Royal Supplier Self-Assessment Form

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Email *

Supplier Name & Location *

Date *

YYYY

Does the Supplier have 3rd party certification for IATF 16949? What steps are being taken to become certified. *

Yes, IATF 16949 certified and there are written procedures which are being followed. A feedback loop exists.

ISO 9001 certified, and there are written procedures which are being followed.

No plans to achieve IATF 16949 or ISO 9001

Is the Supplier ISO 14001 certified? Does the Supplier understand and conform to all environmental regulations? *

Yes

Documented, achievable plan in place.

No plans for ISO 14001 certification.

Does the Supplier have a 5S program that ensures work areas are clean, orderly, and free from hazards? Are 5S facility audits conducted? *

Documented 5S program in place; evidence of audits is available.

Documented 5S program in place; no audits conducted

No 5S program. 5S is poor

Are Key Performance Indicators (KPI's) tracked and utilized for quality improvement? *

KPI's are tracked and posted, with goals set for each. Corrective actions are in place for any KPI not meeting the goal.

KPI's exist. Corrective actions are not in place for KPI's not meeting goal

KPI's not posted, lack of improvement plans

Is there a procedure followed that defines the control, and prevents the escape, of non-conforming material?

Documented system in place, immediate quarantine process prevents unintended use of product.

System in place/manual system, not documented; inconsistent or not immediate quarantine process

Lack of adequate controls

Clear selection

Is there a receiving inspection system in place? *

System in place. Incoming materials are prevented from moving into inventory until inspection is completed and deemed conforming

Manual system not too difficult for suspect or nonconforming material to be moved into inventory.

Lack of systematic controls

Are critical product and process characteristics identified, managed, and controlled? *

Critical Characteristics identified and have strong controls in place

Critical Characteristics aren't identified or limited controls are in place

Poor system

Do manufacturing work instructions, and other documented standard work/ job instructions, exist? Are they audited? *

Instructions are clear, are available at the work station, are audited, and have controls in place triggering updates.

Instructions are available, but not clear, audited or updated

Poor or lack of system

Does the Supplier have a preventive maintenance schedule for their equipment? *

Robust system that is visual and followed

Manual system that is scheduled and followed

No controlled schedule / plan

Does the Supplier have an employee training matrix, and are back-ups trained for each job? *

Systemic training program exists, training includes evidence of knowledge, matrix is up to date and being followed

Manual training process exists. Doesn't include evidence of knowledge or matrix outdated.

Poor controls of training matrix or does not exist

Does the Supplier implement poka-yokes/error proofing in their manufacturing processes? *

Poka-yoke, error proofing in place for all critical process outputs

Poka-yokes in place for some critical process outputs

Little to poor poka yoke strategy

Does lot traceability and part identification exist through the manufacturing process? *

Parts easily identified, both electronically and visually, as to their place in the process. Effective lot traceability in place

Manual system or limited electronic part identification and lot traceability

Poor system without adequate controls

Is there an effective inventory management system? Is FIFO used? *

Inventory is controlled electronically or by a strict system; FIFO consistently utilized

Inventory not electronically controlled; FIFO not consistently utilized

No system in place

Does the Supplier have a system for managing, tracking, and communicating launch activities and engineering changes? *

Documented system in place, consistently updated and communicated to cross-functional leadership group

Manual system, not completely followed, or not controlled.

Poor system in place that could allow missing steps

Does the plant have a process flow that covers all operations from Receiving to Shipping? *

Yes and up to date. Movement is controlled, tracked throughout the plant.

Process Flow does not cover all operations

Poor Process Flow documentation

Are PFMEAs and Control Plans created for each product by a cross-functional team, and are they kept up to date? *

PFMEAs & Control Plans are generated by cross-functional team and up to date electronically.

PFMEA's and Control Plans are not robust - manual (not from crossfunctional team, not up to date)

Poor use of PFMEAs or Control Plans

Do PFMEA items with a high RPN, or high severity, occurrence, or detection, have a reaction plan noted in the Control Plan? *

Highest RPN's, or items with a high severity, occurrence, or detection, have an associated action plan noted on the Control Plan

Not all of the noted items from the PFMEA have an associated reaction plan noted on the Control Plan

Poor use of PFMEAs or Control Plans

Has the Supplier reviewed Royal's Supplier Handbook, and have actions been taken to incorporate Royal-specific requirements? *

Royal's Supplier Handbook has been reviewed and all Royal-specific requirements have been incorporated into the Supplier's processes

Royal's Supplier Handbook has been reviewed and some Royal-specific requirements have been incorporated into the Supplier's processes

Royal's Supplier Handbook has not been reviewed; Royal-specific requirements have not been incorporated into the Supplier's processes

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

This form was created inside of Royal.

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Forms