1 of 65

WorldFAIR+: Making data work for cross-domain grand challenges

A CODATA workshop as part of the ISC General Assembly, Muscat, Oman

2 of 65

3 of 65

SciDataCon 2025, part of International Data Week:

Call open for sessions and papers!

  • Propose a session with speakers or a workshop; or an individual paper.
  • Data for Positive Change! https://bit.ly/SDC2025-Call
    • CAREful Indigenous Data Governance
    • Rigorous, responsible, and reproducible science in the era of FAIR data and AI
    • Open research through Interconnected, Interoperable, and Interdisciplinary Data
    • Empowering the global data community for impact, equity, and inclusion
    • Infrastructures to Support Data-Intensive Research – Local to Global
    • The Transformative Role of Data in Sustainable Development Goals and Disaster Resilience
  • SciDataCon persistent themes of data in science, data science, data stewardship.
  • Deadline 15 April.

4 of 65

  1. Making data work for cross-domain grand challenges: WorldFAIR+, Simon Hodson, Executive Director, CODATA (25 mins)
  2. Discussion: what are the interdisciplinary challenges in your discipline / country? (20 mins)
  3. Chemistry and WorldFAIR+ - IUPAC making the central science available to other disciplines, Richard Hartshorn, Professor, School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand and CODATA Vice-President (10 mins)
  4. Combining social science data for interdisciplinary research, Steve McEachern, Director, UK Data Service and CODATA Officer (10 mins)
  5. Addressing transdisciplinary approach for tackling urban heat as a science mission, Shaily Gandhi, Senior Post-Doctoral Researcher, Geosocial Artificial Intelligence Research Group, Interdisciplinary Transformational University, Linz, Austria and ISC Fellow (10 mins)
  6. WorldFAIR+: How to get involved, Simon Hodson, Executive Director, CODATA (5 mins)
  7. Discussion: how to get involved? (15 mins)

Programme

5 of 65

Making data work for cross-domain grand challenges: WorldFAIR+

Simon Hodson, CODATA Executive Director

6 of 65

Image CC-BY-SA by SangyaPundir

(Wilkinson, M., et al., The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship, Scientific Data, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18)

7 of 65

  • FAIR: encompasses in an easy communicable acronym, high level principles of good data stewardship
    • Increases the usability and utility of data, metadata, code.
    • Extremely influential (6519 citations Nature; 15595 citations Google Scholar).
  • Emphasis of the benefits of machine-actionability: network of FAIR data
    • FAIR principles designed to support the use of data at scale, by machines, harnessing technological potential, better enabling AI.
    • Vision of harnessing the technologies of the web, to improve querying of vast, dispersed and heterogenous data.
  • Increases the value of data for science and the economy
    • PWC report, 2019: Opportunity cost to the European science system of NOT having FAIR data: 8.2 Bn Euros.
    • (at least) 80% of project effort goes into downstream ‘data wrangling’, rather than upstream ‘data stewardship’.

FAIR Principles

Wilkinson, Mons, et al., The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship, Scientific Data, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Barend Mons and Mercè Crosas, past and current CODATA Presidents, both authors of the FAIR Principles.

Turning FAIR Into Reality: Final Report and Action Plan from the European Commission Expert Group on FAIR Data, 2018, Hodson (chair of working group/lead author), et al., https://doi.org/10.2777/1524

8 of 65

Making Data Work – WorldFAIR – WorldFAIR+

Making Data Work

(2018-2022)

WorldFAIR

(2022-2024)

WorldFAIR+

(2024+)

9 of 65

  • The digital and data revolution presents us with huge opportunities and significant challenges.
  • Premise: The major, pressing global scientific and human challenges of the 21st century can ONLY be addressed through research that works across disciplines to understand complex systems, and which uses a transdisciplinary approach to turn data into knowledge and then into action.
  • Addressing the SDGs or DRR in a science-informed way, requires a fundamentally interdisciplinary approach, the interaction of natural and social sciences… And lots of FAIR data!
  • ISC Action Plans entrusted CODATA with an initiative ‘Making Data Work for Cross-Domain Grand Challenges’: establish a global (decadal) programme to address these issues.
  • ISC provided funding support for a Preparatory Phase:
    • Exploratory workshops with Unions and standards organisations.
    • Developed a case study driven methodology.
    • Established a very strong collaboration with the DDI Alliance.
    • Jointly explored cross-domain interoperability issues at a series of Dagstuhl workshops: https://codata.org/initiatives/decadal-programme2/dagstuhl-workshops/

Making Data Work for Cross-Domain Grand Challenges

10 of 65

  • Advances in FAIR implementation in cross-domain scenarios, in 11 specific disciplines and globally.
  • Global in approach, because research domains, data and metadata standards and specifications need to be global. Leveraged CODATA and RDA networks to achieve this.
  • Includes authoritative international entities (e.g. IUPAC, OneGeochemistry, GBIF, ODIS); connections with important projects or standards organisations (e.g. NanoCommons, DDI Alliance, OHDSI, TDWG, SalUrbAL).
  • Considerable emphasis on case studies and the recommendations from these organisations.
  • Leveraged links to international standards and scientific organisations, as well as reliable articulations of good (web) practice to make cross-domain recommendations. Were able to have funded partners outside the European Union.
  • Helps reinforce bidirectional links between EOSC and global developments.

  • Funded by the European Union, HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ERA-0 — Project: 101058393

WorldFAIR: Global cooperation on FAIR data policy and practice

11 of 65

WorldFAIR Partners

12 of 65

  • Chemistry – making IUPAC assets FAIR
  • Nanomaterials – applying NanoInchi and FAIR recommendations in Nanosafety.
  • Geochemistry – recommendations for FAIR in geochemistry, particularly vocabularies.
  • Social Surveys Data – data harmonisation between ESS and AussiESS.
  • Population Health – INSPIRE - Integration of population surveys with clinical and genomics data for COVID-19 research in eastern and southern Africa.
  • Urban Health – terminologies and making urban health data FAIR
  • Biodiversity – improving GBIF data model in collaboration with TDWG - GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility)
  • Agricultural Biodiversity – pollinator data (KALRO, Embrapa, Meise, HiveTracks)
  • Ocean Science – Implementing FAIR in the ODIS (Ocean Data and Information System) for the UNESCO Oceans’ decade.
  • Disaster Risk Reduction – recommendations on making DRR data and terminologies FAIR, case studies in Africa and Pacific Islands
  • Cultural Heritage – recommendations on making cultural heritage data FAIR (particularly digital representation of heritage artefacts)

WorldFAIR Case Studies

13 of 65

  • Identifies a set of functional requirements for interoperability, particular for steps in data combination, and identifies good practices for each of these requirements.
  • Draws on work with the WorldFAIR case studies and with a number of international initiatives (ODIS, Science on Schema.org, UN Stats KG work, GBIF…)
  • Significant proportion of CDIF rests on good web practice, domain neutral standards and good practice: disciplines can adopt or map.
  • Use cases: domain or cross-domain projects or data services that need to combine data for analysis, modelling etc.
  • Directed at implementers: describes use cases, identifies standards, gives guidance and on how to implement them.
  • Categorically not a new standard. Rather it is a framework of existing and emerging standards, to provide a lingua franca.

What is the CDIF (Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework)?

14 of 65

What is CDIF?

  • The Cross Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF) is a set of practical, implementation-level principles designed to improve data management practices within any community and lower the barriers to cross-domain data reuse. CDIF offers standards and methodologies for achieving different levels of interoperability necessary for reusing data across diverse domains. It is built around five core profiles that address the essential functions for implementing cross-domain FAIR principles.
  • About CDIF: https://bit.ly/CDIF-Intro
  • CDIF was first released in May 2024 as an output of the WorldFAIR project: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11236871
  • The point of reference for CDIF and its component profiles is now the CDIF Book: https://bit.ly/CDIF-Book
  • Very good feedback from implementers.

15 of 65

CDIF, the Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework

Feedback received from a colleague at a national data infrastructure

“I have a long reading list that I’m working through and initially wasn’t too excited to be sitting down to read another technical report, and a massive one at that, but as I started reading, it was like it stopped me in my tracks to ask “Is it your job to try to work out the design of metadata for a cross-domain repository and would you like us to tell you how you might do that in the best, most FAIR way?” to which I had to reply “Yes, yes that’s exactly what I’m trying to do…”. This will make a real difference to guide and frame what we’re doing and save me much time by recommending best practices and summarising choices that we would be making along the way. It gives us an achievable first scope for our metadata but will allow us to grow this over time as CDIF develops beyond version 1. We were reassured by how well it aligns well with what we were thinking of doing — we had independently already decided to start at the top-level with a SKOS vocabulary and DCAT catalogue description. As such, we intend to use your report as a starting point for how to implement this and build it up as far as it fits with our project plan.”

16 of 65

CDIF, Next Steps

17 of 65

WorldFAIR+, CDIF Implementation Projects

  1. “Data Science Without Borders”: CODATA is a partner in this Wellcome-funded project which builds on the work of WorldFAIR WP07. Three years. Underway. Africa.
    • The project includes CDIF implementation (particularly data interoperability/integration and privacy management) to enable federated analysis across four African health research centres (Kenya, Ethiopia, Senegal, Cameroon).
    • Combining population health / statistical data, clinical outcome data, phylogenetic data, environmental data.
    • Exploring issues of AI assisted cohort analysis and fine-grained privacy management.
  2. “FAIR Data and Emergencies: CODATA will coordinate a project funded by ISC applying the WorldFAIR methodology and implementing CDIF components for disaster preparedness, response and recovery. 18 months. Started 1 September 2024. Türkiye and Malawi.
    • Case study on Turkish earthquake. Scoping underway. Will likely focus on applying CDIF to a national disaster data platform.
    • Case study on Malawi floods and cholera (cascading hazards). Scoping underway. Will likely focus on CDIF-assisted data combination from multiple sources (MoH, WB, UNICEF, universities, health centres and social media).

18 of 65

WorldFAIR+, CDIF Implementation Projects

  1. “CDIF-4-XAS”: an OSCARS project cascading grant, to implement, test and refine the CDIF, to prepare X-ray absorption spectroscopy data for interdisciplinary reuse. Two years. Started 1 October 2024. Europe (Germany and UK, but with global relevance).
    • Partners include STFC (UKRI), Cardiff (UK Catalysis Hub), Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin, Helmholtz Metadata Consortium.

Outputs

    • Overview of standards, vocabularies (and ontologies), data formats and practices within the XAS area (landscape analysis): underway, examining standards and workflows.
    • Semantic description of at least two XAS community standards using a CDIF profile (XAS-CDIF)
    • Implementation plan and method for using XAS-CDIF
    • Prototypes for using XAS-CDIF
    • Recommendations and guidelines for the use of CDIF for XAS data (XAS-CDIF) and in other domains.

19 of 65

WorldFAIR+, CDIF Implementation Projects

  1. “CLIMATE-ADAPT4EOSC”: CODATA is a member of the consortium for a major four-year project on FAIR data and innovative services for climate adaptation. A central part of the project will be the implementation and further development of the CDIF and related tooling. The project comprises three case studies: urban heat (Greece); oceans / coastal management data (Portugal); clay soils / hydrology / built environment / insurance (France). Four years. Starts 1 Jan. Europe (Greece, Portugal, France).
    • Multiple data types and standards.
    • Includes work on organizational and legal interoperability, as well as CDIF implementation.
      • Organizational interoperability framework.
      • Legal interoperability framework.
      • CDIF-based approach to Climate-Adapt data integration.
  2. “FAIR Principles implementation for DDE”: Implementation of FAIR principles, alignment of IUGS CGI standards with CDIF, for cross-domain research topics and data reuse in geology. Three years. From Jan 2025. Global. Funding from IUGS.
    • Enabling the alignment of IUGS CGI and other geology standards with CDIF.
    • Envisage a similar methodology to the OSCARS project with XAS data.

20 of 65

WorldFAIR+, CDIF Implementation Projects

  1. “JUSTSAFE”: CODATA is a member of the consortium for a three-year, EC-funded project looking at data services for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Resilience. Case studies focus on marginalized groups, extreme heat events, and floods. Significant co-design and transdisciplinary element. Three years. Starts later in 2025. Europe, multiple countries. Funding from EC.
    • Multiple data types and standards.
    • Includes work on organizational and legal interoperability, as well as CDIF implementation.
  2. “Citizen-Driven Living Labs for Urban Heat Island Mitigation”: CODATA is part of a consortium for a pilot International Science Council ‘Science Mission’ taking a transdisciplinary approach for health, equity and sustainability to urban heat in India and SE Asia. Multiple data sources (including in situ sensor data, participant and citizen science data. Working with women led NGO, Mahila Housing Trust as well as civic governments and multiple data experts. Eighteen months. Starts later in 2025. Funding from ISC.
    • CDIF core to data integration.
  3. ARDC Planet Commons: Planning underway for an initiative with ARDC Planet Commons taking the WorldFAIR approach and implementing CDIF.
    • See ‘Uplifting FAIR and CARE across Earth and Environmental Science (E&ES) Data’: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14241825

21 of 65

Uplifting FAIR and CARE: CODATA WorldFAIR Policy and Technical Recommendations promoted by ARDC

  • Uplifting FAIR and CARE recommends implementing the WorldFAIR policy and technical recommendations for the Australian Planet Data Commons.
  • Endorses the WorldFAIR Policy Recommendations.
  • Recommends the implementation and further development of CDIF, the Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework.
  • Argues that FAIR and CDIF can assist with the implementation of decisions made by indigenous communities in line with the CARE principles.
  • Uplifting FAIR and CARE: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14241825

22 of 65

Discussion:

What are the interdisciplinary challenges in your discipline / country?

23 of 65

Chemistry and WorldFAIR+: IUPAC making the central science available to other disciplines

Professor Richard Hartshorn

School of Physical and Chemical Sciences

University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

24 of 65

FAIR attributes

Functionality

Chemical notations (examples)

Findablemetadata schema

Indexing, matching

InChI, nomenclature

Searching

Chemical notations (e.g., SMILES), �terms (e.g., properties, methods)

Accessible

retrieval protocols

Searching, retrieving (APIs) �(consistent across systems)

Chemical structure resolver �(API spec prototype in WFC)

Interoperable

knowledge representations, vocabularies, �metadata references

File formats for chemical entities and experimental measurements

SDF, CIF, ThermoML, JCAMP-DX, mzML

Referrable terms and definitions

Gold Book, VIM, MeSH

Classification, modeling

CHMO, RXNO, ChEBI, FAIRSpec

Reusable

validation services

Completeness, consistency

checkCIF

Adapted from

FAIR-enabling chemistry data standards/tools

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

25 of 65

Adapted from

FAIR-enabling chemistry data standards/tools

InChI - the International Chemical Identifier

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

26 of 65

Adapted from

FAIR-enabling chemistry data standards/tools

InChI

InChIKey

Smiles string

Global Resolver - a web service interface to manage this process

Databases

Chemical Structure

Properties/Data

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

27 of 65

Adapted from

FAIR-enabling chemistry data standards/tools

Crystallography leading the way

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

28 of 65

Adapted from

FAIR-enabling chemistry data standards/tools

The CIF Standard and CheckCIF

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

29 of 65

Adapted from

Structure Validator

Machine readability…

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

30 of 65

Adapted from

Structure Validator

Machine readability…

Interpretation of Standard Formats may differ

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

31 of 65

Adapted from

Structure Validator

Machine readability…

Interpretation of Standard Formats may differ

Does an automatically generated structure match mine?

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

32 of 65

Adapted from

Structure Validator

Machine readability…

Interpretation of Standard Formats may differ

Does an automatically generated structure match mine?

How do we validate chemical structures?

  • Correct valences?
  • Implicit hydrogen atoms?
  • Stereocentres represented appropriately?

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

33 of 65

Envisioning IUPAC at the World’s FAIR hub

iupac.org/what-we-do/digital-standards

Practical Resources (in progress)

Descriptions

WorldFAIR inputs

Cheminformatics Color Book

  • Best practices for digital chemical data notation
  • D3.1, Enabling Guidance
  • FIP analysis, CDIF

Global Chemical Representation Resolver

  • Notate & validate
  • Cross-link & federate
  • D3.3, API Protocols
  • InChI in other WPs

IUPAC FAIR Chemistry Cookbook

  • Interactive training toolbox
  • Atomized demos & workflows
  • D3.2, Digital Recipes
  • Collaborations

IUPAC Gold Book Compendium

  • Source terminology for data models, metadata
  • FIP analysis, CDIF
  • Collaborations

Chemistry Data Standards Map

  • Knowledge graph of data standards parameters
  • FIP analysis
  • Workshops

Digital Units & Quantity Converter

  • Digital representations of property measurements
  • CDIF (Events & Samples)
  • CODATA DRUM

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

34 of 65

Envisioning IUPAC at the World’s FAIR hub

iupac.org/what-we-do/digital-standards

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

35 of 65

Acknowledgements

WorldFAIR “Global cooperation on FAIR data policy and practice” is funded by the EC HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ERA-01-41 Coordination and Support Action under Grant Agreement No. 101058393.

iupac.org/what-we-do/digital-standards

Dr Rajika Munasinghe

InChI Trust

Leah McEwen

A legion of volunteers…

ADVANCING CHEMISTRY WORLDWIDE

36 of 65

WP6 – Social Surveys

Steve McEachern

Director, UK Data Service, University of Essex

And Visitor, Australian Data Archive, Australian National University

37 of 65

What we are doing

  • Comparative study of the data management, harmonization and integration practices of one of the satellite countries – Australia, through the AUSSI-ESS – and the core ESS, an ERIC social science infrastructure.
  • The project will examine both administrative procedures, data and metadata management, and technical environments.
  • It will then leverage the DDI metadata standards to understand how such multi-national collections could be made increasingly interoperable and reusable through shared procedural and technical development, and
  • Establish a set of guidelines and tools for the development of cross-national collections into the future

38 of 65

Data Harmonisation

Three broad approaches: 

  1. Input translation and adaptation: use of the same survey questionnaire in all contexts, along with the same survey methodology (sampling, data collection procedures, etc.)
  2. Ex-ante output harmonisation: collection of data using the same survey questions, but with pre-designed re-coding 
  3. Ex-post output harmonisation: import “existing data and build an integrated database with variables following a common definition” (Wolf et al., 2017).

39 of 65

Harmonisation and Metadata standards

  • SDMX: Statistical Data and Metadata Exchange
  • DDI: Data Documentation Initiative

40 of 65

Survey data elements

  • The variable (including the variable name and label);
  • The representation (text, numeric, categories);
  • Properties of the representations:
    • For categorical representations, the categories and codes
    • For numerical representations, the units of measurement
    • For text representations, the text properties;
  • The encoding of the values in the dataset (e.g. character encoding, data types, etc.)

41 of 65

The cross-cultural survey harmonisation workflow

Case study:

International Social Survey Program (https://issp.org)

42 of 65

1. Importing

  • Aim: direct data and metadata access, using API calls to registry
  • Result:
    • Data: successful – call to ADA Dataverse repository
    • Metadata: partial
      • Metadata is Findable, Accessible and Reusable (available from the ISSP coordinating repository, online)
      • Excellent documentation at concept, variable and code and category level
      • Not Interoperable: hidden behind a login page, with no API access, and stored inside a syntax (code) file rather than a registry
      • Syntax can be used to generate metadata in an SPSS format file, which can be published to a registry

43 of 65

2. Harmonisation of concepts

  • Aim: Establish the set of target conceptual variable(s) (DDI Conceptual Variable)
    • Detail the concept that is being defined and measured
    • Locate the agreed target content in project documentation or (ideally) in a variable registry. If this is not available, establish an agreed target variable
    • Establish the source content
  • Result:
    • Concepts are fully documented in the ISSP project documentation. But not published in an external registry
    • To generate the target variables for use in the ISSP pilot, the template SPSS script was used to generate an empty SPSS dataset which was then ingested into the Colectica registry.
    • The instance variables in the empty ingested empty dataset can then be used to generate conceptual variables and variable groups.
    • For source variables, in many instances, there is a one-to-one correspondence of source and target variables, or a planned recoding of source content into a target variable ex ante.

44 of 65

Pilot Colectica registry

45 of 65

3. Harmonise variable names

  • Aim: execute transformation code to change the variable names in the source dataset(s) to the target names in the destination dataset.
  • Source-to-target concordance file was established in , the generation of the The transformation of source variable names to target variable names is a standard activity in most statistical packages. A script for transforming variable names was generated using a simple Excel concatenation function, and could be automatically generated from a concordance file using standard text functions in the relevant programming language .

46 of 65

4. Harmonise variable codes and categories (labels)

  • Aim:
    • Sub-task 4.1: align the codes and categories associated with the substantive categories in the target variable and source variables
    • Sub-task 4.2: align the codes and categories used to manage non-sentinel content (e.g. categories denoting missing information, ineligibility to respond or non-applicability of the question) to target sentinel values
  • Alignment of the codes and categories in a variable can be completed using the creation of a simple matrix, with target codes and categories along the rows, and equivalent codes from the source variables in subsequent columns
  • Two core challenges however were identified in the process of creating these harmonisation matrices:
    • a) The variation in processing of missing and sentinel values between data formats required significant iteration to identify and resolve format errors
    • b) The accumulation of small variations in both codes and categories (e.g. Capital letters) created large matrices which were both challenging to read and difficult to automatically process
      • Established a pilot tool to streamline this from Colectica registry content

47 of 65

5. Data type harmonisation

  • Aim: align the data type of newly generated target variables with the intended data type
  • Not tested due to time constraints

48 of 65

6. Documentation of harmonisation

  • Aim: Capture information on the execution of the harmonisation workflow to capture the process that has been executed.
  • The execution of the CCSH pilot has been able to generate some degree of documentation as a byproduct of executing the process itself.
  • The use of software scripts and external registries in the piloting of this harmonisation process resulted in artifacts which reflect the workflow process undertaken.
  • This documentation could however be further enhanced through the automated generation of log outputs in the execution of scripts or automation tools.
    • A first attempt to do this has been incorporated in the python Harmonisation tool, which generates a “Harmonisation Decision” table when it generates a machine-learning generated Target Harmonisation Matrix

49 of 65

Example of automated documentation

50 of 65

Summarising the process

51 of 65

Recommendations

  • The following recommendations are proposed coming out of this Phase 3 work:

  1. Establishment of standardised access controls both to data and metadata registries, to limit the need for less technical users to navigate access control systems
  2. Establishment of a code repository for interaction with social science metadata repositories.
  3. Establishment of mechanisms for reuse of conceptual variable and other reference metadata across the DDI standards ecosystem. (It was not clear for example how to use or reference a conceptual variable in the Sikt ESS metadata registry within the ADA harmonisation tool)
  4. Standardised practices and code libraries for the creation of DDI resource packages for external reuse (to facilitate the reuse in Recommendation 3)

52 of 65

Pilot Science Mission

Citizen-Driven Living Labs for Urban Heat Island Mitigation; a women-led transdisciplinary approach for health, equity and sustainability

Dr. Shaily Gandhi

Senior Post-Doctoral Researcher

Geosocial AI Research Group

Interdisciplinary Transformation University

Austria

53 of 65

  • Urban Heat Islands (UHI)

  • Threaten millions across Asia

  • Heat action plans

  • Non-traditional data sources

  • GeoAI technology

Addressing transdisciplinary approach for tackling urban heat as a science mission

54 of 65

Source: Awan, W. Z. (2022). Differentiation between interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary concepts. IMAQ Press. https://imaqpress.com/2678/differentiation-between-interdisciplinary-and-transdisciplinary-concepts/ Google Scholar

55 of 65

Intersection with multiple SDGs

56 of 65

Capacities of the consortium

57 of 65

Community led implementation model:

58 of 65

  • Our Pilot Science Mission will seek to:

Vision for impact

59 of 65

Sustainable Solution Approach

60 of 65

Our consortium brings together the following disciplines

61 of 65

Methods

62 of 65

Multi-modal Datasets

63 of 65

Next Steps…

WP

Activity

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

1

Project Initiation and Coordination

2

Community Engagement and Data Collection

3

Multi-Modal Data Analysis of the Urban Heat Island Effect

4

Piloting the mitigation and adaptive strategies

5

Policy Engagement and Advocacy

6

Capacity Building and Knowledge Sharing

7

Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning

64 of 65

Discussion:

How to get involved with WorldFAIR+?

65 of 65

WorldFAIR+

Vision:

  • federation of case studies (existing and new), with parallel funding and supported by a coordinating mechanism with technical expertise.

Potential Case Studies and partnerships:

  • Do you have a potential (project, initiative) case study needing FAIRification, data engineering, metadata uplift?
  • Would you be interested in CDIF implementation?
  • Keen to discuss potential case studies!

WorldFAIR+ how to get involved?

  • ISC has approved WorldFAIR+ as part of its portfolio of activities: https://bit.ly/ISC-WorldFAIR-PLUS
  • Vision and approach for WorldFAIR+: https://bit.ly/worldfair-plus
  • Will put in place lightweight MoU / LoA for case studies and partner projects.
  • Contact simon@codata.org