Read the article below about Party Politics and answer the thought questions at the end of it.
Minnesota DFL asks state Supreme Court to order Trump, Pence removed from ballot
The party's petition asks that the secretary of state be forced to remove Trump and Pence from the ballot, saying the
process that put them on it broke the law.
By Pat Pheifer Star Tribune (Minneapolis, MN)
SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 — 11:53PM
Ken Martin, chair of the Minnesota DFL Party, filed a petition late Thursday with the state Supreme Court asking
it to order the secretary of state to strip the names off the Nov. 8 election ballot.
In a bold escalation of its effort to have Donald Trump and Mike Pence removed from the ballot in Minnesota,
the DFL Party has taken its argument to the state Supreme Court.
Ken Martin, the party’s chair, late Thursday filed a petition with the court asking it to order the Minnesota
secretary of state to strip the Republicans’ names off the state’s Nov. 8 election ballot.
There is urgency in resolving the issue, because early voting will begin in Minnesota Sept. 23.
The petition names Secretary of State Steve Simon as the defendant. It says Simon erred when he accepted a
“certificate of nomination” filed about Aug. 25 by the state Republican Party after its Executive Committee met
to select and approve alternate presidential electors. According to state law, electors and alternate electors
must be nominated at an official state convention.
The petition said the state GOP erred at its state convention on May 20-21 in Duluth, where delegates “at large”
and from each of Minnesota’s congressional districts nominated 10 presidential electors but failed to nominate
10 alternate electors.
The petition quoted the law (the italicized type is the party’s) as saying, “Presidential electors and alternates for
the major political parties of this state shall be nominated by delegate conventions called and held under the
supervision of the respective state central committees of the parties of this state.”
The petition continued: “This language is clear and unequivocal: Alternatives ‘shall’ be nominated — not
unilaterally by party leaders — but by ‘delegate conventions.’ After the convention, the chair of each major
political party must then certify the names of the persons nominated as presidential electors and alternates at
the convention, as well as the names of the party candidates for president and vice president to the Secretary of
State at least 71 days before the general election.”
“The Executive Committee,” the petition said, “is obviously not a ‘delegate convention.’ ”
Because the state GOP missed the Aug. 29 deadline to comply with state law, “the Secretary of State had no
authority to certify Trump and Pence … thereby causing their names to be placed on the general election ballot
in Minnesota,” the document said.
Republican Party Chairman Keith Downey did not respond to phone and e-mail requests for comment Thursday
And a DFL Party spokesman said Martin would not be making any comments Thursday night.
At least two of the lawyers representing Martin and the party, Marc Elias and Kevin Hamilton of the Perkins Coie
law firm, represented now-U.S. Sen. Al Franken in the 2008 U.S. Senate seat race recount.
The current ballot issue caused a brief frenzy in late August when Michael Brodkorb, a former GOP political
operative and a former Star Tribune blogger, reported on Twitter that the state Republican Party had failed to
properly submit the names of its presidential and vice presidential candidates, as well as electors and alternate
electors for the Electoral College.
The members of the Electoral College officially decide the presidential race by casting votes following the
The next day, Aug. 25, a spokesman for Simon said the filing was complete and the Republican ticket would be
listed on the office website shortly.
As of Thursday evening, Trump and Pence’s names were on the sample ballot at the secretary of state’s website.
Late Thursday, Ryan Furlong, a spokesman for the secretary of state’s office, said, “Our office doesn’t comment
on pending litigation.”
Name (Last, First)
1. Summarize the issues that are being discussed here.
2. How does this article help reveal why it is so important for Political Parties to make sure they are doing everything they are supposed to correctly.
3. Evaluate the possible outcomes of what were to happen if the DFL was successful in removing the Candidates. What would be the most likely outcome? Explain your reasoning.
Send me a copy of my responses.
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Terms of Service