The output generated by OOPS! shows clearly what is the problem detected and in which elements.
Please explain, if needed, your answer for the previous question.
Your answer
The output generated by OOPS! has been useful for:
Please describe it and/or list the type of error in which detection OOPS! has been useful.
Your answer
The output generated by OOPS! has not been useful for:
Please describe it and/or list the type of error in which detection OOPS! has not been useful.
Your answer
In your ontology developments, do you think you will use again OOPS! for validating your ontology?
Clear selection
Please explain, if needed, your answer for the previous question.
Your answer
In general, do you think OOPS! is:
Clear selection
Please explain, if needed, your answer for the previous question.
Your answer
Would you recommend OOPS! to other colleagues involved in ontology development projects?
Clear selection
Please explain, if needed, your answer for the previous question.
Your answer
Which features or improvements would you add to OOPS!?
Your answer
From your point of view, what is the main contribution of OOPS!?
Your answer
Have you ever used other ontology evaluation tools apart from OOPS!?
Please, list them here.
Your answer
In case you have used other ontology evaluation tools: Which features from the other ontology evaluation tools would you add to OOPS!?
Please, explain them here, relating the features with the tool providing them if possible.
Your answer
In case you have used other ontology evaluation tools: Would you change them for OOPS or use all of them as complements?
Please, explain your answer here.
Your answer
If you have any other comments or suggestions about OOPS!, please write them here.
You can also add your name and email address if there is any particular question that you want us to answer personally or just if you want to let us know who is our user :-) We will be glad