Requirements for an accredited and practice-oriented certification system for open source hardware
Thank you for participating in our activities, and hope you enjoy it as much as we do.

We hope to get your feedback to understand the need for open source hardware certification. Please fill out this short questionnaire and tell us what you think (your answers will be processed anonymously).
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Do you have a certain understanding of open source hardware? *
If an applicant wants to have their OSH certified, he should first register (to be a member)  in the community, which is the accreditation body for OSH. *
Disagree
Agree
In order to assess the applicant's credibility, their activities in the community and their contribution value should be evaluated (e.g. number of high-quality contributions and comments, contribution value of the certified project) *
Disagree
Agree
In order to reduce costs and harmonize the standard, the accreditation bodies should integrate resources so that a credible and official community can be established. *
Disagree
Agree
In order to make the certification for OSH more standardized, there should be at least one qualified auditor as project manager in the conformity assessment phase. *
Disagree
Agree
How long should the certificate for a piece of OSH be issued after application? *
After the certificate has been issued for a piece of OSH, the monitoring and verification mechanism should start immediately and continue to be carried out in the community. *
Disagree
Agree
To cover the cost of certification, how much should the applicant pay for certification or recertification of a piece of OSH? *
Which other requirements do you think are still needed?
What is your occupation? *
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms