Solar geoengineering: What could go wrong? A natural science perspective

We want your input on climate hazards that might be caused by stratospheric aerosol injection.

Suggestions will be considered by a small group of scientists assessing solar geoengineering risks.

Consider a scenario where sulfate aerosols are injected into the stratosphere. The injection rate is ramped up to achieve a peak cooling of ≤0.5°C at the time of peak radiative forcing by greenhouse gases. The injection rate is then ramped down about as fast as it was ramped up. During the ramp-up period, sulfate cooling increases by ≤0.1°C per decade. Injection is always adjusted to minimize hemispheric asymmetry.

Here is a published example of one such scenario.

Our questions are about the climate hazards that might arise from such a scenario.

We are focusing on physical events that may harm humans or environmental systems on which humans depend, consistent with the IPCC’s definition of a climate hazard. We consider mechanisms or causal chains from the deployment of sulfate aerosols to climate hazards. 

Such mechanisms are limited to the natural sciences. Solar geoengineering may also cause harm mediated by sociopolitical pathways, such as unjust or malevolent deployment, or the moral hazard of reduced attention to emissions cuts. These are important, perhaps more important than climate hazards, but beyond the scope of this survey.

We are especially interested in any potential hazard or uncertainty that the broader literature or the scientific community has ignored so far, or is not aware of. The more of the following questions you answer, the more carefully we can evaluate your suggestion.

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Cartoon of scenario described above:

What is the hazard?

ex. Increased droughts in agricultural regions reduce agricultural yields. 

Note: One hazard per response. Please fill in the form multiple times for multiple hazards.

What is the proposed mechanism or causal chain? 

ex. Less sunlight will reach Earth’s surface. This will reduce evaporation. This will reduce precipitation. This will lead to more drought.

Are there relevant publications?

ex. Lunt et al. 2008 GRL. doi: 10.1029/2008GL033674

Note: Please provide full citations, DOIs, or links.

How could this hazard impact humans or ecosystems?

ex. Many millions of people could be affected by freshwater access or crop yield reductions.

Note: Please be as quantitative as possible.

How likely are these impacts in the scenario above? 

ex. Unlikely

Note: Please be as quantitative as possible.

What research might reduce this hazard’s uncertainty or risk?

Other comments?

Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report