AI Integration in Legal Practice Necessitates Subscription Billing
Mathew Kerbis, The Subscription Attorney
In this session, you’ll learn:
(1) About the latent legal market
(2) How to correctly apply artificial intelligence for legal services
(3) Implications of AI efficiencies on billing time
(4) Tools and strategies for implementation
Disclaimer:
Everything today is for educational purposes only
Things are changing all the time in this fast moving legal AI landscape.
This is a snapshot of the present moment.
Companies pivot their products all the time anyway.
Not all of these companies will survive.
Discussing an AI tool is not a warranty or representation of the quality of the tool.
Do your own further research into each tool and use demos/trials.
Mathew Kerbis Bona Fides:
Launched Subscription Attorney LLC in March of 2022
Using AI since launch (still a daily user)
Using Generative AI since November 2022 when ChatGPT launched
Teaches lawyers how to ethically use AI in law practice
Teaches lawyers how to adopt and use hardware and software
Target market is latent legal market
My Software/Platforms:
Canva
LinkedIn Live
River
Meetup
Meta
Partiful
Luma
Pie
Eventbrite
iOS Invites
Google Docs
Word
Google Sheets
Overture
Lexamica
ContractsCounsel
Google Slides
Calendly
Calendly Chrome Extension
BeforeSunset
Carrd
Substack
GoDaddy
SuiteDash
SixFifty
IICLE Formulaw
Gavel
Paxton
NotebookLM Pro
Perplexity
Gemini
Claude
ChatGPT
Stripe
Confido Legal
US Bank App
AmEx/Amazon App
Chase App
iOS Passwords App
Passwords Chrome Extension
Zoom
Google Meet
Webex
GoToMeeting
OBS
Continuity Camera
Descript
Elgato Control Center
Elgato Camera Hub
DisplayLink Manager
Lawline
Bar Associations
Adobe Acrobat Pro
Notarize
iCloud
Google Drive
Google Voice for Business
Google Workspace
Chrome Browser
Wave Accounting
ScanSnap
HPSmart
Adobe Scan
iPad Pro Photo Scan Mode
iD
ShurePlus MOTIV
OnScreen Control
MacOS Sequoia 15.3.1 Screen Control
Teams
Slack
Discord
WhatsApp Business
Switchmail
Logi Plugin Service
Canon Print
iOS Google Drive
iOS Finder
Xfinity Internet 1G/s
Xfinity Mobile
Kisi
Comet
My Software/Platforms:
Canva
LinkedIn Live
River
Meetup
Meta
Partiful
Luma
Pie
Eventbrite
iOS Invites
Google Docs
Word
Google Sheets
Overture
Lexamica
ContractsCounsel
Google Slides
Calendly
Calendly Chrome Extension
BeforeSunset
Carrd
Substack
GoDaddy
SuiteDash
SixFifty
IICLE Formulaw
Gavel
Paxton
NotebookLM Pro
Perplexity
Gemini
Claude
ChatGPT
Stripe
Confido Legal
US Bank App
AmEx/Amazon App
Chase App
iOS Passwords App
Passwords Chrome Extension
Zoom
Google Meet
Webex
GoToMeeting
OBS
Continuity Camera
Descript
Elgato Control Center
Elgato Camera Hub
DisplayLink Manager
Lawline
Bar Associations
Adobe Acrobat Pro
Notarize
iCloud
Google Drive
Google Voice for Business
Google Workspace
Chrome Browser
Wave Accounting
ScanSnap
HPSmart
Adobe Scan
iPad Pro Photo Scan Mode
iD
ShurePlus MOTIV
OnScreen Control
MacOS Sequoia 15.3.1 Screen Control
Teams
Slack
Discord
WhatsApp Business
Switchmail
Logi Plugin Service
Canon Print
iOS Google Drive
iOS Finder
Xfinity Internet 1G/s
Xfinity Mobile
Kisi
Comet
Latent Legal Market:
According to Grand View Research, approximately $396.80 billion was spent on US legal services in 2024
https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/us-legal-services-market-report
World Justice Project estimates that 77% of US legal issues are unresolved by a lawyer (https://worldjusticeproject.org/)
Only 23% of the market is being served by lawyers
Potential legal market of approximately $1.328 trillion
Probably greater since this is based on most fees being billable hours
AI for Law Firm Commercials:
On May 20, 2025, Google launched Gemini Veo 3
This is a game changer
We don’t need more than 8 seconds for online ads
Here’s my 7th prompt in Veo for a currently fictional legaltech company:
An asian woman walking away from the camera in a city with skyscrapers. She turns her head around, looks right at the camera, and says, "Is your attorney using Practee? They should be."
Next, the unedited video, then my edit that took 2 minutes in Descript
Imagine the possibilities…
Old World:
Rent equipment
Hire a production team
Audition an actor (and pay them)
Write a script (kind of did this as a prompt)
Find a day to shoot
Hope that day would be sunny
Get lucky that passerbys didn’t ruin the shot
Edit it over days or weeks
New World:
Prompt AI tool new feature that I’m already paying for
Make minor tweaks in an AI-powered editing tool I already have
Publish to the world
Old World:
New World:
Spend a lot of time and money to get a complicated thing done
Don’t spend anything more and get it done faster and better
Same principle applies to legal services.
Hypothetical:
You charge $500/hour
10 hours of billable time makes you $5,000
Generative artificial intelligence can make 10 hours of billable work only take 10 minutes
Under the billable hour in a GenAI world, $5,000 worth of work is only billable at $100
What do you do?
Raise your rates?
Hypothetical:
To make .2 of an hour worth $5,000 means your billable hour rate would be $25,000/hour
That’s a 5,000% increase to your hourly rate (or 50x)
Will your clients be happy to be to pay that rate?
Are you ethically allowed to charge that high of a rate?
What does that mean for serving the latent legal market and access to justice?
What are your options?
Generative AI:
What makes AI generative?
It generates something!
Analysis is not generative but it can be powered by AI
GenAI can revolutionize the practice of law when used correctly
GenAI’s training data is not a source of facts or data
YOU or a DATABASE are the source of facts or data
It’s not perfect but it’s less prone to error than humans
Another Analogy:
Your hire a contractor to do you work at your home
You’re going to pay them by the hour
They show up with a manual screwdriver and saw
You know power tools exist — why didn’t they bring them?
You’re not paying them by the hour unless they use power tools
So the contractor comes back with power tools
Sets down a 2x4 to saw in half
Then uses his power drill to drill sequential holes to cut it in half
*I tried to use AI to generate this image but it was so nonsensical that it didn’t work
Another Analogy:
When you use ChatGPT to do legal research and then check all of your citations, this is EXACTLY what you are doing
At best, you get a case available online
At worst, it makes something up
Wrong tool for the job
It will take longer and have rough edges
AI is not all equal and cannot be used for all things
Use purpose-built AI for specific tasks
Retrieval-Augmented Generation:
What is retrieval-augmented generation and why does it matter?
RAG is when Generative AI (GenAI) draws from a specific source of truth when responding to a prompt.
The purpose is to improve the accuracy and relevance of responses.
External knowledge sources include documents, databases, and APIs.
Reduces if not completely eliminates “hallucinations.”
LLMs are not necessarily trained on the sources of truth.
GPT Wrapper:
Provides a user-friendly interface to interact with and utilize LLMs
Sits on top of the core GPT language model, providing a more accessible and purpose-built user experience
Makes it easier for users to leverage the capabilities of GPT models without having to directly interface with the underlying API or complex prompting
Pre-built templates, industry-specific/specialized models, and mechanisms for user feedback to improve the outputs
Simplify user experience and making GPT more accessible
GenAI is like…
The smartest person on the planet
Who is your assistant
Has read everything on the Internet
Works for free
Or for a much lower cost than a human assistant
But they’re an entry level worker
This is their first job
And it’s their first day on the job
And it’s like that every time you start a new conversion with them
GenAI is like…
What would you do?
You’d provide a lot of context
And follow up and iterate on whatever the work product is
You would not give up if they didn’t get it right the first time
Would you trust this assistant as a source of truth?
Of course not!
This assistant is also not socially well adjusted and doesn't know how to say no or ask follow up questions (unless it does as a GPT wrapper)
GenAI is not…
A calculator
2+2=4 is an immutable truth, and once programmed it always gets it right
Language is all made up and the meaning changes with context
GenAI is a probabilistic model guessing the next most likely word
This is why it can never be relied on, on its own, as a source of truth
General Use vs. Legal-Specific AI:
What makes an AI legal-specific?
The vendor will tell you it’s designed for legal.
Is that enough?
No - but’s a good start.
Inputs/uploads/prompts will not train underlying LLMs.
Each user and/or client will have a separate layer/instance from the LLM and can be replicated through the firm or per client.
Higher security for compliance such as with HIPAA/SOC 2.
Company reps cannot access your data or prompt history.
General Use AI:
Underlying large language models powering the GenAI is training on all documents and prompts put into the tool.
Default typically doesn’t use RAG.
Company can access your prompt history and past uploads.
Less reliable results.
Broader use cases.
Perplexity Pro, NotebookLM Pro (and other Gemini tools), and Descript
Legal AI Categories:
Assistants
Research
Analysis
Drafting
Litigation
Database/Knowledge Base
Intellectual Property
Augmentation
Legal AI Categories:
Assistants
Research
Analysis
Drafting
Litigation
Database/Knowledge Base
Intellectual Property
Augmentation
Legal AI Assistants:
Paxton (proprietary Legal LLM)
LawDroid (customizable)
GC AI (in-house)
Legalyze (practice area agnostic)
Callidus (practice area agnostic)
Centari (transactional)
Eve (Plaintiff litigation focused)
Alexi (litigation focused)
Legora (formerly Leya)
Harvey
Filevine AI
Clio Duo
MyCase IQ
etc.
Augmentation:
Screens AI (acquired by Agiloft)
Gavel (formerly Documate)
PatternBuilder (NetDocs)
Josef Q
SixFifty
Prompt Engineering Tips:
Leverage GenAI like it’s a superpowered personal assistant
Direct it like you’d direct an associate or staff-person
“Review this document and summarize it for me”
“Distill the three most persuasive arguments and explain why”
“Put all of the deadlines and dates in a table with explanations of the obligations next to the date”
“Analyze these three cases, synthesize them in three paragraphs, and list in bullet points the differences between the facts of each case”
You will have results in seconds or minutes compared to hours or days
AI Tips:
Written/spoken natural language is the interface
Follow up, follow up, follow up
Context windows matter
The power of personas
The future is agentic
Non-legal tasks
Semantic search
Subscriber benefit is access to models trained on firm data
Internal version for firm team members to use to increase productivity
The era of the billable hour is over…
ABA Model Rule 1.5:
Terms of Payment
Comment: [5] a lawyer should not enter into an agreement whereby services are to be provided only up to a stated amount when it is foreseeable that more extensive services probably will be required, unless the situation is adequately explained to the client…A lawyer should not exploit a fee arrangement based primarily on hourly charges by using wasteful procedures.
Why ditch the billable hour?
Not using AI in your practice means that you are exploiting a fee arrangement based primarily on hourly charges by using wasteful procedures
Adoption of legaltech and AI eliminates billable hours
Client expectations have changed
Remote meetings are expected
Cost transparency demanded
Scale is possible without more hiring
Incentivized to be efficient and effective (adopt technology)
Thought Experiment:
AI is making billing time untenable and maybe unethical
Imagine your licensing entity bans the billable hour in 365 days
You have one year to strategize and implement a plan
What would you do?
Start Now!
Contact Information:
Mathew Kerbis, The Subscription Attorney
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/kerbisverse
Law Firm: subscriptionattorney.com
Law Subscribed: lawsubscribed.com
Legal AI Live: legalailive.com
Series: howtorunalawfirm.com
Email: kerbis@lawsubscribed.com
Paxton
NotebookLM
Perplexity