REVIEW OF INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM FOR INDUSTRY ENGAGEMENT IN TVET/SKILLS TRAINING
Wednesday | 5th of May 2021 | 10 am – 12 pm
WORKPLAN
Workplan : Activities and Timeline (March – April)
Project Kick-off
Planning
Desk Review
Engagement
In-depth Interview
Workplan : Activities and Timeline (April - May)
Interim Report (IR)
IR Workshop
Final Report (Draft)
DFR Workshop
DFR – 1st Revision
Workplan : Activities and Timeline (May - June)
Structure Plan
Draft TOR
DFR – 2nd Revision
Final Report (FR)
List of Targeted Informants
01
02
03
Government
Department of skills development (DSD), Malaysian Qualification Agencies (MQA), Manpower Department, Department of Polytechnic and Community College Education (DPCCE), Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industries (MAFI) and Human Resource Development Fund.
Sectoral regulatory bodies
Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB) and Department of Occupational Safety & Health, Food Safety & Quality Division in the Department of Public Health (BKKM).
Industry-led bodies
Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF), Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM) and Master Builders Association Malaysia (MBAM).
04
State-focused TVET institutions
KISMEC, PSDC, SSTC and GIATMARA.
Indicative Interview Questions
05
02
03
04
Lorem Ipsum
Achievements and Challenges
Funding Incentives and Endowment
Skills standard setting and curriculum design
j
01
Roles and responsibilities of the institutions
Upskilling and Reskilling Initiatives
•What is your role and responsibility to ensure an effective mechanism for industry engagement in TVET?
•What is the mechanism for industry engagement in TVET to ensure successful roles and responsibilities?
•What is the achievement in the implementation of industry engagement in TVET to ensure the effectiveness of TVET?
•What are the constraints faced by the institution for the implementation of industry engagement in TVET?
•How is the acceptance of the relevant industry/institution on the policy or standard developed?
•If there any industry involvement in the developing of curriculum design?
•Is there any related training program on continuous learning for upskilling and reskilling the TVET workforce?
•How is the training program has been developed? Is there any involvement from the industry?
•Are there any initiatives or incentives to encourage industry engagement activities?
• Is there any benefit gained by the industry during the cooperation?
REPORT LAYOUT
Report Layout - Overview
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Malaysia Cases: Industry Engagement – Current Situation and Future
Preamble
Literature Review
International Practices: Industry Engagement Model in Advanced Countries
TVET Industry Engagement: Comparison between Model in Advanced Countries & Malaysia
The Model: Structured Institutional Mechanism for Industrial Engagement in TVET
Conclusion
Report Chapters
Preamble
1
Report Layout – Chapter’s Summary
Literature Review
2
Report Layout – Chapter’s Summary (cont.)
Malaysia Cases: Industry Engagement – Current Situation and Future
3
International Practices: Industry Engagement Model in Advanced Countries *(To be confirmed and elaborated with international experts)
4
Report Layout – Chapter’s Summary (cont.)
TVET Industry Engagement: Comparison between Model in Advanced Countries & Malaysia
5
The Model: Structured Institutional Mechanism for Industrial Engagement in TVET
6
Report Layout – Chapter’s Summary (cont.)
Conclusion
7
Report Layout – Chapter’s Summary (cont.)
The Way Forward : Your Input is Needed
KNOWLEDGE
We need resourceful knowledge and information on your current approach in industry engagement for us to dig deeper and identify good practices in Malaysia vs. advance countries.
EXPERIENCE
We need your experience to assist us in identifying the best approach and mechanism to develop a robust industry-led institutional mechanism for industry engagement in TVET.
IDEA
We need your idea to help us identify the gap and room for improvement in the existing institutional mechanism for industry engagement and the idea of establishing sector based skill council.