Exploring Free Expression and Institutional Responsibility

This survey is part of a research project analyzing controversial social media discourse and the boundaries of free speech in academic settings. Your responses will help explore how students and staff perceive issues surrounding free expression, online behavior, and university policy.

All responses are anonymous and will be used for academic purposes only. Please answer honestly and thoughtfully.

Thank you for your participation!

P.S: This survey contains Karma to get free survey responses at SurveySwap.io

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Consent to Participate:
By continuing, you acknowledge that your participation is voluntary and that your responses are anonymous and used solely for educational research purposes.
*
Required
Background Information
A recent controversy arose when a Boston University employee posted on his personal social media that "DOGE employees are wanted dead or alive," prompting widespread concern and national attention. While the First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects freedom of speech, this incident has raised complex questions about how those protections apply to public university employees, particularly in digital spaces. The situation invites reflection on the balance between upholding constitutional rights and maintaining a respectful, safe academic environment. This survey seeks to explore public perspectives on the ethical, legal, and institutional dimensions of free speech in such contexts.
Do you believe the First Amendment protects the employee's social media post in this case?   *
To what extent should public university employees be held accountable for what they post on personal social media accounts?   *
Should universities be allowed to discipline staff for speech done in their own personal time that, while legally protected, may be considered offensive or harmful?   *
Submit
Clear form
This form was created inside of Southeastern Louisiana University.

Does this form look suspicious? Report