Outbreak Science Preprint Review [beta]
This is a rapid review intended to capture high-level, independent scientific feedback on preprint manuscripts. Please answer the questions below. There are 3 multiple-choice questions about you and 12 about the manuscript. Aggregated, non-identifiable results will be posted publicly.
I am an active scientist (at least one peer reviewed publication in the past year) and have no actual or perceived conflicts of interests for reviewing this manuscript. *
Please enter the link to the manuscript: *
Your answer
I am not an author or close collaborator of any author of this manuscript. *
This research is.... *
Which content did you read? *
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Supplement
I read the...
Overall *
True
False
Not applicable/I don't know
The results are new (new data or new analyses, not previously published).
The conclusions are supported by the data and analyses.
The writing is appropriate and readable.
The manuscript does not raise ethical or research integrity concerns.
The results are likely to lead to future research.
The conclusions are of broad scientific interest.
The conclusions are of high interest to a specific scientific community.
I recommend this work for peer review.
Data/Methods *
True
False
Not applicable/I don't know
The manuscript includes new data.
The data are provided or openly accessible elsewhere.
Sufficient detail was provided to allow reproducibility.
The methods/statistical analyses are high quality.
Your ORCID (xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx, optional and will not be shared)
Your answer
Feedback (optional)
Please provide suggestions on how to improve this service.
Is there a question we should have asked, but didn't? Suggestion (200 character limit):
Your answer
Other suggestions (200 character limit):
Your answer
Submit
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of Outbreak Science. Report Abuse - Terms of Service