Coaching Plans:
Empowering Students Through Goal-Setting
Who are we?
Erika Sterup, MA, NCC, LPC
Truman State University UB
What Is Coaching?
The National Academic Advising Association defines Academic Coaching as a 1-on-1 interaction with a student focusing on strengths, goals, study skills, engagement, academic planning, and performance.
Objectives of Coaching
What makes Appreciative Advising or Coaching different?
The Coaching Process
Many models of coaching have similar processes, which are labeled in slightly different ways based on the coach’s target population. For Truman State University Upward Bound, we use the model outlined by Bloom, Hutson, He, and Konkle in The Appreciative Advising Revolution (2014).
Disarm�Taking concrete steps to create a welcoming atmosphere and put students at ease.
Discover�Taking concrete steps to learn students’ stories, obstacles, supports, and accomplishments.
Dream�Learning about students’ hopes and dreams for their careers and lives.
Design�Co-creating a specific, step-by-step plan that converts dreams to reality.
Deliver�Creating agency in students through encouragement, accountability, and troubleshooting.
Don’t Settle�Reviewing successes and challenges to redesign the plan for continuous improvement.
Admin�Focus
For the first few weeks of the semester
Staff�Focus
For most weeks of the semester
Everyone�Focus
For the last few weeks of the semester
Tools
Written�Needs Assessment
Initial�Coaching�Meeting�Prompts
�Coaching�Plan�Document
Staff �Notes
Staff Training for Coaching
In case we have time left…
Effective Coaching Essentials
Self-Awareness – Be aware of your own biases, strengths, limitations, and motivation for helping. Recognize when you’re using jargon that may be unfamiliar to students.
Warmth – Openness and friendliness make you more approachable than formality or aloofness.
Trustworthiness – Be reliable and responsible, do what you promise, and maintain confidentiality.
Competence – Make sure you have the necessary knowledge and skills to be helpful. Admit when you don’t know something, then model follow-through by finding out.
Positivity –Overcome the tendency to find fault; instead consistently look for and appreciate the best in each student. Social acceptance is a powerful motivator.
Communication – Actively listen to students, give immediate and honest feedback, and share your own experiences when appropriate.
Professionalism – Though goals are co-created, you are still responsible for keeping the conversation productive and appropriate. Student growth should be emphasized over staff’s experience of helping.
Wrestling with Paradoxes
Subjectivity and Objectivity – A helping relationship requires that the Coach be truly empathic with the student, understanding and appreciating their perspective as much as possible. At the same time, the Coach must be able to step back and see where the student is contradicting themselves, believing cognitive distortions, or making assumptions that are limiting their progress.
Strategy - Commit to communicate consistent, honest feedback against a background of extensive positive support.
Wrestling with Paradoxes
Cooperativeness and Directiveness – Inviting students to be co-creators of their own goals is a key factor in their motivation, and it is difficult to predict how long it will take to build trust and rapport with a student. Coaches should expect individual differences in the ease and speed at which students get through coaching meetings. At the same time, the Coach must be responsible for completing tasks within a reasonable time frame.
Strategy – Select limits related to time or to topic before beginning 1-on-1 meetings. Look out for conversations getting off-course and be prepared to redirect in an honest, positive manner.
Wrestling with Paradoxes
Acceptance and Change – Particularly for adolescents and potential first-generation college attendees, it is important to validate students as vital members of the UB and future college community. At the same time, Coaches must maintain high expectations and make students responsible for continuous improvement in agency and competence.
Strategy – Focus language on students’ behaviors, consistently reinforcing the difference between who a person is and what they did in a particular situation.