INEBRIA Greensboro 2023 - Conference Evaluation

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Please complete the following questionnaire in order to help us to evaluate the conference.

Name (optional)

Country

Gender

Male

Female

Clear selection

Indicate the category that best describes your work position:

Politician/Decision maker

Policy Adviser

Public Health

NGO

Health professional

Other:

Clear selection

Please choose the TWO most important logistical factors that influenced your decision to attend this conference

Location

Conference dates

Networking opportunities

Other:

Overall impression of the conference

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Very poor

Clear selection

Potential impact of the conference:

Please rate each statement on the scale provided.

Not at all satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Satisfied

Very satisfied

Strongly satisfied

Opportunity for interaction with attendees (colleagues)

Opportunity for interaction with or by trainees

Personal competence increased

Valuable for my daily work activities

Contributes to improve regional policy

Clear selection

Did the conference.....

YES

Help you develop a new collaboration?

Help you strengthen an existing collaboration?

Help you develop your SBI research ideas?

Inspire plans to implement new SBI studies?

Clear selection

Administrative feedback:

Please rate each statement on the scale provided.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neither agree nor disagree

Agree

Strongly agree

I received sufficient information on the conference in advance.

Information via email was effective.

Information provided on the website was useful.

Clear selection

General conference feedback:

Please rate each statement on the scale provided.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neither agree nor disagree

Agree

Strongly agree

The issues raised at the conference were important and useful to deal with

The duration of each session was appropriate

The individual presenters had adequate time to present their material

The subjects covered at this conference were relevant to my work

The conference provided adequate networking and collaborative opportunities

The number and length of breaks were adequate

The social program was attractive

The concurrent sessions helped me to increase my knowledge and skills

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neither agree nor disagree

Agree

Strongly agree

The issues raised at the conference were important and useful to deal with

The duration of each session was appropriate

The individual presenters had adequate time to present their material

The subjects covered at this conference were relevant to my work

The conference provided adequate networking and collaborative opportunities

The number and length of breaks were adequate

The social program was attractive

The concurrent sessions helped me to increase my knowledge and skills

Clear selection

Was the conference....

Too many days?

Too few days?

Just the right number of days?

Clear selection

How many days should the conference be (including pre-conference)?

1 day

2 days

3 days

Clear selection

Were the days at the conference...

Too long?

Too short?

Just right?

Clear selection

Particular aspects of the conference:

Please rate each item on a 5-point scale (1=INADEQUATE and 5= EXCELLENT)

Not applicable

Plenary/large group session

Concurrent oral abstract presentations

Concurrent symposia

Concurrent workshop presentations

Small group sessions

Conference dinner

Reception

Lunch

Venue (hotel, conference space)

Clear selection

Any comments on the best sessions?

Any comments on the worst sessions?

Any comments on the format of the overall conference?

Any recommendations for future conference format and content?

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

Forms

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.