTH VIEW
The Home screen allows the integration of multiple plants into a single platform for quick identification of potential failure risks. �On a single screen, the management team can oversee and compare the health performance of multiple assets.
SYSTEM VIEW
The analysis follows with a view of systems and subsystems, where the operator checks in an illustrated way the systems that need more attention.
A powerful tool that enables decision-making based on data analysis.
A powerful tool that enables decision-making based on data analysis.
Lighthouse
EQUIPMENT VIEW
Next, the operator has access to vision by equipment, making maintenance prioritization decisions based on data.
The detailing screen by equipment aggregates all the information of the same, discoursing the main information for classification of the health of the equipment.
Lighthouse
RISK MONITOR
The alarm response monitor displays the analysis graph of the risk model. The model is developed to identify possible failure trends and generates an alarm when the risk reaches a predefined limit.
CONTRIBUTION OF VARIABLES
The model identifies the contribution of variables to the risk of failure. Giving the user a quick diagnosis of where to act to prevent failure.
Success Cases
Lighthouse:�Go Live!
Go Live!
FEATURES |
|
How it works
Integrate
TIME SERIES DATA |
|
CONTEXTUAL DATA |
|
Asset Hierarchies
Event Data Sources
CMMS / ERPs
Data Sheets
Transform
Export
ANALYTICS |
|
Modeling
Services
Engineering
Support
Process�Transformation
Application�Training
Historians
IIOT Platforms�- Data Lakes
SAFETY & INTEGRITY�DBMS
DBMS: value proposition
BASE CASE
ONLINE BOWTIE
GUIDED RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS
SAP AND AMOS DATA INTEGRATED
INTEGRATED CASE TO OPERATE
DIGITAL BARRIER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Bowtie and SCE files
CMMS maintenance work orders information
Equipment, barriers and MAH classification
Reactive approach to risk assess SCE impairment event, and Case to Operate – paper-based system
Shape's Digital Barrier Management System
allows seamless and online monitoring of safety barriers
Digital Barrier Management System (DBMS) currently�use as data sources…
…to generate and update critical information to stakeholders across assets.
DBMS
Digital Barrier Management System - DBMS provides a vision of the integrity status of Safety Critical Elements (SCEs) in operation and their relation to mapped threats, top events, Major Accident Hazards (MAHs), and consequences in Bowtie diagrams and help teams act in advance.
With DBMS, operation team can quickly identify sources of risks and make the required adjustments before an accident occurs.
DBMS Routine
Vessel Owner & Vessel Operator
Operator Team
Operator Headquarter
Operator Support team
Vessel Owner
Vessel Owner and Vessel Operator main areas involved in the project will have access according to permit level.
DBMS tool holds a huge flexibility capacity to reflect an asset safety process methodology and routine elected. Shape works in a collaborative environment with local Process Safety and Operation teams, and with MODEC’s Global Process Safety area.
DBMS�development roadmap
ONLINE NOW |
7 VESSELS ONLINE IN BRAZIL AND MEXICO |
MOMEX | MV34: First version deployed�32 SCEs and 31 MAHs monitored |
MdB | MV24, MV26, MV27, MV29, MV30 and MV31: First version deployed�182 SCEs and 158 MAHs monitored |
READY IN Q4/2023 |
CtO Applications:�CtO functional into DBMS tool with Change Management on course Installed base:�New vessel in Africa online being supervised by DBMS |
POTENTIAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS* |
New Data Sources:�Sensor data for inhibition risk�Safety Training Compliance Quantitative Intelligence:�Revised dynamic MAH risk calculation New Processes:�MOC�Preventive maintenance deferment |
* We are continuously striving to identify the most effective enhancements for our tool, and we are receptive to new concepts and proposals for DBMS.
Demo DBMS
DEMO
SUSTAINABILITY�Sylph
Sylph: Problem Statement
~90% of these emissions come from Gas Turbine Generators, which means that we need to improve the FPSO’s energy efficiency to reduce it.
Possible�GHG reduction initiatives
Sylph's focus
Scope 1 emissions sources
(tCO2e)
Stationary Combustion (80~85%)
Most of the flaring is the result of unplanned shutdowns, so will be the scope of the Predictive Maintenance solution.
Flaring
(10~15%)
Optimization of operational practices, including ensuring that all equipment run at their optimal energy efficiency point.
Operational optimization
Capital investments in new technologies, including installing new equipment or replacing existing ones with “green” alternatives.
Capital investments
Help operators to track and reduce scope 1 GHG emissions of industrial plants, striking a balance between production and sustainability by optimizing operational practices.
FPSO example:
WELLS
Production Header
Oil System
Gas Plant
Power Generation
SIMPLIFIED DIAGRAM
Focus of the solution
Recap: Problem Statement
To improve the energy efficiency of FPSOs, we propose to focus on GTGs and the Gas Plant1, balancing with production requirements.
1 Responsible for ~70% of the energy consumption.
CRUDE OIL TANK
Recommend optimal pressures and flow rates for each compressor via adjustment of throttle and anti-surge valves, constrained by production, project specifications (e.g., Molsieve design pressure), and non-controllable variables (e.g., well pressure).
Recommend turning redundant Main A compressors on and off based on monitoring real vs. nominal flowrates.
Recommend repairs or switch to redundancies based on efficiency loss vs. theoretical performance curves provided by manufacturers.
The tool's first stage is centered on optimizing the Gas Plant. Optimization levers that can be considered by the Gas Plant VET
Sylph: potential impact
The initial estimation indicates a potential energy consumption reduction of at least ~5%.
POTENTIAL IN GAS PLANT |
|
POTENTIAL OF FULL-SCALE SOLUTION |
|
Sylph: look & feel
Tool user-journey, starts with fleet-wide coverage and full-scale vessel optimization.
FLEET VIEW
A first visualization to support fleet surveillance
VESSEL VIEW
Expand vessel-level view with support for systems and their respective KPIs
Illustrative mockups
Sylph: look & feel
To contextualize each equipment virtual engineer module, we aim to include them in a vessel-level view.
THIS VESSEL-LEVEL VIEW CAN CONTAIN ELEMENTS SUCH AS:
KPI tracking: Emissions and energy efficiency-related metrics, in addition to important metrics for each covered system (e.g., GTG and ISO50001 KPIs).
Consolidated results: Calculated impact of implemented recommendations.
System drill-down: Access to system-level opportunities for all developed virtual engineer module.
Illustrative mockups
Sylph: look & feel
The virtual engineer module, for each system, aims to provide recommendations for different proposed optimization levers. We may recommend starting with most offensive systems.
Equipment virtual engineer module:
Illustrative mockups
SURVEILLANCE VIEW
System - and equipment - level metrics will allow users to understand their current state
OPTIMIZATION VIEW
Users will be able to generate ad-hoc recommendations or configure alarms, customizing production and operational constraints
Sylph: look & feel
To help the operations team track recommendation execution and impact, we propose to include a management module.
Illustrative mockups
The effect of each recommendation will be monitored and consolidated as the results of the tool.
Every recommendation issued by the solution will be tracked for whether they are accepted and executed as expected.
Sylph: capabilities summary
The first stage of this tool is centered on the optimization of a specific system.
Asset View
Equipment & Process View
MONITORING
SURVEILLANCE
OPTIMIZATION
RECOMMENDATION
SYSTEM
Recommend optimal equipment setpoints – e.g., pressures and flowrates
Recommend turning equipment On / Off based on real & nominal parameters
Recommend repairs or switch to redundancies
based on efficiency loss vs. theoretical performance
Sylph has an estimation of expected impact, so that operations teams can prioritize and execute them
Expected impact could be used to estimate de ROI of investments
Fleet View
AI-BASED ENGINEERING�Virtual Engineering Tool - VET
SRU Virtual Engineer Tool
PROBLEM STATEMENT
The SRU membrane gradually clogs in operation and needs to be cleaned. Cleaning is expensive, takes time and consequently generates unavailability.
OBJECTIVE
Simulate the combination of CIP (Cleaning in Place) parameters to optimize the cleaning process, reduce the use of chemicals and provide longer campaigns, reducing downtime.
SOLUTION
A Virtual Engineering Tool that uses a CIP simulator to test various combinations of different parameter values and recommend an optimal combination. This will enable the user to improve the performance of the CIP, resulting in important financial results.
SRU Virtual Engineer Tool
Using the operational knowledge, we can develop several virtual engineers trained specifically for the system.
OIL TREATMENT
MOLSIEVE
CO2 REMOVAL
SRU
Recovery unit of sulfate
PdM models being improved to make process optimization recommendations.
The work begins with the objective of extending the duration of the campaign based on hypotheses raised by the operation.
controllable variable
uncontrollable variable
What variables influence the dP of the membrane?
Temperature
Season
Flow
Opening PCV valve
Information from mediafilter (bacteria proliferation trend)
Sulfate
Sulfide
pH
Other process variables
Chlorine
SDI
Cartridge filter mesh size
Quantity of biocide (flow or dosage)
Frequency of biocide injection
Duration of biocide dose (ppm/hour)
Variables that influence bacteria proliferation
Campaign duration
Process variable
Lab data
CIP flow (alkaline phase)
Type of cleaning (normal or deep)
Chemicals used
Peaks of pressure during CIP
Process data from CIP auxiliary system
Duration of CIP (and the different CIP steps)
Process variables
Variables during the campaign
Variables during cleaning
What affects dP during cleaning?
What makes dP grow faster or slower?
What makes a high-performance CIP?
Problem statement: optimizing the CIP to reduce the total number of cleanings in a given period.
IMPACT ANALYSIS UNIVARIATE | ||
Each parameter is tested against CIP performance | ||
dP Pre CIP | X | Performance CIP |
Residual valve | X | Performance CIP |
Qtd. Biocide | X | Performance CIP |
A list of the most important parameters is created | ||
MULTIVARIATE IMPACT ANALYSIS | ||
The parameters, together, are tested against the performance of the CIP | ||
dP Pre CIP | | Performance CIP |
Residual valve | X | |
Qtd. Biocide | | |
Several models are tested to assess the impact of parameters on CIP | ||
|
Historical Data |
|
SELECTED THE PARAMETERS WITH THE GREATEST IMPACT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CIP |
CONTROLLABLE VARIABLES
NON-CONTROLLED VARIABLES
INPUT
ACTUAL STATUS
USER INPUT
PREDICTIVE MODEL
VALUE ADDED
dP ESTIMATE MODEL THROUGH SELECTED PARAMETERS
FUTURE STATUS
dP SIMULATION
SOLUTION OUTPUT
We have developed a Virtual Engineering Tool to support the CIP planning decision process
Virtual Engineer Tool:
Engineer determines when the CIP will be performed |
|
SRU�Virtual Engineer Tool |
The simulator receives the dP values and other non-controllable variables |
VET simulates multiple cleanings |
The simulator receives the dP values and other non-controllable variables |
Simulador CIP
Engineer can simulate the parameters according to the current situation of the process |
|
Engineer can simulate the parameters according to the current situation of the process |
|
We have developed a Virtual Engineering Tool to support the CIP planning decision process
Virtual Engineer Tool:
Engineer determines when the CIP will be performed |
|
SRU�Virtual Engineer Tool |
The simulator receives the dP values and other non-controllable variables |
VET simulates multiple cleanings |
The simulator receives the dP values and other non-controllable variables |
Simulador CIP
DEMO
VET: look & feel
Success Cases
Use Case: Electric Motor
Electric motor internal component defect
EVENT DESCRIPTION
The model identified an early upward trend in the stator temperature without correlation with load increase in a HV electrical motor. After troubleshooting, a fallen internal air deflector plate was found.
OPERATION ACTION
The Equipment Specialist asked the offshore team to inspect the electric parameters and the cooling water condition at the electric motor`s heat exchange.
POTENTIAL SAVING
Risk scenario: Water injection system partial stop, and in a worst-case, a mechanical damage in the fan or a short-circuit on the stator due to overheating caused by non-uniform air flow, with a total repair estimated cost of USD 600,000 in a worst-case scenario.
Use Case: Sea Water�Injection Pump
Seal failure on water injection pump
EVENT DESCRIPTION
Sea water injection pump with several historical events of seal failure and no clear root cause addressed before the PdM tool implementation. Just after the rollout for the MV23, several cavitation events were identified and associated as root cause of the seal problems.
OPERATION ACTION
The Equipment Specialist recommended an inspection of the thrust and journal bearing and the mechanical seal during the shutdown. Besides that, before, shutdown, adjust equipment setpoints (flowrates) and keep monitoring.
POTENTIAL SAVING
Risk scenario: Water injection system partial stop, and in a worst-case, a mechanical damage in the fan or a short-circuit on the stator due to overheating caused by non-uniform air flow, with a total repair estimated cost of USD 600,000 in a worst-case scenario.
EVENT DESCRIPTION
The risk score started an upward tendency and triggered the alarms on PdM tool (figure below). Therefore, client specialist and Shape´s team analyzed this model and confirmed that the pressure on the oil side was out of limited area (figure above), which are the dark red points, indicating the start of scaling. The model allowed the team to identify the scaling occurrence at an early stage. This model already alarmed before as we can see on the risk score below and the specialist detected early signs of scaling. After the flushing, the risk started to increase again as explained above.
Use Case: Crude Heat Exchanger
OPERATION RECOMENDATION
As the flushing did not work as expected at the first time the PdM alarmed, this time the specialist recommendation was to exchange the plates.
POTENTIAL SAVING
Risk scenario: Well shutdown for cleaning, resulting in 3 days of 100% downtime and with a total repair estimated cost of USD 1,694,000 in a worst-case scenario.
Scaling on Crude Crude Heat Exchanger
EVENT DESCRIPTION
VRU Gearbox 1st stage bearing temperature transmitter (TI-2110-20) readings are presenting signs of malfunction. The temperature transmitter readings are below ambient temperature while the compressor is not operating, and during operation, the readings show a 35 °C difference from sensor TI-2110-21 that is placed on the same bearing.
Use Case:�VRU Compressor
OPERATION RECOMENDATION
Junction box, cables and fittings must be checked. In case of damage to parts, they should be replaced or fixed. Temperature transmitter (TI-2110-20) must be checked and calibrated. If calibration is not able to be properly performed, the instrument must be replaced.
POTENTIAL SAVING
Risk scenario: Equipment sudden stop due to trip could lead to equipment internal parts damage (i.e., bearing seal, shaft). Potential downtime impact with a repair estimate cost of USD 350,000 in a worst-case scenario.
Gearbox 1st Stage Temperature Transmitter Malfunction
Lighthouse in a Box
Accelerating the Time to Value with Out-of-Box Predictive Models.
Lighthouse in a box
Out-of-Box Predictive Models * On-Demand (150+ Models)
Equipment Surveillance Downtime avoidance
Reliability Platform with alarm Management
GTG
CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR
CENTRIFUGAL PUMP
SCREW COMPRESSOR
MOTOR
FAILURE MODE
PERFORMANCE
FAILURE CAUSE
HEAT EXCHANGER
* AI-based models require retraining services.
Sample of Out-of-Box Predictive Models Matrix.
| CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR | SCREW COMPRESSOR | CENTRIFUGAL PUMP | MOTOR | GTG |
FAILURE MODE |
|
|
|
|
|
FAILURE CAUSE |
|
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE |
|
|
|
| |
Lighthouse in a box
APPLICATIONS�SUITE
RISK SCORE (Interpretation)
ALARM
Pre-defined thresholds per equipment
Shape and client work in partnership to customize application and develop new models
Beyond Lighthouse in a box, in a collaborative basis Shape and client work together to increase value added.
Complement the Solution deployed according to client`s particular needs and potential in-house initiatives
Specialized fit-for-purpose Model Creation
| LIGHTHOUSE PLATFORM | PREDICTIVE MODELS ENGINEERING BASED / AI BASED | |
| | Market Place | New Models |
Subscription | | | |
Perpetual License | | | |
PaaS
SaaS
SaaS
Shape’s Model Library
150+ Equipment Models Online
SAMPLE OF EQUIPMENT TYPES
Business Models:
Lighthouse in a box
HIGHLIGHTS
GENERAL ARCHITECTURE – SHAPE CLOUD:
Data lake at customer`s cloud and model processing data visualization and diagnosys proccess at Shape`s cloud.
Maintenance
Data Source
(ERP / CMMS)
Data Historian
Real-Time Data
Customer
Data Lake
Shape
Hub Lake
Application
App Data
Warehouse
CUSTOMER CLOUD
SHAPE CLOUD
Data
Processing
MLOps and�App Standards
Lighthouse in a box
How it works
Asset Hierarchies
Event Data Sources
CMMS / ERPs
Equipment Data Sheet
Historians
IIoT Platforms / �Data Lakes
TIME SERIES DATA
CONTEXTUAL DATA
Value Assurance
Shape Value Assurance
INTEGRATED DATA PLATAFORM
DATABASE
*ETL + CONTEXTUALIZATION
CLOUD
Data Lake Processed data ready to use
APPLICATIONS SUITE
DATA
PREDICTIVE MODELS
Mathematical Equations
RISK SCORE (interpretation)
ALARM
Engineers and Data Scientists
building models together
Shape provides engineering support + IT support since failure mode discover
VALUE ASSURANCE
SMS
Push
Notification
OPERATIONS ENGINEER
DIAGNOSTIC SCREEN IS CUSTOMIZABLE PER EQUIPMENT
Failure Mode Discovered
FEEDBACK
Execution Follow-up
Value Assurance
Shape Value Assurance
REMOTE CONTROL CENTER
AI-MODELS POWERED BY ENGINEERING
Data Science team working side by side with engineers building AI models leveraging industry knowledge.
USER SUPPORT FOR FPSO OPERATOR
Our engineers work side-by-side with clients’ teams, supporting them to better use the tools we provide.
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
Shape’s team is constantly identifying opportunities for new solutions and improvements – models network effect within MODEC’s fleet.
We have Shape engineers working aside clients with AI-based technologies.
Shape Value Assurance
Shape’s
Performance
Report
Reports will be delivered, detailing occurrences and the financial impact of Lighthouse.
Report
Get in touch
If you have any questions, comments or just want to say hi, feel free to get in touch.
Simply scan one of the QR codes on your screen using your smartphone's camera.
WEBSITE
Failure modes and causes study
Methodology:
Failure Modes�“symptoms”
Failure Causes�“Root Causes”
P-F Curve
Health Score
P-F Curve
Health Score
Time
Time