Recently, Lynn R. of Massachusetts made a simple yet important suggestion based on her own experiences with the psychiatric system: We should have the equivalent of 'Miranda Rights' in psychiatry when someone is being picked up by the police or otherwise detained for a psychiatric evaluation and potential hold.
The Miranda rights were established in 1996 as an outcome of a Supreme Court Case (Miranda V. Arizona). When a police officer is arresting someone, they are required to say the following:
- "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law."
- "You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you."
- "Do you understand the rights I have just read to you? With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?"
In contrast, it is common practice to ask people being involuntarily detained for a psychiatric hold dozens of invasive questions that could determine whether or not they will be held against their will. Often, they're not given information about their rights at all or, if they are, until after many questions have already been asked and usually with an overwhelming pile of other information.
Help us think through whether or not this idea should be pursued and what it could look like! All responses are anonymous. E-mails are not being collected unless you choose to share your contact info at the end of the survey.
While this is not exclusively a Wildflower Alliance initiative, we are invested in being a part of exploring and supporting it.
And please share this survey with anyone you think might be interested in voicing their opinion on this idea. We've created this short link to help people share it more easily: https://tinyurl.com/MirandaPsych
PLEASE NOTE: Although people have the rights stated above when being arrested by police and should not face negative consequences for exercising those rights, police are in the power position and sometimes do respond negatively when someone refuses to answer questions (etc.) even though they have that right. Similarly, although people being detained on psychiatric holds (and similar) have certain rights to refuse treatment, etc. this also unfortunately does not mean that police, providers, and others will never respond poorly or in a retaliatory manner. We recommend--if you are in a vulnerable position and intend to refuse treatment or challenge police or providers--that you do your best to make informed decisions about the risks and consequences you are able and willing to face and that you involve witnesses/advocates/supporters whenever possible to help protect against retaliation and similar. We wish it were the case that having a right meant that people were always protected when exercising that right, but we know all too well that that is not always the case.
This survey was put together and is being distributed by a small group including Sera Davidow and Lionel Frechette from Wildflower Alliance, Howard Trachtman, and Lynn R. This group will have access to survey responses. Others may also be added to the larger group to move any legislation forward, but we will commit to anonymizing data beyond this initial group.