Yo starting a new VC fund
General Partner (GP)
of a venture capital firm
a.k.a. the “VC”
I need a 3x return
LP
Limited Partner (LP)
$50M
Fund
x 3 in 5-10 years…
or
$40M
Investments
Fees (10y)
50%
Initial Checks
50%
Follow-Ons
$20M
Actual allocation to new investments
20 x
$1M
Deployed into 20 companies over 3 year investing period
Each investment is $1M, on average
$1M
10%
$10M
Investment
Ownership
Valuation
at
for
Repeat 20 times to create a portfolio.
A common early-stage Valley VC investment in 2020:
Wait 4.5 years, on average...
10%
$50M
$5M
Ownership
Exit Value
Return
=
of
$50 million scenario
$5M = 5x return on investment. Great news!
...Or is it?
$50M
x 3 =
$145M remaining
$5M return
$5M is only 3% of the expected return of the fund
YES VC
20 companies
Return multiplier
Most probably, almost all of the VC’s returns will come from one company
5x exit
Congrats, but… this VC just missed one of their 20 shots on goal.
x
So. To qualify for VC investment,
your company needs a credible path to becoming their sole fund returner.
$1M investment
=>
$150M return
needed to 3x the fund
This VC needs to see the path to a 150x return, every new company they invest in.
$50M fund
At 10% ownership, it translates to a $1.5 billion exit.
$1.5B
Exit value
$150M return
10%
Wait... we didn’t account for dilution.
10%
=>
5%
Companies commonly raise A, B, C, D… rounds before exit.
Early-stage ownership stakes dwindle down further with each round.
(If it can, the VC will deploy its reserves to slow down its dilution).
To account for 50% dilution, the needed exit value doubles to $3 billion.
$3B
Exit value
$150M return
5%
Before raising $1M from a $50M venture fund,
look in the mirror and ask:
Do I see myself building a $3B business?
(It’s what you’re signing up for)
If the answer is you are probably better off not raising VC.
But it doesn’t necessarily mean you should not raise any financing.
You can tap angels, family offices, impact & non-VC funds, corporates, loans and grants.
Or, new “challenger” venture funds (look up Indie VC) with nontraditional models.
Uh, no...
The VC decision tree
(Often more like a pinball game)
At time of intro, these matter:
Mention these in your first email:
Ultimately it boils down to:
The superior capital source is not a venture fund. It’s your customer base.
Mailchimp is worth $4B+ and funded 100% with customer revenue.
Start on that path and the VCs will come calling at your door.
PRO TIP
Growth | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
MoM growth rate | 80% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
Active users (EOY) | 1,000 | 8,916 | 79,495 | 708,793 |
Revenue/user/month | $10 | $10 | $10 | $10 |
Revenue | $120,000 | $1,069,920 | $9,539,400 | $85,055,160 |
Gross burn | -$883,200 | -$3,477,600 | -$9,439,200 | -$30,429,000 |
Profit Margin | -636% | -225% | 1% | 64% |
What “perfect” growth looks like to an early-stage VC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
When you grow like this, you have ample access to venture capital,�but need it relatively little.
It is why many VCs are so weary of founders who reach out to pitch.
A founder who has to woo investors is probably not on this growth path.
Strong founders raise VC like elite players play Super Mario Bros.
They use Warp Pipes to skip levels.
Thanks @shanesnow
for the warp pipe analogy!
Warp Pipe through the VC process
Capitalization | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
Angels | $200,000 | | | |
Pre-Seed VC | $750,000 | | | |
Seed VC | | $3,000,000 | | |
Revenue | $120,000 | $1,069,920 | $9,539,400 | $85,055,160 |
Burn | -$883,200 | -$3,477,600 | -$9,439,200 | -$30,429,000 |
EBITDA | -$763,200 | -$2,407,680 | $100,200 | $54,626,160 |
YE Cash position | $186,800 | $779,120 | $879,320 | $55,505,480 |
What “perfect” capitalization looks like to an early-stage VC
2024
2025
=> “Home run” for the founder and the investors
3
5
4
1
2
Burn | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
Eng. annual comp | $150,000 | $150,000 | $150,000 | $150,000 |
Data Science annual comp | $190,000 | $190,000 | $190,000 | $190,000 |
Ops annual comp | $75,000 | $75,000 | $75,000 | $75,000 |
Headcount (Eng) | 2 | 10 | 30 | 100 |
Headcount (Data Science) | 1 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
Headcont (Ops) | 2 | 6 | 16 | 56 |
Team MoM growth | | 10% | 10% | 10% |
People subtotal | $640,000 | $2,520,000 | $6,840,000 | $22,050,000 |
Overhead 15% | $96,000 | $378,000 | $1,026,000 | $3,307,500 |
S&M 20% | $147,200 | $579,600 | $1,573,200 | $5,071,500 |
Gross burn | $883,200 | $3,477,600 | $9,439,200 | $30,429,000 |
Revenue | $120,000 | $1,069,920 | $9,539,400 | $85,055,160 |
EBITDA | -$763,200 | -$2,407,680 | $100,200 | $54,626,160 |
Burn breakdown (Valley salaries)
3
4
1
2
Other functions like B2B sales come into play in a serious way after growth round.
Ownership | Founder Round | Pre-Seed Round | Seed Round | Value (2023) |
Founder | 99.0% | 77.8% | 69.8% | $890,078,179 |
Employee #1 | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.5% | $5,833,338 |
Pool | | 10.0% | 10.0% | $127,582,740 |
Angels | | 0.7% | 0.4% | $4,962,969 |
Pre-Seed VC | | 10.7% | 9.4% | $119,787,435 |
Seed VC | | | 10.0% | $127,582,740 |
Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | $1,275,827,400 |
Equity allocation example
3
7
6
1
2
4
5
Tune to fit your circumstances.