Response form for 597B: 12/11/2012 (Carroll et al)
This is the response form for E. Carroll, C. Latulipe, R. Fung, and M. Terry. Creativity factor evaluation: Towards a standardized survey metric for creativity support. In Proceedings of ACM Creativity & Cognition, pages 127–136, 2009.
Please summarize the paper (~1 paragraph)
Be sure to include a summary of the motivation, a summary of the paper's intended contribution, a description of the experiments or arguments used in support of the authors' claims.
Write a 1-2 paragraph scholarly response.
Not just praise and critique (though those are fine to include.) Say something meaningful about this work. What are the implications of the findings, approach, technique, etc.? Do you see any critical flaws or oversights? What does this suggest about future work that might be done? How is this work interesting or unique in the context of other research or systems we've discussed in class? etc.
Optional: Personal response
What did you think of the paper? Was it useful, interesting, well-written, surprising, none of the above, etc.?
Any other thoughts/questions/comments you'd like to share? (If you have a question for which you would definitely like an answer, please post it to Piazza as well!)
Please suggest at least one discussion question for this paper for the benefit your Esteemed Discussion Leader.
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Terms of Service