Peer Review for MAE126B --- Jan Kleissl
Please provide your answers in the following boxes
First Name *
Your answer
Last Name *
Your answer
YOUR team number *
Your answer
Title *
The title should be descriptive yet short.
Your answer
Abstract *
The abstract should be written concisely, summarize the problem being addressed, the methods, and the results of your design / model / experiment.
Your answer
1. Introduction *
Is the motivation for the project clear? Are project definition, background, review of existing solutions, task description present and clear?
Your answer
2. Methods *
Is this section well structured? It is clear how the experiment / design / model will be conducted? Is the description of the theory adequate? Are team assignment and work schedule reasonable?
Your answer
3. Results *
Are the results clearly described and well illustrated? What other results should be obtained?
Your answer
4. Discussion / Conclusions *
Are the conclusions supported by the data? Is the discussion sophisticated (reference results against literature, display technical knowledge)?
Your answer
5. References *
Are the references numerous and do they follow a consistent and accepted format?
Your answer
6. Appendix *
Does the appendix supply all the extra information needed to make the report clearer and add more depth to certain sections if needed?
Your answer
7. Figures and Tables *
Are the figures and tables on the report helpful, provide good insight and are clearly labeled? Please Provide an example of the best and worst figure on this report. Are the captions sufficient?
Your answer
8. Overall comments *
Provide comments on structure, language, etc.
Your answer
Submit
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of UCSD Jacobs School of Engineering. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Additional Terms