Meeting/Conference Evaluation (Form 3)
Activity Title: 4th Quarter  FY 2023   Division Monitoring, Evaluation & Adjustment - Program Implementation review (DMEA-PIR)  System Conference 
Venue: Via Zoom Cloud Application
Date: February 01, 2024


Dear Participant,
     
        Your feedback is important to us. Kindly take a few moments to complete our Meeting Quality Survey. Your responses will help us address any issues that you may have, as well as improve the conduct of Meeting/Conference to better achieve our objectives.

        Your answers will be treated with utmost confidentiality. Thank you.

                                                                                                     Sincerely,

                                                                                                     Quality Assurance Monitoring and Evaluation (QAME)                                                                                                       School Management Monitoring and Evaluation
                                                                                                     Schools Division of Tagum City


Privacy Note:
"The personal information included in this document should only be used for the purposes of administering the survey. Any personal information included herein may not be used for other purposes aside from those stated above."

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Name: *
Sex: *
Agency/Office/School: *
Position/Designation: *
A. Conference Quality Survey 1 (Proceedings) *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Conference started and ended on time
Conference was clearly introduced
Conference was focused on the agenda
Conference had energy around for productivity
Conference was facilitated well in that they use specific tools and processes to ensure that the discussions are focused, productive and outcome oriented
Conference actions, assignments and accountabilities are clearly captured at he end of the meetings so that we clearly know what we decided, who is doing what and how we will be accountable for the decisions
Conference was well documented so that we have clear accountability, a reference point when we have questions, and a history that keeps us from revisiting the agenda we have already covered.
The decision-making process was clear for all participants and is followed for all decisions.
There was a balance of power in meetings where all team members have roughly and equal voice and were empowered to advance for positions in opposition to the majority view.
Most agenda items are allowed the appropriate amount of time so that thoughtful decisions were made, while keeping the meeting on time and on task.
The conference was very useful in the improvement of one’s practices.
B. Meeting Quality Survey 2 (Participants) *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Participants came to the conference prepared , having reviewed materials, thought through agenda items, and focused on meeting objectives
Participants were engaged in the conference process and actively participate in the discussions, and have a voice in every decision.
C. On the Medium - Teleconference (Zoom Cloud App) *
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Microsoft Teams was easy to use and navigate
Other participants (attendees) could hear and see me
I could hear and see other attendees
Good audio quality
Good video quality
D1. Comments: *
What were the strong points of the conference?
D2. Comments: *
What were the weak points of the conference?
D3. Comments: *
If there's one thing you could change/improve about the conference, what would it be?
D4. Comments: *
Based on your current experience, would you recommend this kind of  activity? (Choose your rating, 5 being "will strongly recommend", 1 being "will not recommend".)
Will not recommend
Will strongly recommend
A copy of your responses will be emailed to the address you provided.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
reCAPTCHA
This form was created inside of Department of Education.

Does this form look suspicious? Report