Open peer review survey
It was Peer Review Week from 11-17 September 2017. The South African Journal of Science would appreciate your views on open peer review #PeerRevWk17 #TransparencyinReview
Are you a South African Journal of Science:
Required
Have you ever SUBMITTED an article to any journal that underwent a form of open peer review?
Have you ever REVIEWED an article for any journal that underwent a form of open peer review?
If you SUBMITTED an article to the South African Journal of Science would you find value in the reviewers’ names being published after review
If you SUBMITTED an article to the South African Journal of Science would you agree to open peer review
If you SUBMITTED an article to the South African Journal of Science would you agree to post-publication review
If you REVIEWED an article for the South African Journal of Science would you agree to have your name disclosed and published on the article after the review?
If you REVIEWED an article for the South African Journal of Science would you agree to have your name disclosed during the review and published after the review?
If you REVIEWED an article for the South African Journal of Science would you agree to have your name and report published after the review?
Rank the following four peer-review models from: not effective (1) to very effective (4)
Single blind peer review
Not effective
Very effective
Double blind peer review
Not effective
Very effective
Open peer review
Not effective
Very effective
Post-publication review
Not effective
Very effective
Do you support open science
Submit
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Additional Terms