1 of 5

AC/JC

Sep 9

2022

Predictive test

Internal consistency test

2 of 5

Methods - models and data analysis

DATA: P(k) FS BOSS-DR12 + CMBLens from Planck 2018 (T + Pol) + BBN Ωb.

PRIORS: Ωm: PanPlus or uncalibrated BAO/CMB, Primordial P(k): CMB

3 of 5

Methods - models and data analysis

DATA: P(k) FS BOSS-DR12 + CMBLens from Planck 2018 (T + Pol) + BBN Ωb.

PRIORS: Ωm: PanPlus or uncalibrated BAO/CMB, Primordial P(k): CMB

ANALYSIS:

4 of 5

Predictive test

Predict H0 using pre-recombination (rs-independent) observations, then compare with direct estimations.

A particular model can be disfavored if the recovered rs-independent value of H0 is in tension with the direct measurement of H0.

5 of 5

Internal consistency test

Compare H0 constraints with (previous case) and without rs-marginalization

This test could be used as an indicator of evidence for of against a given model but still inconclusive with current data.

How does the w/o rs-marg work?