CS160 Team Assessment - Summer 2015
This self and peer evaluation asks about how you and each of your teammates contributed to the
team since the last team assessment.
This period covers the following assignments:
- interactive prototype
- usability study
- final poster/presentation/video

Confidentially rate yourself and your teammates by selecting the relevant radio buttons.
Instructions
Here are descriptions of the five dimensions we ask you to think about:

1. Contributing to the team's work: Does the person you are rating contribute a fair share of the team's work? Do they complete assignments on time? Do they help out other teammates?

2. Interacting with teammates: Does the person you are rating listen to other teammates? Do they share information? Do they listen to feedback from the team?

3. Keeping the team on track: Does the person you are rating monitor the team's progress and make sure appropriate progress is made? Do they provide specific, timely, and constructive feedback to others?

4. Expecting quality: Does the person you are evaluating motivate the team to do excellent work? Do they care that the team does outstanding work and believe that the team can do excellent work?

5. Having Relevant Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Does the person you are evaluating demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and abilities to do excellent work? Are they willing to acquire new knowledge or skills to improve the team’s performance? Can they perform the role of any other team member if necessary?
Rate Yourself
your team name *
your name *
Please rate yourself along these five team dimensions *
outstanding
very good
adequate
problematic
inadequate
Contributing to the team's work
Interacting with teammates
Keeping the team on track
Expecting quality
Having relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities
If there is anything you wish to elaborate on about your own performance, please let us know below:
Rate your first teammate
first teammate's name *
Please rate your first teammate along these five team dimensions *
outstanding
very good
adequate
problematic
inadequate
Contributing to the team's work
Interacting with teammates
Keeping the team on track
Expecting quality
Having relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities
If there is anything you wish to elaborate on about your first teammate's performance, please let us know below:
Rate your second teammate
second teammate's name *
Please rate your second teammate along these five team dimensions *
outstanding
very good
adequate
problematic
inadequate
Contributing to the team's work
Interacting with teammates
Keeping the team on track
Expecting quality
Having relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities
If there is anything you wish to elaborate on about your second teammate's performance, please let us know below:
Rate your third teammate
third teammate's name *
Please rate your third teammate along these five team dimensions *
outstanding
very good
adequate
problematic
inadequate
Contributing to the team's work
Interacting with teammates
Keeping the team on track
Expecting quality
Having relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities
If there is anything you wish to elaborate on about your third teammate's performance, please let us know below:
Rate your fourth teammate
fourth teammate's name
Please rate your fourth teammate along these five team dimensions
outstanding
very good
adequate
problematic
inadequate
Contributing to the team's work
Interacting with teammates
Keeping the team on track
Expecting quality
Having relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities
Clear selection
If there is anything you wish to elaborate on about your fourth teammate's performance, please let us know below:
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of UC Berkeley.