Author Feedback form - ReproHack
Name of participant(s)
Which paper did you attempt? *
Reproducibility
Did you manage to reproduce it? *
On a scale of 1 to 10, how much of the paper did you manage to reproduce? *
None of it
All of it
Briefly describe the procedure followed / tools used to reproduce it.
Briefly describe your familiarity with the procedure/ tools used by the paper.
What operating system were you working on? What additional software did you need to install?
What were the main challenges you ran into (if any)?
What were the positive features of this approach?
Any other comments / suggestions on the reproducibility approach?
Documentation
How well was the material documented? *
Not well at all
Very well
How could the documentation be improved? *
What did you like about the documentation? *
After attempting to reproduce, how familiar do you feel with code and method used in the paper? *
Not familiar at all
Very familiar and can follow the analysis easily
Any suggestions on how the analysis could be made more transparent?
Reusability
Rate the project on reusability of the material *
Are materials clearly covered by a permissive enough license to build on?
Any suggestions on how the project could be more reusable?
Any Final Comments:
Contact email
Submit
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of University of Sheffield. Report Abuse