Student Evaluation of LIT101: Life in Verse: Themes in Contemporary Poetry, Dilisha Subba
To promote honesty in answering these questionnaire, all feedback is anonymous.
Your frank evaluation is an important part of our efforts to promote a high level of teaching quality at RTC and to provide feedback to the RUB for improvement of module content.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
A. Module Tutor:                                                                                                                                                       Performance Indices *
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3= Neither Agree Nor Disagree
4= Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1.The module descriptor was made available to me in the first class of the module.
2. The semester work plan was clear and was according to the module descriptor.
3. The assignments due dates were clearly reflected in the work plan.
4. The tutor clearly explained the objectives and learning outcomes of the module.
5. The tutor was well prepared for the class.
6. There was a close agreement between the stated module learning outcomes and what was actually taught.
7. The criteria used in marking were made clear in advance while assigning any assessment component.
8. The tutor reminded about academic dishonesty and its outcome while giving assignments.
9. The tutor gave feedback on assignments as scheduled in work plan.
10. The tutor gave useful feedback on students work.
11. The tutor used varied teaching learning resources effectively.
12. The tutor was accessible for consultation both outside and inside the classroom.
13. The tutor actively engaged students in the process of learning.
14. The teaching learning approaches adopted were appropriate and useful.
15. The tutor was punctual
16. The tutor was not biased in assessing students
17. The tutor used educational technology in teaching
B. On Module and Resources:                                                                                                              Performance Indices                 *
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3= Neither Agree Nor Disagree
4= Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1. All essential readings required for students were accessible.
2. The class size in this module was acceptable for maintaining a conducive learning environment.
3. The physical facilities provided for this module were appropriate (e.g. classroom/lab space, teaching learning resources)
4. All mentioned essential readings were relevant to the module.
5. The overall time required for this module (class time, studying, assignments, projects, and laboratory) was reasonable.
6. The module was clearly relevant to my programme of study
7. The module content matched the module learning outcomes.
8. The module helped me in developing critical thinking.
9. The distribution of marks among different assessment components were adequate (e.g. Examinations & Continuous Assessment).
10. The module delivery was spread over all teaching weeks as per the work plan
 1. What do you like the best about this module?
2.  What would you like to change in this module?
3.  What are the tutor’s strengths?
4.  What suggestions do you have to improve the tutor’s teachings?
5.  Approximately, how many times did you consult the tutor outside the classroom in reference to this module?
6.    Any other comments (if any: Please do not put any personal remarks. Comments should help to improve the performance of the tutor or the content of the module)  
7. May we use your quotes/comments? *
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of Royal Thimphu College. Report Abuse
Google Forms