Open peer review survey
It was Peer Review Week from 11-17 September 2017. The South African Journal of Science would appreciate your views on open peer review #PeerRevWk17 #TransparencyinReview
Are you a South African Journal of Science: *
Required
Have you ever SUBMITTED an article to any journal that underwent a form of open peer review? *
Have you ever REVIEWED an article for any journal that underwent a form of open peer review? *
If you SUBMITTED an article to the South African Journal of Science would you find value in the reviewers’ names being published after review *
If you SUBMITTED an article to the South African Journal of Science would you agree to open peer review *
If you SUBMITTED an article to the South African Journal of Science would you agree to post-publication review *
If you REVIEWED an article for the South African Journal of Science would you agree to have your name disclosed and published on the article after the review? *
If you REVIEWED an article for the South African Journal of Science would you agree to have your name disclosed during the review and published after the review? *
If you REVIEWED an article for the South African Journal of Science would you agree to have your name and report published after the review? *
Rank the following four peer-review models from: not effective (1) to very effective (4) *
Single blind peer review
Not effective
Very effective
*
Double blind peer review
Not effective
Very effective
*
Open peer review
Not effective
Very effective
*
Post-publication review
Not effective
Very effective
Do you support open science *
Submit
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Additional Terms