1 of 69

Department of Computer Engineering

Welcomes NBA Expert Committee

15th - 17th July, 2022

1

8/29/2022

2 of 69

OUTLINE

Part I

  • Introduction
  • Department Achievements/ Recognitions
    • Department Level
    • Faculty Level
    • Student Level
  • Criteria 1 - Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives
  • Criteria 2 - Program Curriculum and Teaching - Learning Processes
  • Criteria 3 - Program Outcomes and Course Outcomes
  • Criteria 4 - Students’ Performance
  • Criteria 5 - Faculty Information and Contributions
  • Criteria 6 - Facilities and Technical Support - Teaching Labs and Special Laboratories
  • Criteria 7 - Continuous Improvement

Part II

  • Outcome Based Education Philosophy of the Department

2

8/29/2022

3 of 69

3

8/29/2022

Sr. No

Programmes offered

Duration

Intake

Lateral admissions

1

B.E

(Computer Engineering)

4 Years

180

18

2

M.E

(Computer Engineering)

2 Years

18

-

3.

Ph.D

(Computer Engineering)

-

10

-

    • Established in 2002-2003 with Intake of 60,
    • 2006-07: 90,
    • 2008-09:120

    • 2011-12: PG started with intake of 18, NBA Accreditation (1st cycle) for 3 years

    • 2015-16: NBA Accreditation (2nd cycle) for 3 years wef 1st July 2016,got permanent affiliation from University of Mumbai

    • 2017-18: PhD (Technology) started with intake of 10 seats, Awarded A Grade by NAAC for 5 years wef 30th October 2017

    • 2019-20: UG intake increased to 180, NBA Accreditation for 3 years (3rd cycle) wef 1st July 2019 , Institute conferred Autonomous status for next 10 years

“The department of Computer Engineering is committed to nurture aspiring students to become globally competent professionals with human values.”

INTRODUCTION�DEPARTMENT GROWTH & HIGHLIGHTS

4 of 69

DEPARTMENT ACHIEVEMENTS/ RECOGNITIONS�DEPARTMENT LEVEL

4

8/29/2022

Average Success rate is more than 80.00% of 18 batches

2 Institute Rank Holders and 5 toppers (10 pointers) in A.Y. 21-22

Placement with highest salary package of 30 lakhs and more than 15 Entrepreneurs

10 Patents, 1 in process, and 5 copyrights

93 Quality Publications during 2018-22

Smart India Hackathon 2017,2019,2020 winners & 2022 - two teams are finalists in Grand Finale

International Conference since 11 years

E-conference since 2 years

5 of 69

DEPARTMENT ACHIEVEMENTS/ RECOGNITIONS�FACULTY LEVEL

5

8/29/2022

Faculty Qualification: 11 completed Ph.D, 1 submitted thesis, 4 pursuing Ph. D

5 Faculty members are Ph.D approved Guides

5 Faculty members are Resource persons for STTPs, FDPs and 5 have conducted Corporate Trainings

1 Faculty members involved in Technology Transfer

11 Faculty members are reviewers for Quality Journals

9 Faculty members received Grants under AICTE, Minor Research Grant, and IEDC

36 Consultancies like RAA technologies, Mission Career Institute, STAR Builders

4 Faculty members are mentors of SIH winning team & SIH Grand Finale finalists (current A.Y)

6 of 69

DEPARTMENT ACHIEVEMENTS/ RECOGNITIONS�STUDENT LEVEL

6

8/29/2022

#

Technical Achievements

1

Winner of ML 100 hour Hackathon & Android Buzz (National Level)

2

3rd Prize in Civo International Hackathon (Prize: 1000 USD)

3

Winner of Byte Synergy Hackathon at IIT Bangalore (Prize: 15000 INR)

4

VCET & KJSCE Hackathon Runner up (National Level)

5

27th Rank out of 3000+ teams in Amazon ML challenge (National Level)

6

Winner of Poster Competition - Progressive India & CBIT Hyderabad

#

Alumni Achievements

1

Students currently working in Amazon, Deloitte, PayPal, Goldman Sachs.

2

Students are pursuing Higher studies in IIM Calcutta & Kashipur, IIT Hyderabad, and foreign universities

3

Student is working as academicians in foreign university , William and Mary, USA.

Entertainment Achievers

Khushi Dubey is a lead actor in hotstar specials Aashiqana.

Amey Pandya has worked with Mr. Amitabh Bachchan, Ajay Devgn, Shahid Kapoor, Alia Bhatt in various ads, movies.

#

Sports Achievements

1

1st Place in TSPARK 2022- Girls Turf-Cricket, Girls Throwball, Girls Table Tennis, Basketball

2

2nd Place in TSPARK 2022- Girls Tug of War, Football

3

Bronze medal in BOSM 2018 Sports Meet (BITS PILANI) - Carrom

4

Winner of Youth 2019 TIMSR, L.P Tiwari - Tug of War (Girls)

5

Winner of Intercollegiate tournament, Lokmanya Tilak College, Shah and Anchor College - Football

7 of 69

DEPARTMENT ACHIEVEMENTS/ RECOGNITIONS�STUDENT LEVEL

7

8/29/2022

T-Spark 2019-20 Winner: COMP Department

T-Spark 2021-22 Winner: COMP Department

SPORTS

ENTERTAINMENT

OUR PRESTIGIOUS ALUMNI

8 of 69

8

8/29/2022

CRITERION 1

VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

DEPARTMENT VISION

“To become the department of National Relevance in the field of Computer Engineering.”

DEPARTMENT MISSION

The Department of Computer Engineering is committed to nurture students with sound engineering knowledge in the field of computing through the effective use of modern tools with a focus on global employability by imbibing leadership qualities, ethical attitude, lifelong learning and social sensitivity.

9 of 69

9

8/29/2022

CRITERION 1

VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES Contd..

    • Attain Sound Engineering knowledge and use of modern tools effectively to solve real life problems (KNOWLEDGE)
    • Attain need based skills and life long learning to ensure global employability (SKILL)
    • Become successful professionals and responsible citizens with good leadership qualities and strong ethical values (PROFESSIONALISM)

PEO 1

PEO 2

PEO 3

10 of 69

10

8/29/2022

CRITERION 2�PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING–LEARNING PROCESSES

    • Programme Curriculum
      • Academic curriculum based on the AICTE model syllabus
        • Basic Science Courses (BSC)
        • Program Core Courses(PCC()
        • Professional Elective Courses
        • Open Elective Courses
        • HSMC courses
        • Mandatory Course (MC)

      • Holistic Student Development (HSD) / Holistic Multidisciplinary Education (HME)

        • Professional Skills (PS)
        • Project-based Learning (PBL)
        • Research-Based Learning (RBL)
        • Activity-Based Learning (ABL)
        • Employability Skill Development (ESD)

      • Summer Internship and Activity Points

Curriculum under TCET-Autonomy Scheme [CBCGS-H 2019]

FE Computer Engineering

Total Number of courses

Total Number of credits

SE Computer

Engineering

Total Number of courses

Total Number Of credits

Basic Sciences, Mathematics, Communication skills and fundamentals of engineering, HSD Activities, Internship

17

49

Fundamental of Computer Science and Engineering, Allied courses, Basic tools and Technical skill, HSD Activities, Internship

24

54

TE Computer Engineering

Total Number of courses

Total Number of credits

BE Computer Engineering

Total Number of courses

Total Number Of credits

Core Computer Sciences and Engineering courses, Specialized tools and Skills and Management, HSD Activities, Internship

24

53

Advance Computer Science and Engineering courses, Advance tools, Skill and Management, HSD Activities, Internship

19

50

Total Courses: 84

Total Credits: 206

Specialization courses:

  1. B.E. Computer Engineering in Artificial Intelligence
  2. B.E. Computer Engineering in Data Science

11 of 69

11

8/29/2022

CRITERION 2�PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING–LEARNING PROCESSES Contd..

12 of 69

12

8/29/2022

TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS & PDCA CYCLE

COURSE DELIVERY MODES

      • M1 – Lecture interspersed with discussions

      • M2 – Lecture with visual annotations

      • M3 – Demonstration

      • M4 – Group Activity

      • M5 – Projects / Presentations

      • M6 – Tutorial

      • M7 - Practical (Additional Experiments)

      • M8 – e-Resources and Online Learning

      • M9 – Internship (Inhouse & Outhouse)

      • M10 - Online Certification Courses

      • M11- 100-Activity Points

      • M12 - Workshops/ Seminars/Guest Lectures

CRITERION 2�PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING–LEARNING PROCESSES Contd..

13 of 69

13

8/29/2022

CRITERION 2�PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING–LEARNING PROCESSES Contd..

14 of 69

14

8/29/2022

Student Categorization

based on attendance, evaluation, assessment, learning attitude

Bright (High)

Average (Medium)

Below Average (Low)

    • .
      • Hackathon

    • .
      • Project Competitions

    • .
      • Reputed Journal Publications

    • .
      • Patent Filing

    • .
      • Specialization(Major/Minor degree)

Weak Students

Bright Students

    • .
      • Doubt Solving Sessions

    • .
      • Revision Sessions

    • .
      • Counselling by Class In charges

    • .
      • Counselling by Subject In charges

      • Counselling by Teacher Guardian

CRITERION 2�PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING–LEARNING PROCESSES Contd..

15 of 69

15

8/29/2022

FINAL YEAR PROJECT & STUDENTS PUBLICATION

  • Industry Experts are allotted to every project group to get the suggestions and guidance as per the industry requirements
  • Project Competitions :
  • SE – PBL project competition
  • TE - RBL project competition,” Aakar”
  • BE- Major project competition,” Zeigen”
  • Mindseye Major project competition at institute level

CRITERION 2�PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING–LEARNING PROCESSES Contd..

16 of 69

Industry Interaction

16

8/29/2022

Sr. No

Type of Interaction

Frequency of interaction

1

Internship

Twice in Academic Year

2

Board Meetings - Regulatory Body - BOS, Department advisory committee

Twice in Semester

3

Resource person in STTP, FDP, Conferences

Twice in Semester

4

Technical Seminar

Twice in Semester

5

Workshop

Once in Semester

6

Employability Skills Development (ESD) program

Twice in Semester

Sr. No

Type of Interaction

Frequency of interaction

7

Industry Experts for major project evaluation

Throughout the academic year

8

Guest Lecture

Throughout the academic year

9

Alumni Connect

Throughout the academic year

10

Out House Project

Throughout the academic year

11

Industry supported laboratories

Throughout the academic year

12

Industrial Visit

One local IV during semester & one during semester break

CRITERION 2�PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING–LEARNING PROCESSES Contd..

17 of 69

17

8/29/2022

INTERNSHIP DETAILS

CRITERION 2�PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING–LEARNING PROCESSES Contd..

18 of 69

18

8/29/2022

PO1-Engineering knowledge

PO2-Problem analysis

PO3- Design /Development of solutions

PO4- Conduct investigations of complex problems

PO5- Modern tool usage

PO6 -The engineer and society

PO7- Environment and sustainability

PO8- Ethics

PO9 -Individual and teamwork

PO10- Communication

PO11- Project management and finance

PO12 -Life-long learning

    • PSO1
      • Develop academic aptitude and apply knowledge of computing and mathematics to computer science problems and thereby design and develop Software and Hardware Systems

    • PSO2
      • Enhance research skills and utilize advanced computing tools for analysis, design and implementation of computing systems for resolving real life / social problems

    • PSO3
      • Utilize multi-disciplinary knowledge required for satisfying industry / global requirements and hence develop an attitude for life long learning

    • PSO4
      • Have all round personality with skills like leadership, verbal and written communication, team work, sensitivity towards society in order to become valued and responsible professionals

CRITERION 3�COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES

COURSE OUTCOMES

19 of 69

19

8/29/2022

COURSE OUTCOME ASSESSMENT

Course Outcome Assessment Tools

Direct Assessment

Formative Assessment

Practical Assessment

Internal Assessment

End Semester Examination

BE Project

Indirect Assessment

Course Survey

CRITERION 3�COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES Contd..

20 of 69

Direct Assessment Tools

The process of calculation of Course Outcome Attainment using Direct Assessment Tools is as follows:

1. Calculate the percentage of marks student-wise for each CO.

2. Map the percentage calculated in 3 levels as given in the table.

20

Attainment of Course Outcomes

Level

Percentage

3

Above 70%

2

Between 50% and 70%

1

Below 50%

3. Count the number of students in each level and find the attainment of each CO using:

4. Calculate average attainment for each CO.

CRITERION 3�COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES Contd..

3* No of students in Level 3 +

2* No of students in Level 2 +

1* No of students in Level 1

Σ Number of students on Level i

where i = 1 to 3

21 of 69

Indirect Assessment Tools

The process of calculation of course Outcome Attainment using Indirect Assessment Tools is as follows:

  1. Faculty has to define a set of questions w.r.t the course/program and inputs are acquired from the students.

2. The set of questions defined are mapped to the CO’s in Course Survey.

3. The response given by students for every question has to be either of the 5 ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. These 5 types of responses are mapped to 3 levels as given in the table:

21

Attainment of Course Outcomes

Level

Percentage

3

Strongly Agree or Agree

2

Neutral

1

Disagree or Strongly Disagree

4. Attainment for each CO is calculated as follows:

5. Calculate average attainment.

CRITERION 3�COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES Contd..

3* No of responses in Level 3 +

2* No of responses in Level 2 +

1* No of responses in Level 1

Total Responses

22 of 69

22

8/29/2022

PO/PSO Attainment of Last Three Batches

Year

PO1

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO11

PO12

PSO1

PSO2

PSO3

PSO4

Batch 15-19

2.4

2.31

2.4

2.39

2.38

2.41

2.39

2.53

2.39

2.36

2.45

2.42

2.49

2.5

2.4

2.49

Batch 16-20

2.48

2.48

2.28

2.4

2.4

2.47

2.43

2.45

2.38

2.43

2.33

2.41

2.47

2.48

2.38

2.49

Batch 17-21

2.49

2.5

2.42

2.42

2.42

2.47

2.44

2.55

2.4

2.45

2.47

2.47

2.48

2.51

2.46

2.5

  • Slight improvement in PO/PSO attainment for the batch A.Y. 2017-21.
  • Due to various changes in teaching-learning, evaluation, co-curricular and extra-curricular activities.

CRITERION 3�COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES Contd..

23 of 69

CRITERION 4STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE

23

8/29/2022

ENROLLMENT RATIO

    • (2019-20)
    • Sanctioned Intake(N) :- 180
    • Students Admitted in First Year(N1):- 194

    • (2020-21)
    • Sanctioned Intake(N) :- 180
    • Students Admitted in First Year(N1):- 192

    • (2021-22)
    • Sanctioned Intake(N) :- 180
    • Students Admitted in First Year(N1):- 192

24 of 69

CRITERION 4STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE Contd..

24

8/29/2022

SUCCESS RATE

Average Success Index without Backlog= 0.67

Average Success Index with/without Backlog= 0.92

25 of 69

25

8/29/2022

Academic Performance Index (API)

Average API of Third Year= 8.55

Average API of Second Year = 8.12

CRITERION 4STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE Contd..

26 of 69

26

8/29/2022

PLACEMENT, HIGHER STUDIES AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Average Placement Index = 0.97

27 of 69

CRITERION 4STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE Contd..

27

8/29/2022

STUDENT PROFESSIONAL BODIES

COMPUTER SOCIETY OF INDIA (CSI)

Faculty In charge – Mr. Vikas Singh

Mr. Shailesh Sangle

Dr. Prachi Janrao

Formed in A.Y. 2002-03

CSI-TCET is the student branch of the Computer Society of India (CSI) at Thakur College of Engineering and Technology (TCET), Mumbai. Today, CSI has members from all over the nation including famous industry leaders, brilliant scientists, and dedicated academicians.

    • COLLEGE LEVEL CHAPTERS
      • National Service Scheme (NSS-TCET)

      • Indian Society for Technical Education
      • (ISTE-TCET)

      • ROTARACT Club of TCET

      • SORT Club of TCET (Students Organization for Reform & Transformation)

      • Model United Nation (TCET MUN)

      • STUDENT COUNCIL-TCET

CSI ACTIVITIES

Word Assessment Test

Thematic Assessment Test

Online Conquest

National Level Coding Competition

National Level Project Competition

28 of 69

28

8/29/2022

MAGAZINE “NIMBUS”

  • Objective: To provide aspiring engineers a wide platform to showcase their technical knowledge and share their innovative ideas.
  • Inclusions: Articles, Industry/alumni interviews, Higher education guides, Achievements of students in Academics, Student teams & Extra curriculum activities

NIMBUS 2020-2021

TECH TALK 2020-2021

  • Objective: Tech Talk attempts to throw light on the exciting activities of each domain by featuring the impressive projects of our Final year students, Blogs of our National level achievers
  • A roadmap of every domain for new students to get acquainted to the knowledge of future technologies and employing industries
  • Inclusions: Domain Activities,Blogs, Projects

NEWSLETTER “TECHTALK”

CSI BULLETIN

  • Objective: To give Gist presentation of all activities performed in semester under professional body
  • Inclusions: No of activity performed in semester is with brief report ensuring the objective of CSI is achieved

CSI BULLETIN 2021-22

CRITERION 4STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE Contd..

29 of 69

29

8/29/2022

CRITERION 5�FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS

Year

CAY-m2 (2019-20)

CAY-m1(2020-21)

CAY (2021-22)

TOTAL NO. OF STUDENTS IN THE DEPARTMENT (S)

456

510

564

NO. OF FACULTY IN THE DEPARTMENT (F)

28

23

29

STUDENT FACULTY RATIO (SFR) = S/F

16.29

22.17

19.45

AVERAGE SFR

19.30

STUDENT FACULTY RATIO

30 of 69

30

8/29/2022

Innovations by Faculty in Teaching and Learning

Impacts

Inclusion of ICT tools for the interactive teaching-learning process to learn problem solving through sharing with peers

Activities like Think, Pair and Share, Brain storming, Flipped classroom to enable students have an active learning environment

E-resources and techniques used during Pandemic (Online Teaching and evaluation via Zoom, Google Classroom, MS Team)

Industry practitioners and researchers are invited as Guest Lectures at regular intervals to augment the teaching-learning experience

CRITERION 5�FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS Contd..

31 of 69

31

8/29/2022

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

CRITERION 5�FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS Contd..

Total Quality Publication: 93

32 of 69

32

8/29/2022

The total amount of Consultancy Funding from A.Y. 2018 – 2022 is 13,95,700 LACS

CRITERION 5�FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS Contd..

33 of 69

33

8/29/2022

GRANTS RECEIVED FOR PROJECTS/RESEARCH

A. Y.

UOM

IEDC

AICTE

Total

2018-19

1,10,000

1,00,000

-

2,10,000

2019-20

20,000

1,00,000

3,49,500

4,69,500

2020-21

-

1,00,000

-

1,00,000

Total

1,30,000

3,00,000

3,49,500

-

CRITERION 5�FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS Contd..

34 of 69

34

8/29/2022

No. of Classrooms

Room Number

Average Capacity

Teaching Aids Available

Other Facilities

07 UG + 2 Tutorial class room

608, 609, 610, 612, 613, 614, 617, 618, 619

80 (UG)

Blackboard, Screen,

Multimedia Projection Facility,

Portable Speaker

Single Seat benches

Air conditioned classrooms, Internet Connection

10 Labs (including 1 for PG and Ph.D Research Center)

304, 305, B-306,308,310, 314, 315, 316

36

Whiteboard, Screen,

Multimedia Projection Facility,

Portable Speaker

CCTV, Computers, Internet Connection (Mbps), Chairs, AC, Light, Fan, Racks, Switches, Stabilizers, Dot Matrix printers

03 (SH1, SH2, SH3)

01(Auditorium)

Central Library

-

120

600

200

250

Blackboard

Audio System,

Multimedia Projection Facility

Chairs, AC

Single Seat benches

Air conditioned classrooms , Internet Connection, Access to online content, AV Room, Digital Library

CRITERION 6  

FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT

35 of 69

35

8/29/2022

Lab No

Lab Name

Facilities

304

MULTIMEDIA SYSTEM DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT

36 PC-Dell intel core i5 Computers with NET Connection,1-LCD Projector in Lab,2-dot Matrix Printers

305

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT & INFORMATION MANAGEMENTSYSTEM

36 PC-Dellintel core i5 Computers with NETConnection,1-LCDProjectorinLab,2-dotMatrixPrinters

314

COMPUTING & SYSTEM DESIGN

19PC-HP intelcorei5 Computers with NET Connection & 17- Dell Computers,1 – LCD Projector in Lab ,2 -dot Matrix Printers ,4-Hardware Kits , 14- DC Power Supply , 14-oscilloscope,14-functiongenerator, 8 -multimeter, Breadboardwireetc.

315

INTELLIGENT SYSTEM DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT

36 PC-Dell intel core i5 Computers with NETConnection,1-LCDProjectorinLab,2-dotMatrixPrinters

316

COMMUNICATION NETWORKING & WEB ENGINEERING

16PC-HP intelcorei5 Computers with NET Connection & 20 -Hp z240 workstation Computers with NET Connection ,1 – LCD Projector in Lab, 2-dot Matrix Printers

310

COMPUTER FUNDAMENTALS II & CENTRAL COMPUTINGII & COMPUTER CENTER II LAB

36 PC-Dell intel core i5 Computers with NETConnection,1-LCDProjectorinLab,2-dotMatrixPrinters

308

COMPUTER FUNDAMENTALS I & CENTRALCOMPUTINGI & COMPUTERCENTERILAB

36 PC-Dell intel core i5 Computers with NETConnection,1-LCDProjectorinLab,2-dotMatrixPrinters

B-306

OPEN SOURCE & RESEARCHLAB

36 PC- Hp 280 g2 desktop, intel i5 - 6th genComputerswithNETConnection,1-LCDProjectorinLab,2-dotMatrixPrinters

CRITERION 6  

FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT Contd..

36 of 69

36

8/29/2022

DEPARTMENT LIBRARY

 Sr. No.

Item

Count

1

Books

363 (17 Titles)

2

Magazines

90

3

NPTEL videos

48

4

DVDs/CDs

3

 Sr. No.

Particulars

Count

Responsibilities

1

Technical Staff

08

  • To assist teacher in conducting Lectures / Practical
  • To prepare write-ups / manuals for the experiments.
  • To arrange material and equipment for the Laboratory.
  • To assist department in procurement and maintaining stock register
  • Maintain Log of peripherals damage and malfunctions
  • To receive materials, tools required for the laboratory work.

2

Central ICT Facility

01

Network monitoring & control of overall ICT facility.

TECHNICAL SUPPORT

STAFF ROOM

 Sr. No.

Item

Count

1

HoD Cabin

1

2

No of cubicles

29

3

Discussion Room

1

CRITERION 6  

FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT Contd..

37 of 69

37

8/29/2022

POs PSO ATTAINMENT

CRITERION 7  

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

    • Academic
    • HSD Activity

    • Department Level Activities

    • Institute Level Activities

    • Professional Body Activities

    • Student Council (TCET-TSDW Activities)

    • National Level Events: Hackathon & Competitions

38 of 69

38

8/29/2022

��POs & PSOs ATTAINMENT LEVELS

CRITERION 7  

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Contd..

39 of 69

39

8/29/2022

ACTIONS TAKEN FOR PO11

    • PO11: PROJECT MANAGEMENT & FINANCE
    • Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering and management and leaders in a team to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments
      • Target Level

      • 2.49
      • Attainment Level

      • 2.47
      • Observations
      • Lack of managerial attitude in Project management and understanding of Financial concepts by students

40 of 69

40

8/29/2022

ACTION TAKEN FOR IMPROVEMENT IN PO11

    • ACTION 1: Inclusion of Mandatory course, Finance Management (FM), Open elective courses (Design Thinking and Problem Solving, Digital Business Management, Basic Taxation for Engineers, Social Network Analysis in the curriculum

    • ACTION 2: Students do projects and follow all the phases of Project Development. They are allocated projects in Project Based Learning, Research Based Learning & Mini/Major/Capstone Projects in their elective subjects

    • ACTION 3: Guest lectures are organized to enhance the importance of Project Management and Finance among the students

    • ACTION 4: Students learn about the management skills while doing projects especially when it is being funded by reputed organizations

41 of 69

41

8/29/2022

Year

Max. salary

(INR-LPA)

Average salary (INR-LPA)

2018-19

31

5.55

2019-20

12

6.5

2020-21

30

9.17

2021-22

30

10.17

CRITERION 7  

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Contd..

42 of 69

42

8/29/2022

HIGHER STUDIES & INTERNSHIP

Name of the

CAY m1 )

CAYm2

CAYm3

CAYm4

Examination

(2021-22)

(2020-21)

(2019-20)

(2018-19)

GRE

26

16

32

42

TOFEL

20

14

20

28

IELTS

6

3

15

15

CAT/CET

0

1

2

1

A1/A2

0

0

0

0

GATE (Qualified)

4

7

8

1

NMAT

0

0

0

2

Students pursuing

Higher Studies

8

23

37

42

Year

Students completed for Internship

Remark

2021-22

578

 

Under Autonomy curriculum Internship is credit course and is mandatory

2020-21

521

2019-20

413

2018-19

35

Under UOM curriculum Internship was not mandatory

CRITERION 7  

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Contd..

43 of 69

STUDENT MENTORING AND SUPPORT

43

8/29/2022

    • Student Mentoring
      • Teacher Guardian
      • Mentoring through Class Teachers
      • Mentoring for slow Learners
      • Anti–Ragging committee
      • Student Grievance Redressal Cell: (Exam Section)
      • Women Development Cell

    • Student Support
      • Financial assistance (UG and PG)
      • Specific support/facilities
      • Book bank facility is provided
      • Physically disabled students are given facilities
      • Training & Placement
      • Assistance for Higher Studies & Placements
      • Encouragement for entrepreneurship

CRITERION 7  

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Contd..

44 of 69

IMPROVEMENT OVER LAST NBA COMMITTEE FINDINGS

44

8/29/2022

FINDINGS

ACTION TAKEN

IMPROVEMENT SINCE LAST VISIT

Amount of funded research verified during visit is 5,00,000 Lakhs and mentioned in SAR was 12,83,194 Lakhs

1,10,000 in 2018-19

3,69,500 in 2019-20

1,00,000 in 2020-21

Funded Research amount has increased slightly to 5,79,500 Lacs.

Amount of consultancy received during visit found is 6,06,150 Lakhs and mentioned in SAR was 44,63,000 Lakhs

3,78,000 in 2018-19

1,20,500 in 2019-20

6,67500 in 2020-21

2,67,700 in 2021-22

Consultancy amount has increased since previous visit which is 14,33,700 Lakhs

Number of PhD in the department should be 30% for 6 year accreditation

8 in 2019-20

10 in 2020-21

11 in 2021-22

No. of PhD in dept is 37.93%

STRENGTHS:

  1. Teaching learning process
  2. Placement
  3. Faculty qualification
  4. Student success rate
  5. Publication

45 of 69

Aspect of education is organized around a set of goals (outcomes)

Main components : Outcomes, Learning activities and Assessment methods

Restructuring of curriculum, assessment and other reporting practices in education system

Targeted at achieving desirable outcomes (in terms of knowledge, skills, attitudes and attributes/behavior) with respect to holistic students development

NEP 2020 and OBE

OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION(OBE)

46 of 69

STANDARD OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION FRAMEWORK

INDUSTRY AND PROFESSIONAL ORGS

INPUTS & FEEDBACK

MISSION/VISION

INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT

PROGRAM

ASSESSMENT

COURSE

ASSESSMENT

PEO

STUDENT OUTCOMES

OUTCOMES

INSTITUTION

PROGRAM

COURSE

ASSESSMENT

EVALUATION

COURSE PLANNING AND DELIVERY

  • SYLLABUS
  • TEACHING METHODS
  • LEARNING ACTIVITIES
  • ASSESSMENT TOOLS

COURSES LEARNING OUTCOMES

IMPROVEMENTS

47 of 69

OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION IMPLEMENTATION

48 of 69

      • Teaching Learning
      • Examination Conduct
      • Placement
      • Higher Studies and Online Certification
      • Extra and Co-Curricular
      • Higher Studies
      • Research & Development

OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION AND PROCESSES

  • To strengthened Outcome Based Education with respect to measurement ,improvements and impact

of each and every process

  • Each process has its philosophy, measurement, continues improvements and impacts
  • Continues improvements will be brought based on inputs and suggestions

49 of 69

Curriculum

Continues Assessment and Evaluation

Before Autonomy

After Autonomy

Before Autonomy

After Autonomy

Theory

Theory

Assignments

Formative Assessment

Tutorial

Tutorial

Internal Assessment

In-Semester Examination

Practical

Practical

End Semester Examination

Innovative Examination

Project

Project

End- Semester Examination

Internship

Holistic Student Development Course

  1. Professional Skills
  2. Activity Based Learning
  3. Project Based Learning
  4. Research Based Learning
  5. Employability Skill Development

CONTINUES IMPROVEMENTS

50 of 69

Mumbai University

TCET-Autonomy

CONTINUES IMPROVEMENTS CONT…

51 of 69

Mumbai University

TCET-Autonomy

CONTINUES IMPROVEMENTS CONT…

52 of 69

DIRECT AND INDIRECT ASSESSMENT

Direct Assessment (DA)

Indirect Direct Assessment (IDA)

Formative Assessment

Course Survey(Course Level)

Laboratory Experiment

Program Exit Survey(Program Level)

In-Semester Assessment

Co-Curricular Activity Survey

End Semester Examination

Extra-Curricular Activity Survey

53 of 69

Direct Attainment = (3 * Number of students in Level 3+2 * Number of students in Level 3+1 * Number

of students in Level 3) / Total Students

DIRECT ATTAINEMNT

Levels

Percentages of Marks

3

Above 70%

2

Between 50% and 70%

1

Below 50%

54 of 69

Program Outcome(PO)

Program Specific Outcome (PSO)

Course Outcome(CO)

DEFINING COURSE , PROGRAM AND PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES

CO

Subject : Database Management System

Students are able to :

1

Explain the fundamental elements of relational database management systems

2

Illustrate ER and EER diagram for the real life problem

3

Solve basic SQL queries on given data.

4

Use advanced SQL queries on given data.

5

Discuss the different normal forms

6

Interpret the concepts of transaction, concurrency and recovery

55 of 69

MAPPING COURSE OUTCOMES WITH PROGRAM AND PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES

CO

PO1

 

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO11

PO12

PSO1

PSO2

PSO3

PSO4

1

3

3

3

3

2

2

 

 

2

2

2

2

3

3

3

2

2

3

3

3

3

2

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

2

 

3

3

3

3

3

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

2

2

4

3

3

3

3

2

 

 

 

2

2

2

 

3

3

3

 

5

3

3

3

3

2

 

 

2

2

 

2

2

3

3

3

 

6

3

3

3

3

2

2

 2

2

2

 

2

2

3

3

3

 

56 of 69

MAPPING COURSE OUTCOMES WITH LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS

CO

P1

 

P2

P3

P4

P5

P6

P7

P8

P9

P10

1

3

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

3

3

3

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

3

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

3

 

3

57 of 69

MAPPING COURSE OUTCOMES WITH FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

Question Number

1

2

3

4

5

Course Outcome

1

2

3

2

3

RBT Level

U

R

A

U

R

Marks of Question

20

20

20

20

20

RN

Name of Student

Total Marks

Level

1

Nipun Navin Agarwal

18

19

16

17

15

85

3

2

Palak Agarwal

18

19

16

14

13

80

3

3

Parth Agarwal

13

11

12

12

14

62

2

4

Agrawal Jash sanjay

8

9

10

7

6

40

1

5

Faraz Ahmed

13

12

11

12

12

60

2

58 of 69

MAPPING COURSE OUTCOMES WITH IN-SEMESTER ASSESSMENT

Question Number

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Course Outcome

1

2

1

1

2

2

1

3

3

1

3

2

3

2

1

3

RBT

U

A

R

U

AN

A

R

U

AN

AN

A

A

A

A

A

R

Marks

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

7

7

8

8

Total Marks

Level

Roll Number

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

4

 

5

 

21

3

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

4

3

 

 

19

3

3

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 

3

 

2

17

3

4

1

1

1

1

1

1

 

 

 

1

1

1

2

 

 

3

14

3

5

1

1

1

1

 

 

1

1

 

 

 

 

2

 

3

 

11

1

59 of 69

ATTAINMENT LEVELS FOR LOBORATORY EXPERIMENT

Roll Number

P1

P2

P3

P4

P5

P6

P7

P8

P9

P10

AVG

Level

1

100

100

93

94

94

93

96

97

96

91

94

3

2

 90

 96

 95

 93

 94

 93

 94

 95

 95

 93

 91

3

3

 67

68 

 70

 67

68 

 70

 67

68 

 70

 69

69 

2

4

 67

68 

 70

 67

68 

 70

 67

68 

 70

 69

69 

2

5

 56

54 

40 

 40

 43

 45

45 

46 

 46

 45

 44

1

60 of 69

ATTAINMENT LEVELS FOR END SEMESTER EXAMINATION

CO1

CO1

CO1

CO2

CO2

CO2

CO2

CO2

CO3

CO3

CO3

CO4

CO4

CO4

CO4

CO4

CO5

CO5

CO5

CO6

CO2

CO2

CO3

CO4

CO1

CO3

CO4

CO6

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

5

5

5

7

7

7

A

U

U

AN

AN

AN

U

A

U

U

U

U

AN

U

AN

U

U

U

U

U

A

A

A

AN

AN

A

C

A

Total

Level

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

4

0

4

4

0

5

6

6

58

3

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

4

4

4

0

6

6

8

61

3

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

0

4

4

4

0

2

2

3

49

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

3

4

0

2

4

4

46

2

1

1

1

 

2

2

 

 

 

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

0

2

2

0

3

2

4

34

1

61 of 69

FA- Attainment (CO1) = (3 * Number of Students in Level 3)+( 2 * Number of Students in Level 2)+ 1 *

Number of Students in Level 1)/Total Responses

FA- Attainment (CO1) = ((3*2)+(2*2)+(1*1)) / 5)=2.2

Similarly for the remaining Course Outcomes and direct assessment tools attainment is calculated.

DIRECT ATTAINMENT CALCULATION

 Course Outcomes

Formative Assessment

In-Semester Assessment

Laboratory Experiment

End Semester Examination

 Average Direct Attainment

1

2.2

2.8

2.4

2.6

2.5

2

2.4

2.6

2.6

2.7

2.5

3

2.6

2.6

2.5

2.6

2.5

4

2.7

2.6

2.8

2.6

2.6

5

2.5

2.8

2.6

2.7

2.6

6

2.5

2.8

2.7

2.6

2.6

62 of 69

IN-DIRECT ATTAINEMNT-COURSE SURVEY

CO 1

CO 2

CO 3

CO 4

CO 5

CO 6

2.92

2.96

2.89

2.87

2.8

2.91

Levels

Responses

3

Strongly Agree and Agree

2

Neutral

1

Disagree and Strongly Disagree

Indirect Attainment = (3 * Number of Responses in Level 3+

2 * Number of Responses in Level 3+

1 * Number of Responses in Level 3) /

Total Responses

63 of 69

Weighted Average Attainment = 0.8*(Attainment obtained by using Direct Assessment Tools) +

0.2*(Attainment obtained by using Indirect Attainment Tools)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE ATTAINMENT

 Course Outcomes

Average Direct Attainment

Average Indirect Assessment

Weighted Average Attainment

1

2.5

2.92

2.58

2

2.5

2.96

2.59

3

2.5

2.89

2.57

4

2.6

2.87

2.65

5

2.6

2.8

2.64

6

2.6

2.91

2.66

64 of 69

  • Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes attainment is calculated through Course Outcome attainment by considering mapping levels (3,2,1) of Course Outcomes with Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes

PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES ATTAINMENT

CO

PO1

 

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO11

PO12

PSO1

PSO2

PSO3

PSO4

1

2.58

2.58

2.58

2.58

1.72

1.72

 

 

1.72

1.72

1.72

1.72

2.58

2.58

2.58

1.72

2

2.59

2.59

2.59

2.59

1.50

1.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.50

1.50

1.50

 

3

2.57

2.57

2.57

2.57

1.72

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.72

1.72

1.72

1.72

4

2.65

2.65

2.65

2.65

1.76

 

 

 

1.76

1.76

1.76

 

2.65

2.65

2.65

 

5

2.64

2.64

2.64

2.64

1.75

 

 

1.76

1.76

 

1.76

1.76

2.64

2.64

2.64

 

6

2.66

2.66

2.66

2.66

1.76

1.76

1.76

1.76

1.76

 

1.76

1.76

2.66

2.66

2.66

 

Attainment

2.58

2.57

2.59

2.58

1.75

1.68

1.76

1.76

1.75

1.74

1.75

2.74

2.54

2.54

2.56

1.72

65 of 69

Attainment = (3 * Number of Responses in Level 3+2 * Number of Responses in Level 3+1 * Number of

Responses in Level 3) /Total Responses

INDIRECT ATTAINMENT-PROGRAM EXIT SURVEY

Levels

Responses

3

Strongly Agree and Agree

2

Neutral

1

Disagree and Strongly Disagree

PO

PO1

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO11

PO12

PSO1

PSO2

PSO3

PSO4

Attainment

2.27

2.49

2.28

2.53

2.66

2.28

2.33

2.57

2.46

2.42

2.28

2.65

2.42

2.54

2.44

2.52

66 of 69

OVERALL ATTAINMENT (BATCH 2017-21)

Semester

PO1

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

PO10

PO11

PO12

PSO 1

PSO2

PSO3

PSO4

III

2.49

2.37

2.50

2.47

2.47

2.56

2.36

2.52

2.43

2.46

2.65

2.56

2.46

2.50

2.46

2.35

IV

2.41

2.46

2.49

2.45

2.44

2.55

2.52

2.58

2.45

2.58

2.46

2.49

2.51

2.57

2.49

2.60

V

2.46

2.55

2.46

2.45

2.41

2.54

2.42

2.45

2.42

2.47

2.50

2.50

2.42

2.61

2.43

2.51

VI

2.47

2.58

2.48

2.49

2.47

2.49

2.47

2.50

2.47

2.51

2.55

2.52

2.43

2.45

2.54

2.54

VII

2.63

2.49

2.32

2.33

2.23

2.28

2.51

2.64

2.29

2.28

2.31

2.36

2.54

2.51

2.40

2.50

VIII

2.47

2.57

2.29

2.34

2.50

2.37

2.33

2.58

2.31

2.37

2.35

2.36

2.49

2.44

2.41

2.48

Attainment

2.49

2.50

2.42

2.42

2.42

2.47

2.44

2.55

2.40

2.45

2.47

2.47

2.48

2.51

2.46

2.50

67 of 69

Attainment of Internship

Project Attainment

ATTAINMENT OF PROJECT AND INTERNSHIP

PO

PO 1

PO 2

PO 3

PO 4

PO 5

PO 6

PO 7

PO 8

PO 9

PO 10

PO 11

PO 12

PSO 1

PSO 2

PSO 3

PSO 4

AVG

1.8

1.8

2.8

2.8

1.8

1.8

1.8

1.8

1.8

1.8

1.8

2.8

2.8

2.8

2.8

1.8

PO

PO 1

PO 2

PO 3

PO 4

PO 5

PO 6

PO 7

PO 8

PO 9

PO 10

PO 11

PO 12

PSO 1

PSO 2

PSO 3

PSO 4

AVG

2.10

2.09

2.09

2.09

2.10

2.27

1.78

1.62

2.10

2.43

2.26

2.12

2.42

2.58

2.74

2.90

68 of 69

ATTAINMENT OF HOLISTIC STUDENT DEVELOPMENT COURSES

Professional Skills

PO

PO 1

PO 2

PO 3

PO 4

PO 5

PO 6

PO 7

PO 8

PO 9

PO 10

PO 11

PO 12

PSO 1

PSO 2

PSO 3

PSO 4

Attainment

2.8

1.68

0.84

0.84

2.8

0.84

0.84

1.68

2.8

2.8

0.84

1.68

2.8

1.68

0.98

0.84

Employability Skill Development

PO

PO 1

PO 2

PO 3

PO 4

PO 5

PO 6

PO 7

PO 8

PO 9

PO 10

PO 11

PO 12

PSO 1

PSO 2

PSO 3

PSO 4

Attainment

2.11

2.11

2.40

2.10

2.03

2.06

1.65

1.65

1.68

2.06

2.09

2.09

1.79

1.75

1.76

1.76

Research Based Learning

PO

PO 1

PO 2

PO 3

PO 4

PO 5

PO 6

PO 7

PO 8

PO 9

PO 10

PO 11

PO 12

PSO 1

PSO 2

PSO 3

PSO 4

Attainment

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

2.83

Project Based Learning

PO

PO 1

PO 2

PO 3

PO 4

PO 5

PO 6

PO 7

PO 8

PO 9

PO 10

PO 11

PO 12

PSO 1

PSO 2

PSO 3

PSO 4

Attainment

2.70

2.60

2.57

2.58

2.58

2.54

2.56

2.60

2.52

2.52

2.54

2.50

2.83

2.59

2.60

2.49

Activity Based Learning

PO

PO 1

PO 2

PO 3

PO 4

PO 5

PO 6

PO 7

PO 8

PO 9

PO 10

PO 11

PO 12

PSO 1

PSO 2

PSO 3

PSO 4

Attainment

1.93

2.12

1.53

1.4

2.33

1.8

1.8

1.8

1

2.67

1

2.47

1.88

2.33

1.87

2.4

69 of 69

Thank You

69

8/29/2022