1 of 30

Pre-term Infant Ventilator Support

Mayah Carlton, Reuven Reyman, Jeffrey Keppler, Parissa Teli, Mike Zhang

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 1

2 of 30

Problem Definition

  • 10% of Pregnancies – result in preterm births
  • Skin to Skin Contact – Proven to benefit preterm infants
  • Challenge – Jet Ventilator cable is extremely short and can easily be pulled out from baby

Mayah

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 2

3 of 30

Project Sponsor

Dr Henry Lee

  • Neonatologist / Medical Director
  • Family Centered Care Task Force
  • Researches Family Interactions in NICU

Mayah

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 3

4 of 30

Objective

Mayah

Prevent unintended removal of ventilator cable from infant during parental skin-to-skin time

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 4

5 of 30

Fundamental Requirements and Constraints

Reuven

Fundamental Requirements

Constraints

  • Enhancement of Safety
  • Ergonomics
  • Size & Integration
  • Existing Ventilator Cables
  • Sterilization capabilities
  • Medical Device Standards and Regulations

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 5

6 of 30

Ventilation Cable Tension Sensor

Pros:

  • Prevent excessive tension on baby’s ventilator cable

Cons:

  • Possibility of failure
  • Additional device and cabling added to complex ventilator system

Reuven

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 6

7 of 30

Ventilation Cable Tension Sensor

High Risk Area:

  • Alarm Accuracy

Planned Risk Reduction Test:

  • Determine Threshold Tension Value Empirically
  • Sensor Testing

Reuven

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 7

8 of 30

Pros:

  • Conforms with Existing Procedure
  • Size

Cons:

  • Existing Products
  • Failure Possibility
  • Comfortability

Parissa

Support Vest

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 8

9 of 30

High Risk Areas:

  • Infant / Parent Comfort
  • Securing box

Planned Risk Reduction Test:

  • Material Durability

Parissa

Support Vest

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 9

10 of 30

Design Description:

  • Secure Tube Management
  • Safe Transfer
  • Skin-to-skin Care

Pros:

  • Reduce Manpower Needs
  • Similar existing structures
  • Integrated Design

Cons:

  • Large footprint
  • Complex Structure
  • Requires large factor of safety
  • High initial cost

Mike

Integrated Infant Transfer System

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 10

11 of 30

High Risk Areas:

  • Infant Overall Safety
  • Effect on Efficiency
  • Tube Connection Safety

Planned Risk Reduction Test:

  • Hardware Testing

Simulated User Operation

Load Capacity Tests

Tube Tension Monitoring

  • Analytical Prediction

Stress Data Analysis & Safety Assessment

Mike

Integrated Infant Transfer System

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 11

12 of 30

Alarm Box

Pros:

    • Battery operated
    • Low Battery indicator
    • Auditory and visual alert methods

Cons:

    • Complex ventilator system
    • Requires batteries
      • Additional regulatory constraints

Jeffrey

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 12

13 of 30

Alarm Box

High Risk Areas:

    • Loud Noises (45db max)
    • Alarm Fatigue

Planned Risk Reduction Test:

    • Response Time
    • Alarm Testing
    • Connectivity Testing
    • Redundancy Testing

Jeffrey

Jeffrey

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 13

14 of 30

Remaining Questions and Unresolved Issues

  • Balancing Patient Comfort and Safety 

  • Streamlining Transfer Process

  • Safety Regulations and Protocol

11

Mayah

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 14

15 of 30

Next Quarter – Milestones

1

Vest/Box Design

Material Selection

Vest Box Interface Prototype

Customer Feedback

Early Warning Design

Sensor Design Prototype

Sensitivity and Consistency Testing

Customer Feedback

Mayah

Transfer Stand

Design Prototype

Durability and Safety Testing

Customer Feedback

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 15

16 of 30

Next Quarter – Individual Component Analysis

Research Medical Related Device Implementation

Sensor Implementation

Support Vest

Transfer Stand

Alarm Box

Mayah

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 16

17 of 30

Gantt Chart

Jeffrey

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 17

18 of 30

Thank You

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 18

19 of 30

Problem Definition Notes

  • 10% of pregnancies result in a preterm birth
  • As part of caring for preterm babies, skin to skin contact has been proven to be an extremely beneficial treatment for preterm infants and mothers.
  • However, some preterm infants required respitory assistance with the use of jet ventilators. This equipment increases the risk associated with parental skin to skin contact due to the risk of dislodging the endotracheal tube

Our sponsor is interested in helping solve this problem

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 19

20 of 30

NOTES Sponsor

  • Neonatologist and Medical Director of the NICU at the Jacobs Medical Center
  • As a part of Family centered care task force, Dr Lee is interested in researching family interactions within the NICU. Dr Lee is dedicated to promoting family connections with the baby in the NICU setting because of the clinical and psychological benefits

1

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 20

21 of 30

NOTES Objective

  • Build, test, and document a device that allows for a safer experience of skin-to-skin treatment with preterm infants while attached to the ventilator by endotracheal tube and respiratory tubing.

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 21

22 of 30

NOTES Fundamental Requirements and Constraints

  • Safety Enhancement: The device shall improve safety during skin-to-skin treatment by providing consistent and reliable support for the infant's endotracheal tube positioning.

  • Ergonomics: The design must be ergonomic and user-friendly, supporting the comfort and ease of use for parents, nurses, and infants.

  • Early Warning System: The device shall incorporate an early warning system that detects and alerts for potential dislodgment of the endotracheal tube.

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 22

23 of 30

NOTES Design Solutions

Discuss :

List pros and Cons 

High Risk Areas

Planned risk reduction test

Risk Reduction Achievements Completed

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 23

24 of 30

Design Solutions Under Consideration

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 24

25 of 30

Pros and Cons

  • Transportation Design:
  • The tray design provides stability and simplifies operation.
  • Sliding may cause device displacement or cable tension.

  • Adjustable Support System:
  • Enhances safety and flexibility.
  • Increases cost.

  • Soft Wrap:
  • Soft and skin-friendly, reduces parental burden.
  • Precise length management for tube fixation.

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 25

26 of 30

List pros and Cons

  • All-in-One Infant Transfer Care Station:

Multifunctional design reduces manpower needs.

 Complex structure and large footprint.

  • Ventilator Tension Sensor:

Effectively reduces tube load, prevents blockage, and ensures easy operation.

Prone to false triggers, with difficult sensitivity adjustment.

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 26

27 of 30

High Risk Areas

  • Operational issues:

Complex equipment prone to misuse, affecting efficiency and infant safety.

  •  Tube detachment risk:

 Loosening or pulling threatens respiratory support.

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 27

28 of 30

Planned risk reduction test

Operational issues:

Hardware Tests:

1.Simulated User Operation. 2.Durability and Usability Tests

Analytical Predictions:

Break down steps, optimize design. Simulate interactions, enhance intuitiveness.

Tube detachment risk:

Hardware Tests:

1.Tensile Strength Test. 2.Alarm System Test.

Analytical Predictions:

Conduct force analysis. Conduct force analysis.

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 28

29 of 30

NOTES Questions

  • How do we balance creating a device with robust safety features without sacrificing patient comfort

  • How do we ensure that we don’t interrupt the existing workflow of the hospital by introducing a new device

  • What are the safety regulations and protocols that our device must adhere to

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 29

30 of 30

NOTES Project Management for Next Quarter

Milestones

  • Material selection for vest
    • Customer feedback (safety / comfort of the baby and parent)
  • Vest/ Box interface prototype
  • Sensor design prototype
    • Create sensitivity and consistency testing setup 
  • Early warning device prototype
    • Customer feedback (effectiveness of warning system)

Topics for each member's individual component analysis (IDEAS)

  • Sensor implementation – Reuven? (sensor and sensor/tube interface)
  • Box – baby interface vest - Parissa (sling or stand)
  • Stand / tray idea - Mike (transfer tray/ actuating arms)
  • Early warning device - Jeffrey (light/ speaker)
  • Study of skin-to-skin treatment workflow from incubator to parent (IE type)
  • Study of Bluetooth/ lowray (idk this word) device use in hospital
  • Study of tension impact on intubated infants/ tension testing devices
  • Study of medical related device implementation/ procedures/ sanitary and safety regulations - Mayah

MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 30