1 of 7

BeModeLS: �Behavioural Models of Land Systems

Breakout Rooms Notes

Workshop February 2023

1

landscapemodelling.net

2 of 7

Working Group Aims

  1. Support construction of a library of models and code
  2. Motivate development of common data to compare models
  3. Foster use of social science theories, insights for modelling
  4. Stimulate experiments that use and compare models
  5. Encourage design/implementation of new models of institutions
  6. Push for modelling of collective actions influencing individuals
  7. Catalyse exploration of impacts of environmental change
  8. Promote identification of best targets for policy levers
  9. Support the development of theories of land system change
  10. Push coupling of behavioural models with earth system models

2

landscapemodelling.net

3 of 7

Contribute

  1. Foster an inclusive, active, diverse and cooperative community of social-ecological land system modellers

  • What would you like the group to do?
  • What is missing from the aims?
  • What aims, topics, themes should we prioritise?
  • How can the group help you with your research?
  • How do we compare/couple models?

Breakout Rooms: Add notes on next slides

3

landscapemodelling.net

4 of 7

Breakout Group 1

Calum Brown, Nick Magliocca, Nils Droste, Almut Arneth, Enoch Bessah

  • What would you like the group to do?
    • Comparing models is an important aim, can be facilitated by a group like this (similar model scales). Scenario-specific? Test model types?
    • Evaluation too - data comparison, interface with reality (how?)
    • What is appropriate at what scales
    • Model integration
    • Feeding qualitative information into models
  • What is missing from the aims?
    • What we are applying models to - developing new scenarios, missing scenario elements (e.g. land grabbing) (different WG?)
    • Reaching out to other geographical areas, broadening reach of group (advertising more in GLP/AIMES should help)
    • Scenarios for particular world regions
    • Identify funding opportunities, especially those that cover under-represented areas
  • What aims, topics, themes should we prioritise?
    • Cross-scale drivers of change
    • Modelling institutions, lock-ins, leverage points…
  • How can the group help you with your research?
    • We need to pursue funding to actually do things. Future Earth, Belmont Forum, foundation funding - shortage of worldwide collaborative grants.
  • How do we compare/couple models?

4

landscapemodelling.net

5 of 7

Breakout Group 2

Gardi Chaudhuri, Michelle de Gruchy, Elizabeth Díaz General, Luana Schwarz, Zhanli “Jerry” Sun, Derek Robinson,

  • What would you like the group to do?
    • Webinars: present papers, new papers coming on board to keep the community updated with state-of-the art, topical (e.g., connecting ABMs to other models)
      • Regularity and substantial discussion would be beneficial
    • Workshops: a discussion of a variety of different types
      • Some that could get new users up and going
      • Tutorial based�
  • What is missing from the aims?
    • Focus. Reduce the number of aims, remove the general aims that many different groups are pursuing
    • Lack of understanding what this working group is particularly about
    • One suggestion to emphasize on behaviour and model coupling

5

landscapemodelling.net

6 of 7

Breakout Group 3

Viera Ukropcova, Jannes Breier, Ronja Hotz, James Millington

Empirical evidence, data challenges,

  • Difficult to find empirical evidence to use in integrating/coupling social models with biophysical
  • Difficult to integrate geographical social differences into models
  • Lack of data on management impact on vegetation
  • Would be useful to compare approaches used to learn e.g. using historical datasets used to evaluate model results
  • Prioritise:
    • Motivate development of sets of common data against which to compare and benchmark human behaviour models and modelling approaches in land systems;
    • Stimulate experiments that use and compare different models of land user/manager decision processes based on alternative theories; ->
    • How? Sharing of work underway by short presentations & discussion/mini-symposium

6

landscapemodelling.net

7 of 7

Breakout Group 4

Participants

  1. Sylvie Huet
  2. Hanna Ekström
  3. Mark Rounsevell
  4. Alena Schmidt
  5. Carsten Lemmen
  6. John Donges

7

  • How can the group help you with your research?
  • What would you like the group to do?
  • What is missing from the aims?
  • What aims, topics, themes should we prioritise?

Aim 4. Social Theory

Sylvie: not too focussed on tech, zoom out from model, reflect on implications. Theories of Land system change

Aim 11. Behavioural models in ESM:

- Carsten: make need clearer to ESM community

- Mark: unrealistic transitions when behaviroural process are not considered. Main ones: time lags

- Jonathan: spreading dynamics (contagion/learning/social tipping) of agricultural practices. LPJml => ESM. Technosphere constraints

=> Planetary boundaries

Joining macro to micro

Aim 3. Common data and models

Alena: what is needed and what are the limits of models, how to communicate

Mark: how to go beyond Networking activities

Do we need to see funding ops?

landscapemodelling.net