Scale: Volunteer Program
Overview of the Volunteer Program
Volunteering is part of our ambitious Scale program, where we will recruit and train 50000 diverse leaders
Volunteering falls under Scale
Purpose | Our Proposal | Our Goals by 2032* |
Scale the Fellowship Pipeline to bring in diverse leaders, supporters and funds into the movement | Student Fellowship & Volunteering Program
| 30000 Student Leaders and Volunteers |
Scale the Fellowship year on year and to new regions |
| 12500 Education Leaders |
Scale the Fellowship Model to most vulnerable children/areas where we can’t scale directly | Strengthen TFIx as our growth model | 100 TFIx Entrepreneurs |
Scale our Training Capabilities for teacher leaders who can not join our Fellowship | TFIx Fellowships & Teaching Programs
| 15000 TFIx Fellows and Teachers trained by teacher trainers across organizations and Govt. bodies in education |
Scale Alumni Impact** with Alumni orgs. working towards an excellent, equitable education | Evolve InnovatED to support Alumni Entrepreneurs solving the biggest problems across our puzzle pieces | 100 InnovatED Entrepreneurs |
*Tentative – inclusive of a 15% attrition rate
**School leaders will be added here, if we choose to keep it as a separate part of our strategy
The Volunteer Program has three key objectives, with the end outcome of bringing 10,000 leaders into the movement
Purpose of Volunteer Program
Build a pipeline for the Fellowship
Create a motivated and engaged talent pool that we can tap into for Fellowship (and Staff) positions
Mobilize new sources of funding
Build awareness and attract donors from retail and diaspora segments
Engage employees effectively to enhance our CSR efforts
Support outcomes in the classroom
Enhance student learning outcomes and exposure
Support Fellows in classroom management thus reducing workload
We will introduce two archetypes of volunteer programs serving different audiences and objectives
Overview: Short 1-2 day events exposing volunteers to education inequity, Teach for India’s model and our impact
Objective: Support fundraising and recruitment at critical times in the year
Audience:
Glimpse: 1-2 day programs
Design of Volunteer Program
Overview: Medium term experiences bringing volunteers into Teach for India classrooms and offices
Objective: Create a pipeline of leaders into the Fellowship, and support fundraising efforts overseas
Audience: Open, with a focus on
Immerse: 2-3 month programs
Glimpse can feed into Immerse program
Immerse programs can be cyclical
Volunteering Program project plan
We will conduct a pilot with the Bridge Program in 2021 while maintaining a long-term view
| May | June | July | August |
Work-streams | | | | |
Key deliverables | Aligned strategy concept note | Draft of volunteer journeys, pilot design Financial, tech, and human resource asks | First group of volunteers on-boarded! | Feedback and insights from pilot Revised long-term plan |
Bridge program design
Run pilot sprint 1
Design pilot
Onboard resource
Strategy and overall vision for volunteer program
Volunteer program project plan
In our pilot, we aim to place 3 volunteers in every classroom, reaching a total of
~2,400 active volunteers committed to bridging our student’s learning gaps
Designing the volunteer journey
We are designing a 6 stage journey for volunteers
The stages of a volunteer journey
Deep-dives follow. Most of the following section relates to Immerse, with limited applicability to Glimpse
02
Match
How do we match the needs of our classrooms to the skills and interests of volunteers?
01
Recruit
How do we reach and recruit the right set of volunteers?
03
Onboard
How can we effectively introduce volunteers to their role and TFI?
05
Evaluate
How do we learn and incorporate feedback into our model?
04
Volunteer
How do we deliver high-quality, seamless and experiential learning for our volunteers?
06
Engage
How do we create a community of volunteers connected and committed to our cause?
Iterative process
We can use a savvy digital strategy to reach and convert potential volunteers at a pre-defined rhythm
1. Recruit Design overview
To reach and interest our desired population and provide an easy, seamless way to sign up
Objective
Design considerations
Conversion rate of 2-5% of population reached to volunteer applications
Criteria for success
Physical
Digital
What channels will we use for outreach?
In-house
Out-source
What is our digital strategy?
Where to recruit
Supply- based
Demand- based
On what frequency do we recruit?
When to recruit
Equitable
Aspirational
What is our program messaging?
How to select
Loose
Strict
How stringent is our eligibility criteria?
Key enablers
How do we easily bring in a large population of interested individuals to volunteer with us?
Pilot with broad population (AC rejects?), potential partnerships with TAP / iVolunteer / Toolbox
Pre-defined start dates (e.g., 15th of every month) to create volunteer “classes”
For pilot
For long-term
1. Recruit Ideas to explore
High
Medium
Low
Priority
Rely strongly on social media – funny and accessible messaging
Word-of-mouth campaigns led by Staff, Alumni, Fellows and ex-Volunteers
Location champions e.g., at residential associations, schools and colleges near our classrooms
Organization-specific recruitment at colleges and corporates offering volunteering time
Themed campaigns e.g., “It’s Summer Time”, #DaanUtsav
Partnerships with volunteer- driven organizations e.g. Robin Hood Army
Organizations are getting increasingly digital-friendly as they look to reach and recruit a wide swath of the population
Sub-theme | Emerging insights from benchmarking | Design implications |
Audience profiles |
| What segments are important for us? Which could feed into the Fellowship? Or development (e.g., high income private schools)? |
Recruitment strategy |
| How do we balance digital v.s. on-ground recruitment strategies? To what extent do we in-house our volunteering program versus out-source on aggregator platforms? |
1. Recruit External benchmarking
We were successful in generating over 2,800 applications from potential volunteers
1. Recruit Learnings from pilot
Who did we recruit?
Where did we recruit?
While we hit our numbers target, there were still areas of improvement to ensure a higher competency and screening of volunteers
1. Recruit Learnings from pilot
Successes
Areas of development
Future avenues to explore
While we can invest in automation upon reaching scale, solid process and data management can support our initial needs
2. Match Design overview
To quickly and easily match our demand (Fellow and classroom needs) with the supply of volunteers
Objective
Design considerations
Match rate of 90% within 48 hours from receiving volunteer application
Criteria for success
Volunteer interest
driven
Classroom need driven
What criteria do we use to match volunteers?
Key enablers
Manual
Automated
How automated do we want this process?
Before reaching scale
Classroom
National
At what unit do we conduct matching?
Leverage online volunteering to reduce location constraints
While we successfully deployed an algorithm to match volunteers into classrooms, there are areas of improvement
2. Match Learnings from pilot
xx
Successes
Areas of development
Future avenues to explore
Our onboarding will have to be simple yet effective to equip volunteers with the right skills, without becoming another entry barrier
3. Onboard Design overview
To introduce volunteers to Teach for India and their role; and equip volunteers with the necessary skill-set
Objective
Design considerations
100% of volunteers understand their role and expectations
Criteria for success
Less time
More
material
How can we simplify onboarding?
Key enablers
To equip
To inspire
What are the goals of onboarding?
How do we maintain a balance between time and content, e.g., by using Firki?
Self-based
learning
Communal
learning
How will we run the o-boarding?
Through the volunteer time, we need to create continuous commitment and engagement with students
4. Volunteer Design overview
To expose volunteers to educational inequity in India, and create commitment towards classroom outcomes
Objective
Design considerations
<10% attrition of volunteers over course of program
Criteria for success
Key enablers
Few weeks
Few months
How long are our programs?
Altruism
Incentives
How do we recognize volunteers?
Few hours a month
Few hours a week
What is the level of commitment?
Duration & intensity
Few
Many
How many programs do we launch?
Beyond
classroom
Classroom outcomes
What is the focus of our program?
Over time, we might want to introduce tracks in Fundraising and Advocacy
Breadth v.s. depth
How do we continuously create volunteer commitment to their classrooms and to our vision of educational equity?
Help measure outcomes and impact that reflect student learning
For pilot
For long-term
4. Volunteer Ideas to explore
High
Medium
Low
Priority
Digital Learning Circles: Whatsapp groups with veteran volunteers and Fellows to problem-solve
On-going up-skilling via classroom management programs (e.g., on Firki), skills at an NGO
Visit-a-Class to learn from Fellows and expert volunteers
Use volunteers in non-TFI classrooms as a tool to enhance in-school equity
Exposure to education inequity e.g., via expert talks
Volunteer Certificates post-program
Volunteer of the Month stories on social media and website
Program options tend to fall in 4 categories, supplemented by internships and fellowships, with a range of structures
Sub-theme | Emerging insights from benchmarking | Design questions to consider |
Program options |
| Can volunteering be a tool to enhance in-school equity between TFI and non-TFI classrooms? How do we fit employee engagement into our model? |
Structure |
| Can we / our Fellows create hyper-local self-governed volunteer circles to support specific communities? |
4. Volunteer External benchmarking
By collecting feedback from stakeholders, we will continuously upgrade our volunteer program
5. Evaluate Design overview
To collect feedback and enhance the volunteer experience with an eye on classroom outcomes
Objective
Design considerations
Feedback collected from >70% of stakeholders (volunteers, students, Fellows)
Criteria for success
Key enablers
Agile and
on-demand
Defined
frequency
How do we integrate feedback into our program design?
Volunteers
All
stakeholders
From whom do we collect feedback?
We need to create high-quality engagement with volunteers to create a viable pipeline into the Fellowship
6. Engage Design overview
To create a dedicated community working to learn more and combat educational inequity
Objective
Design considerations
>50% volunteers stay engaged via some channel after the initial program completion
Criteria for success
Few
Many
What channels do we use to reach volunteers?
Key enablers
Monthly
Quarterly
How frequently do we reach volunteers?
How do we create a community of dedicated volunteers, serving into our Fellowship, without becoming another source of digital spam?
For pilot
For long-term
6. Engage Ideas to explore
High
Medium
Low
Priority
Digital Local Communities: WhatsApp groups with volunteers from similar classrooms / locations as resources for projects or emergencies
Keep Learning Journey – provide opportunities to high performing volunteers (e.g., Path to Fellow / Staff, InspirED)
Volunteer Newsletter – providing recognition, resources and requesting help (e.g., to Fundraise)
Dus ka Dum challenge – can you bring 10 friends into our community?
Volunteer Day – yearly event to recognize and celebrate
While organizations tend to not monetarily compensate volunteers, there is a clear split in choosing to give formal recognition (certificates)
Emerging insights from benchmarking | Design questions to consider |
| How do we balance giving recognition to volunteers while ensuring they have altruistic motivations? |
6. Engage External benchmarking
Piloting the Bridge Program in 2021
Our pilot will run in collaboration with the Bridge program, with a bold and ambitious vision for 2021
Vision of the Bridge pilot
Every child in our classrooms,
every other day,
has access to small-group
remedial programs
to reverse learning losses suffered
in the COVID-19 pandemic.
By the end of 2021, we aim to place virtual volunteers in every classroom running the Bridge program by conducting 3 sprints
| Sprint 1 (July – August) | Sprint 2 (September – October) | Sprint 3 (November - December) |
Total classrooms running Bridge | 810 | 810 | 810 |
New volunteers on-boarded | 1,200 (600/month) | 1,650 (~825/month) | 2,050 (~1025/month) |
Total active volunteers (at end of Sprint) | 1,080 | 1,960 | 2,440 |
% students covered by volunteers (at end of Sprint) | ~60% | ~80% | 100% |
Where we need to get to
Detailed numbers are here. Student coverage is only for students that are in classrooms running Bridge.
We start a new batch every 2 weeks, with volunteers completing a 3-month Bridge program. Numbers take into account attrition of new volunteers and retention of veteran volunteers.
We will scale our breadth and reach of recruitment efforts to continuously bring in volunteers
Design question | Pilot design |
What channels will we use for out-reach? |
|
What is our digital strategy? | In-house for Sprints 1 & 2, start partnerships for Sprint 3 |
On what frequency do we recruit? | Once a month: for 2 batches starting fortnightly |
How stringent is our eligibility criteria? | Basic reading and math proficiency (e.g., 8th grade English) |
What is our program messaging? | Arrest learning loss for children – and the long-term effects on income loss due to COVID-19 |
What enablers are needed?
What risks or barriers exist?
1. Recruit Pilot design
We will build strong data management systems – from capturing demand in classrooms to the supply of volunteers – to place volunteers in the most at-need classrooms
Design question | Pilot design |
How automated do we want this process? | Manual with minimal tech investment |
What criteria do we use to match volunteers? |
|
At what unit do we conduct matching? | National for now – pilot to run virtually |
What enablers are needed?
What risks or barriers exist?
2. Match Pilot design
We will run a short, simple onboarding once a month for our new set of volunteers
Design question | Pilot design |
What are the goals of onboarding? | To both equip volunteers with the right skills and inform/inspire them to be part of our movement We will leverage ready content from other contexts as much as possible
|
How can we simplify onboarding? | Use Firki for parts (or most?) of the training |
How will we run the onboarding? | Group on-boarding at a defined frequency for a new batch, with minimal self-based learning |
What enablers are needed?
What risks or barriers exist?
3. Onboard Pilot design
We need to ensure Fellow and PM accountability to use the volunteer’s time effectively on enhancing classroom outcomes
Design question | Pilot design |
How long are our programs? | 3 months |
What is the level of commitment? | 4-6 hours / week (1-2 hours every other day) = 72 hours in total Preference for weekdays |
How many programs do we launch? | In 2021, we will only launch the Bridge program |
What is the focus of our program? | Classroom remediation – with a focus on reading and math proficiency and socio-emotional learning |
How do we recognize volunteers? |
|
What enablers are needed?
What risks or barriers exist?
4. Volunteer Pilot design
We need a resource dedicated to collecting feedback and feeding improvements into our pilot design
Design question | Pilot design |
How do we integrate feedback into our program design? | Agile – keep iterating for the next Sprint |
From whom do we collect feedback? |
We should also think about collecting data on student outcomes, and communicating these to volunteers |
What enablers are needed?
What risks or barriers exist?
5. Evaluate Pilot design
To start building and engaging our base of volunteers, we will launch a set of select digital initiatives
Design question | Pilot design |
How frequently do we reach volunteers? | Monthly |
What channels do we use to reach volunteers? | Few, for now
|
What enablers are needed?
What risks or barriers exist?
6. Engage Pilot design
We have laid out a set of milestones over the next 7 weeks to bring our first batch of volunteers into classrooms on July 1st
Week of… | 17th May | 24th May | 31st May | 7th June |
Technology | | | |
|
Content | |
|
|
|
Resources |
| |
| |
Other | |
|
|
|
What will it take? Part 1
We have laid out a set of milestones over the next 7 weeks to bring our first batch of volunteers into classrooms on July 1st
What will it take? Part 2
Launch 2 week campaign for first batch of volunteers!
Week of… | 14th June | 21st June | 28th June |
Technology |
|
|
|
Content |
|
|
|
Resources | | | |
Other | | | |
Future state of the volunteer program
What does this look like in the future?
Stage | Current state | Future recommendations |
Recruit | Open recruitment with loose eligibility criteria | Stricter, application-based volunteering Frequency of cycles tbd. |
Match | One-time needs analysis from Fellows with matching done on a set of criteria Frequency - once for each batch | Needs collected real-time or pre-defined frequency for Fellows; Fellow’s screen volunteer applications; Matching to ensure volunteers go to classrooms with highest needs; Frequency to be defined |
Onboard | Centralized 1 week with async and sync components | Async onboarding for each learning track; Sync onboarding at pre-defined frequency |
Program | Bridge curriculum - 12 weeks, 4 hours/week | Pre-defined learning tracks in key areas (each with fixed length/levels or outcomes): 1. Fundraising - Help raise funds for devices or classrooms 2. Advocacy - Spread the word about key issues 3. Community engagement - Work with TFI communities on their needs (such as education, health) 4. Academic Interventions - Teach TFI Students 5. Holistic Education Interventions - Do extracurriculars and mentorship activities 6. Classroom support - Work with TFI Fellows on classroom management or BTCP 7. Buddy - Mentor new volunteers to help them grow |
End state recommendations
What does this look like in the future?
Stage | Current state | Future recommendations |
Engage | | |
Evaluate | | |
End state recommendations
Interest area wise needs
Real-time needs collected from Fellows
Application based matching to maintain high bar