The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss
How common is statistical machismo?
405 responses
Loading...
What is your career stage
No responses yet for this question.
Field of research
No responses yet for this question.
Would you describe your research as more
No responses yet for this question.
How would you describe your knowledge of statistics
No responses yet for this question.
When you see a paper that is in an area of high interest to you and you see it has advanced and complex statistics do you:
No responses yet for this question.
My self-identified gender is
No responses yet for this question.
How often have you felt pushed by reviewers to use more COMPLEX statistics for reasons that felt to you more like showing off, gatekeeping or egotism than catching genuine mistakes or offering constructive suggestions?
No responses yet for this question.
How often have you felt pushed by reviewers to user SIMPLER statistical methods due to some form of resistance to more advanced methods and not just catching mistakes or offering constructive suggestions?
No responses yet for this question.
How often have you used more COMPLEX statistics than you think you need out of fear or expectations that reviewers will make you do it anyway?
No responses yet for this question.
How often have you used SIMPLER statistics than you think you need out of fear or expectations that reviewers will make you do it anyway?
No responses yet for this question.
How do you think using complex, advanced statistics in a manuscript changes the probability of getting into a high profile journal
No responses yet for this question.
How do you think being known as a person who can and does use complex, advanced statistics affects ones professional reputation
No responses yet for this question.
How do you think the use of complex, advanced statistics in an article affects its impact and citation rate
No responses yet for this question.
Aside from reputation, how do you think using complex advanced statistics on average actually changes the true quality of ecological or scientific conclusions
No responses yet for this question.
How often do you think the choice to use simple, traditional versus complex advanced statistics actually changes the ecological or scientific conclusions (in a qualitative, not just quantitative way)
No responses yet for this question.
Regardless of complexity, how often do you feel forced by reviewers to change to statistical methods you think are inappropriate (i.e. they are not just catching mistakes or being constructive)
No responses yet for this question.
Which of the following techniques do you think are pushed by reviewers when they aren't needed/won't change conclusions?
No responses yet for this question.
Waiting for responses
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
