1 of 22

Public Sector Accountability and the Role of an Integrity Commissioner

PRESENTED BY ERIN CROSLEY AND KRISTEN HAMILTON

October 2024

2 of 22

Introduction

Municipal Codes of Conduct, Complaint Processes, and Best Practices

3 of 22

Municipal Government Act – Bill 20

  • Bill 20 came into force in 2017
  • This amended the MGA to provide that municipal councils must establish a code to govern councillors by June 13, 2018
    • The Codes of Conduct were to be enacted through municipal bylaws
  • This amended the duties of councillors (s. 153) to include adherence to the Code of Conduct
  • The Code of Conduct for Elected Officials Regulation, AR 200/2017 (Regulation) also came into force at the same time as the amendments

3

4 of 22

Requirements of a Code of Conduct

  • A Code of Conduct must address the following topics:
    • Representing and communicating on behalf of the municipality
    • Respecting the decision-making process
    • Adherence to policies, procedures, and by-laws
    • Respectful interactions with councillors, staff, the public and others
    • Confidential information
    • Conflicts of interest
    • Improper use of influence
    • Use of municipal assets and services
    • Orientation and training attendance

4

5 of 22

Code of Conduct: Enforcement

  • MGA respects the autonomy of Councils to govern themselves
  • Council may choose to create an office of the integrity commissioner to receive complaints, investigate, and recommend sanctions
  • Council has final decision making about enforcement of its code and imposing sanctions
    • Mandate of Integrity commissioners should only allow recommending sanctions, not imposing them

5

6 of 22

Role of an Integrity Commissioner

  • Generally, an integrity commissioner is responsible for applying the rules governing the ethical conduct of members of municipal councils
  • Integrity commissioners can review complaints to determine if they require an investigation and conduct formal investigations where necessary
  • If a council chooses to appoint an integrity commissioner, their role and authority should be clearly laid out in the Code of Conduct

6

7 of 22

Benefits of Integrity Commissioner

  • Can appoint the same integrity commissioner for a set term
  • Familiarity with your municipality’s Code of Conduct
  • An avenue for more proactive advice on revising the Code of Conduct or navigating ethical concerns
  • Parts (or all) of an investigation report may later be subject to a Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy request

7

8 of 22

Code of Conduct: Receiving and Accepting Complaints

  • The Code of Conduct needs to outline the process for making a complaint for an alleged violation of the Code
  • Consider:
    • Who can make Complaints?
    • How can Complaints be submitted?
    • Who should they be submitted to?
    • What must a Complaint include?
    • What are the time limits on filing a complaint?
    • What will happen if an anonymous complaint is received?

8

9 of 22

Code of Conduct: Receiving and Accepting Complaints (cont’d)

  • Remove barriers to making a complaint
    • There should be no barriers to making a complaint to the integrity commissioner, such as fees or onerous administrative requirements
    • Outline in the Code of Conduct when Complaints can be dismissed
    • Frivolous or vexatious
    • Even if allegations proven, no breach of the Code

9

10 of 22

Code of Conduct: Complaint Investigation Processes

  • Timelines for investigations
    • How long does an investigator have to complete an investigation into a complaint?
    • What is the procedure for if a time limit cannot be adhered to?
  • How will the Councillor(s) under investigation be advised of a complaint?
    • Will they/Council receive a copy of the Complaint and/or a summary of allegations?

10

11 of 22

Code of Conduct: Complaint Investigation Processes (cont’d)

  • How will confidentiality be protected throughout the investigation?
  • Do integrity commissioners have discretion with respect to some investigation processes?
    • If so, specify this wherever possible in the Complaint protocol.

11

12 of 22

Code of Conduct: After the Investigation

  • How will the Investigation findings be reported to council?
    • Who will have access to the written report?
    • Who will be present for an oral presentation of the report?
  • Will the investigator recommend sanctions?
  • Will the Complainant be advised of the outcome of the Investigation? In what format?

12

13 of 22

Code of Conduct: Written Reports

  • Written reports should include:
    • Summaries of the complaint, the investigative process and the evidence obtained during the investigation;
    • The relevant conduct standard or other applicable rules;
    • An explanation that clearly explains how the commissioner weighed the evidence against that standard; and
    • A clear conclusion based on the evidence

13

14 of 22

Procedural Fairness and Natural Justice Considerations

  • Natural Justice and Procedural Fairness apply to Council sanctions:
    • Duty to provide notice as to the nature of the alleged contravention
    • Duty to inform of the potential sanction(s)
    • Accused Councillor has the right to respond to investigation

14

15 of 22

Integrity Commissioner Findings – Can they be appealed?

  • The findings and decisions of an integrity commissioner are final decisions and cannot be appealed
  • Rule of Law requires if allegations of breach of procedural fairness or bias, these can be reviewed by the courts
  • Where a council has acted on the findings of an investigation, the Court has the jurisdiction to review the council decision through applying for judicial review

15

16 of 22

Clark v Medicine Hat, 2024 ABKB 513

  • Judicial Review of decision made by Council for the City of Medicine Hat after an investigation under Code of Conduct
  • Councillor appealed the decision, in part, because the sanctions were severe and disproportionate with the conduct
  • The Record did not indicate why a severe remedy was decided upon by Council
  • As part of the sanctions, the councilor’s official spokesperson status was revoked and she was no longer able to attend meetings of the administration, and her salary was reduced by 50%

16

17 of 22

Clark v Medicine Hat, 2024 ABKB 513

  • Court held that regulatory sanctions are not intended to be punitive and there must be proportionality between the wrongdoing and the penalty
  • In this case, the sanctions were too severe
  • Judicial review was granted and the matter was sent back to Council

17

18 of 22

Code of Conduct Training for Councillors

  • Training should occur when new Councillor(s) take office
  • Refresher courses should occur once a year and may also provide an opportunity to workshop new issues that Council may want to include in Code of Conduct

18

19 of 22

Additional Training for Councillors

  • Council should receive training on items such as:
    • Respect
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Bias
    • Social Media Use
    • Confidentiality
    • Conflict Resolution
    • Conflicts of Interest

19

20 of 22

Questions?

21 of 22

Today’s Presenters

Erin Crosley

403.444.4074�erin.crosley@mross.com

Kristen Hamilton

403.303.2905�kristen.hamilton@mross.com

Stephanie Lawless

403.303.9110�stephanie.lawless@mross.com

21

22 of 22

Thank You.

mross.com