1 of 87

Variational Bayesian Experimental Design for Geophysical Application

Dominik Strutz & Andrew Curtis

2 of 87

What information will be provided by an experimental design?

How do expected data uncertainties affect optimal designs?

Can experiments be optimised to focus on specific scientific questions?

How can experiments be designed efficiently?

2

3 of 87

3

4 of 87

4

5 of 87

5

6 of 87

6

7 of 87

7

prior information

 

8 of 87

8

prior information

 

9 of 87

9

prior information

 

10 of 87

10

prior information

 

11 of 87

11

prior information

 

12 of 87

12

prior information

 

13 of 87

13

prior information

posterior information

 

14 of 87

14

prior information

 

posterior information

15 of 87

15

prior information

posterior information

 

16 of 87

16

 

prior information

posterior information

17 of 87

17

prior information

posterior information

 

18 of 87

18

information gain (data, design) =

prior information

posterior information

19 of 87

19

expected information gain (design) =

prior information

posterior information

-

average over all data that are plausible according to prior information

 

20 of 87

20

expected information gain (design) =

prior information

posterior information

-

average over all data that are plausible according to prior information

 

21 of 87

21

expected information gain (design) =

prior information

posterior information

-

average over all data that are plausible according to prior information

 

22 of 87

22

expected information gain (design) =

prior information

posterior information

-

average over all data that are plausible according to prior information

 

23 of 87

23

expected information gain (design) =

prior information

posterior information

-

average over all data that are plausible according to prior information

 

24 of 87

24

expected information gain (design) =

prior information

posterior information

-

average over all data that are plausible according to prior information

 

25 of 87

25

expected information gain (design) =

prior information

posterior information

-

average over all data that are plausible according to prior information

 

26 of 87

26

expected information gain (design) =

prior information

posterior information

-

average over all data that are plausible according to prior information

 

27 of 87

27

expected information gain (design) =

prior information

posterior information

-

average over all data that are plausible according to prior information

 

28 of 87

28

expected information gain (design) =

prior information

posterior information

-

average over all data that are plausible according to prior information

 

29 of 87

29

expected information gain (design) =

prior information

posterior information

-

average over all data that are plausible according to prior information

 

30 of 87

30

prior pdf

prior samples

forward function

data likelihood

data samples

experimental design

forward function

forward function

forward function

inverse problem

inverse problem

inverse problem

inverse problem

EIG

calculate information gain

sample from prior

posterior distribution

sample

sample

sample

sample

31 of 87

31

prior pdf

prior samples

forward function

data likelihood

data samples

experimental design

forward function

forward function

forward function

inverse problem

inverse problem

inverse problem

inverse problem

EIG

calculate information gain

sample from prior

posterior distribution

sample

sample

sample

sample

32 of 87

Variational Methods

32

data samples

inverse problem

posterior distribution

33 of 87

Variational Methods

33

data

Mixture Density Network

data samples

inverse problem

posterior distribution

34 of 87

Variational Methods

34

data

Mixture Density Network

data samples

inverse problem

posterior distribution

35 of 87

35

prior pdf

prior samples

forward function

data likelihood

data samples

experimental design

forward function

forward function

forward function

inverse problem

inverse problem

inverse problem

inverse problem

EIG

calculate information gain

sample from prior

posterior distribution

sample

sample

sample

sample

36 of 87

36

prior pdf

prior samples

data samples

sample from prior

EIG

posterior distribution

experimental design

37 of 87

37

prior pdf

prior samples

data samples

experimental design

sample from prior

EIG

information of the data likelihood

information of the evidence

38 of 87

38

EIG

information of the evidence

information of the data likelihood

data samples

 

 

prior pdf

prior samples

sample from prior

39 of 87

39

data samples

 

 

EIG

information of the evidence

information of the data likelihood

prior pdf

prior samples

sample from prior

40 of 87

40

EIG

information of the evidence

information of the data likelihood

data samples

 

 

prior pdf

prior samples

sample from prior

41 of 87

41

EIG

information of the evidence

information of the data likelihood

data samples

 

 

prior pdf

prior samples

sample from prior

42 of 87

42

EIG

information of the evidence

information of the data likelihood

data samples

 

 

prior pdf

prior samples

sample from prior

43 of 87

43

data samples

 

 

EIG

information of the evidence

information of the data likelihood

prior pdf

prior samples

sample from prior

44 of 87

44

data samples

 

 

EIG

information of the evidence

information of the data likelihood

prior pdf

prior samples

sample from prior

45 of 87

45

prior pdf

prior samples

data samples

experimental design

sample from prior

EIG

information of the data likelihood

information of the evidence

46 of 87

46

prior pdf

prior samples

data samples

experimental design

sample from prior

EIG

information of the data likelihood

information of the evidence

47 of 87

47

prior pdf

prior samples

data samples

experimental design

sample from prior

EIG

information of the data likelihood

information of the evidence

48 of 87

48

What information will be provided by an experimental design?

How do expected data uncertainties affect optimal designs?

49 of 87

Effect of the Likelihood Function

49

Lomax et al. (2014)

50 of 87

Effect of the Likelihood Function

50

damage zone

prior distribution of event locations

51 of 87

Effect of the Likelihood Function

51

52 of 87

Effect of the Likelihood Function

52

53 of 87

Effect of the Likelihood Function

53

54 of 87

54

What information will be provided by an experimental design?

How do expected data uncertainties affect optimal designs?

Can experiments be optimised to focus on specific scientific questions?

55 of 87

CO₂ Interrogation

55

CO₂ injection

56 of 87

CO₂ Interrogation

56

Layer

Parameter

Value

Unit

Upper Layer

(m/s)

(m/s)

(kg/m³)

(m)

Lower Layer

(GPa)

(GPa)

porosity

(GPa)

(kg/m³)

(GPa)

(kg/m³)

(GPa)

(kg/m³)

57 of 87

CO₂ Interrogation

57

Layer

Parameter

Value

Unit

Upper Layer

(m/s)

(m/s)

(kg/m³)

(m)

Lower Layer

(GPa)

(GPa)

porosity

(GPa)

(kg/m³)

(GPa)

(kg/m³)

(GPa)

(kg/m³)

fluid properties

saturated rock properties

seismic properties

 

 

58 of 87

58

CO₂ Interrogation

59 of 87

59

CO₂ Interrogation

reflection coefficient

60 of 87

60

CO₂ Interrogation

reflection coefficient

61 of 87

61

CO₂ Interrogation

reflection coefficient

62 of 87

62

CO₂ Interrogation

reflection coefficient

63 of 87

63

CO₂ Interrogation

reflection coefficient

64 of 87

64

CO₂ Interrogation

reflection coefficient

65 of 87

65

CO₂ Interrogation

reflection coefficient

66 of 87

66

CO₂ Interrogation

reflection coefficient

67 of 87

67

CO₂ Interrogation

reflection coefficient

68 of 87

68

CO₂ Interrogation

reflection coefficient

69 of 87

69

CO₂ Interrogation

including data uncertainty

reflection coefficient

reflection coefficient

70 of 87

70

CO₂ Interrogation

71 of 87

71

CO₂ Interrogation

72 of 87

72

CO₂ Interrogation

73 of 87

73

CO₂ Interrogation

+25% EIG

Compared to heuristic:

74 of 87

74

CO₂ Interrogation

+25% EIG

+8% EIG

Compared to heuristic:

75 of 87

75

CO₂ Interrogation

+25% EIG

+8% EIG

+8% EIG

Compared to heuristic:

76 of 87

76

What information will be provided by an experimental design?

How do expected data uncertainties affect optimal designs?

Can experiments be optimised to focus on specific scientific questions?

How can experiments be designed efficiently?

77 of 87

77

Variational Function

EIG

experimental design

update variational function

Variational Function

EIG

update variational function

Variational Function

EIG

prior pdf

78 of 87

78

Variational Function

EIG

experimental design

update variational function

Variational Function

EIG

update variational function

Variational Function

EIG

design

update design

design

update design

optimal experimental design

prior pdf

79 of 87

one-step design optimisation

79

80 of 87

80

more stations at higher offsets

81 of 87

81

increasing EIG

82 of 87

82

83 of 87

83

84 of 87

84

computational savings of

at least one order of magnitude

different prior

85 of 87

Conclusions

85

  • information gain of an experiment can be calculated in different ways

  • effects of the different data likelihoods can be included

  • experiments can be designed to answer specific scientific questions

  • variational methods provide new possibilities of efficiently optimizing experimental designs

86 of 87

Future Directions

86

  • apply methods to more useful real-world application

  • investigate if focusing on specific questions allows optimal design to
    • be more resource efficient,
    • to be applied for more complex problems,
    • and explore which methods can be used to achieve this.

  • derive heuristics for new sensor types (e.g., DAS, rotational sensors, …)

  • I am open to ideas or collaborations

87 of 87

Accessibility

87

Visit my website (dominik-strutz.github.io) for further updates and contact information

For more information see our recently published preprint

Implementations of all algorithms presented in this talk.

Will be extended and made more user friendly in the future.