Research Ecosystem Review
Oct 5: This survey is currently focused on Res Integrity and Compliance, and will be updated later to fit other working groups as we hear from them.
Oct 11: Invited all CCAS faculty for input on post-award (asked the CCAS Res Adv Council on Oct 8)
Oct 16: Email (from Bill Briscoe on behalf of Pre-award Working Group) to PIs asking for feedback on Pre-Award.
Oct 17. ADR Review on Res Integrity / Compliance (sent to the working comm on Oct 15) was shared w CCAS faculty. Additional comments can be sent to Kimberly Acquaviva at
Oct 22 Email from Valentina Harizanov (CCAS representatie of the Post-Award process group) was sent to CCAS faculty and staff asking for input in
Your Name (optional)
Your answer
Your Department (optional)
Your answer
Your Email (optional)
Your answer
Indicate the area for your input.
What is working well in the CCAS and GW? (Just list any number of items that you see)
Your answer
Critical questions/pain points/issues and proposed solutions. (Just list any number of items that you see).
Your answer
Possible metrics for evaluating progress moving forward? (Just list any number of items that you see).
Your answer
Other Important Information or thoughts.
Your answer
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of The George Washington University. Report Abuse - Terms of Service