Repository Selection Criteria - Community feedback form
Through a collaboration between FAIRsharing, Datacite and a number of journal publishers (PLOS, Springer Nature, F1000, Wiley, Taylor and Francis, Elsevier, EMBO Press, Hindawi, eLife, GigaScience and Cambridge University Press), we have refined a set of criteria that journals and publishers believe are important for the identification and selection of data repositories, which can be recommended to researchers when they are preparing to publish the data underlying their findings.

Find the criteria, the background, and the scope of the work in the draft article entitled 'Data Repository Selection - Criteria That Matter.pdf':

Please provide your comments/feedback via this form no later than the end of January 2020.

*Please note, we have leave this feedback form open for late comments, but may not be able to respond to all late comments*.

All comments and feedback are being fed into a revised second draft of the repository criteria. We will release this for further comment once complete.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Name (First name, Surname) *
What is your background? *
Are you replying on behalf of an organisation or repository (and if so, please specify)
Organisation (and country) *
Feedback/Comments *
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy