Lexington High School�School Building Committee Meeting����02/24/2025

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

2

2/24/2025

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

3

2/24/2025

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

4

2/24/2025

• Preferred Schematic Report comments received on 2/11/2025
• Town of Lexington and Project Team will respond by 2/25/2025

MSBA Update

5

2/24/2025

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

6

2/24/2025

Safety & Security Features

• Entry sequence & access
• After-hours access diagram
• Lockdown procedures & locations
• Extent of security glazing
• Safety & security technology
• Site security features

​

Electrical Design Features

• Extent of doors to have electronic locks
• Distributed Antenna Systems
• Cellular repeater system
• Two–way radio needs
• Mass Notification System

Design Meetings Update / January 27th

7

2/24/2025

Town Shelter Requirements

• Level 2 – Gymnasium & Field House
• Level 3 – Remainder of Building�

HVAC Design

• Identify 3 HVAC systems to be studied
• Identify systems required to be supported on Standby Power
• Ventilation basis of design CO2 level PPM

​

Plumbing Design

• Electric water heaters vs. domestic heat pump with electric backup�

Electrical Design

• Generator load list and size of diesel generator
• Electrical service calcs
• Lighting control system preferences
• Lightning protection systems vs prevention system

​

​

Design Meetings Update / February 3rd

8

2/24/2025

Building Design

• Mass timber vs. structural steel
• Add/Reno field house – scope & constructability
• Design of building entrances

​

Building Floor Plan Review

• Proposed space layouts and circulation
• Location of and access to Central Office
• Elevators – count, usage, control & roof access
• Future expansion GSF�

​

​

Design Meetings Update / February 10th

9

2/24/2025

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

10

2/24/2025

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation

11

2/24/2025

Building Floor Plan Review / Proposed space layouts and circulation

12

2/24/2025

KEY PLAN

A

B

C

D

E

LEVEL 1

Building Floor Plan Review / Proposed space layouts and circulation

13

2/24/2025

LEVEL 2

Building Floor Plan Review / Proposed space layouts and circulation

14

2/24/2025

LEVEL 3

Building Floor Plan Review / Proposed space layouts and circulation

15

2/24/2025

LEVEL 4

Central Office / Expansion

Existing Travel Time (Level 2 Building A to Level 2 Building J)

= 5.5 minutes at an average adult walking speed

= 7 minutes at a slower pace simulating an overcrowded condition between classes

​

​

​

​

Travel Times

16

2/24/2025

Proposed Building Travel Time (Level 1 C Wing to Level 4 B Wing)

= 3.5 minutes at an average adult walking speed

​

​

​

1,350ft

352ft

260ft

+ 48 vertical ft

+ 25 vertical ft

Total = 660ft

Total = 1,375ft

The most remote travel distance is cut by more than half (52%) in the proposed design

Level 1

Level 4

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

17

2/24/2025

Confirm Future Expansion GSF

18

2/24/2025

Building Floor Plan Review / Future expansion GSF

Design Enrollment: 2,395 students

​

Upper Limit of Future Expansion*: 3,000 students

​

Total Future Expansion Need: 605 students

​

Capacity of Central Office Conversion to Classrooms: 322 students (14 classrooms)

​

Remaining Expansion GFA Needed: 283 students (~13 classrooms)

​

​

​

* Per SBC’s PSR Preferred Concept Statement 11/12/2024

19

2/24/2025

Building Floor Plan Review / Future expansion GSF

Option 1 – 53,760 GSF

​

• Adds (4) full Gen Ed Classroom bays per floor Total 16
• Adds (2) Science Labs and (1) Prep Room per floor Total 8/4
• Adds an egress stair at end of wing
• Allows space for exit from internal egress stair
• Includes internal zone for support space, toilets

​

• Additional Capacity: 552 students
• Total Capacity at 85% Utilization: 3,269 students �(target + 269 or 9%)

20

2/24/2025

13,440sf per floor

LEVEL 3

Building Floor Plan Review / Future expansion GSF

Option 2 – 40,320 GSF

​

• Adds (4) full Gen Ed Classroom bays per floor Total: 16
• Adds (1) Science Lab and (1) Prep Room per floor Total: 4/4
• Adds an egress stair at end of wing
• Allows space for exit from internal egress stair
• Includes internal zone for support space, toilets

​

• Additional Capacity: 552 students
• Total Capacity at 85% Utilization: 3,177 students �(target + 177 or 6%)

​

21

2/24/2025

10,080sf per floor

LEVEL 3

Building Floor Plan Review / Future expansion GSF

Potential Future Conversion to Dining for 200 Students (600/3 seatings)

Displaces 4 classroom bays or 92 students – may be offset in Wing B expansion options

​

22

2/24/2025

LEVEL 2

Open to Dining Commons Below

​

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

23

2/24/2025

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned

24

2/24/2025

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned

25

2/24/2025

A

B

D

C

E

Not Air Conditioned

May Be Air Conditioned

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

26

2/24/2025

Decide Between 146M or 200M track in Field House

27

2/24/2025

Field House Programming Meeting Takeaways:

1. Safety is a major concern and should be considered as part of every decision
2. Providing space for programs that don’t have sufficient space in the existing field house �(i.e. trainers, weight room, cheer, etc.) is a priority
3. Flexibility of space to accommodate the number of different groups utilizing the field house is a priority
4. Strong preference for 146-meter track from athletics coaches and trainers. Track coaches still preferred a 200m track.
5. Unanimous preference for 146-meter track among athletic director, principal, PE coordinator, and recreation dept.
6. Track coach requested consideration of a banked track if 146-meter track is pursued.
7. A few individuals expressed a preference for Option B (trainers and AD) as it would compartmentalize uses in a way that would enhance safety, scheduling and monitoring.

​

​

​

​

Decide Between 146M or 200M track in Field House

28

2/24/2025

CONFIRM

CONFIRM

Add/Reno Field House Scope & Constructability

29

2/24/2025

Field House Scope & Constructability / Option Summary

30

2/24/2025

Field House Scope & Constructability

• Option A: Renovation Only (34,400 GFA)

31

2/24/2025

• New slab on grade
• New exterior enclosure:
• Brick veneer cavity wall
• 8” Mineral Wool Insulation
• AVB on existing concrete walls
• Triple-pane clerestory glazing
• New HM doors
• Membrane roofing on 10” insulation
• New MEP systems
• New lighting and PA systems
• (2) new scoreboards
• Retractable bleachers for 400 seats
• Interior finishes: Resilient athletic flooring, rubber flooring at PE Alt and Weight Room, wall paint and wall pads

Option A.1 / Renovation Only

32

2/24/2025

Additional Program:

​

• Toilets
• Storage

​

​

1. Minimum safe run-out length to be determined. Drawing shows only 13’ with 55m straight track*
2. 4 lanes possible if using less than regulation radius.
3. 3 courts possible if overlapping track and portable long jump pit
4. PE Alt room does not accommodate (2) regulation 42’x42’ wrestling mats
5. Existing roof structure does not allow for goals, wrestling mats, batting cage, etc. to be hung from rafters
6. Slight increase of storage and toilet space possible

Field House Scope & Constructability

• Option B: Renovation + Addition (48,000 GFA)
• Renovate existing 34,400 GFA Field House
• Add 13,600 GFA New Construction Addition on Grade with Flat Roof

​

33

2/24/2025

• New slab on grade
• New exterior enclosure on existing Field House same as Option A.
• Addition to be steel framing with same exterior enclosure on 6” metal studs and sheathing.
• Expansion joint between Field House and School
• New MEP systems
• New lighting and PA systems
• (2) new scoreboards
• Retractable bleachers for 400 seats
• Interior finishes: Resilient athletic flooring, rubber flooring at PE Alt and Weight Room, wall paint and wall pads

Option B / Renovation + Addition

34

2/24/2025

Additional Program:

​

• Fitness Room – 1,600 sf
• Locker Rooms - (2) 1,500 sf
• Trainer’s Room – 1,900 sf
• Toilets – 1,000 sf
• Storage – 1,700 sf

​

​

1. Minimum safe run-out length to be determined. Drawing shows only 13’ with 55m straight track*
2. 3 courts possible if overlapping track and portable long jump pit
3. Increased PE Alt. size from 3,300 sf existing
4. Increased Weight room size from 679 sf existing
5. Existing roof structure does not allow for goals, wrestling mats, batting cage, etc. to be hung from rafters

• Renovate existing 34,400 GFA Field House​
• Add 13,600 GFA New Construction Addition on Grade with Flat Roof

Field House Scope & Constructability

• Option C: Renovation + Addition (48,000 GFA)
• Renovate half of existing 34,400 GFA Field House
• Add 30,800 GFA New Construction Addition to Extend Domed Roof

​

35

2/24/2025

• New slab on grade
• New exterior enclosure on existing Field House similar to Option A. Backup wall at expanded areas to be 8” CMU.
• New roof structure
• Existing dome structure requires temporary shoring
• Expansion joint between Field House and School
• See following slide for Structural assumptions

Field House Scope & Constructability

• Option C: Renovation + Addition (48,000 GFA)
• Structural Assumptions

​

36

2/24/2025

Field House Scope & Constructability

• Option D: Renovation + Addition (48,000 GFA)
• Retain half of existing Field House foundations
• Extend Building to enclose 48,000 GFA, similar to Option C, but with Flat Roof

​

37

2/24/2025

• New slab on grade
• New exterior enclosure same as Option A, with 8” CMU backup at new walls
• New roof structure with 10’ deep steel trusses spaced at 12’ o.c.
• Existing dome structure requires temporary shoring
• Expansion joint between Field House and School
• See following slide for Structural assumptions

Option C.1 & D.1 / Renovation + Addition

38

2/24/2025

Additional Program:

​

• Fitness Room – 1,600 sf
• Locker Rooms - (2) 900 sf
• Trainer’s Room – 1,000 sf
• Toilets – 800 sf
• Storage – 700 sf

​

1. 3 courts possible if overlapping track
2. Increased PE Alt. size from 3,300 sf existing
3. Increased Weight room size from 679 sf existing
4. All new roof structure allows for goals, wrestling mats, batting cage, etc. to be hung from rafters

​

• Retain half of existing Field House foundations
• Extend Building to enclose 48,000 GFA, Option D similar to Option C, but with Flat Roof

Option C.2 & D.2 / Renovation + Addition

39

2/24/2025

1. PE Alt. located within track footprint shows overlay of (2) regulation 42’x42’ wrestling mats
2. All new roof structure allows for goals, wrestling mats, batting cage, etc. to be hung from rafters

• Retain half of existing Field House foundations
• Extend Building to enclose 48,000 GFA, Option D similar to Option C, but with Flat Roof

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

40

2/24/2025

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel

41

2/24/2025

​

Q1: Acoustics seem to be a big issue (i.e. noise transfer between spaces)

 A: Mass timber floor assemblies: typically lower Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC) rating vs. standard concrete floor on metal deck:

• Gypcrete topping with an acoustical underlayment included at to match the NRC of a concrete on deck floor. 
• Gypcrete and underlayment already accounted for in the estimated project costs for mass timber.

​

Q2: Do the costs account for the amount of the newly exposed infrastructure and what that may mean in terms of needed mitigation (i.e. fireproofing, aesthetics). Are there savings or adds there?

 A: Costs and visuals:

• The added costs for mass timber account for the fireproofing reduction savings.
• Exposed MEP infrastructure: assuming program spaces may still have a finish ceiling, while feature spaces and possibly hallways expose the mass timber structure. 
• Strategic use of ceiling clouds or finished enclosures for mechanical equipment to be considered, pending cost impacts

​

Q3: Can embodied carbon be presented in a measurable, easy to understand unit. Compared to 1 year of current school emissions for example?

 A: A comparative impact may be provided.

• Embodied carbon is measured in carbon dioxide equivalent (kgCO2eq) over a 30-year life cycle.
• Operational carbon (school emissions) are annual. They may be accumulated over 30 years for the purpose of the comparison.

​

​

Mass Timber / Town Questions

42

2/24/2025

​

Q4: What are the warranties, life cycle costs, and maintenance requirements?

 A:

• Warranties vary by manufacturer but generally covers the structural integrity of the projects.
• Life cycle costs: recent studies concluded that wood buildings are fully capable of having long lifespans. However, it is found that there is no relationship between structural material and average service life.  
• The durability and maintenance of mass timber will vary based on exposure. There are options for coatings that can be used for greater durability and longevity.

​

Q5: Are there any savings if finishes are not needed where mass timber would remain exposed?

A: See response to question #2 on the previous slide for exposed ceiling design approach

• Exposed mass timber assumes a $15/sf savings, not including potential costs such as acoustic clouds or fabric panels.   

​

Q6: What is the base cost of steel/concrete versus mass timber?

A:

• Steel and concrete structure: $24,636,380, plus the $2,186,389 spray and intumescent fireproofing totals to $26,822,769.  
• Mass timber structure incremental costs: 
• Option A – all mass timber:      $24,000,000 incremental costs.
• Option B – Hybrid (steel columns):  $19,000,000
• Option C – Gym/Dining/Media only:  $2,000,000 

​

​

​

​

Mass Timber / Town Questions

43

2/24/2025

Mass Timber / Town Questions

44

2/24/2025

​

Q: Where does the mass timber come from? What country? (i.e. tariffs)?

 A: Mass Timber is mostly sourced in the U.S. and Canada. Both Eastern and Western forests of each country provide for mass timber.

• When considering embodied carbon, it would be best to source from the Eastern Forests, as the Western Forests Timber imposes higher transportation carbon emissions.
• The potential tariffs on the Canadian wood, in addition to the already existing tariffs, will have costs impact.
• Conversely, the higher demand on the sourced U.S. timber may trigger higher costs on US sourced timber.
• Steel and aluminum will also be subject to tariffs. Similar to wood, U.S. steel/aluminum production demand will increase, with the likeliness of costs potentially increase across the board due to limited production capacity.

​

Q: Provide a cost per SF for mass timber to help potentially deciding on where it could be used in specific spaces.

A:

• The cost for a full building mass timber structure is roughly $54/sf. 
• The cost for more limited usage of mass timber beams over steel columns and bracing is roughly $45/sf.

​

​

​

Other Wood or Wood-Look Finishes in Lieu of Mass Timber

45

2/24/2025

Option A (Mass timber used for the entire structure)

​

Est. Total Project Cost = $24,000,000

​

​

​

​

​

​

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel

46

2/24/2025

PSR Cost Estimate Considerations

Option B (Hybrid system – all mass timber except steel used for columns)

​

Est. Total Project Cost = $19,000,000

​

​

​

​

​

Option C (Mass timber used at the Gymnasium, Dining Commons and Media Center only)

​

Est. Total Project Cost = $2,000,000

​

​

​

​

​

​

Level 1

​

​

​

​

​

​

Level 2

​

​

​

​

​

​

Level 1

​

​

​

​

​

​

CONFIRM

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

47

2/24/2025

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House

48

2/24/2025

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House

Option 1

​

Bleachers off-center from competition court

​

All doors at side walls

​

​

49

2/24/2025

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House

Option 2

​

Bleachers centered on competition court

​

Main entry doors at end wall

​

​

50

2/24/2025

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House

1,016 Seats on 8 tiers

​

3’-4” from outer edge of sideline to edge of bleacher steps

​

4’-0” sideline

​

​

51

2/24/2025

1,068 Seats on 9 tiers

​

1’-5” from outer edge of sideline to edge of bleacher steps

​

4’-0” sideline

​

​

CONFIRM

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House

52

2/24/2025

Additional Program:

​

• Fitness Room – 1,600 sf
• Locker Rooms - (2) 900 sf
• Trainer’s Room – 1,000 sf
• Toilets – 800 sf
• Storage – 700 sf

​

1. 3 courts possible if overlapping track
2. Increased PE Alt. size from 3,300 sf existing
3. Increased Weight room size from 679 sf existing
4. All new roof structure allows for goals, wrestling mats, batting cage, etc. to be hung from rafters

​

CONFIRM

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

53

2/24/2025

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

54

2/24/2025

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

55

2/24/2025

Call to Order

Vote on Previous Meeting Minutes 12:00 – 12:05

MSBA Update 12:05 – 12:10

Design Meetings Update 12:10 – 12:20

Proposed Space Layouts & Circulation 12:20 – 12:30

Confirm Future Expansion GSF 12:30 – 12:45

Identify Spaces to be Air Conditioned 12:45 – 12:50

Add/Reno Field House, 146m or 200m, Scope & Constructability 12:50 – 1:20

Mass Timber vs. Structural Steel 1:20 – 1:35

Confirm Maximum Assembly Size in Gym/Field House 1:35 – 1:45

Community Submissions 1:45 - 1:50

Public Comment 1:50 – 1:55

Reflections & Action Items 1:55 – 2:00

Adjourn 2:00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

56

2/24/2025

Thank you

SBC Meeting

02/24/2025

Preferred Option C.5B Bloom�

SBC Preferred Option

59

02/13/2025

Considerations:

• Fully addresses Education Program and adjacencies
• Includes MSBA funding (Approx. $100M)
• Article 97 land swap required
• Impact to Students/Staff - Low
• Move into new building Fall 2029
• Site complete 2030
• Includes Central Offices
• Includes desired parking (onsite)
• Includes Addition/Renovation to Field House
• Does not require modulars

Approximate -------------- = Article 97 land

C.5B Bloom

• Total Project Cost $662,000,000
• After MSBA Contribution $562,000,000

​

D. 2 Weave (not selected)

SMMA Proposed Option

61

02/13/2025

Considerations:

• Fully addresses Education Program and adjacencies
• Includes MSBA funding (Approx. $100M)
• Article 97 Land swap required
• Impact to Students/Staff - High
• Move into new building 2031
• Site complete 2032
• Includes Central Offices
• Includes desired parking (onsite)
• Includes Addition/Renovation to Field House
• Requires Modulars

Approximate -------------- = Article 97 land

D.2 Weave

• Total Project Cost $734,710,000
• After MSBA Contribution $634,710,000

​

Community Submissions

Community Submissions

63

02/13/2025

Considerations:

• Phase 1 - Does not address Educational Program, adjacencies/efficiencies
• Phase 1 &2 - Loss of MSBA Funding ($100 million)
• Phase 1 - Article 97 Land swap required
• Phase 1 & 2 - Impact to Students/Staff- HIGH
• Phase 1 & 2 - Completion likely not before 2035
• Phase 1 - Requires full code upgrade to the attached existing building
• Phase 1 - Field house receives Code upgrades only
• Phase 2 - Assumes all renovated areas from Phase 1 are replaced with Phase 2.
• Phase 1 -Upgrades to MEP's assumed
• Phase 1 - Does not address Central Office
• Phase 1 -Parking (approx. 200 spaces) would need to be replicated on fields -Cost not included
• Phase 2 -Location for addition would require additional loss of fields
• Phase 1 - Modulars required at least for Commons II during the code upgrade to all existing during. Costs included for Commons II only
• Phase 1 - Requires gas and water main relocation

​

Approximate

​

=Article 97 land

2015 SMMA Master Plan Phased New/Reno

• Phase 1 Project Cost $594,608,000
• Phase 2 Project Costs (assumed) $210,990,000
• Total Project Cost $862,565,000
• After zero MSBA Contribution $862,565,000

​

Community Submissions

64

02/13/2025

Approximate

​

= Article 97 land

Thrive .1 (without Modular Classrooms)

• Phase 1 Project Cost $297,759,000
• Phase 2 Project Costs (assumed) $552,914,000
• Total Project Cost $850,673,000
• After zero MSBA Contribution $850,673,000

​

Considerations:

• Phase 1 - Does not address Educational Program adjacencies/efficiencies
• Phase 1 & 2 - Loss of MSBA Funding ($100 million)
• Phase 1 - Article 97 Land swap required
• Phase 1 & 2 - Impact to Students/Staff- HIGH
• Phase 1 & 2 - Completion likely not before 2035
• Phase 1 - Required ADA only upgrades to existing building and Field House
• Phase 2 - Assumes all renovated areas from Phase 1 are replaced with Phase 2.
• Phase 1 - Retains existing MEP systems (at end of useful life) as is and increasing annual maintenance budget. Costs not included for maintenance.
• Phase 1 - Does not address Central Office
• Phase 1 - Parking (approx. 200 spaces) would need to be replicated on fields -Cost not included
• Phase 2 - Location for addition would require additional loss of fields
• Phase 1 & 2 - Assumes no Modulars
• Phase 1 - Requires gas and water main relocation

​

Community Submissions

65

02/13/2025

Approximate

= Article 97 land

Thrive .2 (with Modular Classrooms)

Considerations:

• Does not address Educational Program adjacencies/efficiencies
• Loss of MSBA Funding ($100 million)
• Phase 1 - Article 97 Land swap required
• Phase 1 & 2 - Impact to Students/Staff- HIGH
• Phase 1 & 2 - Completion likely not before 2035
• Phase 1 - required ADA only upgrades to existing building and Field House
• Phase 2 - Assumes all renovated areas from Phase 1 are replaced with Phase 2.
• Phase 1 - Retains existing MEP systems (at end of useful life) as is and increasing annual maintenance budget. Costs not included for ongoing maintenance.
• Phase 1 - Does not address Central Office
• Phase 1 - Parking (approx. 200 spaces) would need to be replicated on fields -Cost not included
• Phase 2 - Location for phase 2 addition would require additional loss of fields
• Phase 1 -Includes Modulars
• Phase 2 – May require Modulars, costs not included
• Phase 1 Requires gas and water main relocation

​

• Phase 1 Project Cost $314,015,000
• Phase 2 Project Costs (assumed) $552,914,000
• Total Project Cost $866,929,000
• After zero MSBA Contribution $866,929,000

​

Option A.1 / Renovation Only

66

2/24/2025

Option A.2 / Renovation Only

​

67

2/24/2025

1. Minimum safe run-out length to be determined. Drawing shows only 13’ with 55m straight track*
2. 3 courts possible if overlapping track and portable long jump pit
3. PE Alt. located within track footprint shows overlay of (2) regulation 42’x42’ wrestling mats
4. Existing roof structure does not allow for goals, wrestling mats, batting cage, etc. to be hung from rafters

Option A.2 / Renovation Only

​

​

68

2/24/2025

Option B / Renovation + Addition

69

2/24/2025

Option C.1 & D.1 / Renovation + Addition

70

2/24/2025

Option C.2 & D.2 / Renovation + Addition

71

2/24/2025