1 of 16

Comprehensive Wing Design Analysis

Bombardier Challenger 650 Business Jet

Aircraft Classification: Business Jet

Scope: Wing Design, Engine Installation, Aerodynamics, Performance

2 of 16

Executive Summary & Aircraft Overview

Twin-engine business jet representing state-of-the-art corporate aviation.

Supercritical wing design optimized for transonic cruise at Mach 0.80.

Max Altitude: 41,000 ft | Cruise: 37,000 ft

Max Speed: Mach 0.85 | Cruise Speed: Mach 0.80

Range: 4,000 nautical miles (NBAA 4-Pax IFR)

Propulsion: 2 × GE CF34-3B Turbofans (41 kN each)

Devanshi

3 of 16

Primary Wing Design Parameters

Parameter

Value

Wing Reference Area (S)

45.4 m² (489 ft²)

Wingspan (b)

19.61 m (64 ft 4 in)

Aspect Ratio (A)

8.46

Root Chord (C_root)

3.706 m (12.16 ft)

Tip Chord (C_tip)

0.927 m (3.04 ft)

Mean Aero Chord (MAC)

2.595 m (8.51 ft)

Taper Ratio (λ)

0.25

Wingspan Calculation:

MAC Derivation:

Abhishek

4 of 16

Advanced Wing Configuration

Sweep Analysis

Λ_1/4: 28° | LE: 32° | TE: 18°

A quarter-chord sweep of 28 degrees.

Reduces transonic drag, Enhances lateral stability and critical Mach number.

Taper Justification

Ratio (λ): 0.25

Optimizes lift distribution. Reduced induced drag by 1.3%. Improved stall and weight efficiency.

Supercritical Airfoil

Type: Modified NACA | t/c: 11%

Rounded LE, inverted camber, blunt TE.

M_crit ≈ 0.795 at cruise.

Ganjare Aavishkar (22AE30010)

5 of 16

Three-Dimensional Wing Optimization

Dihedral (5.5°) & Twist (-3.5°)

Roll Stability: Lateral stability via positive roll restoring moment.

Dutch Roll Damping: Improved coordination.

Washout (-3.5°): Root section stalls at 16°, while tip remains at 12.5°.

Aileron Authority: Tips stall AFTER root, preserving control at high AOA.

Apoorva

6 of 16

Aircraft Weight Distribution

Category: Midsize-to-Heavy

CG Range: 25%-35% MAC

Ensures stability, good climb, and short-field capability.

Dheeraj (22AE30009)

Operating Empty Weight (OEW) - 12315kg

Bombardier Challenger 650

Fuel - 9000kg

Maximum Take Off Weight (MTOW) - 21315kg

7 of 16

Interference Drag Analysis

Engine Nacelle Design & Interference Drag

Total Wetted Area: 34.98 m² (Nacelle + Pylon)

Interference Factor: 0.35 | Cf: 0.00269

Contribution represents ~2.4% of zero-lift drag. Smooth blending minimizes separation zones.

Phani Surya (22AE30006)

Component

Dimension

Unit

Nacelle Diameter

1.50

m

Nacelle Length

3.20

m

Inner Diameter(Max)

1.52

m

Inner Duct Length

0.65

m

8 of 16

Zero-Lift Drag Coefficient Breakdown

TOTAL CD₀: 0.02683 | CD_i: 0.01083 | CD_total: 0.03766

Lift-to-Drag Ratio (L/D): 12.75 at Cruise (CL=0.48)

Phani Surya (22AE30006)

9 of 16

High-Altitude Cruise Flow Characteristics

1.54 × 10⁷

Reynolds Number (Re)

Fully Turbulent Boundary Layer

Condition (37,000 ft/11,277.6 m)

Value

True Airspeed (V)

235.7 m/s

Air Density (ρ)

0.369 kg/m³

Dynamic Pressure (q)

10.25 kPa

C_f (Turbulent)

0.00269

Kumar Ashmit Ranjan (22AE30016)

10 of 16

Raked Winglet Configuration & Benefits

Span Efficiency

A_eff: 8.76 (+3.5%)

Δe (Oswald): +4.0%

Weakened vortex strength and decreased wake effects.

Fuel Savings

ΔCD_i: -4.2% reduction

Annual Saving: ~2,100 kg fuel/year per aircraft based on 500h flight time.

Priyangshu Karmakar (22AE10048)

The winglets effectively extend the wing span from the perspective of induced drag calculations.

The winglets reduce the induced drag by 4% approximately at cruise lift coefficients.

The Bombardier Challenger 650 wing incorporates raked winglets at the wing tips, a feature that improves efficiency through induced drag reduction.

11 of 16

Stabilizer Design & Directional Stability

Horizontal Tail

Area: 9.2 m² | AR: 6.6

Sh / Swing: 0.203 (Standard Range)

Ensures pitch authority across envelope and flare landing performance.

Vertical Tail (Fin)

Area: 5.8 m² | AR: 1.76

Cn_β: -0.0048 per degree

Provides positive directional stability (Negative derivative = Stable).

Meet Raju Meshram (22AE30019)

12 of 16

Spanwise Lift Distribution & Wing Box

Span Location %

Normalized Lift

Root (0%)

1.56

20% / 40%

1.48 / 1.56

60% / 80%

1.32 / 0.72

Tip (100%)

0.00

Twin-Spar Concept

Front Spar: ~20% MAC (Primary Strength)

Rear Spar: ~60% MAC (Torsion Rigidity)

Fuel System: 5 internal tanks; 9,072L total capacity.

Bending Relief: Distributed fuel load reduces wing bending moments.

Jenish Patel (22AE30014)

13 of 16

Critical Mach Number & Shock Formation

M_crit (Cruise): 0.755 | M_crit (Comp): 0.76

Buffet Onset: Mach 0.82-0.85

Wave Drag: CD_wave ∝ (M - M_crit)⁴

Separation: Shock waves form on upper surface, causing flow separation and drag rise.

Supercritical Benefit: Delays shock to M=0.80 instead of M=0.70.

NACA 00XX-64 series (specifically the NACA 0011-64 at the root and NACA 0010-64 at the tip)

14 of 16

Operational Performance Predictions

Optimum Cruise (Max L/D = 13.72): Occurs at ~Mach 0.65. Current mission profile at Mach 0.80 trades 7% efficiency for higher speeds.

Mission Segment

Parameter

Value

Cruise (37k ft)

True Airspeed / Fuel Burn

236 m/s / 267 kg/h

Climb Profile

Time to FL350

32 - 37 minutes

Takeoff (SL)

V_stall / Dist (MTOW)

145 kt / 1,720 m

Landing (SL)

V_ref / Dist (Typ)

140 kt / 732 m

Gundla Sanjeev (22AE30011)

15 of 16

Design Summary & Achievements

Design Optimization

References

[1] Anderson, J. D. (2012). Introduction to Flight.

[2] Bombardier. (2024). Challenger 650 Specs.

[3] Raymer, D. P. (2012). Aircraft Design.

[4] NASA. (1998). Supercritical Airfoil Dev.

AR 8.46 balanced with structural weight.

Taper λ=0.25 improves stall and efficiency.

Supercritical wing enables Mach 0.85 capability.

Raked winglets reduce induced drag by 4%.

L/D Ratio of 12.75 facilitates 4,000 NM range.

16 of 16

Image Sources

https://bombardier.com/en/aircraft/challenger-650

Source: bombardier.com

https://bombardier.com/en/aircraft/challenger-650

Source: bombardier.com

https://eaglepubs.erau.edu/app/uploads/sites/4/2022/07/WingTwist.png

Source: eaglepubs.erau.edu

https://i.sstatic.net/U0N1T.jpg

Source: aviation.stackexchange.com

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6d/Transonic_flow_patterns.svg/250px-Transonic_flow_patterns.svg.png

Source: en.wikipedia.org