Sustainable Procurement
June 2025 edition
Exclusive to “Master Slide Decks” subscribers
7 Potential Uses of the Master Slide Decks
How to find slides on a specific topic within a Master Slide Deck
User Tips & Reminders
7 Learning Prompts - Use the deck as a self-study micro course on this topic.
Table of Contents
Topics | Slide #s |
What is SP? – Definitions, Terminology | 5-18 |
Why SP? – Drivers, Barriers, Benefits | 19-52 |
How SP? – SP Toolkit | 53-84 |
What is NZP? – Definition, Positioning | 85-88 |
Why NZP? – Drivers, Benefits | 89-124 |
How NZP? – NZP Toolkit | 125-154 |
Status of NZP | 155-173 |
SP and NZP Support Organizations | 174-182 |
What is SP? �Definitions, Terminology
“Obtaining best value for money by purchasing…
…the most sustainable goods & services…
…from the most sustainable suppliers…
…in support of the buyer’s purpose and strategic goals.”
Sustainable Procurement (SP): Definition
Sustainable Procurement makes sustainability matter to suppliers, �because the scores on product and supplier sustainability �are significantly weighted (10+% of the points) in bid appraisals.
SP incentivizes companies to improve their product and company scores,� so that they earn more points than their competitors and win more bids.
“Sustainable �Procurement”(SP)
“Green Procurement”
“Social Procurement”
“Decoding Sustainable Procurement and Its 4 Starter Subsets,” Sustainability Advantage blog, August 2023.
Green Procurement
Net-Zero Procurement & Circular Procurement (NZP)
Obtaining best value for money by purchasing…�…the most low-carbon and circular goods & services…�…from suppliers who are most committed to science-based� net-zero GHG reduction targets and to circularity…�…in support of the buyer’s purpose and strategic goals.
Social Procurement�Obtaining best value for money by purchasing…�…the most socially beneficial goods & services / projects…
…from the most socially responsible suppliers who protect and enhance employee and community well-being…
…in support of the buyer’s purpose and strategic sustainability goals.
Obtaining best value for money by purchasing…�…the most environmentally beneficial goods & services…�…from the most environmentally responsible suppliers…�…in support of the buyer’s purpose and strategic sustainability goals.
Obtaining best value for money by purchasing…�…the most sustainable goods & services…from the most sustainable suppliers…�…in support of the buyer’s purpose and strategic sustainability goals.
Sustainable Procurement (SP)
Green Procurement
Net-Zero Procurement
Social Procurement�
Circular Procurement
A market force enabling attainment of the SDGS
Sustainable Procurement
Sustainable Procurement Enables the SDGs
Employee & Community / Society Wellbeing
Types of Suppliers
1
Producers of Product Inputs
Producers of �Ancillary Consumables
Providers of
Outsourced Core Functions
Producers of
Manufactured Assets
1
3
2
2
3
4
4
Company�Operations
Products
1
3
2
2
3
4
4
1
Providers of Occasional Services
1
2
3
4
3
2
2
3
4
4
2
3
4
1
Providers of �Outsourced Ancillary Functions
2
3
4
“Ancillary Suppliers”
Ancillary
Operations
“Core Suppliers”
Multi-Tiered Supply Chains
Tier 1�Suppliers
Core
Operations
Supplier Descriptions
Type of Supplier | Product Categories Procured from Suppliers |
Producers of �Product Inputs |
|
Providers of Outsourced Core Functions |
|
Producers of �Manufactured Assets |
|
Producers of Ancillary Consumables |
|
Providers of Outsourced Ancillary Functions |
|
Providers of �Occasional Services |
|
“Ancillary Suppliers”
“Core Suppliers”
SPLC Navigator
SPLC Navigator
SPLC Navigator – SP Integration Status
38 KPIs – multiple choice - applicable to all types of organizations
sustainablepurchasing.org/splc-navigator
1. Strategic Integration
continued …
1. Strategic Integration … continued
2. Supplier Sustainability
3. Product Sustainability
We use best-available guidance on priority product categories
4. Make It Matter
Competitive bid procurement
Standing offer procurement
5. External Leadership & Advocacy
Why SP?�Drivers, Barriers, Benefits
Greatest Impacts Are In Supply Chains
Based on a figure in “A Sustainable IT Purchasing Guide,” HP, January 2020.
Mutual Accountability For Value Chain Impacts
Organ-ization
Upstream Supply Chain
(End of �1st life dispos-ition)
Total Life Cycle / Value Chain
Downstream �Customer Chain
Tier 4 Suppliers:�Raw / virgin material extraction
Tier 3 Suppliers:�Raw material refining and processing
Tier 2 Suppliers: �Parts manufacturing & subassembly
Tier 1 Suppliers: �Final assembly, manufacturing, packaging
Impacts on the environment, on employees, and on society
Customer
EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)
“Just and sustainable economy,” European Commission press release, February 2024.
Companies must integrate due diligence into policies and strategies, �identify actual or potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts, and �end or minimize actual impacts from company operations, subsidiaries and supply chains.
PUMA Tier 1-4 Footprints
https://about.puma.com/en/newsroom/news/puma-and-ppr-home-announce-first-results-unprecedented-environmental-profit-loss
“Sustainable Public Procurement: 2022 Global Review, Part 1,” UN Environmental Programme, January 2022.�Based on data collected in 2021 on 314 organizations across 92 countries via a Stakeholder Survey, plus data gathered on SP activities of 45 countries in a National Government Questionnaire, plus interviews with 26 sustainable procurement experts, plus a literature review.
Top 10 Drivers to Implementing SPP
Based on a slide used in “Procurement 2025: The Journey to a New Value Proposition” webinar, Gartner, January 2025. �Based on a 2024 survey of 258 CPO respondents about procurement’s top 3 value propositions in 2025.
Top Procurement Value Propositions
“Return on Sustainability – The Value of Responsible,” EcoVadis, February 2025.
Top 7 Value Creation Drivers of SP
“State of Supply Chain Sustainability 2024,” MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics, 5th annual report, October 2024.�Based on 7,000+ valid responses from buyers in 80 countries to a 45-question survey.
State of Supply Chain Sustainability
Sources of pressure on companies to make their supply chains more sustainable.
Does your company have initiatives to reduce Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 GHG emissions?
“Sustainable Procurement Barometer 2024,” EcoVadis and Accenture, February 2024. �Based on data collected from nearly 600 buyers and more than 1,000 suppliers, worldwide.
Benefits of SP
“2023 Global Chief Procurement Officer (CPO) Survey: Orchestrators of Value,” Deloitte, June 2022.�Based on responses of nearly 350 senior procurement leaders from more than 40 countries.
Top Procurement / Enterprise Priorities
ESG was ranked 7th in 2021; now is 2nd highest priority
“Sustainable Public Procurement: 2022 Global Review, Part 2,” UN Environmental Programme, January 2022.�Based on data collected in 2021 on 314 organizations across 92 countries via a Stakeholder Survey, plus data gathered on SP activities of 45 countries in a National Government Questionnaire, plus interviews with 26 sustainable procurement experts, plus a literature review.
Top Drivers of SP in Private Corps
“Building supply chain sustainability that can drive revenues and reduce operational risks,” �EY, October 2022. Based on a survey of 525 supply chain executive across the Western hemisphere.
Top Motivators For Sustainable Supply Chains
Plus “non-financial” benefits
Based on a slide used in “Procurement 2025: The Journey to a New Value Proposition” webinar, Gartner, January 2025. �Based on a 2024 survey of 258 CPO respondents about the top 4 risks to procurement future success.
Top Risks to Procurement
Trade Policy Now On Par With Geopolitical Instability
“Economic Conditions Outlook, March 2025,” McKinsey & Company, March 2025.�Based on a worldwide survey of 988 executives, Feb. 26-Mar. 7, 2025.
“Supply Chain Risk Report 2025,” Sphera, February 2025.
Supply Chain Risks
Based on a slide used in “Procurement 2025: The Journey to a New Value Proposition” webinar, Gartner, January 2025. �Based on a 2024 survey of 104 CPO respondents about top ESG topics in sustainable procurement in 2025.
Top Sustainability Issues For Procurement
“Value of Sustainable Procurement Practices,” PwC and EcoVadis in collaboration with the INSEAD Social Innovation Centre, 2011.
Benefits of SP
Cost �reduction
Risk �reduction
Revenue�growth
Desired Benefits of SP
“Sustainable Procurement Barometer 2021: Key Findings Infographic,” EcoVadis and the Stanford Business School Value Chain Innovation Initiative, July 2021.
“Sustainable Procurement Barometer 2021: Key Findings Infographic,” �EcoVadis and the Stanford Business School Value Chain Innovation Initiative, July 2021.
Evolving Procurement Priorities
“Building supply chain sustainability that can drive revenues and reduce operational risks,” EY, July 2022.�Based on a survey of 525 supply chain executive across the Western hemisphere.
Benefits of Sustainable Supply Chains
“Sustainable Public Procurement: 2022 Global Review, Part 2,” UN Environmental Programme, January 2022.�Based on data collected in 2021 on 314 organizations across 92 countries via a Stakeholder Survey, plus data gathered on SP activities of 45 countries in a National Government Questionnaire, plus interviews with 26 sustainable procurement experts, plus a literature review.
Top Barriers to SP in Private Corps
“Sustainable Public Procurement: 2022 Global Review, Part 1,” UN Environmental Programme, January 2022.�Based on data collected in 2021 on 314 organizations across 92 countries via a Stakeholder Survey, plus data gathered on SP activities of 45 countries in a National Government Questionnaire, plus interviews with 26 sustainable procurement experts, plus a literature review.
Top 5 Barriers to SPP
“Sustainable Public Procurement: 2022 Global Review, Part 1,” UN Environmental Programme, January 2022.�Based on data collected in 2021 on 314 organizations across 92 countries via a Stakeholder Survey, plus data gathered on SP activities of 45 countries in a National Government Questionnaire, plus interviews with 26 sustainable procurement experts, plus a literature review.
Regional Comparison of Barriers to SPP (1 of 2)
“Sustainable Public Procurement: 2022 Global Review, Part 1,” UN Environmental Programme, January 2022.�Based on data collected in 2021 on 314 organizations across 92 countries via a Stakeholder Survey, plus data gathered on SP activities of 45 countries in a National Government Questionnaire, plus interviews with 26 sustainable procurement experts, plus a literature review.
Regional Comparison of Barriers to SPP (2 of 2)
Based partly on questions in “Sustainable Procurement Barometer 2023: Global Benchmark Survey with Accenture and EcoVadis”
Mitigating Supply Chain ESG “Hot Spots”
Benefits to Buyers of SP
Benefits to Suppliers of SP
Propose SP as a “Project”
20th Century CAPEX Request Form |
Project Requesters / Sponsors |
|
Project Description / Why needed |
|
Expense and Revenue Impacts |
|
Risks |
|
Capital Required (CAPEX) and Sources |
|
Financial Analysis / ROI |
Payback Period, IRR, NPV … |
+ Information added to traditional content
21st Century CAPEX Request Form |
Project Requesters / Sponsors |
|
Project Description / Why Needed |
+ Helps fulfill purpose / vision / values�+ Aligns with long-term strategic plans + Improves environmental and social impacts |
Expense and Revenue Impacts |
+ Increased revenue�+ Savings on operational and HR expenses + Lower cost of capital + Higher asset values and market value |
Risks avoided |
+ Monetized risks of not doing the project |
Capital Required (CAPEX) and Sources |
+ New sources of capital |
Financial Analysis / ROI |
Payback Period, IRR, NPV … |
SP “Project” Cost-Benefit Analysis
Identification / quantification / monetization help
Revenue growth
Employee productivity
Expense reductions
Access to capital
Higher asset value
Risk reductions
Improve stakeholder wellbeing�Attain sustainability goals
sustainabilityadvantage.com/businesscases/�project-level-business-case/
% Weight | Appraisal Criteria | Score�(1-5) | Weighted �Score |
% Weight | Project Description / Purpose fulfillment | Score | Weighted Score |
+ Helps fulfill Purpose�+ Aligns with long-term strategic plans + Improves environmental and social impacts | |||
% Weight | Opportunities arising from the project | Score | Weighted Score |
+ Savings on operational and HR expenses + Increased revenue�+ Lower cost of capital + Higher asset values and market value | |||
% Weight | Risks avoided | Score | Weighted Score |
+ Monetized risks of not doing the project | |||
% Weight | Capital Required (CAPEX) and Sources | Score | Weighted Score |
+ New sources of capital | |||
Financial Analysis / ROI | |||
Payback Period, IRR, NPV … | |||
100% | Projects with the highest total scores are funded | Total | |
Project Appraisal Tool
69% of respondents are taking sustainability performance into consideration when selecting new suppliers and renewing contracts – up from 51% in 2019.
SP Status
“Sustainable Procurement Barometer 2021: Key Findings Infographic,” �EcoVadis and the Stanford Business School Value Chain Innovation Initiative, July 2021.
Status of SP Use by�the Quebec Government
“Responsible Government Acquisitions,” Quebec Statistical Showcase on Sustainable Development website, April 2025�Based on an analysis of 8, 643 contracts in 2023-2024..
How SP? �SP Toolkit
Sustainable Procurement (SP) Toolkit
Expedites the integration of SP into any procurement process.
sustainabilityadvantage.com/sp/toolkit/
Toolkit
+ The Toolkit also includes a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator for use, if appropriate.
Pre-Procurement Checklist
“The most sustainable products �are the ones you don’t buy.”
Before purchasing new products, ask these circular economy-related questions:
Toolkit
Based on “Circular Procurement: Strategies for Circular Criteria,” Circular Innovation Council (CIC), January 2024.
“Sustainable Public Procurement: 2022 Global Review, Part 1,” UN Environmental Programme, January 2022.�Based on data collected in 2021 on 314 organizations across 92 countries via a Stakeholder Survey, plus data gathered on SP activities of 45 countries in a National Government Questionnaire, plus interviews with 26 sustainable procurement experts, plus a literature review.
Top 10 Product Categories in SP
Sample generic product sustainability specs | Score |
Product-as-a-Service (PaaS) or lease options | --%-- |
Supplier-refurbished product option | --%-- |
Take-back / trade-in / extended warranty options | --%-- |
Designed for repair, upgrades, refurbishment | --%-- |
Designed for disassembly and reuse of parts | --%-- |
% recycled, renewable, biodegradable materials | --%-- |
Traceability / chain of custody certifications | --%-- |
Harmful / toxic materials & chemicals | --%-- |
% recycled, biodegradable materials in packaging | --%-- |
% reuse & takeback of packaging | --%-- |
Carbon footprint of the product | --%-- |
GHGs from shipping / delivery | --%-- |
GHGs emitted during use, repair, EOL disposition | --%-- |
Energy efficiency ecolabel | --%-- |
(Other product-specific specs… ) | --%-- |
Average score | --%-- |
Sample SP Product Specs
Toolkit
Sources of Product Category Sustainability Specs
Sustainable Project / Works Specs Checklist
Project socio-economic-related specs
Project environmentally-related specs
These specifications are often found in Community Benefit Agreements (CBAs) associated with large infrastructure / works / construction projects.
communitybenefitsagreements.ca
US Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR):�Sustainable Products and Services procurement rule
“Biden-Harris Administration Announces Plan to Maximize Purchases of Sustainable Products and Services as Part of the President’s Investing in America Agenda,” White House press release, August 2023. �The rule is open for public comment for 60 days.
Will require Federal agencies to purchase EPA-recommended green products and services “to the maximum extent practicable”
The US Federal Government is the world’s largest buyer: �> $630B / year by GSA, NASA and DoD.
Sustainable Procurement (SP) Toolkit
Expedites the integration of SP into any procurement process.
sustainabilityadvantage.com/sp/toolkit/
Toolkit
+ The Toolkit also includes a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator for use, if appropriate.
Third-party supplier sustainability assessment or certification� e.g., EcoVadis rating� B Corp BIA score� CDP� Corporate Knights Global 100 ranking�
Self-assessment by supplier� e.g., Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)� Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Integrated Reporting <IR>
EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)
ISO 26000
SDG Action Manager� Basic Sustainability Assessment Tool (BSAT)
Supplier Sustainability Assessment
Walmart’s Supplier Sustainability Index
GreenBiz, “Why Walmart's better supplier scorecard is a big deal,” April 2013.
Walmart’s Supplier Sustainability Index
“Supplier Index,” walmartstores.com/sustainability/, 2010.
Energy & Climate
Material Efficiency
Natural Resources
People & Community
P&G’s Annual Supplier Citizenship Survey
Supplier Citizenship, P&G website (pgsupplier.com/supplier-citizenship#responsible-sourcing)
66
Framework �Comparisons
sustainabilityadvantage.com/frameworks/overview/
What impact topics / issues are common to all main sustainability reporting, standards, and rating frameworks?
Self-Assssment Frameworks |
+ Rating frameworks e.g., CK Global 100, CDP, EcoVadis, DJSI |
Common Core Topics / Issues
Issues / Topics | GRI | B Corp BIA | SDGs | <IR> | FFBB | TCFD | SASB | … | CK G100 | CDP | DJSI | … | |
Governance | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | - - - | - - - | | |
Environment | Goods & Services | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Energy | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | - - - | - - - | | |
Water | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | - - - | - - - | | |
GHG emissions | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | - - - | - - - | | |
Non-GHG emissions | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | - - - | - - - | | |
Waste & Circularity | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | |
Encroachment | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | |
Employees | Employee wages | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | |
Health & wellbeing | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | |
Employment terms | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | |
Concerns process | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | |
Diversity & Inclusion | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | |
Community | Community impacts | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Taxes & Donations | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | |
Business ethics | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | |
Lobbying | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | | | - - - | | |
Investments | - - - | - - - | - - - | | - - - | | - - - | | | | | | |
https://sustainabilityadvantage.com/assessments/bsat/
Challenges With Most Assessment Frameworks
Most Companies Are SMEs
Stats Canada, 2022 data
+ 2.8 million non-employer firms
SMEs employ 63.8% of the total Canadian labor force.
1.3 million employer firms
Basic Sustainability Assessment Tool (BSAT)
sustainabilityadvantage.com/assessments/bsat/
BSAT Verification / Assurance Approach
Community
Employees
Environment
Wages
Energy
Procured products
Encroachment
Wellbeing
Diversity & Inclusion
Employment terms
Water
42%
83%
80%
30%
73%
67%
63%
Governance
63%
79%
GHG emissions�(Scope 1, 2, & 3)
Waste & Circularity
Non-GHG emissions
54%
66%
69%
70%
Positive Impacts
9%
OVERALL SCORE
65%
Basic Sustainability �Assessment Tool (BSAT) �Sample Scores
sustainabilityadvantage.com/assessments/bsat/
Sustainable Procurement (SP) Toolkit
Expedites the integration of SP into any procurement process.
sustainabilityadvantage.com/sp/toolkit/
Toolkit
+ The Toolkit also includes a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator for use, if appropriate.
SP Bid Appraisal Template �Weighting makes sustainability attributes matter.
Weight (% of Points) | SP Bid Appraisal Criteria | Score �(0-100%) | Weighted Score |
X% | Product quality ‒ performance, durability | Score | Weighted score |
10-30% | Product sustainability quality – �meets sustainability-related specifications | Score | Weighted score |
Y% | Supplier quality ‒ reliability, capacity, experience | Score | Weighted score |
10-30% | Supplier sustainability quality – �performance on sustainability-related issues | Score | Weighted score |
Z% | Price / Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) | Score | Weighted score |
100% of the points | Bid with the best value = Bid with the highest total | Total | |
Toolkit
Best Price
Best product quality
Best supplier quality
Best Value
Affordability
Best TCO
Poorer product �quality…
Poorer supplier �quality…
Best Value – Weighted Scores Methodology
Weight �(% of points) | SP Bid Appraisal �Criteria | Supplier A Bid | Supplier B Bid | Supplier C Bid | |||
% Score | Weighted Score | % Score | Weighted Score | % Score | Weighted Score | ||
X% | Product quality ‒ performance, durability | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score |
10-30% | Product sustainability quality | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score |
Y% | Supplier quality – reliability, capacity, experience | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score |
10-30% | Supplier sustainability quality | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score |
Z% | Price / TCO | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score |
100% | Best value = Highest total | Total | | Total | | Total | |
Best Value – Example
Weight �(% of points) | SP Bid Appraisal �Criteria | Supplier A Bid | Supplier B Bid | Supplier C Bid | |||
% Score | Weighted Score | % Score | Weighted Score | % Score | Weighted Score | ||
30% | Product quality | 80% | 240 | 90% | 270 | 50% | 150 |
10% | Product sustainability quality | 50% | 50 | 60% | 60 | 40% | 40 |
10% | Supplier quality | 70% | 70 | 80% | 80 | 60% | 60 |
10% | Supplier sustainability quality | 60% | 60 | 70% | 70 | 50% | 50 |
40% | Price / TCO | 60%* | 240 | 80%* | 320 | 100%* | 400 |
100% | Best value = Highest total | 660 | | 800 | | 700 | |
($700K)
($600K)
($500K)
* Score = 100% – (% by which that supplier’s price exceeds the lowest price)
Best Value
Best Price
Best Non-Financial Value Methodology - Example
SP Bid Appraisal Criteria | Supplier A Bid | Supplier B Bid | Supplier C Bid |
% Score | % Score | % Score | |
Product quality ‒ performance, durability | 80% | 90% | 50% |
Product sustainability quality | 50% | 60% | 40% |
Supplier quality ‒ reliability, capacity, experience | 70% | 80% | 60% |
Supplier sustainability quality | 60% | 70% | 50% |
Total non-financial value score | 260 | 300 | 220 |
Price / Total Cost of Ownership | $700,000 | $600,000 | $500,000 |
Best value for money �= Lowest cost per non-financial value score�(Price ÷ non-financial value score) | $2,692 | $2,000 | $2,272 |
Based on a best value calculation methodology (Price ÷ Non-financial value score) developed by Buy Social Canada and Larry Berglund.
Best Value
Best Price
Sustainable Procurement (SP) Toolkit
Expedites the integration of SP into any procurement process.
sustainabilityadvantage.com/sp/toolkit/
Toolkit
+ The Toolkit also includes a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator for use, if appropriate.
SP Contract Ts & C’s
Contract terms and conditions that help ensure winning suppliers �will meet their sustainability targets. For example …
Toolkit
“Reaching Net-Zero: Incentives for Supply Chain Decarbonization,” WBCSD and PwC, November 2021; The Chancery Lane Project, SME’s Net-Zero Objectives clauses;�“2024 Global Trends in Stakeholder Incentives: What’s Next?” Farient Advisors, the Global Governance and Executive Compensation (GECN) Group,, March 2024.
Sustainable Procurement (SP) Toolkit
Expedites the integration of SP into any procurement process.
sustainabilityadvantage.com/sp/toolkit/
Toolkit
+ The Toolkit also includes a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator for use, if appropriate.
Estimates all ongoing direct and indirect costs, benefits and value associated with the procurement of the goods and services.
Total Cost / Value Of Ownership (TCO)
TCO helps determine if initially paying more for the goods and services is the best long-term financial decision.
Benefits
Total Cost / Value of Ownership (TCO) | Yr 1 | Yr 2 | Yr 3 | Yr 4 | Yr 5 | … | Yr x |
One-time acquisition and start-up costs | | | | | | | |
All prices, taxes, fees, start-up costs, etc., �‒ Any incentives for sustainable products | | | | | | | |
Ongoing costs / expenses | | | | | | | |
Utilities, fees, supplies, insurance, maintenance, etc. | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
Value of ongoing revenue increases (optional, if significant) | | | | | | | |
From improved reputation, brand, image | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
Value of employee-related benefits (optional, if significant) | | | | | | | |
Improved productivity; lower hiring and attrition costs | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
Cost of disposition at end-of-life | | | | | | | |
Cost of disposition, minus Trade-in value | | | | | | | $ |
Annual cash flows | $$ | $$ | $$ | $$ | $$ | $$ | $$ |
NPV of impact on cash flows | $$$ | ||||||
Value added to balance sheet (optional, if significant) | $$$ | ||||||
Avoided costs if did NOT make the acquisition (optional) | $$$ | ||||||
Based on …
“Net-Zero Procurement” ensures that buyers… �
… obtain the best value for money when� purchasing …
�… the most sustainable goods and services …
�… from the most sustainable suppliers …
�… in support of the organization’s stated purpose � and strategic goals.�
SP Toolkit Simplifies SP Integration
Bid Appraisal Template
TCO Tool (optional)
Sample Product Specs
Bid Appraisal Template
Basic Sustainability Assessment Tool (BSAT)
Toolkit
What is NZP�Definition, Positioning
“Sustainable �Procurement”(SP)
“Green Procurement”
“Social Procurement”
“Decoding Sustainable Procurement and Its 4 Starter Subsets,” Sustainability Advantage blog, August 2023.
“Obtaining best value for money by purchasing…
…the most low-carbon and circular goods & services…
…from suppliers who are most committed to science-based, � net-zero GHG reduction targets and to circularity, …
…in support of the buyer’s purpose and strategic goals.”
Net-Zero Procurement (NZP): Definition
Net-Zero Procurement makes GHG reductions and circularity matter to suppliers, because the scores on product and supplier low-carbon and circularity attributes are significantly weighted (10+% of the points) in their customers’ bid appraisals.
NZP incentivizes suppliers to improve their product and company scores, so that they earn more points than their competitors and win more bids.
Best Price
Best product quality
Best supplier quality
Best Value
Affordability�Best TCO
Poorer product �quality…
Poorer supplier �quality…
Why NZP?
Drivers, Benefits
Trump Anti-Climate Rollbacks
.
“Trump Tracker: 100 Days, 100 Harms,” Climate Action Campaign, April 2025.
Addressing the Climate Emergency
.
The Net-Zero Procurement (NZP) Solution:
Use the buying power of the public, private, and academic sectors as a �market force to mobilize suppliers/ businesses in the race to net-zero.
“Next Generation NDCs: Accelerating climate action under the Paris Agreement,” WRI, October 2024.� “The Benefits for SMEs of Taking Climate Actions,” BDC, December 2023. �Businesses account for roughly 80% of annual GHG emissions in Canada, households 17%, and the public sector 3%.
Governments Are Not Doing Enough
“Emissions Pathways,” Climate Action Tracker website, May 2025.
California Large Suppliers’ GHG Reporting
“California Supply Chain Report,” G&A, April 2025.�Based on an analysis of GHG reporting by 136 large suppliers doing $25M+ annual business with State of California
… and these are the large suppliers in California!
NZP Is An Untapped GHG Reduction Market Force
87% of suppliers who reduce their GHGs are actively engaged by their customers / buyers. However,
“Scope 3 Upstream: Big Challenges, Simple Remedies,” CDP & BCG, June 2024, and “Strengthening the Chain,” CDP, & HSBC, October 2024. �Based on data from over 23,000 companies that disclosed to CDP in 2023.
Supply chain Scope 3 emissions are 26X buyers’ Scopes 1 and 2 GHG emissions.
5 Supply Chain Decarbonization Obstacles
“Best Practices: Supply Chain Decarbonization” Verdantix infographic, February 2025.
Based on “SBTi Net-Zero Standard,” Science-Based Targets, October 2021..
SBTi Net-Zero Target
“Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of climate change,” Summary for Policymakers of the IPCC Working Group III report, April 2022.
IPCC – April 2022
UN Secretary General António Guterres
“The latest IPCC report is a litany of broken climate promises. Some government & business leaders are saying one thing, but doing another. They are lying. It is time to stop burning our planet.”
Most Severe Risks to Economies
“The Global Risks Report 2023,” World Economic Forum (WEF), January 2023.
Drivers Of Decarbonization
“The State of Decarbonization,” Smart Energy Decisions Research, sponsored by NRG, August 2022.
Trends in GHG Emissions Management
“Trends in Corporate Emissions Management,” Optera, Nov 2024. Based on a survey of managers in 90 NA and EU x-sector large companies, summer 2024.
Net Zero Initiative (NZI) 10 Principles
“The 10 NZI principles for an ambitious climate action,” Net Zero Initiative website, April 2023.
Mutual Accountability For Value Chain Impacts
Organ-ization
Upstream Supply Chain
Customer
(End of �1st life dispos-ition)
Total Life Cycle / Value Chain
Downstream �Customer Chain
Tier 4 Suppliers:�Raw / virgin material extraction
Tier 3 Suppliers:�Raw material refining and processing
Tier 2 Suppliers: �Parts manufacturing & subassembly
Tier 1 Suppliers: �Final assembly, manufacturing, packaging
Impacts on the environment / nature, on employees, and on society
Supply Chain Scope 3 GHGs Dwarf Buyers’ Scope 1 and 2 Emissions
“Scope 3 Upstream: Big Challenges, Simple Remedies,” CDP, & BCG, June 2024.
Scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG Emission Sources
Tier 4
Tier 3
Tier 2
Tier 1
Buyer / Customer
Supply Chain / Upstream Scope 3
User
End of 1st life disposition
Scope 1
Total Life Cycle / Value Chain
Downstream Scope 3
Scope 2
1
6
8
7
3
4
5
9
10
11
14
13
12
15
2
1
6
7
4
2
Carbon footprints of …
Product Carbon Footprints
Tier 4
Tier 3
Tier 2
Tier 1
Buyer / Customer
Supply Chain / Upstream Scope 3
User
End of 1st life disposition
Scope 1
Downstream Scope 3
Scope 2
6
8
7
3
4
5
9
10
11
14
13
12
15
1
6
7
4
2
Tier 4 Supplier
Tier 3 Supplier
Tier 2 Supplier
Tier 1 Supplier
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
Product Carbon Footprints
Tier 4 Suppliers:��Raw / virgin material extraction
Tier 3 Suppliers:��Raw material refining and processing
Tier 2 Suppliers:� �Subassembly �& parts manufacturing
Tier 1 Suppliers:�
Final assembly, manufacturing, packaging, sale
Buyer / Customer��
Supply Chain / Cradle-to-Gate
Carbon footprints of …
1
2
3
3
3
3
1: Supplier Scope 1 GHG emissions
2: Supplier Scope 2 GHG emissions
3: Supplier Scope 3 GHGs from transportation (Categories 4 & 9)
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
Circularity Lowers Carbon Footprints
Buyer / Customer
User
End of 1st life disposition
Avoids resource extraction and production of new goods, which are responsible for 45% of global GHG emissions.
Repairing and refurbishing products can cut global GHG emissions by 39%
Repair & Refurbish
Recycle
Legend
Tier 4 Supplier
Tier 3 Supplier
Tier 2 Supplier
Tier 1 Supplier
Carbon footprints of …
1
2
3
3
3
3
1
2
1
2
1
2
X
X
X
1: Supplier Scope 1 GHG emissions
2: Supplier Scope 2 GHG emissions
3: Supplier Scope 3 GHG emissions� from transportation (Category 9)
Current Drivers of GHG Reductions
Tier 4 Suppliers:��Raw / virgin material extraction
Tier 3 Suppliers:��Raw material refining and processing
Tier 2 Suppliers:� �Subassembly �& parts manufacturing
Tier 1 Suppliers:�
Final assembly, manufacturing, packaging, sale
Buyer / Customer��
Government regulations and incentives
Pressure from bankers, investors, employees, etc.
NZP Adds 3 More Drivers of GHG Reductions
Tier 4 Suppliers:��Raw / virgin material extraction
Tier 3 Suppliers:��Raw material refining and processing
Tier 2 Suppliers:� �Subassembly �& parts manufacturing
Tier 1 Suppliers:�
Final assembly, manufacturing, packaging, sale
Buyer / Customer��
NZP
NZP
NZP
NZP
Government regulations and incentives
Pressure from bankers, investors, employees, etc.
3. Suppliers’ other customers’, and buyers’ customers, use of NZP
2. Ripple effect of NZP through supply chains when suppliers are incentivized to use NZP with their suppliers
1. Customers’ use of NZP with their Tier 1 suppliers
Scope 3 Reduction Strategies
Screen capture from recording of Persefoni“Climate Disclosures and Supply Chain Emissions” webinar, with 3 Degrees and Persefoni.
“Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard,” GHG Protocol, 2011.
Scope 3-Related Opportunities
“Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard,” GHG Protocol, 2011.
Scope 3-Related Risks
NZP Increases Demand For Clean Energy
“The Oil and Gas Industry in Net Zero Transitions,” International Energy Agency (IEA), Nov 2023
Supply-side
Demand-side
Fossil Fuels
Renewables
NZP Reduces Demand For Fossil Fuels
Buy products that do not require fossil fuels
(“The Stone Age didn’t end because we ran out of stones …”)
NZCP
Incetivize reduced demand for fossil fuels
Demands for Scope 3 / Supply Chain GHG Disclosures
“Think you won’t have to report Scope 3? Think again.” GreenFin Weekly, GreenBiz, May 2023.
Benefits to Buyers of NZP
Net-Zero �Procurement Toolkit
Benefits to Suppliers of NZP
Why Net-Zero Procurement
“5 Reasons Net-Zero Procurement Can Achieve System Change,” Sustainability Advantage blog, May 2022.
https://sustainabilityadvantage.com/2022/04/05/6757/
3 Superpowers of Net-Zero Procurement
“7 Benefits to any COP government of Net-Zero Procurement” at sustainabilityadvantage.com/blog/
NZP Is A “Super-Leverage Point”
Uses the super-leverage point attributes described in ““The Breakthrough Effect: How To Trigger A Cascade Of Tipping Points To Accelerate The Net Zero Transition,” Bezos Earth Fund, SystemIQ, and University of Exeter, January 2023.
NZP Implementation Plan
Ubiquitous Net-Zero Procurement (NZP)
NZP used by all �levels of government in Canada �… and their suppliers
NZP used by all governments and sectors, worldwide
NZP used by �the Canadian Government�… and its suppliers�
Provinces / Territories�/ Municipalities
Suppliers / Buyers
Other countries
CCPI
COP30
Suppliers / Buyers
Suppliers / Buyers
$400B
$30B
$9T
Tier�1
Tier�2
Tier�3
Tier�4
Start small …
… to go big
Align procurement systems to create global market forces �that drive the transition to the world we want, in time.
Expand Net-Zero Procurement to�Sustainable Procurement, to make more supplier and product social and environmental attributes matter.
Institutionalize a decarbonized, circular, and inclusive economy, supported by a regenerative environment.
Procure the World We Want
All countries
All suppliers / Buyers
Sustainable business models
NZP Helps Win the GHG Reduction Trifecta
1. Reduce the carbon footprints of all products to net-zero by 2050 or sooner
NZP incentivizes a buyer’s suppliers to reduce their Scope 1, Scope 2, and relevant Scope 3 GHG emissions to net-zero by 2050 or sooner. If suppliers’ GHG emissions are net-zero, their products' carbon footprints are net-zero.
2. Reduce all organizations' GHG emissions to net-zero by 2050 or sooner
All companies are in supply chains. Deploying NZP with speed and scale, globally, would unleash $trillions of buying power to incentivize a critical mass of companies to reduce their GHGs to net zero by 2050 or sooner.
3. Fix the climate emergency by 2050 or sooner
NZP can be used buyers in all sectors (public, private, academic) to incentivize their suppliers to reduce their GHG emissions. The ubiquitous use of NZP incentivizes all businesses to take action to reduce their GHGs to net-zero by 2050 or sooner, increasing the possibility that we can fix the climate crisis, in time.
How NZP? �NZP Toolkit
NZP Toolkit is a Subset of the SP Toolkit
Net-Zero Procurement (NZP) Toolkit
Sustainable Procurement (SP) Toolkit
Net-Zero Procurement (NZP) Toolkit
Expedites the integration of NZP into any procurement process.
+ The Toolkit also includes a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator for use, if appropriate.
https://sustainabilityadvantage.com/sp/net-zero/
Pre-Purchase Checklist for NZP
“The most low-carbon and circular products �are the ones you don’t buy.”
Before purchasing new products, ask these questions:
Based on “Circular Procurement: Strategies for Circular Criteria,” Circular Innovation Council (CIC), September 2023.
Sample NZP Product Specs
Based on “Circular Procurement: Strategies for Circular Criteria,” Circular Innovation Council (CIC), September 2023.
Sample Generic Low-Carbon & Circularity Specs | Score |
Product-as-a-Service (PaaS) or lease options | --%-- |
Supplier-refurbished product option | --%-- |
Take-back / trade-in / extended warranty options | --%-- |
Designed for repair, upgrades, refurbishment | --%-- |
Designed for disassembly and reuse of parts | --%-- |
% recycled, renewable, biodegradable materials | --%-- |
Traceability / chain of custody certifications | --%-- |
Harmful / toxic materials & chemicals | --%-- |
% recycled, biodegradable materials in packaging | --%-- |
% reuse & takeback of packaging | --%-- |
Carbon footprint of the product | --%-- |
GHGs from shipping / delivery | --%-- |
GHGs emitted during use, repair, EOL disposition | --%-- |
Energy efficiency ecolabel | --%-- |
(Other product-specific specs…) | --%-- |
Average score | --%-- |
NZP Project / Works Specs Checklist
Project socio-economic-related specs
Project low-carbon / circularity specs
These specifications are often found in Community Benefit Agreements (CBAs) associated with large infrastructure / works / construction projects.
communitybenefitsagreements.ca
Net-Zero Procurement (NZP) Toolkit
Expedites the integration of NZP into any procurement process.
+ The Toolkit also includes a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator for use, if appropriate.
https://sustainabilityadvantage.com/sp/net-zero/
Excel-based supplier questionnaire
Online supplier questionnaire platforms
Supplier GHG Assessment Tools
Online Supplier GHG Assessment Tool Criteria
Need to Engage SMEs in the Race to Net-Zero …
“The Benefits for SMEs of Taking Climate Actions,” BDC, December 2023.
Comparison of Online Supplier GHG Assessments
Attributes / Capabilities | CDP | Cority | EcoVadis | Persefoni | Salesforce | Sphera | |
Credentials | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Supplier Question� Topics | Scope 1 | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - |
Scope 2 | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Scope 3 | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Circularity | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Governance | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
(Other ESG topics) | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
- - - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Supplier �Support | SME-friendly | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - |
Scorecard | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Improvement plan | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Education, Help | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
- - - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Buyer Support | Bulk deployment | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - |
Survey tracking | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Dashboard | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
- - - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
Pricing | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | - - - | |
sustainabilityadvantage.com/assessments/nzat/
“Mobilizing Small Businesses to Net Zero,” We Mean Business Coalition and SME Climate Hub, 2025.
Customers Motivate SMEs To Reduce Their GHGs
“Mobilizing Small Businesses to Net Zero,” We Mean Business Coalition and SME Climate Hub, 2025.
NZP Is An Untapped Market Force That Would Engage SMEs in the Race to Net-Zero
Net-Zero Ambition Assessment Tool (NZAAT)
https://sustainabilityadvantage.com/assessments/nzat/
NZAAT Is A Subset Of BSAT
Net-Zero Ambition Assessment Tool (NZAAT)
+ Bonus for using NZP with their suppliers,� helping others’ reduce their GHGs
5%
Governance commitment to net-zero
36%
OVERALL SCORE
62%
Environment
Commitment to net-zero targets� for Scope 1 emissions
82%
Commitment to net-zero targets �for Scope 2 emissions
63%
Commitment to net-zero targets �for Scope 3 emissions
54%
Commitment to circularity
54%
Basic Sustainability Assessment Tool (BSAT)
Tracking, Targets, Plans | All �Scope 1 | All �Scope 2 | At least 1 Scope 3 | Score |
We monitor and record our GHG emissions. | □ | □ | □ | % |
We have a base reference year for our GHG reductions. | □ | □ | □ | % |
We have a target to reduce our GHGs by 100% by 2050, or earlier. | □ | □ | □ | % |
We have a target to reduce our GHGs by 50% by 2030, or earlier. | □ | □ | □ | % |
We have a target to reduce our GHGs by X% within 2 years. | □ | □ | □ | % |
(This is our plan to reduce our GHGs in the next 2 years) | □ | □ | □ | % |
We participate in a third-party net-zero assessment / validation. | □ | □ | □ | % |
Bonus Points | | |||
We use Net-Zero Procurement (NZP) with >10% of our suppliers >10% of revenue from our cleantech products that help others reduce their GHGs | % % | |||
>10% of revenue from our cleantech products that remove GHGs from the atmosphere | % | |||
Score | Avg % | |||
Qs on Ambition re Net-Zero Targets
Based on Net-Zero Ambition Assessment Tool (NZAAT), Sustainability Advantage
Circular design of products, offerings, and packaging | Today, to nearest 10% | Target, within 3 years |
% by weight of recycled parts / materials / plastics in our sold products | --%-- | --%-- |
% of revenue from products designed for repair and refurbishing | --%-- | --%-- |
% of revenue from products designed for disassembly by third parties | --%-- | --%-- |
% of revenue from products that we offer to take-back | --%-- | --%-- |
% of revenue from products that we offer as refurbished products | --%-- | --%-- |
% of revenue not from single-use plastic products or products with microbeads | --%-- | --%-- |
% of revenue from products we offer for lease, rent, or Product-as-a-Service (PaaS) | --%-- | --%-- |
% by weight of recycled, recyclable, or biodegradable material in our packaging | --%-- | --%-- |
% of our packaging that we take-back and reuse or recycle | --%-- | --%-- |
Score | Avg % | |
Qs on Ambition re Circular Design (Draft)
Based on “Circular Procurement: Strategies for Circular Criteria,” Circular Innovation Council (CIC), January 2024.
BSAT Verification / Assurance Approach
Net-Zero Procurement (NZP) Toolkit
Expedites the integration of NZP into any procurement process.
+ The Toolkit also includes a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator for use, if appropriate.
https://sustainabilityadvantage.com/sp/net-zero/
NZP Bid Appraisal Template - Sample�Weighting makes low-carbon and circularity attributes matter
Weight (% of Points) | NZP Bid Appraisal Criteria | Score �(0-100%) | Weighted Score |
30% | Product quality ‒ performance, durability | Score | Weighted score |
10% | Product low-carbon and circularity quality – �meets priority low-carbon and circularity specs | Score | Weighted score |
10% | Supplier quality ‒ reliability, capacity, experience | Score | Weighted score |
10% | Supplier net-zero and circularity quality –�commits to reducing GHGs and to circularity | Score | Weighted score |
40% | Price / Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) | Score | Weighted score |
(100%) | Bid with the best value = Bid with the highest total | Total | |
Best Price
Best product quality
Best supplier quality
Best Value
Affordable
Best TCO
Poorer product �quality…
Poorer supplier �quality…
Best Value – Weighted Scores Methodology
Weight �(% of points) | NZP Bid Appraisal �Criteria | Supplier A Bid | Supplier B Bid | Supplier C Bid | |||
% Score | Weighted Score | % Score | Weighted Score | % Score | Weighted Score | ||
X% | Product quality ‒ performance, durability | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score |
10-30% | Product low-carbon and circularity quality | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score |
Y% | Supplier quality ‒ reliability, capacity, experience | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score |
10-30% | Supplier net-zero and circularity quality | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score |
Z% | Price / TCO | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score | Score | Weighted score |
100% | Best value = Highest total | Total | | Total | | Total | |
Best Value – Example
Weight �(% of points) | NZP Bid Appraisal �Criteria | Supplier A | Supplier B | Supplier C | |||
% Score | Weighted Score | % Score | Weighted Score | % Score | Weighted Score | ||
30% | Product quality ‒ performance, durability | 80% | 240 | 90% | 270 | 50% | 150 |
10% | Product low-carbon and circularity quality | 50% | 50 | 60% | 60 | 40% | 40 |
10% | Supplier quality ‒ reliability, capacity, experience | 70% | 70 | 80% | 80 | 60% | 60 |
10% | Supplier net-zero and circularity quality | 60% | 60 | 70% | 70 | 50% | 50 |
40% | Price / TCO | 60%* | 240 | 80%* | 320 | 100%* | 400 |
100% | Best value = Highest total | 660 | | 800 | | 700 | |
($700K)
($600K)
($500K)
* Score = 100% – (% by which that supplier’s price exceeds the lowest price)
Best Value
Best Price
Best Non-Financial Value Methodology - Example
NZP Bid Appraisal Criteria | Supplier A Bid | Supplier B Bid | Supplier C Bid |
% Score | % Score | % Score | |
Product quality ‒ performance, durability | 80% | 90% | 50% |
Product low-carbon and circularity quality | 50% | 60% | 40% |
Supplier quality ‒ reliability, capacity, experience | 70% | 80% | 60% |
Supplier low-carbon and circularity quality | 60% | 70% | 50% |
Total non-financial value score | 260 | 300 | 220 |
Price / Total Cost of Ownership | $700,000 | $600,000 | $500,000 |
Best value for money �= Lowest cost per non-financial value score�(Price ÷ non-financial value score) | $2,692 | $2,000 | $2,272 |
Based on a best value calculation methodology (Price ÷ Non-financial value score) developed by Buy Social Canada and Larry Berglund.
Best Value
Best Price
Net-Zero Procurement (NZP) Toolkit
Expedites the integration of NZP into any procurement process.
+ The Toolkit also includes a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator for use, if appropriate.
https://sustainabilityadvantage.com/sp/net-zero/
NZP Contract Ts & Cs
Contract terms and conditions (Ts & Cs) that help ensure winning suppliers �will meet their net-zero and circularity targets. For example …
“Reaching Net-Zero: Incentives for Supply Chain Decarbonization,” WBCSD and PwC, November 2021; The Chancery Lane Project, SME’s Net-Zero Objectives clauses;�“2024 Global Trends in Stakeholder Incentives: What’s Next?” Farient Advisors, the Global Governance and Executive Compensation (GECN) Group,, March 2024.
Net-Zero Procurement (NZP) Toolkit
Plug-and-Play “NZP-In-A-Box”
https://sustainabilityadvantage.com/sp/net-zero/
+ The Toolkit also includes a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator for use, if appropriate.
Estimates all ongoing direct and indirect costs, benefits and value associated with the procurement of the goods and services.
Total Cost / Value Of Ownership (TCO)
TCO helps determine if initially paying more for the goods and services is the best long-term financial decision.
Benefits
Total Cost / Value of Ownership (TCO) | Yr 1 | Yr 2 | Yr 3 | Yr 4 | Yr 5 | … | Yr x |
One-time acquisition and start-up costs | | | | | | | |
All prices, taxes, fees, start-up costs, etc., �‒ Any incentives for sustainable products | | | | | | | |
Ongoing costs / expenses | | | | | | | |
Utilities, fees, supplies, insurance, maintenance, etc. | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
Value of ongoing revenue increases (optional, if significant) | | | | | | | |
From improved reputation, brand, image | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
Value of employee-related benefits (optional, if significant) | | | | | | | |
Improved productivity; lower hiring and attrition costs | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
Cost of disposition at end-of-life | | | | | | | |
Cost of disposition, minus Trade-in value | | | | | | | $ |
Annual cash flows | $$ | $$ | $$ | $$ | $$ | $$ | $$ |
NPV of impact on cash flows | $$$ | ||||||
Value added to balance sheet (optional, if significant) | $$$ | ||||||
Avoided costs if did NOT make the acquisition (optional) | $$$ | ||||||
Based on …
“Net-Zero Procurement” ensures that buyers… �
… obtain the best value for money when� purchasing …
�… the most low-carbon goods & services…��… from suppliers who are most committed to� net-zero targets and to circularity, …��… in support of the organization’s stated purpose, � policies, and strategic goals.�
NZP Toolkit Simplifies NZP Integration
Bid Appraisal Template �TCO Tool (optional)
Sample Product Specs
Bid Appraisal Template
Net-Zero Ambition Assessment Tool (NZAAT)
Status of NZP
Canada, US, and UK Require Some�Supplier Net-Zero GHG Disclosures
Country | Value of contractor’s �annual federal contracts | Public disclosures of GHGs | GHG net-zero reduction targets validated | |
CA1 | “Major” suppliers | > $25M | Scope 1, 2 & �relevant Scope 3 | Participate in Net Zero Challenge (NZC) or equivalent |
US2 | “Major” contractors | > $50M | Scope 1, 2 & �relevant Scope 3 | Yes (thru SBTi) |
“Significant” contractors | $7.5M to $50M | Scope 1 &2 only | No | |
UK3 | (Any) suppliers | > £5M | Scope 1, 2 & five Scope 3 categories | Net-zero for UK operations �+ Carbon Reduction Plan (CRP) |
NHS England4 |
| Scope 1, 2 & five Scope 3 categories |
| |
1 Canada: Standard on the Disclosure of GHG Emissions and the Setting of Reduction Targets; since April 2023.
2 US: Federal Supplier Climate Risks and Resilience Proposed Rule; comment period ended February 2023; expected November 2024.
3 UK: PPN 06/21: Taking Account of Carbon Reduction Plans in the procurement of major government contracts; since September 2021.�4 “Carbon reduction plan and net zero commitment requirements for the procurement of NHS goods, services and works,” NHS, Oct. 2023.
US Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR):�Federal Supplier Climate Risks and Resilience Rule
“Federal Supplier Climate Risks and Resilience Proposed Rule,” Office of the U.S. Federal Chief Sustainability Officer, Nov. 2022. �Contractors can use CDP, TCFD, and SBTi criteria and assessments when making their disclosures.
Value of contractor’s �annual federal contracts | Public disclosures of current GHGs (thru GHG Protocol) | GHG net-zero reduction targets validated | TCFD-aligned assessment of climate-related financial risks | |
“Major” contractors | > $50M | Scope 1, 2 & �relevant Scope 3 | Yes (thru SBTi; 25% of majors use SBTi) | Yes (thru CDP; 50% of majors use CDP) |
“Significant” contractors | $7.5M to $50M | Scope 1 &2 | No | No |
| < $7.5M | No | No | No |
Executive Order: �Climate-related Financial Risk
“Biden Administration Encourages the Requirement of Science-Based Targets for Federal Suppliers,” Science-Based Targets, May 2021.
U.S. Federal “Buy Clean” Initiative
“FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Buy Clean Actions to Ensure American Manufacturing Leads in the 21st Century,” White House press release, September 2022.
The Biden Administration announced that the federal government will prioritize the purchase of key low carbon construction materials, covering 98% of construction materials purchased.
UK Procurement Policy Note (PPN) 06/21�Taking Account of Carbon Reduction Plans in the procurement of major government contracts
“Procurement Policy Note PPN 06/21,” UK Cabinet Office, June 2021.�“Technical standard for Completion of Carbon Reduction Plans,” UK Cabinet Office, 2021.�“Guidance on adopting and applying the PPN 06/21 – Selection Criteria,” UK Cabinet Office, 2021.
Value of contractor’s �annual federal contracts | Public disclosures of current GHGs | GHG net-zero reduction targets | TCFD-aligned assessment of climate-related financial risks | |
(Any) suppliers | > £5M | Scope 1, 2 & five Scope 3 categories* | Net zero by 2050 for UK operations | (Silent on this) |
Requires bidding suppliers to provide a Carbon Reduction Plan (CRP) confirming their public commitment to achieving net-zero by 2050 or earlier, and specific carbon reduction measures during the contract or a certification that supports their meeting net-zero by 2050 or earlier.
* Five Scope 3 categories: 4-Upstream transportation and distribution; 9-Downstream transportation� and distribution; 6-Business travel; 7- Employee commuting; 5-Waste generated in operations.
National Health Service (NHS) Procurement
“Carbon reduction plan and net zero commitment requirements for the procurement of NHS goods, services and works,” NHS, Oct. 2023.
Value of supplier’s contracts | Supplier must publish �net-zero commitments1 | Supplier must publish net-zero commitments,1 �and publish a CRP2 to meet them |
> £5M / year | | From April 2023 |
Contracts > £10K | From April 2024 | |
New framework agreements3 | | From April 2024 |
All procurements | From April 2026 | From April 2027 |
1 As a minimum, publicly commit to reducing Scope 1, Scope 2 and a subset of Scope 3 emission� (Upstream transportation and distribution; Downstream transportation and distribution; Business travel;� Employee commuting; Waste generated in operations) from UK operations to net-zero by 2050, or earlier.
2 A Carbon Reduction Plan (CRP) includes baseline year emissions, current emissions, target reductions on� the way to net-zero, and the measures / projects that will achieve the targets; approved by the board.
3 A framework agreement is a fixed-term purchasing agreement with specific suppliers that stipulates price� and quality of specified goods and services that will be acquired exclusively from them during that period.
Note: NHS has used a minimum 10% weighting for supplier net-zero and social value in all procurements, since April 2022. These new requirements are in addition to that.
NHS Evergreen Sustainable Supplier Assessment Tool
“Evergreen Sustainable Supplier Assessment,” National Health Service (NHS) website, October 2023.
Canada: Standard on the Disclosure of GHG �Emissions and the Setting of Reduction Targets
“Standard on the Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Setting of Reduction Targets,” �Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS), Government of Canada, Nov. 2022.
Value of contractor’s �annual federal contracts | Public disclosures of current GHGs | GHG reduction targets | TCFD-aligned assessment of climate-related financial risks | |
“Major” suppliers | > $25M | Scope 1, 2 & �relevant Scope 3 | Participate in Net Zero Challenge (NZC) or equivalent | Required in NZC (SMEs exempt) |
Canada: Net-Zero Challenge
“Net Zero Challenge,” Government of Canada website, November 2022.
Encourages businesses to voluntarily develop and �implement credible and effective plans to transition �to net-zero emissions by 2050.
Canada: Buyers For Climate Action
“Buyers for Climate Action – Terms of Reference,” Government of Canada, June 2022.
USA Federal GHG Reporting Status
“US Climate Disclosure: Stay up to Date with Key Federal & State Regulations for Businesses,” EcoAct, March 2025.
California SB 219 Disclosure Requirements
“US Climate Disclosure: Stay up to Date with Key Federal & State Regulations for Businesses,” EcoAct, March 2025.
New York State SB 897C and SB 5437
“US Climate Disclosure: Stay up to Date with Key Federal & State Regulations for Businesses,” EcoAct, March 2025.
Amazon To Require Supplier GHG Disclosures
“Get ready: Amazon will ask supply chain to report emissions starting in 2024,” GreenBiz, July 2023.
Acts re Forced Labor & Child Labor in Supply Chains
Government institutions and private sector businesses now required to proactively identify, report on, and eliminate forced labour and child labor in their supply chains.
Top 5 highest value at risk products imported by the G20: Electronics, Garments, Palm Oil, Solar Panels, Textiles
Canada’s Fighting Against Forced Labor �and Child Labor in Supply Chains Act (Bill S-211)
“Canada passes legislation on due diligence in forced and child labour in supply chains,” Global Rights Compliance, June 2023.�Bill S-211 was passed in June 2023; goes into force January 2024, reports for previous year must be submitted by May 2024.
EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)
“EU Parliament Votes to Require Companies to Introduce Climate Transition Plans,” ESG Today, June 2023.
Companies must integrate due diligence into policies and strategies, �identify actual or potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts, and �end or minimize actual impacts in company operations, subsidiaries and supply chains.
French Circularity-related Legislation
https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/indice-reparabilite
French Reparability Index
French Durability Index
SP and NZP Support Organizations
SPLC
sustainablepurchasing.org/
Mission: Drive positive environmental and social impact through the power of procurement.
CCSP
reeveconsulting.com/about-ccsp/
ECPAR
ecpar.org/
ECPAR contributes value for organizations by supporting responsible purchasing and sustainable development in supply chains.
Every 4 years
Circular Innovation Council (CIC)
circularprocurement.ca/procure4circular-network/
Circular Economy Leadership Canada (CELC)
circulareconomyleaders.ca/about-us/
SPP
spp.earth/
Procura+ Network
procuraplus.org
Supply Chain Sustainability School
supplychainschool.co.uk/