Pre-term Infant Ventilator Support
Mayah Carlton, Reuven Reyman, Jeffrey Keppler, Parissa Teli, Mike Zhang
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 1
Problem Definition
Mayah
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 2
Project Sponsor
Dr Henry Lee
Mayah
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 3
Objective
Mayah
Prevent unintended removal of ventilator cable from infant during parental skin-to-skin time
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 4
Fundamental Requirements and Constraints
Reuven
Fundamental Requirements | Constraints |
|
|
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 5
Ventilation Cable Tension Sensor
Pros:
Cons:
Reuven
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 6
Ventilation Cable Tension Sensor
High Risk Area:
Planned Risk Reduction Test:
Reuven
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 7
Pros:
Cons:
Parissa
Support Vest
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 8
High Risk Areas:
Planned Risk Reduction Test:
Parissa
Support Vest
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 9
Design Description:
Pros:
Cons:
Mike
Integrated Infant Transfer System
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 10
High Risk Areas:
Planned Risk Reduction Test:
Simulated User Operation
Load Capacity Tests
Tube Tension Monitoring
Stress Data Analysis & Safety Assessment
Mike
Integrated Infant Transfer System
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 11
Alarm Box
Pros:
Cons:
Jeffrey
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 12
Alarm Box
High Risk Areas:
Planned Risk Reduction Test:
Jeffrey
Jeffrey
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 13
Remaining Questions and Unresolved Issues
11
Mayah
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 14
Next Quarter – Milestones
1
Vest/Box Design
Material Selection
Vest Box Interface Prototype
Customer Feedback
Early Warning Design
Sensor Design Prototype
Sensitivity and Consistency Testing
Customer Feedback
Mayah
Transfer Stand
Design Prototype
Durability and Safety Testing
Customer Feedback
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 15
Next Quarter – Individual Component Analysis
Research Medical Related Device Implementation
Sensor Implementation
Support Vest
Transfer Stand
Alarm Box
Mayah
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 16
Gantt Chart
Jeffrey
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 17
Thank You
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 18
Problem Definition Notes
Our sponsor is interested in helping solve this problem
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 19
NOTES Sponsor
1
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 20
NOTES Objective
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 21
NOTES Fundamental Requirements and Constraints
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 22
NOTES Design Solutions
Discuss :
List pros and Cons
High Risk Areas
Planned risk reduction test
Risk Reduction Achievements Completed
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 23
Design Solutions Under Consideration
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 24
Pros and Cons
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 25
List pros and Cons
Multifunctional design reduces manpower needs.
Complex structure and large footprint.
Effectively reduces tube load, prevents blockage, and ensures easy operation.
Prone to false triggers, with difficult sensitivity adjustment.
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 26
High Risk Areas
Complex equipment prone to misuse, affecting efficiency and infant safety.
Loosening or pulling threatens respiratory support.
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 27
Planned risk reduction test
Operational issues:
Hardware Tests:
1.Simulated User Operation. 2.Durability and Usability Tests
Analytical Predictions:
Break down steps, optimize design. Simulate interactions, enhance intuitiveness.
Tube detachment risk:
Hardware Tests:
1.Tensile Strength Test. 2.Alarm System Test.
Analytical Predictions:
Conduct force analysis. Conduct force analysis.
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 28
NOTES Questions
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 29
NOTES Project Management for Next Quarter
Milestones
Topics for each member's individual component analysis (IDEAS)
MAE 156A | Team 7 | Page 30