Surfing for Quality Digital Tools for Personalized Learning
This rubric is designed for evaluating the efficacy of digital technologies in supporting personalized learning.
To receive a copy of your responses please enter your email address.
This evaluation rubric is based on the Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition model developed by Dr. Ruben R. Puentedura. As you progress through the rubric think about the following:
Does the .....
Levels of Rating:
1 = Ineffective - The technology being evaluated makes no significant improvement to the learning experience. This tool or program will not support any instructional strategies.
2 = Inadequate - The technology being evaluated makes an insignificant improvement to the learning experience. This tool or program has very little support for instructional strategies.
3 = Effective - The technology being evaluated makes a moderate improvement to the learning experience. This tool or program may support instructional strategies.
4 = Transforming - The technology being evaluated makes a significant improvement in the learning experience. This tool or program will support instructional strategies.
Dole, S., Bloom, L., & Kowalske, K. (2015). Transforming pedagogy: Changing perspectives from teacher-centered to learner-centered. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1), 1-16. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1538
Hilton, J. T. (2016). A case study of the application of SAMR and TPACK for reflection on technology integration into two social studies classrooms. Social Studies, 107(2), 68–73.
Pfaffe, L. (2017). Using the SAMR model as a framework for evaluating mLearning activities and supporting a transformation of learning (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
Puentedura, R. R. (2014, December 11). Ruben R. Puentedura's weblog: SAMR and TPCK: A hands-on approach to classroom practice [Web log post]. Retrieved from
Van Thiel, L. (2018). Professional learning design framework: supporting technology integration in Alberta. Research in Learning Technology, 26(0). doi:10.25304/rlt.v26.1989
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Terms of Service