Service Provider Review Form
Use this form to leave a review for a service provider on Counterparty Catalogue.
** Please include your business email. We will use this for verification. **
** Your identity will be kept anonymous. We will not share information you provide here with anyone without your consent. **
** For a limited time, we're offering rewards for verified user reviews of crypto counterparties. Submit your anonymous review and earn up to $50 in BTC or stablecoins per accepted review. Rewards are limited to the first 100 verified reviews, restricted to a max of 10 reviews/person. The $50 reward applies for the first 30 total reviews; afterward, the reward is $25. Subject to account verification & basic KYC (we may decline or withhold payment if verification fails). We may amend, suspend, or cancel the program, and reject any review, at our sole discretion; the offer is void where prohibited, and recipients are responsible for their own taxes. Terms & conditions apply. **
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Which service provider are you leaving a review for? *
How would you rate this provider overall? *
Awful
Amazing
What do you *like* about this provider? *
Some things to consider in the review: onboarding, transparency, coverage, support.
What do you *not like* about this provider? *
Some things to consider in the review: onboarding, transparency, coverage, support.
What are the services you use this provider for?
Operations and transparency *
How do you rate the provider along these operational metrics?
1 - Awful
2
3
4
5 - Amazing
N/A
Security
Financial transparency
Operational transparency
Ease of use
Support
Initial onboarding
Universe coverage (assets, chains, exchanges, DeFi) *
How do you rate this provider regarding their universe coverage?

1. Token coverage – are relevant tokens available to access via their service?
2. Blockchain coverage – are relevant blockchains available to access via their service?
3. Exchange integrations – are relevant and reliable exchange integrations available via their service?
4. DeFi integrations – is interacting with DeFi via this provider a robust experience?
1 - Awful
2
3
4
5 - Amazing
N/A
Token coverage
Blockchain coverage
Exchange integrations
DeFi integrations
Integrations with other service providers *
How do you rate this provider regarding their integrations with other service providers?
1 - Awful
2
3
4
5 - Amazing
N/A
Total integrations (quantity)
Integration ease of use (quality)
API
How do you rate this provider regarding the functionality made available via their API?
1 - Awful
2
3
4
5 - Amazing
N/A
API
Clear selection
Outages & Reliability
How do you rate this provider's uptime and reliability?
1 - Awful
2
3
4
5 - Amazing
N/A
System's Uptime
Responsiveness and resolution during service outages
Clear selection
Trading and pricing
If applicable, how do you rate this provider regarding trading and asset pricing?

Definitions:
1. Trading cost – how are trading related costs with this provider? Either explicit transaction costs, or implied costs (e.g., spread).
2. Accurate pricing – are prices reported from this provider accurate?
3. Trading algorithm quality – how do you rate the trading algo's from the provider (e.g., TWAP, VWAP, iceberg)? (if applicable)
1 - Awful
2
3
4
5 - Amazing
N/A
Trading cost
Accurate pricing
Trading algorithm quality
Clear selection
Tokenization
How do you rate this provider regarding their tokenization capabilities?

Definitions:
1. Token deployment – Ease of use for deploying token contracts and setting relevant token parameters.
2. Token governance – Ease of use for admin functionality over tokens once deployed (e.g., setting/changing admins, pausing contracts).
3. Mint/burn – Ease of use for minting and burning tokens.
1 - Awful
2
3
4
5 - Amazing
N/A
Token deployment
Token governance (admin management)
Mint/burn
Clear selection
Compliance and Reporting
How do you rate this provider regarding their compliance functionality?

Definitions:
1. AML/KYC – Anti-Money Laundering and Know Your Customer verifications and/or integrations.
2. Validation reporting – Audit reports for cryptographic validation of backups and recovery keys, provided on a customer-configurable basis to show continued security and integrity.
3. Audit trail – Quality of audit reports for interactions with the provider platform (e.g., transactions, administration)
1 - Awful
2
3
4
5 - Amazing
N/A
AML/KYC
Validation reporting
Audit trail
Clear selection
Fiat on/off-ramp
How do you rate this provider's fiat on/off-ramps? (if applicable)
1 - Awful
2
3
4
5 - Amazing
N/A
Fiat on/off-ramp
Clear selection
Multi-region flexibility
Can the provider flexibly deploy their services in different geographic regions if required by the user? (if applicable)
1 - Awful
2
3
4
5 - Amazing
N/A
Multi-region flexibility
Clear selection
Transaction Policy Management *
Please rate how effectively this provider lets you design, enforce, and audit transaction-policy workflows.
(Applies to any firm that holds client assets or supplies wallet / custody infrastructure... e.g., custodians, custody/wallet tech, prime brokers)

Definitions:
1. Admin / Signer Management – Lifecycle controls over authorized admins and/or signers: onboarding and off-boarding, role assignment, quorum thresholds, key rotation or revocation, and comprehensive audit logging of all related changes.
2. Spend Allowance – Ability to impose quantitative limits—amount, frequency, time window—on outbound transfers per asset, wallet, or user, with enforced approvals and an immutable audit trail.
3. External Address Management – Workflow to whitelist or blacklist addresses, label counterparties.
4. Token Management – Controls over which tokens can be held or moved.
5. Smart Contract Management – Restrict outbound calls to a pre-approved set of contract addresses (e.g., only approved bridge contracts, or DEX contracts), verify code hash / version, and block all others.
6. Smart Contract Function Management – Within whitelisted contracts, allow only specific methods to be called (e.g., cross_chain_transfer()), while blocking sensitive or irrelevant functions like upgrade() or pause().
7. Smart Contract Parameter Management – Enforce rules on the arguments passed into approved functions (e.g., settlement address must match a whitelist in a decentralized exchange contract call ).
1 = No controls
2
3 = Basic workflow & logging
4
5 = Fine-grained enforcement with analytics
N/A
Admin/signer management
Spend allowance
External address management
Token management
Smart contract management
Smart contract function management
Smart contract parameter management
Other features
How would you rate the provider along these features (where applicable)?
1 - Awful
2
3
4
5 - Amazing
N/A
Fraud detection
Insurance coverage
Disaster recovery (private keys)
Clear selection
What is your perceived value you get from this provider (your bang for the buck)? *
Expensive relative to offerings
Amazing value relative to offerings
Were there other providers you evaluated as competitors to this one?
Are there any other notes you would like to leave?
Are you currently a user of this provider? *
Next
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of digopp.group.

Does this form look suspicious? Report