OQA-1 Instructor Comments in Pilot Training Record Evaluation
This evaluation examines the quality of instructor comments in PTR records, relative to the requirements of the LFS SOPs.

This evaluation form is completed for each Instructor specified by the Chief Flying Instructor in the audit request.

The sampling method is based on the 5/10/15 rule of selection. On the date and time that this evaluation is conducted, count back and identify the 5th, 10th, and 15th flight dual flight conducted by the evaluated Instructor. These dual flights form the samples to be evaluated. If the flight record selected is NOT a dual training flight--if it is a rental check flight, for example--select instead the next preceding dual training flight. If you have questions contact the CFI.

IN THE EVENT that you answer "no" to any of the questions below, advise the CFI, and complete the LFS Non-Conformance or Unsatisfactory Finding Report, available on the school's website on the Education Quality Assurance page, linked from the Staff web page, or at the following link:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/11ezT56SVopWbL3Yp2zJxemPx6cBB0Nu3RJdq_iI39lg/viewform

1) Name of the person conducting this evaluation:
Your answer
2) Date of evaluation:
MM
/
DD
/
YYYY
3) Time at which the 5/10/15 samples are selected:
Time
:
4) What is the name of the Flight Instructor being audited?
The name of the Instructor is derived from the random number (using seniority) displayed on the attachment to the CFI’s request.
Your answer
Flight Record #1
For the flight in question, select the student PTR record of the first audited flight and answer the following questions:
FR1.1) What the Date of the flight?
MM
/
DD
/
YYYY
FR1.2) What is the name of the student?
Your answer
FR1.3) What is the Pilotlog Flight Number?
Your answer
FR1.4) Do the Instructor Comments in Flight Record #1 provide a general description of the flight?
FR1.5) Do the Instructor Comments in Flight Record #1 describe areas for improvement (maximum of three)?
FR1.6) Do the Instructor Comments in Flight Record #1 describe a plan of action for the students next flight?
Flight Record #2
For the flight in question, select the student PTR record of the second audited flight and answer the following questions:
FR2.1) What the Date of the flight?
MM
/
DD
/
YYYY
FR2.2) What is the name of the student?
Your answer
FR2.3) What is the Pilotlog Flight Number?
Your answer
FR2.3) Do the Instructor Comments in Flight Record #2 provide a general description of the flight?
FR2.4) Do the Instructor Comments in Flight Record #2 describe areas for improvement (maximum of three)?
FR2.5) Do the Instructor Comments in Flight Record #2 describe a plan of action for the students next flight?
Flight Record #3
For the flight in question, select the student PTR record of the second audited flight and answer the following questions:
FR3.1) What the Date of the flight?
MM
/
DD
/
YYYY
FR3.2) What is the name of the student?
Your answer
FR3.3) What is the Pilotlog Flight Number?
Your answer
FR3.4) Do the Instructor Comments in Flight Record #3 provide a general description of the flight?
FR3.5) Do the Instructor Comments in Flight Record #3 describe areas for improvement (maximum of three)?
FR3.5) Do the Instructor Comments in Flight Record #3 describe a plan of action for the students next flight?
Unsatisfactory Findings
An unsatisfactory finding occurs when "NO" is answered to any of the above questions. If this is the case, and for each instance, complete the LFS Non-Conformance or Unsatisfactory Finding Report, available on the school's website on the Education Quality Assurance page, link from the Staff web page, or at the following link:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/11ezT56SVopWbL3Yp2zJxemPx6cBB0Nu3RJdq_iI39lg/viewform

Comments:
Your answer
Submit
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service