JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
ISMB/ECCB 2023 Tutorial Feedback
Thank you for participating in the ISMB/ECCB 2023 Tutorial sessions.
Please take a moment to provide feedback to the tutorial leads.
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
Which tutorial did you attend? (If you attended more than one tutorial, you will have the opportunity to submit a second survey)
*
IP1: Accessing structural biology data from experimental and predicted models
IP2: Spatial transcriptomics data analysis: theory and practice
IP3: Using Virtual Reality technology for exploring biological data
IP4: Orchestrating Large-Scale Single-Cell Analysis with Bioconductor
IP5: How to make reproducible, portable and reusable bioinformatics software using software containerization
IP6: Interactive microbiome analysis using DIAMOND+MEGAN
IP7: nf-core: a best-practice framework for creating Nextflow pipelines and sharing them with the community
IP8: Explainable AI and Omics Data: Interactive Data Visualization and Machine Learning in Python
VT1: Make your research FAIRer with Quarto, GitHub and Zenodo
VT2: Protein Sequence Analysis using Transformer-based Large Language Model
VT3: Functional metagenomics made easy
VT4: Deep learning modeling, training, prediction, and marker analysis of Multiomics data using G2PDeep-v2 web server
VT5: Biomedical knowledge exploration using graph databases: Neo4j, Cypher, Biolink, and emerging standards
VT6: Introduction to AlphaFold 2 and Practical PyMOL Visualization
The tutorial was well-organized.
*
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
I would recommend this tutorial to others.
*
Yes
No
Required
The exercises were useful and well-integrated into the tutorials.
*
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
No exercises provided
The balance between theory and exercises was good.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
No exercises provided
The length of the tutorial session was suitable for the topics covered.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
The documentation and references provided were useful.
*
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
The tutorial met my expectations.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
What were the strengths of the tutorial?
Your answer
What aspects of the tutorial should be improved?
Your answer
Do you have any additional comments or suggestions (e.g. ideas for future tutorials; a topic that you thought was missing in the tutorial)?
Your answer
Submit
Page 1 of 1
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. -
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Does this form look suspicious?
Report
Forms
Help and feedback
Contact form owner
Help Forms improve
Report