TARO Index Terms Survey
Dear TARO participants,

We need your input to plan our path forward in relation to the Index Terms (also known as <controlaccess> terms) such as personal and corporate names, subject terms, and genre terms used in finding aids submitted to TARO.

As you may know, TARO has not in the past strictly required use of a particular controlled vocabulary, and repositories have used what fit their collections. This has resulted in a rather wide variety of headings in TARO, raising concerns for the user's experience in trying to browse TARO by index terms. Imagine for example, browsing across all name, subject, or format headings in TARO - there would be similar headings with minor differences in them, some finding aids with many headings and some with few, some with ending punctuation and others with none, some with local headings, some with only authorized headings.

We are therefore exploring whether it makes sense to either:
1.) Engage in TARO-wide index term clean up work (with repository participation / approval) and require use of only specific vocabularies going forward or
2.) Leave repositories to use vocabularies as they wish, and implement software (Metadata Hopper, https://metadatahopper.bitbucket.io/) to apply broad subject categories for browsing purposes. A program using this software is the Chicago Collections (explore.chicagocollections.org).

Many repositories will have varied answers to these questions, please just answer as best you can. The information will not be publicized; it will only be used to get an honest view for planning purposes.


Please answer our very brief survey by Friday June 2, 2017.

1. Is your repository able to check all Index Terms (Names, Subjects, Document Types, and Titles) in the <controlaccess> section in your EAD files before uploading to TARO to verify that the terms match the authorized version of the term and that the encodinganalog and source attribute values are assigned correctly?
Note: TARO strongly encourages the use of standard controlled vocabularies such as Library of Congress Subject Headings and Name Authority File but also understands that repositories have and use locally controlled vocabulary lists.
Your answer
2. Do you believe your repository has the necessary resources (staff time and expertise) to retrospectively review your EAD files’ <controlaccess> terms and edit them as needed to use the authorized vocabulary terms if TARO provided a report of what terms need to be updated?
Your answer
3. In addition to controlled lists of local terms would it cause practical/logistical problems for your institution if TARO decided to require that EAD files use specific controlled vocabularies, such as Library of Congress Name Authority File and Subject Headings, and Getty Art & Architecture Thesaurus, for <controlaccess> terms going forward?
Your answer
4. Would your repository be willing to have its TARO finding aids sorted into broad TARO subject categories to enhance user experience in browsing? For an example, see the Chicago Collections site (http://explore.chicagocollections.org/)
Note: The broad subject categories would be added in addition to the index terms entered by your repository.
5. Do you have additional comments or questions? *
Next
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Additional Terms