1 of 28

Bidirectional Reflectance Calibration of Spectrometer Data using Spectralon Reference Panels

April 27, 2001

Larry Biehl

Electrical & Computer Engineering

Purdue University

(biehl@purdue.edu)

ASPRS 2001 1

2001 ASPRS Annual Conference

April 23-27, St. Louis, Missouri

2 of 28

Acknowledgements

  • This research was funded in part by NASA contracts in 1990 and 2000.

ASPRS 2001 2

3 of 28

Outline

  • Purpose of study
  • Background
  • Approach and methodology used
  • Results
  • Analysis
  • Summary
  • References

ASPRS 2001 3

4 of 28

Objective

  • Develop procedure to calibrate the spectrometer field data (such as that from a GER 2600) to bi-directional reflectance factor using R(80/h) values supplied by Labsphere and measured angular properties of a Spectralon panel.

ASPRS 2001 4

5 of 28

Background

  • In many cases, measurements of a reflectance reference surface such as a Spectralon panel (made by Labsphere) are used for field measurements to calibrate the data to bidirectional reflectance factor.

ASPRS 2001 5

6 of 28

Background (cont.)

  • Reflectance factor is defined as the ratio of flux reflected by a sample surface to that which would be reflected into the same beam geometry by a lossless, perfectly diffuse (lambertian) surface that is identically radiated (Nicodemus et al., 1977)

ASPRS 2001 6

7 of 28

Background (cont.)

  • Not possible to construct a perfectly lambertian surface.
  • Need to take into account the angular (non-lambertian) properties of the reference surface during calibration, Rr(θ,λ).

ASPRS 2001 7

8 of 28

Background (cont.)

  • Calibration measurements provided with spectralon reference panel are directional-hemispherical reflectance: �R(80/h)
  • The need for much field collected data is directional-directional reflectance: �R(00/θ)

ASPRS 2001 8

9 of 28

Background (cont.)

  • Jackson et al. (1997) adapted work by Hsia & Weidner (1981) and angular measurements of spectralon panels with a Barnes Modular Multiband Radiometer (MMR) to generate “general” equations that relate R(80,h) and R(00,θ) for TM Bands. Measurements were made with an outdoor apparatus.

ASPRS 2001 9

10 of 28

Background (cont.)

  • The need is for similar procedure to calibrate spectrometer data with 100’s of wavelength measurements (bands).

ASPRS 2001 10

11 of 28

Background (cont.)

Relationship of directional-hemispherical and directional-directional measurements.

Or

When R(0ο/θ) is approximated by a polynomial in θ (radians) of degree n. bi are the coefficients of the polynomial and Ii are 0.50000, 0.39270, 0.36685, 0.37990, 0.42147 and 0.49129 for i=0-5).

ASPRS 2001 11

12 of 28

Background (cont.)

  • Hsia & Weidner (1981) found that R(45ο/0ο)/ R(6ο/ h) was 1.015 at 550 nm for polytetrafluoroethylene, the base material for Spectralon.

ASPRS 2001 12

13 of 28

Methodology

  • Bidirectional reflectance factor measurements were made of 30x30 cm Spectralon plate at illumination zenith angles of:
    • 3, 6, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80 degrees.
    • Using LARS indoor reflectometer
    • and Exotech 20C Spectroradiometer

ASPRS 2001 13

14 of 28

Methodology (cont.)

Picture of Indoor Reflectometer

Picture of Exotech 20C

Exotech 20C was mounted above reflectometer in a dark room to take measurements of spectralon plate.

ASPRS 2001 14

15 of 28

Methodology (cont.)

  • Determine R(45ο/0ο)/ R(8ο/ h) for the the measured data over the Spectralon panel and compare Shia & Weidner’s value at 550 nm.
  • Compare the angular measurements in reflective Landsat TM bands to those made by Jackson et. al.(1992).

ASPRS 2001 15

16 of 28

Results

Labsphere’s Spectralon table was used for 100 illumination data.

ASPRS 2001 16

17 of 28

Results (cont.)

ASPRS 2001 17

18 of 28

Results (cont.)

ASPRS 2001 18

19 of 28

Analysis

ASPRS 2001 19

20 of 28

Analysis (cont.)

ASPRS 2001 20

21 of 28

Analysis (cont.)

ASPRS 2001 21

22 of 28

Analysis(cont.)

  • Reflectance of Spectralon is computed by:

ρ = R(8/h)*(a0+a1θ+a2θ2+a3θ3+a4θ4+a5θ5)

where:

ρ = bidirectional reflectance factor of scene

R(8/h) = directional-hemispherical reflectance for spectralon panel from Labsphere

θ = illumination zenith angle in radians

ai = Fifth order polynomial coefficients

ASPRS 2001 22

23 of 28

Analysis (cont.)

5th Order Polynomial Coefficients Wavelength (Function of Illumination Zenith Angle in Radians)

(um) a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5

0.25 1.0784 -0.1007 0.2380 -0.6660 0.7336 -0.2934

0.30 1.0784 -0.1001 0.2325 -0.6560 0.7281 -0.2925

0.35 1.0784 -0.1003 0.2306 -0.6517 0.7258 -0.2922

0.40 1.0784 -0.0999 0.2275 -0.6466 0.7239 -0.2923

0.45 1.0786 -0.1019 0.2322 -0.6536 0.7302 -0.2943

0.50 1.0785 -0.1024 0.2340 -0.6583 0.7361 -0.2965

0.55 1.0786 -0.1029 0.2339 -0.6585 0.7383 -0.2978

0.60 1.0785 -0.1015 0.2259 -0.6450 0.7300 -0.2960

0.65 1.0786 -0.1029 0.2292 -0.6495 0.7348 -0.2978

0.70 1.0785 -0.1018 0.2220 -0.6375 0.7277 -0.2965

0.75 1.0787 -0.1047 0.2320 -0.6550 0.7431 -0.3013

0.80 1.0786 -0.1039 0.2284 -0.6507 0.7426 -0.3019

0.85 1.0788 -0.1053 0.2303 -0.6523 0.7447 -0.3028

0.90 1.0787 -0.1036 0.2198 -0.6323 0.7303 -0.2991

0.95 1.0788 -0.1047 0.2228 -0.6384 0.7370 -0.3016

1.00 1.0788 -0.1053 0.2238 -0.6405 0.7404 -0.3030

1.05 1.0788 -0.1061 0.2243 -0.6400 0.7410 -0.3035

1.10 1.0788 -0.1067 0.2259 -0.6440 0.7464 -0.3056

1.15 1.0790 -0.1080 0.2272 -0.6449 0.7482 -0.3066

1.20 1.0789 -0.1068 0.2219 -0.6384 0.7468 -0.3070

1.25 1.0790 -0.1085 0.2260 -0.6444 0.7525 -0.3090

1.30 1.0791 -0.1088 0.2248 -0.6420 0.7522 -0.3094

1.35 1.0792 -0.1099 0.2278 -0.6482 0.7590 -0.3118

1.40 1.0791 -0.1095 0.2235 -0.6395 0.7539 -0.3109

ASPRS 2001 23

24 of 28

Analysis (cont.)

5th Order Polynomial Coefficients

Wavelength (Function of Illumination Zenith Angle in Radians)

(um) a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5

1.45 1.0793 -0.1110 0.2274 -0.6470 0.7618 -0.3137

1.50 1.0792 -0.1107 0.2256 -0.6453 0.7627 -0.3145

1.55 1.0793 -0.1124 0.2297 -0.6513 0.7684 -0.3165

1.60 1.0793 -0.1118 0.2252 -0.6442 0.7655 -0.3164

1.65 1.0792 -0.1117 0.2226 -0.6395 0.7637 -0.3165

1.70 1.0793 -0.1120 0.2201 -0.6333 0.7594 -0.3155

1.75 1.0792 -0.1105 0.2131 -0.6232 0.7547 -0.3150

1.80 1.0793 -0.1125 0.2186 -0.6322 0.7633 -0.3179

1.85 1.0794 -0.1134 0.2199 -0.6330 0.7645 -0.3184

1.90 1.0795 -0.1147 0.2234 -0.6397 0.7718 -0.3211

1.95 1.0794 -0.1137 0.2167 -0.6281 0.7650 -0.3198

2.00 1.0795 -0.1145 0.2198 -0.6356 0.7735 -0.3228

2.05 1.0795 -0.1146 0.2156 -0.6252 0.7654 -0.3207

2.10 1.0795 -0.1139 0.2127 -0.6232 0.7676 -0.3222

2.15 1.0797 -0.1166 0.2203 -0.6353 0.7780 -0.3255

2.20 1.0796 -0.1159 0.2165 -0.6296 0.7759 -0.3256

2.25 1.0796 -0.1167 0.2180 -0.6322 0.7794 -0.3270

2.30 1.0796 -0.1164 0.2133 -0.6225 0.7730 -0.3256

2.35 1.0797 -0.1175 0.2147 -0.6234 0.7748 -0.3265

2.40 1.0797 -0.1176 0.2145 -0.6254 0.7794 -0.3286

2.45 1.0797 -0.1178 0.2144 -0.6266 0.7826 -0.3300

2.50 1.0798 -0.1189 0.2132 -0.6206 0.7781 -0.3290

ASPRS 2001 24

25 of 28

Summary/Conclusions

  • R(45ο/0ο)/ R(8ο/ h) ratio at 550 nm (1.016) was very near that published by Shia & Weidner (1.015); difference of 0.1%.
  • However, the Purdue measurements indicate that this ratio is a function of wavelength which differs from the Jackson et al data. The ratio varied from 1.017 to 1.011.
  • Not sure if reality or instrument related.

ASPRS 2001 25

26 of 28

Summary/Conclusions (cont.)

  • The Purdue angular measurements (indoor) were very similar to those reported by Jackson et al. (outdoor) from 0 to 75 degrees.

ASPRS 2001 26

27 of 28

Summary/Conclusions (cont.)

  • Algorithm has been implemented using Matlab to calibrate our spectrometer data. The steps are:
    • Determine illumination zenith angle
    • Determine R(00/θ) for each .05 um
    • Subsample the .05 um table to match wavelengths for spectrometer
    • Apply the subsampled table to the data

ASPRS 2001 27

28 of 28

References

  • Jack Hsia and Victor Weidner, “NBS 450/Normal Reflectometer for Absolute Reflectance Factors”, Metrologia, Vol. 17, pp 97-102, 1981.
  • Ray Jackson, Thomas Clarke and Susan Moran, “Bidirectional Calibration Results for 11 Spectralon and 16 BaSO4 Reference Reflectance Panels”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 40, pp 231-239, 1992.

ASPRS 2001 28